Organizational Design and Restructuring in Response to Crises: Lessons from Computational Modeling and Real-World Cases

References

• Aldrich H. E.Organizations and Environment (1979) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Anderson P., Tushman M. L. Organizational environments and industry exit: The effects of uncertainty, munificence and complexity. Indust. Corporate Change (2001) 10(3):6705–6711Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andres H. P., Zmud R. W. A contingency approach to software project coordination. J. Management Inform. Systems (2002) 18(3):41–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baligh H. H., Burton R. M., Obel B., Masuch Michael. Devising expert systems in organization theory: The organizational consultant. Organization, Management, and Expert Systems (1990) (Walter De Gruyter, Berlin, Germany) 35–57Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bigley G. A., Roberts K. H. The incident command system: High-reliability organization for complex and volatile task environments. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(6):1281–1300Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K. M.Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Burton R. M., Obel B. The validity of computational models in organizations science: From model realism to purpose of the model. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory (1995) 1(1):57–71Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton R. M., Obel B.Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design: The Dynamics of Fit (2004) 3rd ed.(Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell D. T. Degrees of freedom and the case study. Comparative Political Stud. (1975) 8:178–193Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carley K. M. A comparison of artificial and human organizations. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1996) 31(2):175–191Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carley K. M., Harrald J. R. Organizational learning under fire: Theory and practice. Amer. Behav. Scientist (1997) 40(3):310–332Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carley K. M., Hill V., Lomi Alessandro, Larsen Erik R. Structural change and learning within organizations. Dynamics of Organizations: Computational Modeling and Organizational Theories (2001) (MIT Press/AAAI Press, Cambridge, MA) 63–92Google Scholar
• Carley K. M., Lin Z. Organizational designs suited to high performance under stress. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, Cybernetic (1995) 25(2):221–230Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carley K. M., Lin Z. A theoretical study of organizational performance under information distortion. Management Sci. (1997) 43(7):976–997Link, Google Scholar
• Carley K. M., Prietula M. J., Carley Kathleen, Prietula Michael. ACTS theory: Extending the model of bounded rationality. Computational Organization Theory (1994) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 55–88Google Scholar
• Carley K. M., Prietula M. J., Lin Z. Design versus cognition: The interaction of agent cognition and organizational design on organizational performance. J. Artificial Soc. Soc. Simulation (1998) 1(3):1–19Google Scholar
• Child J. What determines organizational performance? The universals vs. it-all-depends. Organ. Dynam. (1974) 3(Summer):2–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen K. J., Cyert R. M., March J. G. Simulation of organizational behavior. Handbook in Organizations (1965) (Rand McNally, Chicago, IL) 305–334Google Scholar
• Cohen M. D., March J. G., Olsen J. P. A garbage can model of organizational choice. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1972) 17(1):1–25Crossref, Google Scholar
• Courtright J. A., Fairhurst G. T., Rogers L. E. Interaction patterns in organic and mechanistic systems. Acad. Management J. (1989) 32(4):773–802Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daft R. L., Weick K. E. Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9(2):284–295Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis S. M., Lawrence P. R.Matrix (1977) (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Dill W. R. Environment as an influence on managerial autonomy. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1958) 2:409–443Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duffy B., Kaylor R., Cary P. How good is this navy, anyway? U.S. News and World Report (1988) July 18Google Scholar
• Dunbar R., Stumpf S. A. Trainings that demystify strategic decision-making processes. J. Management Development (1989) 8(1):36–42Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(4):532–550Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galbraith J. R.Organization Design (1977) (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Green F. E. When just-in-time breaks down on the line. Indust. Management (1989) 31(1):26–29Google Scholar
• Hannan M. T., Freeman J. The population ecology of organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. (1977) 82:929–964Crossref, Google Scholar
• Health and Safety Executive Flixborough, Nypro UK Explosion, 1 June 1974. Health and Safety Executive (2001) . Hazardous Installations Directorate, London, UK. http://www.hse.gov.ukGoogle Scholar
• Hermann C. F. Some consequences of crisis which limit the viability of organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1963) 8:343–358Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollenbeck J. R., Ilgen D. R., Tuttle D., Sego D. J. Team performance on monitoring tasks: An examination of decision errors in contexts requiring sustained attention. J. Appl. Psych. (1995) 80:685–696Crossref, Google Scholar
• Houskisson R. E., Galbraith C. S. The effect of quantum versus incremental m-form reorganization on performance: A time series exploration of intervention dynamics. J. Management (1985) 11:55–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hutchins E. Organizing work by adaptation. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):14–39Link, Google Scholar
• Jablin F. M., Putnam L. L., Roberts K. H., Porter L. W.Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (1986) (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) Google Scholar
• Klein K. J., Tosi H., Cannella A. A. Multilevel theory building: Benefits, barriers, and new developments. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24(2):243–248Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lagadec P.Major Technological Risk: An Assessment of Industrial Disasters (1981) (Pergamon Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Lant T. K., Mezias S. J. An organizational learning model of convergence and reorientation. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:47–71Link, Google Scholar
• La Porte T. R., Consolini P. M. Working in practice but not in theory: Theoretical challengers of “high-reliability organizations”. J. Public Admin. Res. Theory (1991) 1(1):19–47Google Scholar
• Lawrence P. R., Lorsch J. W.Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration (1986) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Levinthal D. A., Warglien M. Landscape design: Designing for local action in complex worlds. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(3):342–357Link, Google Scholar
• Lin Z. Organizational performance under critical situations: Exploring the role of computer modeling in crisis case analyses. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory (2000a) 6(3):277–310Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin Z. Organizational restructuring and the impact of knowledge transfer. J. Math. Sociol. (2000b) 24(2):129–149Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin Z., Carley M. DYCORP: A computational framework for examining organizational performance under dynamic conditions. J. Math. Sociol. (1995) 20(2–3):193–217Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin Z., Carley M. Organizational response: The cost performance tradeoff. Management Sci. (1997) 43(2):217–234Link, Google Scholar
• Lin Z., Carley M.Designing Stress Resistant Organizations: Computational Theorizing and Crisis Applications (2003) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin Z., Hui C. Should lean replace mass organization systems: A theoretical examination from a management coordination perspective. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1999) 30(1):45–80Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mackenzie K. D.Organizational Structures (1978) (AHM Publishing Corporation, Arlington Heights, IL) Google Scholar
• Mantzavinos C.Individuals, Institutions, and Markets (2001) (Cambridge University of Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J. G., Olsen J. P.Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations (1976) (Universitetsforlaget, Bergen, Germany) Google Scholar
• March J. G., Simon H. A.Organizations (1958) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• March J. G., Sproull L. S., Tamuz M. Learning from the samples of one or fewer. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):1–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marcus A. A., Nichols M. L. On the edge: Heeding the warning of unusual events. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(4):482–499Link, Google Scholar
• Miles R. E., Creed W. E. D., Staw B. M., Cummings L. L. Organizational forms and managerial philosophies: A descriptive and analytical review. Research in Organizational Behavior (1995) 17(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 333–372Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H.The Structure of Organizations (1979) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Newell A.Unified Theories of Cognition (1990) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Pauchant T. C., Douville R. Recent research in crisis management: A study of 24 authors’ publications from 1986 to 1991. Indust. Environ. Crisis Quart. (1993) 7:43–61Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pearson C. M., Clair J. A. Reframing crisis management. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(1):59–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pearson C. M., Mitroff I. I. From crisis prone to crisis prepared: A framework for crisis management. Acad. Management Executive (1993) 7(1):48–59Google Scholar
• Perrow C.Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies (1984) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Perrow C.Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay (1986) (Scott, Foresman and Company, Glenview, IL) Google Scholar
• Perrow C. The limits of safety: The enhancement of a theory of accidents. J. Contingencies Crisis Management (1994) 4(2):212–220Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R.The External Control of Organizations (1978) (Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
• Reason J. Broadening the cognitive engineering horizons: More engineering, less cognition, and no philosophy of science, please. Ergonomics (1998) 41(2):150–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts K. H. Some characteristics of one type of high reliability organizations. Organ. Sci. (1990) 1(2):160–176Link, Google Scholar
• Roberts N. C., Dotterway K. The Vincennes incident: Another player on the stage? Defense Anal. (1995) 11(1):31–45Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rochlin G. I., La Porte Todd R. Iran Air Flight 655 and the USS Vincennes: Complex, large-scale military systems and the failure of control. Social Responses to Large Technical Systems: Control or Anticipation (1991) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rolfe J., Saunders D., Powell T.Simulation and Games for Emergency and Crisis Management (1998) (Kogan Page, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Rosenthal U., Pijnenburg B.Crisis Management and Decision Making: Simulation Oriented Scenarios (1991) (Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rousseau D. M., House R. J. Meso organizational behavior: Avoiding the fundamental biases. J. Organ. Behav. (1994) 1:13–30Google Scholar
• Schlager N., Schlager N.When Technology Fails. Significant Disasters, Accidents, and Failures of the Twentieth Century (1994) (Gale Research, Inc., Detroit, MI) Google Scholar
• Scott W. R.Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems (1987) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Shaw M. E.Group Dynamics: The Psychology of Small Group Behavior (1981) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Shrivastava P.Bhopal: Anatomy of a Crisis (1987) (Ballinger Publishing, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N., Levinthal D. A. Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralize, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(6):650–669Link, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N., Rivkin J. Speed and search: Designing organizations for turbulence and complexity. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(2):101–122Link, Google Scholar
• Simon H. A.Administrative Behavior (1947) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Simon H. A. The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. (1962) 106(6):467–482Google Scholar
• Simon H. A. Applying information technology to organizational design. Public Admin. Rev. (1973) 33:268–278Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staw B. M., Sanderlands L. E., Dutton J. E. Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26:501–524Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe A. L.When Formality Works: Authority and Abstraction in Law and Organizations (2001) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Suchman L. A.Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human Machine Communication (1987) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Tamminga H., Kilijanek T. S., Adams C.Managing Multi-Organizational Emergency Responses (1981) (University of Colorado Press, Seven Springs, CO) Google Scholar
• Taylor J. R., Van Every E. J.The Emergent Organization: Communication as Its Site and Surface (2000) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
• Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Thompson M. B. Expanding simulation beyond planning and design. Indust. Engrg. (1994) 26(10):64–66Google Scholar
• U.S. Congress (1988) . Air flight 655 compensation hearings before the Defense Policy Panel of the Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, 2nd session (held August 3–4, September 9, October 6). U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
• Vromen J. J.Economic Evolution: An Enquiry into the Foundations of New Institutional Economics (1995) (Routledge, London, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walker W. E.The Use of Scenarios and Gaming in Crisis Management Planning and Training (1995) (RAND, Santa Monica, CA) Google Scholar
• Watson R., Barry J., Sandza R. A case of human error. Newsweek (1988) August 15Google Scholar
• Weick K. E.The Sociology Psychology of Organizing (1969) 2nd ed.(Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Weick K. E., Roberts K. H. Collective minds in organizations: Heedful interacting on flight decks. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38:357–381Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yin R. K.Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1994) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Zey-Ferrell M.Dimensions of Organizations: Environment, Context, Structure, Process, and Performance (1979) (Goodyear Publishing Company, Santa Monica, CA) Google Scholar
• Zucker L. G., Staw B. M., Cummings L. L. Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. Research in Organizational Behavior (1986) 8(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 53–111Google Scholar