Going Mobile: Aesthetic Design Considerations from Calder and the Constructivists

References

• Andrews R., Kalinovska M., Andrews R., Kalinovska M.Art into Life: Russian Constructivism 1914–1932 (1984) (Rizzoli, New York) Google Scholar
• Arnason H.Calder (1971) (Viking Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Austin R., Devin L.Artful Making: What Managers Need to Know About How Artists Work (2003) (Prentice-Hall, New York) Google Scholar
• Bann S.The Tradition of Constructivism (1974) (Thames and Hudson, London, U.K) Google Scholar
• Barry D. Making the invisible visible: Using analogically-based methods to surface the organizational unconscious. Organ. Development J. (1994) 12(4):37–48Google Scholar
• Boland R. J., Collopy F., Boland R. J., Collopy F.Managing as Designing (2004) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) Google Scholar
• Brown S., Eisenhardt K. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:1–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bruzeau M.Calder (1975) (I. M. Paris, trans. Harry N. Abrams, Inc., New York) Google Scholar
• Calder A. “A Propos of Measuring a Mobile. (1943) . The Calder Foundation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Calder A. What abstract art means to me. Museum of Modern Art Bulletin (1951) 18:8–9Google Scholar
• Calder A.Calder: An Autobiography with Pictures (1966) (Pantheon Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Casey C.Work, Self, and Society: After Industrialism (1995) (Routledge, London, U.K.) Google Scholar
• Child J., McGrath R. G. Organizations unfettered: Organizational forms in an information-intensive economy. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44:1135–1148Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dupin J.Miró (1993) (Harry N. Abrams, Inc., New York) Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M. Building theory from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14:532–550Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Sull D. N. Strategy as simple rules. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2001) 79:106–116Google Scholar
• Ethiraj S. K., Levinthal D. Bounded rationality and the search for organizational architecture: An evolutionary perspective on the design of organizations and their evolvability. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2004) 49:404–437Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R., Kotha S. Using the brain as a metaphor to model flexible production systems. Acad. Management Rev. (1994) 19:671–698Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gentner D. Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Sci. (1983) 7:155–170Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson M.Calder (1988) (Universe Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Guillén M. F. Scientific management’s lost aesthetic: Architecture, organization, and the taylorized beauty of the mechanical. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:682–715Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guillet de Monthoux P.The Art Firm: Aesthetic Management and Metaphysical Marketing (2004) (Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA) Google Scholar
• Hammer M., Lodder C.Constructing Modernity: The Art and Career of Naum Gabo (2000) (Yale University Press, London, U.K.) Google Scholar
• Hatch M. J. Jazz as a metaphor for organizing in the 21st century. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9:556–557Link, Google Scholar
• Larsen B., Aagaard P.På en bølge af begejstring (2003) (Nyt fra Samfundsvidenskaberne, Copenhagen, Denmark) . (On a Wave of Excitement)Google Scholar
• Learning Lab Denmark Strategy document. (2003) . Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
• Linstead S., Höpfl H., Linstead S., Höpfl H.The Aesthetics of Organization (2000) (Sage Publications, London, U.K.) Google Scholar
• Lipman J.Calder’s Universe (1976) (Whitney Museum of American Art, New York) Google Scholar
• LLD Quarterly Learning Lab Denmark. (2003) . MarchGoogle Scholar
• Lodder C.Russian Constructivism (1983) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) Google Scholar
• Marter J. M. The engineer behind Calder. Mech. Engrg. (1998) 120:52–57Google Scholar
• Meredith B., Latouche J., Matter H.Works of Calder (1950) (Museum of Modern Art, New York) Google Scholar
• Miles M. B., Huberman M.Qualitative Data Analysis (1994) 2nd ed.(Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA) Google Scholar
• Miner A., Bassoff P., Mooreman C. Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46:304–337Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H.Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations (1983) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Nickerson J. A., Zenger T. R. Being efficiently fickle: A dynamic theory of organizational choice. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13:547–566Link, Google Scholar
• Nohria N., Eccles R. G.Networks and Organizations (1992) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Pine B. J., Gilmore J. H.Experience Economy: Work is Theatre and Every Business a Stage (1999) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Poole M. S., Van de Ven A. H. Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14:562–578Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prather M.Alexander Calder 1898–76 (1998) (National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
• Sartre J. P., Sartre J. P. The mobiles of Calder. Essays in Aesthetics (1963) (Washington Square Press, New York) 123–127Google Scholar
• Sherman R., McNamee T.American Masters: Alexander Calder (1998) (Sherman Pictures, New York) Google Scholar
• Sims P.Alexander Calder. A 50th Anniversary Exhibition (1981) (Whitney Museum of American Art, New York) Google Scholar
• Strati A. Aesthetic understanding of organizational life. Acad. Management Rev. (1992) 17:568–581Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strati A.Organization and Aesthetics (1999) (Sage Publications, London, U.K.) Google Scholar
• Strati A., Linstead S., Hopfl H. The aesthetic of organization. The Aesthetic Approach in Organization Studies (2000) (Sage Publications, London, UK) 13–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor S., Hansen H. Finding form: Looking at the field of organizational aesthetics. J. Management Stud. (2005) 42(6):1211–1231Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsoukas H. The missing link: A transformational view of metaphors in organizational science. Acad. Management Rev. (1991) 16:566–585Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsoukas H. Analogical reasoning and knowledge generation in organization theory. Organ. Stud. (1993) 14(3):323–346Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., O’Reilley C. A. The ambidextrous organization. California Management Rev. (1996) 38(4):8–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vilardebo C.Calder’s Circus (1985) (, Societe Nouvelle, Pathe Cinema, Paris, France) Google Scholar
• Weick K. E. Improvisation as a metaphor for organizing. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9:543–555Link, Google Scholar
• Weick K. E., Weick K. E. Organizational redesign as improvisation. Making Sense of the Organization (2001) (Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA) 57–91Google Scholar
• Weick K. E., Boland R. J., Collopy F. Rethinking organizational design. Managing as Designing (2004) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) 36–53Google Scholar
• Wetware Preliminary study—Learning Lab Denmark. (2001) . Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar