Construction Principles and Design Rules in the Case of Circular Design

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0169

References

  • Ackoff R. L.Re-creating the Corporation: A Design of Organizations For the 21st Century (1999) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Baligh H. H., Burton R. M., Obel B. Organizational consultant: Creating a useable theory for organizational design. Management Sci. (1996) 42:1648–1662LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bartunek J. M., Louis M. R.Insider/Outsider Team Research (1996) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Bate P., Khan R., Pye A. Towards a culturally sensitive approach to organization structuring: Where organization design meets organization development. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11:197–211LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Beer S.Cybernetics and Management (1959) (English Universities Press, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Boland R. J., Collopy F., Boland R. J., Collopy F. Design matters for management. Managing as Designing (2004a) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) 3–18Google Scholar
  • Boland R. J., Collopy F., Boland R. J., Collopy F. Toward a design vocabulary for management. Managing as Designing (2004b) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) 265–276Google Scholar
  • Buck J.Employee Commitment in Sociocratic Organizations (2002) . Unpublished master’s thesis, George Washington University, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  • Endenburg G.Sociocratie: Een Redelijk Ideaal (1974) (Klaas Woudt, Zaandijk, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
  • Endenburg G.Sociocracy as Social Design (1998) (Eburon, Delft, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
  • Fiol C. M., O’Connor E. J. When hot and cold collide in radical change processes: Lessons from community development. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13:532–546LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Foss N. J. Selective intervention and internal hybrids: Interpreting and learning from the rise and decline of the Oticon spaghetti organization. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14:331–349LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hansmann H.The Ownership of Enterprise (1996) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Hardy C., Leiba-O’Sullivan S. The power behind empowerment: Implications for research and practice. Human Relations (1998) 51:451–483CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim W. C., Mauborgne R. A. Procedural justice, attitudes, and subsidiary top management compliance with multinationals’ corporate strategic decisions. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36:502–526CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Likert R.New Patterns of Management (1961) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • McMaster M. D.The Intelligence Advantage: Organizing for Complexity (1996) (Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Milliken F. J., Morrison E. W., Hewlin P. F. An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don’t communicate upward and why. J. Management Stud. (2003) 40:1453–1476CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moss S. E., Sanchez J. I. Are your employees avoiding you? Managerial strategies for closing the feedback gap. Acad. Management Executive (2004) 18(1):32–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Riecken H. W., Boruch R. F.Social Experimentation: A Method for Planning and Evaluating Social Intervention (1974) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Romme A. G. L. Domination, self-determination and circular organizing. Organ. Stud. (1999) 20:801–832CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Romme A. G. L. Making a difference: Organization as design. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14:558–573LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Romme A. G. L. Unanimity rule and organizational decision making: A simulation model. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15:704–718LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Romme A. G. L., Endenburg G. Naar een nieuwe vormgeving van het aandeel. Tijdschrift voor Management Organisatie (2001) 55(3):40–53Google Scholar
  • Schein E. H.The Clinical Perspective in Fieldwork (1987) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H. A., Pattee H. H. The organization of complex systems. Hierarchy Theory: The Challenge of Complex Systems (1973) (George Braziller, New York) 1–27Google Scholar
  • Simon H. A.The Sciences of the Artificial (1996) 3rd ed.(MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Starbuck W. H. Shouldn’t organization theory emerge from adolescence? Organization (2003) 10:439–452CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Starbuck W. H. Why I stopped trying to understand the real world. Organ. Stud. (2004) 25:1233–1254CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Aken J. E. Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: The quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. J. Management Stud. (2004) 41:219–246CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Vlissingen R. F. A management system based on consent. Human Systems Management (1991) 10:149–154Google Scholar
  • Warfield J. N.A Science of Generic Design (1994) 2nd ed.(Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA) Google Scholar
  • Wicks A. C., Freeman R. E. Organization studies and the new pragmatism: Positivism, anti-positivism, and the search for ethics. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9:123–140LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Worren N., Moore K., Elliott R. When theories become tools: Toward a framework for pragmatic validity. Human Relations (2002) 55:1227–1250CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.