Owning the Code: Status Closure in Distributed Groups

References

• Alderfer C. P., Lorsch J. W. An intergroup perspective on group dynamics. Handbook of Organizational Behavior (1987) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) 190–222Google Scholar
• Alderfer C. P., Smith K. K. Studying intergroup relations embedded in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1982) 27(1):35–65Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allport G.The Nature of Prejudice (1954) (Beacon Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Ancona Deborah G. Outward bound: Strategies for team survival in an organization. Acad. Management J. (1990) 33(2):334–365Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arendt H.Between the Past and the Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought (1978) (Penguin Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Barley S. R. Technicians in the workplace: Ethnographic evidence for bringing work into organization studies. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:404–441Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnes B. Status groups and collective action. Sociology (1992) 26(2):259–270Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bechky B. Object lessons: Workplace artifacts as representations of occupational jurisdiction. Amer. J. Sociol. (2003) 109(3):720–752Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beck K.Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change (1999) (Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Becker H. S.Tricks of the Trade: How to Think about Your Research While You’re Doing It (1998) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bielby W., Bielby D., Jacobs J. Cumulative versus continuous disadvantage in an unstructured labor market: Gender differences in the careers of television writers. Gender Inequality at Work (1995) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 209–230Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P.Outline of a Theory of Practice (1977) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P.Distinction (1984) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P., Wacquant L. D.An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology (1992) (Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Brewer M. B. In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive motivational analysis. Psych. Bull. (1979) 86:307–324Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer M. B., Ashmore R., Jussim L., Wilder D. In-group identification and intergroup conflict: When does in-group love become outgroup hate? Social Identity, Intergroup Conflict, and Conflict Reduction (2001) (Oxford University Press, New York) 17–41Google Scholar
• Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K. M. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:1–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carmel E.Global Software Development Teams: Collaborating Across Borders and Time Zones (1999) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Coleman J.Community Conflict (1957) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Cramton C. D. The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences in geographically dispersed teams. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:346–371Link, Google Scholar
• Cramton C. D., Hinds P., Kiesler S. Attribution in distributed work groups. Distributed Work: New Ways of Working Across Distance Using Technology (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 191–212Google Scholar
• Cramton C. D., Hinds P. J. Subgroup dynamics in internationally distributed teams: Ethnocentrism or cross-national learning? Res. Organ. Behav. (2005) 26:233–265Google Scholar
• Cummings J. N. Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Sci. (2004) 50:352–364Link, Google Scholar
• Cusumano M. A.Japan’s Software Factories (1991) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Daft R., Lengel R. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Sci. (1986) 32:554–571Link, Google Scholar
• Dougherty Deborah. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:179–202Link, Google Scholar
• Dutton J. E., Dukerich J. M., Harquail C. V. Organizational images and member identification. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39:239–263Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14:532–550Crossref, Google Scholar
• Espinosa A. J., Kraut R. E., Slaughter S. A., Lerch J. F., Herbsleb J. D., Mockus A. Shared mental models, familiarity, and coordination: A multi-method study of distributed software teams. Proc. Twenty-Third Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (2002) AIS, Atlanta, GA:425–433Google Scholar
• Fiske S. T., Neuberg S. L., Zanna M. P. A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1990) Vol. 23(Academic Press, New York) 1–74Google Scholar
• Giddens Anthony. Social Theory and Modern Sociology (1987) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) Google Scholar
• Glaser B. G., Strauss A. L.The Discovery of Grounded Theory (1967) (Aldine Publishing Company, New York) Google Scholar
• Glass R. L.Software Creativity (1995) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Goodwin S. A., Operario D., Fiske S. T. Situational power and interpersonal dominance facilitate bias and inequality. J. Soc. Issues (1998) 54(4):677–698Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grinter R. E., Herbsleb J. D., Perry D. E. The geography of coordination: Dealing with distance in R&D work. Proc. Internat. ACM Conf. Supporting Group Work (1999) ACM, New York:306–315Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinds P. J., Bailey D. E. Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(6):615–632Link, Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa S. L., Leidner D. E. Communication and trust in virtual teams. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(6):791–815Link, Google Scholar
• Kane A. A., Argote L., Levine J. M. Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2005) 96:56–71Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kiesler S., Cummings J., Hinds P., Kiesler S. What do we know about proximity in work groups? A legacy of research on physical distance. Distributed Work: New Ways of Working Across Distance Using Technology (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 57–80Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Metiu A. Open source software development and distributed innovation. Oxford Rev. Econom. Policy (2001) 17(2):248–264Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kramer R. M., Brewer M. B. Effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated commons dilemma. J. Personality Soc. Psychology (1984) 46(5):1044–1057Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kunda G.Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation (1992) (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA) Google Scholar
• Lamont M.Money, Morals, and Manners. The Culture of the French and American Upper Middle Classes (1992) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lamont M., Lareau A. Cultural capital: Allusions, gaps, and glissandos in recent theoretical developments. Sociol. Theory (1988) 6:153–168Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawler E. E.The Ultimate Advantage: Creating the High-Involvement Organization (1992) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Mackie D. M., Smith E. R. Intergroup relations: Insights from a theoretically integrative approach. Psych. Rev. (1998) 105(3):499–529Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maznevski M. L., Chudoba K. M. Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(5):473–492Link, Google Scholar
• McGrath J. E., Hollingshead A. B.Groups Interacting with Technology (1994) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Miller M. H-1B to B. Wired (2001) MarchGoogle Scholar
• Mockus A., Fielding R., Herbsleb J. D. Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla. ACM Trans. Software Engrg. Methodology (2002) 11(3):309–346Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montoya-Weiss M. M., Massey A. P., Song M. Getting it together: Temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(8):1251–1262Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy R.Social Closure. The Theory of Monopolization and Exclusion (1988) (Clarendon, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Nilekani N. Boomgalore. Wired (2000) FebruaryGoogle Scholar
• O’Leary M. B., Orlikowski W. J., Yates J., Kiesler S., Hinds P. Distributed work over the centuries: Trust and control in the Hudson’s Bay Company, 1670–1826. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 25–54Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olson M.The Logic of Collective Action (1965) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J. Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(3):249–273Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J., Yates J. Genre repertoire: The structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39(4):541–574Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parkin F., Parkin F. Strategies of social closure in class formation. The Social Analysis of Class Structure (1974) (Tavistock, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Parkin F.Marxism and Class Theory: A Bourgeois Critique (1979) (Columbia University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Podolny J. M. A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociol. (1993) 98:829–872Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratt M. G., Whetten D. A., Godfrey P. C. To be or not to be? Central questions in organizational identification. Identity in Organizations: Building Theory through Conversations (1998) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 171–207Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C. L. Interaction and the conservation of gender inequality: Considering employment. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1997) 62(2):218–235Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C. L., Berger J. Expectations, legitimation, and dominance behavior in task groups. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1986) 51(5):603–617Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schopler J., Insko C. A., Stroebe W., Hewstone M. The discontinuity effect in interpersonal and intergroup relations: Generality and mediation. European Review of Social Psychology (1992) Vol. 3(John Wiley, Chicester, UK) 121–151Google Scholar
• Sherif M., Sherif C. W.Groups in Harmony and Tension (1953) (Harper, New York) Google Scholar
• Sole D., Edmondson A. Situated knowledge and learning in dispersed teams. British J. Management (2002) 13 :17–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H.Differentiation between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (1978) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Tajfel H.Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology (1981) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Tajfel H., Turner J. C., Worchel S., Austin W. G. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Psychology of Intergroup Relations (1986) (Nelson-Hall Publishers, Chicago, IL) 7–24Google Scholar
• Tilly Charles. Durable Inequality (1998) (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner J. C.Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory (1987) (Blackwell, New York) Google Scholar
• Vallas S. P. Symbolic boundaries and the new division of labor: Engineers, workers and the restructuring of factory life. Res. Social Stratification Mobility (2001) 18:3–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walby S.Theorizing Patriarchy (1990) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Washington M., Zajac E. J. By invitation only: The institutional evolution of status and privilege. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48(2):281–296Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber M.Economy and Society (1978) (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) Google Scholar
• Weeden K. A. Why do some occupations pay more than others? Social closure and earnings inequality in the United States. Amer. J. Sociol. (2002) 108(1):55–101Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weisband S. P., Schneider S. K., Connolly T. Computer-mediated communication and social information: Status salience and status differences. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38(4):1124–1151Crossref, Google Scholar
• Witz A. Patriarchy and professions: The gendered politics of occupational closure. Sociology (1990) 24(4):675–690Crossref, Google Scholar