Life in the Trading Zone: Structuring Coordination Across Boundaries in Postbureaucratic Organizations

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0157

References

  • Adler P. S. Interdepartmental interdependence and coordination: The case of the design/manufacturing interface. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(2):147–167LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Agar M.The Professional Stranger: An Informal Introduction to Ethnography (1980) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Allen T. Communication, technology transfer, and the role of the technical gatekeeper. R&D Management (1971) 1:14–21CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley S. R. Technicians in the workplace: Ethnographic evidence for bringing work into organization studies. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41(3):404–441CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley S. R., Kunda G. Bringing work back in. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(1):76–95LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky B. A. Object lessons: Workplace artifacts as representations of occupational jurisdiction. Amer. J. Sociology (2003a) 109(3):720–752CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky B. A. Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. (2003b) 14(3):312–330LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Boland R. J., Tenkasi R. V. Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6:350–372LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Borer M. L. The Cyborgian self: Toward a critical social theory of cyberspace. Reconstruction: Stud. Contemporary Culture (2002) 2(3Google Scholar
  • Brown J. S., Duguid P. Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):40–57LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brown J. S., Duguid P. Organizing knowledge. California Management Rev. (1998) 40(3):90–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Callon M.The Laws of the Markets (1998) (Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Callon M., Law J., Mol A. Writing and (re)writing devices as tools for managing complexity. Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices (2002) (Duke University Press, Durham, NC) 191–217CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carlile P. R. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(4):442–455LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carlile P. R. Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(5):555–568LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Castells M.The Rise of the Network Society (1996) (Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA) Google Scholar
  • Child J., McGrath R. G. Organizations unfettered: Organizational form in an information-intensive economy. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(6):1135–1148CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ciborra C. U. The platform organization: Recombining strategies, structures, and surprises. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(2):103–118LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Daft R. L., Lewin A. Y. Where are the theories for the “new” organizational forms? Organ. Sci. (1993) 4(6):i–vGoogle Scholar
  • Donnellon A., Gray B., Bougon M. G. Communication, meaning, and organized action. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31(1):43–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dougherty D. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(2):179–202LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(4):532–550CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiol C. M. Consensus, diversity, and learning in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(3):403–420LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Galbraith J. R.Designing Complex Organization (1973) (Addison-Wesley Publishing, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Galison P.Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics (1997) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Galison P., Biagioli M. Trading zone: Coordinating action and belief. The Science Studies Reader (1999) (Routledge, New York) 137–160Google Scholar
  • Gherardi S., Nicolini D. To transfer is to transform: The circulation of safety knowledge. Organization (2000) 7(2):329–348CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Giddens A.The Constitution of Society (1984) (Polity Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
  • Giddens A.Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age (1991) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) Google Scholar
  • Girard M., Stark D. Distributing intelligence and organizing diversity in new-media projects. Environ. Planning A (2002) 34(11):1927–1949CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glaser B. G., Strauss A. L.The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (1967) (Aldine Publishing, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Grabher G. Ecologies of creativity: The village, the group, and the heterarchic organisation of the British advertising industry. Environ. Planning A (2001) 33(2):351–374CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grabher G. Fragile sector, robust practice: Project ecologies in new media. Environ. Planning A (2002) 34(11):1911–1926CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant R. M. Prospering in dynamically competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(4):375–387LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen M. T. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(1):82–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hargadon A., Sutton R. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(4):716–749CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heckscher C. C., Donnellon A.The Post-Bureaucratic Organization: New Perspectives on Organizational Change (1994) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) 129–177Google Scholar
  • Henderson K. Flexible sketches and inflexible data-bases: Visual communication, conscription devices, and boundary objects in design engineering. Sci. Tech. Human Values (1991) 16(4):448–473CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heydebrand W., Miron A. Constructing innovativeness in new-media start-up firms. Environ. Planning A (2002) 34(11):1951–1984CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hutchins E.Cognition in the Wild (1995) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iskander N. Innovating state practices: Migration, development, and state learning in the Moroccan Souss. (2005) . Working paper, Industrial Performance Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Kotamraju N. The birth of web site design skills: Making the present history. Amer. Behavioral Scientist (1999) 43(3):464–474CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lant T. K. The creation of cognitive communities in an emerging industry: The New York new media industry. Proc. Soc. Organ. Learning Res. Greenhouse (1999) Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Latour B., Lynch M., Woolgar S. Drawing things together. Representation in Scientific Practice (1988) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 19–68Google Scholar
  • Lave J.Cognition in Practice (1988) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lave J., Wenger E.Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (1991) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawrence P. R., Lorsch J. W.Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration (1969) (Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, IL) Google Scholar
  • Leonard-Barton D. Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13:111–125CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levina N. Multi-party information systems development: The challenge of cross-boundary communication. (2001) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Neff G., Stark D., Howard P., Jones S. Permanently Beta: Responsive organization in the Internet era. Society Online: The Internet in Context (2003) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) 173–188Google Scholar
  • Nelson R., Winter S.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Nonaka I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(1):14–38LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(4):404–428LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J. Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(3):249–273LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J., Yates J. Genre repertoire: Examining the structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39(4):541–574CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J., Fujimoto J. Shaping electronic communication: The metastructuring of technology in the context of use. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(4):423–444LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orr J. E.Talking about Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job (1996) (ILR, Ithaca, NY) Google Scholar
  • Pawlowski S., Robey D. Bridging user organizations: Knowledge brokering as the work of information technology professionals. MIS Quart. (2004) 28(4):645–672CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perlow L. The time famine: Towards a sociology of work time. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:57–81CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pickering A.The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency and Science (1995) (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell W. Interorganizational collaboration in the biotechnology industry. J. Institutional Theoret. Econom. (1996) 120:197–215Google Scholar
  • Powell W., DiMaggio P. The capitalist firm in the 21st century: Emerging patterns. The Twenty-First Century Firm: Changing Economic Organization in International Perspective (2001) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Rindova V. P., Kotha S. Continuous “Morphing:” Competing through dynamic capabilities, form, and function. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(6):1263–1280CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sapsed J., Salter A. Postcards from the edge: Local communities, global programs, and boundary objects. Organ. Stud. (2004) 25(9):1515–1534CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schatzki T. R., Knorr-Cetina E., Savigny K.The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory (2001) (Routledge, London, New York) Google Scholar
  • Schon D. A.The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action (1983) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Simon H. A.Models of Bounded Rationality (1982) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Sitkin S. B., Brown J. S. Fostering the coupling of generative differences: Creating space for pluralism. Proc. AOM 1999 Conf. (1999) Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  • Spender J. C. Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:45–62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Star S. L., Griesemer J. R. Institutional ecology, translations, and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–1939. Soc. Stud. Sci. (1989) 19:387–420CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stark D., Clippinger J. H. Heterarchy: Distributed authority and organizing diversity. The Biology of Business: Decoding the Natural Laws of Enterprise (1999) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) 153–179Google Scholar
  • Stark D., DiMaggio P. Ambiguous assets for uncertain environments: Heterarchy in postsocialist firms. The Twenty-First Century Firm: Changing Economic Organization in International Perspective (2001) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strauss A. L., Corbin J. M.Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (1990) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Suchman L. Working relations of technology production and use. CSCW: J. Collaborative Comput. (1994) 2:21–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. J. Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets. California Management Rev. (1998) 40(3):55–79CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsoukas H. The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:11–25CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Turnbull D. The ad hoc collective work of building Gothic cathedrals with templates, string, and geometry. Sci., Tech., Human Values (1993) 18(3):315–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Turnbull D.Masons, Tricksters and Cartographers: Comparative Studies in the Sociology of Scientific and Indigenous Knowledge (2000) (Routledge, London, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vaughan D. The role of the organization in the production of techno-scientific knowledge. Soc. Stud. Sci. (1999) 29(6):913–943CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Volberda H. W. Toward the flexible form: How to remain vital in hypercompetitive environments. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(4):359–374LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weick K. E.The Social Psychology of Organizing (1979) (McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E., Quinn R. E. Organizational change and development. Annual Rev. Psych. (1999) 50:361–386CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wenger E.Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity (1998) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wittel A., Lury C., Lash S., Woolgar S. Real and virtual connectivity: New media in London. Virtual Society? Technology, Cyperbole, Reality (2002) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 189–208Google Scholar
  • Yanow D. Seeing organizational learning: A “cultural” view. Organization (2000) 7(2):247–268CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yates J., Orlikowski W. J., Zachry M., Thralls C. The PowerPoint presentation and its corollaries: How genres shape communicative action in organizations. Communicative Practices in Workplaces and the Professions: Cultural Perspectives on the Regulation of Discourse and Organizations(Baywood Publishing, Amityville, NY) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Yates J., Orlikowski W. J., Okamura K. Explicit and implicit structuring of genres: Electronic communication in a Japanese R&D organization. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(1):83–103LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.