Change in the Presence of Residual Fit: Can Competing Frames Coexist?

References

• Adler P. S., Goldoft B., Levine D. I. Flexibility verses efficiency: A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(1):43–68Link, Google Scholar
• Alba J. W., Hasher L. Is memory schematic? Psych. Bull. (1983) 93(2):203–231Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin C. Y., Clark K. B.Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (2000) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner M. J., Tushman M. L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28(2):238–256Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bower J. L.Managing the Resource Allocation Process (1970) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Bower J. L., Gilbert C. G.From Resource Allocation to Strategy (2005) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, England) Google Scholar
• Brown S., Eisenhardt K. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:1–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgelman R. A model of the interaction of strategic behavior, corporate context, and the concept of strategy. Acad. Management Rev. (1983) 3(1):61–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgelman R. A. An intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:239–262Link, Google Scholar
• Cantor N., Mischel W. Traits as prototypes: Effects on recognition memory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1977) 35(1):38–48Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charron C., Bass B. Goodbye to classifieds. (1998) . Forrester Research ReportGoogle Scholar
• Christensen C. M.The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Christensen C. M., Bower J. L. Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:197–218Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen C. M., Rosenbloom R. S. Explaining the attackers advantage: Technological paradigms, organizational dynamics and the value network. Res. Policy (1995) 24:233–257Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice Hall, New York) Google Scholar
• Daft R. L., Weick K. E. Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 12(1):76–90Google Scholar
• Duncan R., Kilman R., Pondy L. The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. The Management of Organizational Design (1976) (Elsevier, New York) 167–188Google Scholar
• Dutton J. The making of organizational opportunities—An interpretive pathway to organizational change. Res. Organ. Behavior (1992) 15:195–226Google Scholar
• Dutton J., Jackson S. Categorizing strategic issues: Links to organizational action. Acad. Management Rev. (1987) 12(1):76–90Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Acad. Management J. (1989) 32(3):543–576Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Martin J. A. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:1105–1121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenmann T. R. The effects of CEO equity ownership and diversification on risk taking. Strategic Management J. (2002) 23:513–534Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenmann T. R., Bower J. L. The entrepreneurial M-form: Strategic integration in global media firms. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11:348–355Link, Google Scholar
• Galunic D. C., Eisenhardt K. M. Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(6):1229–1249Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G., Levinthal D. Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45:113–137Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert C. G. The disruption opportunity. Sloan Management Rev. (2003) 44(4):27–32Google Scholar
• Gipson M. Opportunities in anarchy: A guide to building business online. (1995) . Newspaper Association of America Research ReportGoogle Scholar
• Glaser B. G., Strauss A. L. Discovery of substantive theory: A basic strategy underlying qualitative research. Amer. Behavioral Sci. (1965) 8:5–12Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan M., Freeman J. The population ecology of organizations. Amer. J. Sociology (1977) 82(5):929–964Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat C., Peteraf M. The dynamic resource-based view: Capabilities lifecycles. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24:997–1010Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R. M., Clark K. G. Architectural innovation: Reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 8:61–82Google Scholar
• Hermann C. F. Some consequences of crises which limit the viability of organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1963) 8:61–82Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson S. E., Dutton J. E. Discerning threats and opportunities. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1988) 33(3):370–387Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jick T. D. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1979) 24:602–611Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: Analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47:263–291Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Tversky A. Choice, values, and frames. Amer. Psych. (1984) 39(4):341–350Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lant T. K., Mezia S. J. An organizational learning model of convergence and reorientation. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:47–71Link, Google Scholar
• Lant T. K., Milliken F. J., Batra B. The role of managerial learning and interpretation in strategic reorientation: An empirical exploration. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13:585–608Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee T. W.Using Qualitative Methods to Organize Research (1999) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Lee T. W., Mitchell T. R., Sablynski C. J. Qualitative research in organizational and vocational psychology. J. Voc. Behavior (1999) 55:161–187Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D. Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13:111–125Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D. A. Surviving Schumpeterian environments: An evolutionary perspective. Indust. Corporate Change (1992) 1:427–443Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D. A. Adaptation in rugged landscapes. Management Sci. (1997) 43(7):934–951Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D. A., March J. G. A model of adaptive organizational search. J. Econom. Behavior Organ. (1981) 2:319–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt B., March J. G. Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociology (1988) 14:319–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J. G., Simon H.Organizations (1958) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Miles M. B., Huberman A. M.Qualitative Data Analysis (1994) (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA) Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H., Waters J. Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management J. (1985) 6:257–272Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H., Raisinghani D., Theoret A. The structure of “unstructured” decision processes. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1976) 21:246–275Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mittal V., Ross W. T. The impact of positive and negative affect and issue framing on issue interpretation and risk taking. Organ. Behavior Human Development (1998) 76(3):298–324Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murtha T. P., Lenway S. A., Hart J. A.Managing New Industry Creation (2001) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) Google Scholar
• Nelson R., Winter S.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Noda T., Bower J. L. Strategy making as iterated processes of resource allocation. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:169–192Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nutt P. C. Types of organizational decision process. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1984) 29:414–451Crossref, Google Scholar
• Papadakis V. M., Kaloghirou Y., Iatrelli M. Decision making from crisis to opportunity. Bus. Strategic Rev. (1999) 10(1):29–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porac J. F., Thomas H. Taxonomic mental models in competitor definition. Acad. Management Rev. (1990) 15:224–240Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prahalad C. K., Bettis R. A. The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management J. (1986) 7(6):485–501Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivkin J. W., Siggelkow N. Balancing search and stability: Interdependency among elements of organizational design. Management Sci. (2003) 49:290–311Link, Google Scholar
• Rommetveit R.Words, Meanings, and Messages (1968) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Rosch E. Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psych. (1975) 7:532–547Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ross J., Staw B. M. Expo 86: An escalation prototype. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31:274–297Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schön D. A., Rein M.Frame Reflection: Toward The Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies (1994) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N. Change in the presence of fit: The rise, fall, and renascence of Liz Claiborne. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44:838–857Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N., Levinthal D. A. Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(6):660–669Link, Google Scholar
• Smith W., Tushman M. L. Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16:522–536Link, Google Scholar
• Staw B. M., Sandelands L., Dutton J. Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26:501–524Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stevenson H., Jarillo J. C. A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management J. (1990) 11:17–27Google Scholar
• Sull D. The dynamics of standing still: Firestone Tire & Rubber and the radial revolution. Bus. History Rev. (1999) 73(3):430–460Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategy management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(7):509–553Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M., Gavetti G. Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:1147–1161Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., Anderson P. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31:439–465Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., O’Reilly C. Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Rev. (1996) 38(4):8–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., Romanelli E., Cummings L. L., Staw B. M. Organizational evolution. A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. Research in Organizational Behavior (1985) Vol. 7(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 171–222Google Scholar
• Yin R. K.Case Study Research: Design and Methods, (1994) 2nd ed.(Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Zimbardo P. G., Boyd J. N. Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1999) 77(6):1271–1288Crossref, Google Scholar