Organization Design and Effectiveness over the Innovation Life Cycle

References

• Abernathy W. J.The Productivity Dilemma (1978) (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) Google Scholar
• Abernathy W. J., Utterback J. Patterns of industrial innovation. Tech. Rev. (1978) 50(June–July):40–47Google Scholar
• Benner M. J., Tushman M. L. Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47(4):676–706Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boston Consulting Group and shop.org The state of online retailing 4.0. shop.org (2001) . Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
• Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K. M. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:1–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgelman R. A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1983) 28(2):223-244Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burns T., Stalker G. M.The Management of Innovation (1961) (Oxford University Press Inc., New York) Google Scholar
• Christensen C. M.The Innovator’s Dilemma (1997) (HBS Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Christensen C., Tedlow R. Patterns of disruption in retailing. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2000) 78(1):42–45Google Scholar
• Clark K. B., Fujimoto T.Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization and Management in the World Auto Industry (1991) (HBS Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Donaldson L.American Anti-Management Theories of Organization (1995) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(4):532–550Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foster R.Innovation: The Attacker’s Advantage (1986) (Summit Books, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foster R., Kaplan S.Creative Destruction: Why Companies that Are Built to Last Underperform the Market—And How to Successfully Transform Them (2001) (Currency, New York) Google Scholar
• Galunic D. C., Eisenhardt K. M. Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(6):1229–1249Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gasparino C., Smith R. Internet trades put Merrill bull on the horns of a dilemma. Wall Street J. (1999) February 12):C1Google Scholar
• Greiner L. E. Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1972) 50(4):37–46Google Scholar
• Gresov C., Drazin R. Equifinality: Functional equivalence in organization design. Acad. Management Rev. (1997) 22(2):403–428Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R., Clark K. B. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):9–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iansiti M.Technology Integration (1997) (HBS Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Lawrence P. R., Lorsch J. W.Organization and Environment (1967) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):71–87Link, Google Scholar
• McGrath R., MacMillan I.The Entrepreneurial Mindset: Strategies for Continuously Creating Opportunity in an Age of Uncertainty (2000) (HBS Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Mezias J. M., Starbuck W. H. What do managers know, anyway? Harvard Bus. Rev. (2003) 81(5):16–17Google Scholar
• Penrose E. T.The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (1959) (Basil Blackwell, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Rice M. P., O’Connor G. C., Leifer R., McDermott C. M., Standish-Kuon T. Corporate venture capital models for promoting radical innovation. J. Marketing Theory Practice (2000) 8(3):1–10Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N. Misperceiving interactions among complements and substitutes: Organizational consequences. Management Sci. (2002) 48(7):900–916Link, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N., Levinthal D. A. Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(6):650–669Link, Google Scholar
• Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Tripsas M., Gavetti G. Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(10/11):1147–1161Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., Anderson P. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31:439–465Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., O’Reilly C. A.Winning Through Innovation (1997) (HBS Press, Boston, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., Romanelli E. Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. Res. Organ. Behavior (1985) 7:171–222Google Scholar