Aspiration Performance and Railroads’ Patterns of Learning from Train Wrecks and Crashes

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0239

References

  • Aldrich H. E., Auster E. R., Staw B. M., Cummings L. L. Even dwarfs started small: Liabilities of age and size and their strategic implications. Research in Organizational Behavior (1986) 8(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 165–198Google Scholar
  • Argote L. Group and organizational learning curves: Individual, system and environmental components. British J. Soc. Psych. (1993) 32:1–21CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L.Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge (1999) (Kluwer, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Argote L., Beckman S., Epple D. The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Sci. (1990) 36:140–154LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Argyris C.Overcoming Organizational Defenses: Facilitating Organizational Learning (1990) (Ally and Bacon, Wellesley, MA) Google Scholar
  • Audia P. G., Locke E. A., Smith K. G. The paradox of success: An archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following a radical environmental change. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43:837–853CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Ingram P. L. Survival-enhancing learning in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898–1980. Management Sci. (1998) 44:996–1016LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A., Li S. X., Usher J. M. Making the next move: How experiential and vicarious learning shape the locations of chains’ acquisitions. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45:766–801CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Rowley T., Shipilov A. V., Chuang Y.-T. Dancing with strangers: Aspiration performance and the search for underwriting syndicate partners. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50:536–575CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baumard P., Starbuck W. H. Learning from failures: Why it may not happen. Long Range Planning (2005) 38:281–298CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bromiley P. Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34:37–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cannon M. D., Edmondson A. C. Failing to learn and learning to fail (intelligently): How great organizations put failure to work to innovate and improve. Long Range Planning (2005) 38:299–319CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chuang Y.-T., Baum J. A. C. It’s all in the name: Failure-induced learning by multiunit chains. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48:33–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Darr E. D., Kurtzberg T. R. An investigation of partner similarity dimensions on knowledge transfer. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2000) 82:28–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Darr E., Argote L., Epple D. The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: Productivity in franchises. Management Sci. (1995) 41:1750–1762LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Denrell J. Vicarious learning, under-sampling of failure, and the myths of management. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14:227–243LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Evans A. W. Fatal train accidents on Britain’s mainline railways. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A—Statist. Soc. (2000) 163(Academy of Science, Briarcliff, NY) 99–119Part 1CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations (1954) 7:117–140CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Finkelstein S.Why Smart Executives Fail and What You Can Learn from Their Mistakes (2003) (Portfolio, New York) Google Scholar
  • Foster A. D., Rosenzweig M. R. Learning by doing and learning from others: Human capital and technical change in agriculture. J. Political Econom. (1995) 104:1176–1209CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G., Levinthal D. A. Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45:113–137CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (2000) 3rd ed.(Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
  • Greve H. R. Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43:58–77CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve H. R.Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change (2003) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haleblian J., Kim J.-Y., Rajagopalan N. The influence of acquisition experience and performance on acquisition behavior: Evidence from the U.S. commercial banking industry. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49:357–370CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haunschild P. R., Rhee M. The role of volition in organizational learning: The case of automotive product recalls. Management Sci. (2004) 50:1545–1560LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Haunschild P. R., Sullivan B. Learning from complexity: Effects of accident/incident heterogeneity on airline learning. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47:609–643CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huber G. P. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:88–115LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ingram P., Baum J. A. C. Opportunity and constraint: Organizations’ learning from the operating and competitive experience of industries. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(Special Issue):75–98CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ingram P., Simons T. The transfer of experience in groups of organizations: Implications for performance and competition. Management Sci. (2002) 48:1517–1533LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Irwin D. A., Klenow P. J. Learning-by-doing spillovers in the semiconductor industry. J. Political Econom. (1994) 102:1200–1227CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaccard J., Turrisi R., Wan C. K.Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression (1990) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Jacobson R. Unobservable effects and business performance. Marketing Sci. (1990) 9:74–85LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Judge G. G., Griffiths W. E., Hill R. C., Lutkepohl H., Lee T.-C.The Theory and Practice of Econometrics (1985) 2nd ed.(John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: Analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47:263–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kennedy P.A Guide to Econometrics (1992) 4th ed.(MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Kim J.-Y. Crash test without dummies: A longitudinal study of interorganizational learning from failure experience in the U.S. commercial banking industry, 1984–1998. (2000) 1984–1998Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
  • Kim J.-Y., Miner A. S. Vicarious learning from the failure and near-failure of others: Evidence from the U.S. commercial banking industry. Acad. Management J. (2006) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Kmenta J.Elements of Econometrics (1971) (Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
  • Lant T. K. Aspiration level adaptation: An empirical exploration. Management Sci. (1992) 38:623–644LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lant T. K., Baum J. A. C., Scott W. R., Christensen S. Cognitive sources of socially constructed competitive groups: Examples from the Manhattan hotel industry. The Institutional Construction of Organization (1995) (Sage)15–39Google Scholar
  • Lant T. K., Milliken F. J., Batra B. The role of managerial learning and interpretation in strategic persistence and reorientation: An empirical exploration. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13:585–608CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lapré M. A., Mukherjee A. S., Van Wassenhove L. N. Behind the learning curve: Linking learning activities to waste reduction. Management Sci. (2000) 46:597–611LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lester R. K., McCabe M. J. The effect of industrial structure on learning by doing in nuclear power plant operation. RAND J. Econom. (1993) 24:418–438CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levin D. Z. Organizational learning and the transfer of knowledge: An investigation of quality improvement. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11:630–647LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D. A., March J. G. A model of adaptive organizational search. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1981) 2:307–333CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D. A., March J. G. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:95–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D. A., Rerup C. Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17:502–513LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B., March J. G. Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1988) 14:319–40CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lieberman M. B., Montgomery D. B. First-mover advantages. Strategic Management J. (1988) 9:41–58CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lindblom C. E. The science of muddling through. Public Admin. Rev. (1959) 14:79–88CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luczak M. On the record...with Norfolk Southern’s safety department. Railway Age (2006) 207(6):10Google Scholar
  • March J. G. Variable risk preferences and adaptive aspirations. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1988) 9:5–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:71–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G., Shapira Z. Variable risk preferences and the focus of attention. Psych. Rev. (1992) 99:172–183CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G., Simon H. A.Organizations (1958) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Mezias S. J., Chen Y., Murphy P. Aspiration-level adaptation in an American financial services organization: A field study. Management Sci. (2002) 48:1285–1301LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Miller D., Chen M.-J. Sources and consequences of competitive inertia: A study of the U.S. airline industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39:1–23CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller K. D., Chen W.-R. Variable organizational risk preferences: Tests of the March-Shapira model. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47:105–116CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milliken F. J., Lant T. K., Lamb R., Shrivastava P. The effect of an organization’s recent performance history on strategic persistence and change: The role of managerial interpretations. Advances in Strategic Management (1991) 7(JAI Press, Stamford, CT) 129–156Google Scholar
  • Miner A. S., Baum J. A. C., Singh J. V. Seeking adaptive advantage: Evolutionary theory and managerial action. Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations (1994) (Oxford University Press, New York) 76–89Google Scholar
  • Miner A. S., Haunschild P. R., Cummings L. L., Staw B. M. Population level learning. Research in Organizational Behavior (1995) 17(JAI Press, Stamford, CT) 115–166Google Scholar
  • Miner A. S., Kim J.-Y., Holzinger I., Haunschild P., Miner A. S., Anderson P. Fruits of failure: Organizational level failure and population level learning. Advances in Strategic Management: Population Level Learning and Industry Change (1999) 16(JAI Press, Stamford, CT) 187–220Google Scholar
  • Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • NTSBWe Are All Safer (1998) . NTSB-inspired Improvements in Safety. National Transportation Safety Board, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  • Ocasio W., Cummings L. L., Staw B. M. The enactment of economic adversity: A reconciliation of theories of failure-induced change and threat-rigidity. Research in Organizational Behavior (1995) 17(JAI Press, Stamford, CT) 287–331Google Scholar
  • Oliver C. The antecedents of deinstitutionalization. Organ. Stud. (1992) 13:563–588CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perrow C.Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies (1984) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Petroski H.Design Paradigms: Case Histories of Error and Judgment in Engineering (1994) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Salancile G. R.The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (1978) (Harper & Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Pisano G., Bohmer R., Edmondson A. Organizational differences in rates of learning: Evidence from the adoption of minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Management Sci. (2001) 47:752–768LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Popper K.The Logic of Scientific Discovery [Logik der Forschung] (1959) (Hutchinson, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Porac J., Thomas H., Wilson F., Paton D., Kanfer A. Rivalry and the industry model of Scottish knitwear producers. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40:203–227CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reger R. K., Huff A. S. Strategic groups: A cognitive perspective. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:103–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rerup C. Success, failure and the gray zone: How organizations learn (or don’t) from ambiguous experience. Acad. Management Best Paper Proc. (2006) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts K. H., Rousseau D. M. Research in nearly failure-free, high reliability systems: “Having the bubble”. IEEE Trans. (1989) 36:132–139CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rochlin G. I., Roberts K. H. Defining high-reliability organizations in practice: A taxonomic prologue. New Challenges to Understanding Organizations (1993) (Macmillan, New York) 11–32Google Scholar
  • Rose N. L. Profitability and product quality: Economic determinants of airline safety performance. J. Political Econom. (1993) 98:944–964CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenkopf L., Nerkar A. Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration and impact in the optical disc industry. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:287–306CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singh J. V. Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making. Acad. Management J. (1986) 29:562–585CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sitkin S. B., Cummings L. L., Staw B. M. Learning through failure: The strategy of small losses. Research in Organizational Behavior (1992) 14(JAI Press, Stamford, CT) 231–266Google Scholar
  • Starbuck W. H., Farjoun M.Organization at the Limit (2005) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Starbuck W. H., Milliken F. J. Challenger: Fine-tuning the odds until something breaks. J. Management Stud. (1988) 25:319–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson P. How much did the Liberty Shipbuilders learn? New evidence for an old case study. J. Political Econom. (2001) 109:103–137CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thornton R. A., Thompson P. Learning from experience and learning from others: An exploration of learning and spillovers in wartime shipbuilding. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2001) 91:1350–1368CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vaughan D.The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture and Deviance at NASA (1996) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E., Sutcliffe K. M.Managing the Unexpected (2001) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E., Sutcliffe K. M. Mindfulness and the quality of organizational attention. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17:514–524LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weick K. E., Sutcliffe K. M., Obstfeld D., Sutton R., Staw B. Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. Research in Organizational Behavior (1999) 21(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 81–123Google Scholar
  • Weiner B.Perceiving the Causes of Success and Failure (1971) (General Learning Press, Morristown, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Weiner B. An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psych. Rev. (1985) 92:548–573CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wolf G. New strategies for derailment prevention. Railway Age (1997) 198(12):41–43Google Scholar
  • Wolf G. Early detection is the key. Railway Age (1998) 199(2):49–51Google Scholar
  • Yelle L. E. The learning curve: Historical review and comprehensive survey. Decision Sci. (1979) 10:302–328CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zimmerman M. B. Learning effects and the commercialization of new energy technologies: The case of nuclear power. Bell J. Econom. (1982) 13:297–310CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.