Making Design Rules: A Multidomain Perspective

References

• Acha V., Brusoni S., Finch J., Orillard M. Complexity is in the eye of the beholder: Lessons from the tire industry. Complexity and the Economy (2005) (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK) Google Scholar
• Adler P. A., Adler P.Membership Roles in Field Research (1987) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agar M. H.The Professional Stranger—An Informal Introduction to Ethnography (1980) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Allen T. J.Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and Dissemination of Technological Information Within the R&D Organization (1977) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Baldwin C. Y., Clark K.Design Rules (2000) Vol. 1(MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brusoni S., Sgalari G. New combinations in old industries: The introduction of radical innovations in tire manufacturing. J. Evolutionary Econom. (2006) 16(1–2):25–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brusoni S., Prencipe A., Pavitt K. Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make? Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46(4):597–621Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chesbrough H., Kusunoki K., Nonaka I., Teece D. The modularity trap: Innovation, technology phase-shifts, and the resulting limits of virtual organizations. Managing Industrial Knowledge (2001) (Sage Press, London, UK) 202–230Crossref, Google Scholar
• Creswell J. W.Research Design (2003) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Drazin E., Van de Ven A. H. Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1985) 30(4):514–539Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunbar R., Garud R., Rahuram S. A frame for deframing in strategic analysis. J. Management Inquiry (1996) 5(1):23–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flick U.An Introduction to Qualitative Research (2002) (Sage, London, UK) Google Scholar
• French M.The U.S. Tire Industry: A History (1991) (Twayne Publishers, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Galbraith J. A.Designing Complex Organizations (1973) (Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Glaser B. G., Strauss A. L.The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (1967) (Aldine, New York) Google Scholar
• Grandori A. Neither hierarchy nor identity: Knowledge governance mechanisms and the theory of the firm. J. Management Governance (2001) 5:381–399Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon A., Sutton R. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:716–749Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langlois R. N. The vanishing hand: The changing dynamics of industrial capitalism. Indust. Corporate Change (2003) 12(2):351–385Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence P., Lorsch J.Organization and Environment (1967) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Levinthal D. Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. (1997) 43:934–950Link, Google Scholar
• Miller D. The genesis of configuration. Acad. Management Rev. (1987) 12(4):686–701Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padgett J. F., Rauch J. E., Casella A. Organizational genesis, identity and control: The transformation of banking in Renaissance Florence. Networks and Markets (2001) (Russell Sage, New York) 211–257Google Scholar
• Padgett J., Powell W. Economic transformation and trajectories: A dynamic multiple network approach. (2003) . Accessed July 13, 2005. http://home.uchicago.edu/∼jpadgett/papers/sfi/intro.chap.pdf/Google Scholar
• Perrow C. A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1967) 79:686–704Google Scholar
• Prencipe A. Technological capabilities and product evolutionary dynamics: A case study from the aero engine industry. Res. Policy (1997) 25:1261–1276Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivkin J. W. Imitation of complex strategies. Management Sci. (2000) 46(6):824–844Link, Google Scholar
• Roberts E.Generating Technological Innovation (1987) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Rothwell R. Successful industrial innovation: Critical factors for the 1990s. R&D Management (1992) 22(3):221–239Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanchez R., Mahoney J. T. Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Winter Special Issue):63–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling M. A. Towards a general modular systems theory and its application to inter-firm product modularity. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25(3):312–324Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N. Change in the presence of fit: The rise, the fall, and the renaissance of Liz Claiborne. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(4):838–857Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N. Evolution toward fit. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47:125–159Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stake R. E.The Art of Case Study Research (1995) (Sage, Thousands Oak, CA) Google Scholar
• Strauss A. L.Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientist (1987) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sturgeon T. Modular production networks: A new model of industrial organization. Indust. Corporate Change (2002) 11(3):451–496Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sull D. N., Tedlow R., Rosenbloom D. N. Managerial commitments and technological change in the US tire industry. Indust. Corporate Change (1997) 6(2):461–501Crossref, Google Scholar
• Takeishi A. Knowledge partitioning in the inter-firm division of labor: The case of automotive product development. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(3):321–338Link, Google Scholar
• Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Whittington R., Pettigrew A., Peck S., Fenton E., Conyon M. Change and complementaries in the new competitive landscape: A European panel study, 1992–1996. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(5):583–600Link, Google Scholar
• Woodward J.Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice (1965) (Oxford University Press, London, UK) Google Scholar