A Future for Organization Theory: Living in and Living with Changing Organizations

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0215

References

  • Aldrich H.Organizations and Environments (1979) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Aldrich H.Organizations Evolving (1999) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Aldrich H., Ruef M.Organizations Evolving (2006) 2nd ed.(Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allen W. T. Our schizophrenic conception of the business corporation. Cardozo Law Rev. (1992) 14:261–281Google Scholar
  • Alvesson M., Deetz S., Clegg Stewart R., Hardy Cynthia, Nord Walter. Critical theory and postmodernism approaches to organizational studies. Handbook of Organizational Studies (1996) (Sage Publications, London, UK) 191–217Google Scholar
  • Annan K. Unparalleled nightmare of AIDS. (2001) . Address to the United States Chamber of Commerce, Washington, D.C., (Jan 6). Retrieved August 30, 2006, http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2001/sgsm7827.doc.htmGoogle Scholar
  • Argyris C., Schön D. A.Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective (1978) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Ashford S. J., George E., Blatt R. Non-standard work practices. Ann. Acad. Management (2007) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Augier M., March J. G., Sullivan B. N. Notes on the evolution of a research community: Organization studies in Anglophone North America, 1945–2000. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(1):85–96LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baker W. E.Networking Smart: How to Build Relationships for Personal and Organizational Success (1994) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
  • Barker K. R. Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managed work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38:408–437CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley S. J., Kunda G.Gurus, Hired Guns, and Warm Bodies: Itinerant Experts in a Knowledge Economy (2004) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Bartlett C. A., Ghoshal S.Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution (2002) 2nd ed.(Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Oliver C. Institutional embeddedness and the dynamics of organizational populations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1992) 57(4):540–559CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baumol W. J., Blinder A. S., Wolff E. N.Downsizing in America: Reality, Causes, and Consequences (2003) (Russell Sage Foundation, New York) Google Scholar
  • Bell D.The Coming of Post-Industrial Society (1976) (Basic Books, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bennis W. G., O’Toole J. How business schools lost their way. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2005) 83):96–104Google Scholar
  • Blau P. M.On the Nature of Organizations (1974) (Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Blau P. M., Meyer M. W.Bureaucracy in Modern Society (1956/1971) 2nd ed.(Random House, New York) Google Scholar
  • Boyacigiller N., Adler N. J. The parochial dinosaur: Organizational science in a global context. Acad. Management Rev. (1991) 16:262–290CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bradley M., Schipani C. A., Sundaram A. K., Walsh J. P. The purposes and accountability of the corporation in contemporary society: Corporate governance at a crossroads. Law Contemporary Problems (1999) 62:9–85CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burns T., Stalker G. M.The Management of Innovation (1961) (Tavistock, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Burt R. S.Corporate Profits and Cooptation (1983) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Calás M., Smircich L. Voicing seduction to silence leadership. Organ. Stud. (1991) 12:567–602CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Calás M., Smircich L., Clegg Stewart R., Hardy Cynthia, Nord Walter. From “the woman’s” point of view: Feminist approaches to organizational studies. Handbook of Organizational Studies (1996) (Sage Publications, London, UK) 218–257Google Scholar
  • Casey C.Work, Self, and Society: After Industrialism (1995) (Routledge, New York) Google Scholar
  • Chiles T. H., Meyer A. D., Hench T. J. Organizational emergence: The origin and transformation of Branson, Missouri’s musical theaters. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15:499–519LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Davenport T. H.Thinking for a Living: How to Get Better Performance and Results from Knowledge Workers (2005) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Davis G. F. Alternative futures for organization theory. Interdisciplinary Committee on Organization Studies (2005) September 9(University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI) . http://www.si.umich.edu/ICOS/Presentations/20050909/Google Scholar
  • Davis G. F. Mechanisms and the theory of organizations. J. Management Inquiry (2006) 15(2):114–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DiMaggio P.The Twenty-First-Century Firm: Changing Economic Organization in International Perspective (2001) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1983) 48:147–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dion D. Evidence and inference in the comparative case study. Comparative Politics (1998) 30:127–145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dobbs L.Exporting America: Why Corporate Greed is Shipping American Jobs Overseas (2004) (Time Warner Book Group, New York) Google Scholar
  • Dorgan B. L.Take This Job and Ship It: How Corporate Greed and Brain-Dead Politics Are Selling Out America (2006) (St. Martin’s Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Drucker P. F.Post-Capitalist Society (1993) (HarperCollins, New York) Google Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14:54–74CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Engardio P. The future of outsourcing. Business Week (2006) January 30Google Scholar
  • Engardio P., Einhorn B. Outsourcing innovation. Business Week (2005) March 21Google Scholar
  • Fama E. F. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. J. Political Econom. (1980) 88:288–307CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Federal Reserve Bank of New York Report on foreign portfolio holdings of U.S. securities. (2004) . (June 30), http://www.treas.gov/tic/shl2004r.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman D. C., Leanna C. R., Rousseau D. M. From the me decade to the flee decade. Relational Wealth (2000) (Oxford University Press, New York) 169–182Google Scholar
  • Frank T.The Conquest of Cool (1997) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman R. E.Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (1984) (Pitman/Ballinger, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Friedman M. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine (1970) September 13):32–33, 122, 124, 126Google Scholar
  • Gabel M., Bruner H.Global Inc.: An Atlas of the Multinational Corporation (2003) (The New Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Ghoshal S. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Acad. Management Learning Ed. (2005) 4:75–91CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Golbe D. L., White L. J., Auerbach A. J. A time series analysis of mergers and acquisitions in the U.S. economy. Corporate Takeovers: Causes and Consequences (1988) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) 265–302Google Scholar
  • Gordon R. A., Howell J. E.Higher Education for Business (1959) (Columbia University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gourville J. T., Rangan V. K. Valuing the cause marketing relationship. California Management Rev. (2004) 47:38–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. (1985) 91(3):481–510CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greening D. W., Turban D. B. Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Bus. Soc. (2000) 39:254–280CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greider W.One World, Ready or Not: The Manic Logic of Global Capitalism (1997) (Simon and Schuster, New York) Google Scholar
  • Grey C. Re-imagining relevance: A response to Starkey and Madan. British J. Management (2001) 12(Special Issue):S27–S32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griffin J. J., Mahon J. F. The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Bus. Soc. (1997) 36:5–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hage J., Aiken M. Relationship of centralization to other structural properties. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1967) 12:72–92CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hage J., Aiken M. Routine technology, social structure, and organizational goals. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1969) 14:366–376CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan M., Freeman J. The population ecology of organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. (1977) 82:929–964CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hart S. L.Capitalism at the Crossroads: The Unlimited Business Opportunities in Solving the World’s Most Difficult Problems (2005) (Wharton School Publishing, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Haveman H. A., Russo M. V., Meyer A. D. Institutional environments in flux: The impact of regulatory change on CEO succession, organizational domain, and performance. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:253–273LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hennart J.-F. A transactions cost theory of equity joint ventures. Strategic Management J. (1988) 9:361–374CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hinings C. R., Greenwood R. Disconnects and consequences in organization theory? Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47:411–421CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hirsch P.Pack Your Own Parachute: How to Survive Mergers, Takeovers, and Other Corporate Disasters (1987) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Hirschhorn L.Beyond Mechanization: Work and Technology in a Postindustrial Age (1984) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Huff A. S. Citigroup’s John Reed and Stanford’s James March on management research and practice. Acad. Management Executive (2000) 14:52–64Google Scholar
  • Ilinitch A. Y., D’Aveni R. A., Lewin A. Y. New organizational forms and strategies for managing in hypercompetitive environments. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:211–220LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Isaac L. W., Griffin J. L. Ahistoricism in time-series analysis of historical process: Critique, redirection and illustrations from US labor history. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1989) 54:873–890CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jacoby S. M.Modern Manors: Welfare Capitalism Since the New Deal (1997) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Jensen M. C. The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. J. Finance (1993) 48:831–880CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen M. C., Meckling W. H. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. (1976) 3:305–360CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kanter R. M. From spare change to real change: The social sector as beta site for business innovation. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1999) 77:122–132Google Scholar
  • Katz D., Kahn R. L.The Social Psychology of Organizations (1966) (Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Keister L. A. Engineering growth: Business group structure and firm performance in China’s economic transition. Amer. J. Sociol. (1998) 104:404–440CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keister L. A. Exchange structures in transition: Lending and trade relations in Chinese business groups. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2001) 66:336–360CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kilduff M. Deconstructing organizations. Acad. Management Rev. (1993) 18:13–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kilduff M., Keleman M. The consolations of organization theory. British J. Management (2001) 12(Special Issue):S55–S59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klein N.No Logo (2000) (Picador, New York) Google Scholar
  • Korten D.When Corporations Rule the World (2001) 2nd ed.(Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
  • Kotler P., Lee N.Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause (2005) (Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Lawrence P. R., Lorsch J. W.Organization and Environment (1967) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Leanna C. R., Rousseau D. M.Relational Wealth (2000) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Levitt T. The dangers of social responsibility. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1958) 36):41–50Google Scholar
  • Lewin K. Action research and minority problems. J. Soc. Issues (1946) 2:34–46CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li H., Schoonhoven C. B., Zhang A. The evolution of communities of industrial populations: Evidence from technology development zones in China 1988–2000. (2005) . Paper presentation, Annual Meetings of the Academy of Management, Honolulu, HIGoogle Scholar
  • Loomis C. J. The tragedy of General Motors. Fortune (2006) Feb. 20):59–75Google Scholar
  • Lubatkin M., Calori R., Very P., Veiga J. F. Managing mergers across borders: A two-nation exploration of a nationally bound administrative heritage. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9:670–684LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mair J., Marti I. Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. J. World Bus. (2006) 41:36–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G. A scholar’s quest. J. Management Inquiry (2003) 12:205–207CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G. Parochialism in the evolution of a research community: The case of organization studies. Management Organ. Rev. (2004) 1:5–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G., Simon H. A.Organizations (1958) (Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • March J. G., Sproull L. S., Tamuz M. Learning from samples of one or fewer. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:1–13LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Margolis J. D., Walsh J. P.People and Profits? The Search for a Link between a Company’s Social and Financial Performance (2001) (Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, Mahwah, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Margolis J. D., Walsh J. P. Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48:265–305CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maynard M. Ford eliminating up to 30,000 jobs and 14 factories. New York Times (2006) January 24):C1, C6Google Scholar
  • Meyer A. D., Brooks G. R., Goes J. B. Environmental jolts and industry revolutions: Organizational responses to discontinuous change. Strategic Management J. (1990) 11:93–110Google Scholar
  • Meyer A. D., Gaba V., Colwell K. A. Organizing far from equilibrium: Nonlinear change in organizational fields. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16:456–473LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer J. W., Rowan B. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structures as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. (1977) 8:340–363CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Munter M. Tuck School of Business: Our history. (1990) . http://www.tuck.dartmouth.edu/about/history/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Nader R.Unsafe at Any Speed: The Designed-In Dangers of the American Automobile (1972) (Bantam Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • OECD Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2001) . Retrieved October 19, 2005, http://www1.oecd.org/publications/e-book/92-2001-04-1-2987/C.5.2.htmGoogle Scholar
  • OTAUnited States Office of Technology Assessment (1993) (Congress of the United States, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
  • Ouchi W. G. A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Sci. (1979) 25:833–848LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Parker B., Clegg Stewart R., Hardy Cynthia, Nord Walter. Evolution and revolution: From international business to globalization. Handbook of Organizational Studies (1996) (Sage Publications, London, UK) 484–506Google Scholar
  • Peredo A. M., Chrisman J. J. Toward a theory of community-based enterprise. Acad. Management Rev. (2006) 31:309–328CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perrow C. A society of organizations. Theory Soc. (1991) 20:725–762CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perrow C. An organizational analysis of organizational theory. Contemporary Sociol. (2000) 29:469–476CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pettigrew A. M. Context and action in the transformation of the firm. J. Management Stud. (1987) 24:649–670CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pettigrew A. M. Management research after modernism. British J. Management (2001) 12(Special Issue):S61–S70CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Fong C. T. The business school “business:” Some lessons from the U.S. experience. J. Management Stud. (2004) 41:1501–1520CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Salancik G.The External Control of Organizations (1978) (Harper & Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Piore M. J., Sabel C. F.The Second Industrial Divide (1984) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Porter M. E., Kramer M. R. The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2002) 80:56–68Google Scholar
  • Powell W. W. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Res. Organ. Behav. (1990) 12:295–336Google Scholar
  • Powell W. W., DiMaggio P. The capitalist firm in the twenty-first century: Emerging patterns in western enterprise. The Twenty-First Century Firm: Changing Economic Organization in International Perspective (2001) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Prahalad C. K.The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty Through Profits (2005) (Wharton School Publishing, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Pugh D. S., Hickson D. J., Hinings C. R. An empirical taxonomy of structures of work organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1969) 14:115–126CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pugh D. S., Hickson D. J., Hinings C. R., Turner C. Dimensions of organizational structure. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1968) 13:65–105CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reich R. B.The Work of Nations (1991) (Vintage Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Rodrik D. Symposium on globalization: An introduction. J. Econom. Perspect. (1998) 12:3–8CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosen S., Simon J., Vincent J. R., MacLeod W., Fox M., Thea D. M. AIDS is your business. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2003) 81:80–87Google Scholar
  • Ruef M. The emergence of organizational forms: A community ecology approach. Amer. J. Sociol. (2000) 106(3):658–714CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Russo M. V., Fouts P. A. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Acad. Management J. (1997) 40:534–559CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schneitz K. E., Epstein M. C. Exploring the financial value of a reputation for corporate social responsibility during a crisis. Corporate Reputation Rev. (2005) 7:327–345CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schoonhoven C. B., Tsui A. S., Bian Y., Cheng L. The emergence of China's private sector firms: Theory development in the midst of evolving institutional and industrial conditions. China's Domestic Private Firms: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Management and Performance (2006) (ME Sharpe Publishers, New York) 479–508Google Scholar
  • Schoonhoven C. B., Romanelli E., Schoonhoven C. B., Romanelli E. Introduction: Premises of the entrepreneurship dynamic. The Entrepreneurship Dynamic: Origins of Entrepreneurship and the Evolution of Industries (2001) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) 1–10Google Scholar
  • Schultz M., Hatch M. J. Building theory from practice. Strategic Organ. (2005) 3:337–348CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott W. R. Reflections on a half-century of organizational sociology. Annual Rev. Sociol. (2004) 30:1–21CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Selsky J. W., Parker B. Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. J. Management (2005) 31:849–873CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Slaughter M. J. Globalisation and employment by U.S. multinationals: A framework and facts. Daily Tax Report (2004) March 26Google Scholar
  • Spicer A. Revolutionary change and organizational form: The politics of investment fund organization in Russia, 1992–1997. Res. Sociol. Organ. (2002) 19:91–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Starbuck W. H., van de Ven A. H., Joyce W. F. A trip to view the elephants and rattlesnakes in the garden of Aston. Perspectives on Organizational Design and Behavior (1981) (Wiley and Sons, New York) 167–198Google Scholar
  • Starbuck W. H. Shouldn't organization theory emerge from adolescence? Organization (2003a) 10:439–452CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Starbuck W. H., Tsoukas H., Knudsen C. The origins of organization theory. The Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory: Meta-Theoretical Perspectives (2003b) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 143–182Google Scholar
  • Starkey K., Madan P. Bridging the relevance gap: Aligning stakeholders in the future of management research. British J. Management (2001) 12(Special Issue):S3–S26CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Staw B. M. Organizational behavior: A review and reformulation of the field's outcome variables. Annual Rev. Psych. (1984) 35:627–666CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stern R. N., Barley S. R. Organizations and social systems: Organization theory's neglected mandate. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:146–162CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strang D., Macy M. W. In search of excellence: Fads, success stories, and adaptive emulation. Amer. J. Sociol. (2001) 107:147–182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sundaram A. K., Black J. S. The environment and internal organization of multinational enterprises. Acad. Management Rev. (1992) 17:729–757CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Susman G. I., Evered R. D. An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1978) 23:582–603CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Tranfield D., Starkey K. The nature, social organization and promotion of management research: Towards policy. British J. Management (1998) 9:341–353CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsui A. S., Pearce J. L., Porter L. W., Tripoli A. M. Alternative approaches to the employee-organization relationship: Does investment in employees pay off? Acad. Management J. (1997) 40:1089–1121CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uchitelle L.The Disposable American: Layoffs and their Consequences (2006) (Alfred A. Knopf, New York) Google Scholar
  • UNCTAD United Nations Conference on Trade and Development: World Investment Report. (1996) . United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • UNCTAD United Nations Conference on Trade and Development: World Investment Report. (2000) . United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • UNCTAD United Nations Conference on Trade and Development: World Investment Report. (2004) . United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Small Business Administration Advocacy Small Business Statistics and Research. (2006) . Retrieved February 4, 2006, http://www.sba.gov/advo/stats/sbfaq.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Useem M.Investor Capitalism: How Money Managers Are Changing the Face of Corporate America (1996) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:35–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Maanen J., Kunda G. Real feelings: Emotional expression and organizational culture. Res. Organ. Behav. (1989) 11:43–103Google Scholar
  • Vernon R.In the Hurricane's Eye: The Troubled Prospects of Multinational Enterprises (1998) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walsh J. P. Book review essay: Taking stock of stakeholder theory. Acad. Management Rev. (2005) 30:426–438CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walsh J. P., Seward J. K. On the efficiency of internal and external corporate control mechanisms. Acad. Management Rev. (1990) 15:421–458CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walsh J. P., Kress J. C., Beyerchen K. W. Book review essay: Promises and perils at the bottom of the pyramid. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50:473–482CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walsh J. P., Weber K., Margolis J. D. Social issues and management: Our lost cause found. J. Management (2003) 29:859–881Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E.The Social Psychology of Organizing (1969) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E. Gapping the relevance bridge: Fashions meet fundamentals in management research. British J. Management (2001) 12(Special Issue):S71–S75CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O.Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Anti-Trust Implications (1975) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. The theory of the firm as governance structure: From choice to contract. J. Econom. Perspect. (2002) 16:171–195CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Willmott H. Strength is ignorance; slavery is freedom: Managing culture in modern organizations. J. Management Stud. (1993) 30:515–543CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou X., Zhao W., Li Q., Cai H. Embeddedness and contractual relationships in China's transitional economy. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2003) 68:75–102CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zuboff S.In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power (1988) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.