Designing a New Organization at NASA: An Organization Design Process Using Simulation

References

• Argyres N. S. The impact of information technology on coordination: Evidence from the B-2 “stealth” bomber. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(2):162–180Link, Google Scholar
• Baligh H. H., Burton R. M., Obel B. Organizational consultant: Creating a useable theory for organization design. Management Sci. (1996) 42(12):1648–1662Link, Google Scholar
• Brooks F. P.The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering (1974) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Burton R. M., Obel B.Strategic Organization Diagnosis and Design: The Dynamics of Fit (2004) 3rd ed.(Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton R. M., Lauridsen J., Obel B. Return on assets loss from situational and contingency misfits. Management Sci. (2002) 48(11):1461–1485Link, Google Scholar
• Columbia Accident Investigation Board Report (2003) Volumes I–VI http://www.caib.us/news/report/default.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Donaldson L.The Contingency Theory of Organisations (2001) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galunic D. C., Eisenhardt K. M., Staw B., Cummings L. Renewing the strategy-structure-performance paradigm. Research in Organizational Behavior (1994) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 215–255Google Scholar
• Greenwood R., Hinings C. R. Organization design types, tracks, and the dynamics of strategic change. Organ. Stud. (1988) 9(3):293–316Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hedberg B. L. T., Nystrom P. C., Starbuck W. H. Camping on see-saws: Prescriptions for a self-designing organization. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1976) 21:41–65Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim J., Burton R. M. The effect of task uncertainty and decentralization on project team performance. Computational Math. Organ. Theory (2002) 8(4):365–384Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt R. E., Cohen G. P., Kunz J. C., Nass C. I., Christiansen T., Jin Y., Carley K. M., Prietula M. J. The “virtual design team”: Simulating how organization structure and information processing tools affect team performance. Computational Organization Theory (1994) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
• Levitt R. E., Thomsen J., Christiansen T. R., Kunz J., Jin Y., Nass C. Simulating project work processes and organizations: Toward a micro-contingency theory of organizational design. Management Sci. (1999) 45(11):1479–1495Link, Google Scholar
• Miles R. E., Snow C. C.Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process (1978) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Miller D., Toulouse J.-M. Chief executive personality and corporate strategy and structure in small firms. Management Sci. (1986) 32(11):1389–1409Link, Google Scholar
• Naman J. L., Slevin D. P. Entrepreneurship and the concept of fit: A model and empirical tests. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14(2):137–153Crossref, Google Scholar
• National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationThe Vision for Space Exploration (2004) . http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/55583main_vision_space_exploration2.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Nystrom P. C., Hedberg B., Starbuck W. H., Killman R., Pondy L., Slevin D. Interacting processes as organizational design. The Management of Organization Design (1976) (North-Holland, New York) 209–230Google Scholar
• Pettigrew A. Context and action in the transformation of the firm. J. Management Stud. (1987) 24(6):649–670Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pettigrew A. M. The character and significance of strategy process research. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13(Winter):5–16Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N. Change in the presence of fit: The rise, the fall, and the renaissance of Liz Claiborne. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(4):838–857Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon H. A. A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. (1955) 69:99–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon H. A. The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. (1962) 106:467–482Google Scholar
• Starbuck W. H., Milliken F. J. Challenger: Fine-tuning the odds until something breaks. J. Management Stud. (1988) 25:319–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steward D. V. The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1981) 78(3):71–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A. H. Suggestions for studying strategy process: A research note. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13(Summer):169–188Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick K. E. Organization design: Organizations as self-designing systems. Organ. Dynam. (1977) 6:31–46Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zammuto R. F., Krakower J. Y. Quantitative and qualitative studies in organizational culture. Res. Organ. Change Development (1991) 5:83–114Google Scholar