Antecedents of Convergence and Divergence in Strategic Positioning: The Effects of Performance and Aspiration on the Direction of Strategic Change

References

• Alchian A. A. Uncertainty, evolution and economic theory. J. Political Econom. (1950) 58(3):211–221Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson P., Miner A. S., Anderson P. Collective interpretation and collective action in population-level learning: Technology choice in the American cement industry. Population-Level Learning and Industry Change (1999) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 277–307Google Scholar
• Argote L., Beckman S., Epple D. The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Sci. (1990) 36:140–154Link, Google Scholar
• Audia P. G., Locke E. A., Smith K. G. The paradox of success: An archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following radical environmental change. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43(5):837–853Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandura A.Social Learning Theory (1977) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Baum J. A. C., Lant T. K., Scott W. T., Christensen S. Cognitive sources of socially constrained and competitive groups: Examples from the Manhattan hotel industry. The Institutional Construction of Organizations (1995) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 15–38Google Scholar
• Beckman C. M., Haunschild P. R. Network learning: The effects of partners’ heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47(1):92–125Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowman E. H. A risk/return paradox for strategic management. Sloan Management Rev. (1980) 21(3):17–31Google Scholar
• Bowman E. H. Risk seeking by troubled firms. Sloan Management Rev. (1982) 23(4):33–42Google Scholar
• Bromiley P. Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34(1):37–59Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bromiley P., Miller K. D., Rau D. Risk in strategic management research. Blackwell Handbook Strategic Management (2001) 259–288Google Scholar
• Burns L. R., Wholey D. R. Adoption and abandonment of matrix management programs: Effects of organizational characteristics and interorganizational networks. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(1):106–138Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cialdini R. B.Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion (1984) (Quill, New York) Google Scholar
• Conell C., Cohn S. Learning from other people’s actions: Environmental variation and diffusion in French coal mining. Amer. J. Sociol. (1995) 101(2):366–403Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cool K., Dierickx I. Rivalry, strategic group and firm profitability. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:47–59Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cool K. O., Schendel D. E. Strategic group formation and performance: The case of the U.S. pharmaceutical industry, 1963–1982. Management Sci. (1987) 13(9):1102–1124Link, Google Scholar
• Cool K., Roller L.-H., Leleux B. The relative impact of actual and potential rivalry on firm profitability in the pharmaceutical. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20(1):1–14Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Blackwell, Malden, MA) Google Scholar
• Deephouse D. L. To be different, or to be the same? It’s a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20(2):147–166Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1983) 48(April):147–160Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations (1954) 7:117–140Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiegenbaum A. Prospect theory and the risk-return association: An empirical examination in 85 industries. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1990) 14:187–203Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiegenbaum A., Thomas H. Dynamic and risk measurement perspectives on Bowman’s risk-return paradox for strategic management: An empirical study. Strategic Management J. (1986) 7:395–407Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiegenbaum A., Thomas H. Attitudes toward risk and the risk-return paradox: Prospect theory explanations. Acad. Management J. (1988) 31:85–106Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiegenbaum A., Thomas H. Industry and strategic group dynamics: Competitive strategy in the insurance industry, 1970–84. J. Management Stud. (1993) 30(1):69–105Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiegenbaum A., Thomas H. Strategic groups as reference groups: Theory, modeling and empirical examination of industry and competitive strategy. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16(6):461–476Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiegenbaum A., Hart S., Schendel D. Strategic reference point theory. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(3):219–235Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S., Hambrick D. C. Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(3):484–503Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geletkanycz M. A., Hambrick D. C. The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(4):654–681Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gimeno J., Woo C. Y. Hypercompetition in a multimarket environment: The role of strategic similarity and multimarket contact in competitive de-escalation. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(3):322–341Link, Google Scholar
• Greve H. R. Performance, aspirations and risky organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43(1):58–86Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve H. R. A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Acad. Management J. (2003a) 46(6):685–702Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve H. R.Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback (2003b) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve H. R. Interorganizational learning and heterogeneous social structure. Organ. Stud. (2005) 26(7):1025–1047Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z. Hybrid corn: An exploration in economics of rechnological change. Econometrica (1957) 25:501–522Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R. Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(4):619–652Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hair J. F., Anderson R. E., Tatham R. L., Black W. C.Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings (1992) (Macmillan Publishing Company, New York) Google Scholar
• Haunschild P. R., Miner A. S. Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:472–500Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haunschild P. R., Sullivan B. N. Learning from complexity: Effects of prior accidents and incidents on airlines’ learning. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47(4):609–643Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman J. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica (1978) 46:1251–1271Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haveman H. Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38:593–627Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayward M. L. A., Hambrick D. C. Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: Evidence of CEO hubris. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(1):103–127Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herriott S. R., Levinthal D., March J. G. Learning from experience in organizations. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1985) 75:298–302Google Scholar
• Hiller N. J., Hambrick D. C. Conceptualizing executive hubris: The role of (hyper-)core self-evaluations in strategic decision-making. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26(4):297–319Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsiao C.Analysis of Panel Data (2003) 2nd ed.(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hunt M. Competition in the major home appliance industry, 1960–1970. (1972) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47:263–291Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelley H. H., Michela J. L. Attribution theory and research. Annual. Rev. Psych. (1980) 31:457–501Crossref, Google Scholar
• Korn H. J., Baum J. A. C. Chance, imitative, and strategic antecedents to multimarket contact. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42(2):171–193Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraatz M. S. Learning by association? Interorganizational networks and adaptation to environmental change. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41(6):621–643Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D. QAP partialling as a test for spuriousness. Soc. Networks (1987) 9:171–186Crossref, Google Scholar
• Labianca G., Fairbank J. F., Thomas J. B., Gioia D. A., Umphress E. E. Emulation in academia: Balancing structure and identity. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(3):312–330Link, Google Scholar
• Lant T. K. Aspiration level adaptation: An empirical exploration. Management Sci. (1992) 38(5):623–644Link, Google Scholar
• Lant T. K., Mezias S. J. An organizational learning model of convergence and reorientation. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(1):47–71Link, Google Scholar
• Lehner J. M. Shifts of reference points for framing of strategic decisions and changing risk-return association. Management Sci. (2000) 46(1):63–76Link, Google Scholar
• Lincoln J. R. Analyzing relations in dyads: Problems, models, and an application to interorganizational research. Sociol. Methods Res. (1984) 13:45–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lincoln J. R., Gerlach M. L., Takahashi P. Keiretsu networks in the Japanese economy: A dyad analysis of intercorporate ties. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1992) 57(5):561–585Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J. G., Shapira Z. Variable risk preferences and the focus of attention. Psych. Rev. (1992) 99:172–183Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mascarenhas B. Strategic group dynamics. Acad. Management J. (1989) 32(2):333–352Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D., Chen M.-J. Sources and consequences of competitive inertia: A study of the U.S. airline industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39(1):1–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D., Chen M.-J. Nonconformity in competitive repertoires: A sociological view of markets. Soc. Forces (1996) 74(4):1209–1234Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller K. D., Chen W.-R. Variable organizational risk preferences: Tests of the March-Shapira model. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(1):105–115Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miner A. S., Anderson P., Miner A. S., Anderson P. Industry and population-level learning: Organizational, interorganizational, and collective learning processes. Population-Level Learning and Industry Change (1999) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 1–30Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H., Ahlstrand B., Lampel J.Strategy Safari: A Guided Tour Through the Wilds of Strategic Management (1998) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Neter J., Wasserman W., Kutner M. H.Applied Linear Statistical Models (1985) (Irwin, Homewood, IL) Google Scholar
• Newman H. H. Strategic groups and the structure performance relationship. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1978) August):417–427Crossref, Google Scholar
• Osborne J. D., Stubbart C. I., Ramaprasad A. Strategic groups and competitive enactment: A study of dynamic relationships between mental models and performance. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22(5):435–454Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peteraf M. A. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:179–191Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porac J. F., Thomas H., Baden-Fuller C. Competitive groups as cognitive communities: The case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers. J. Management Stud. (1989) 26(4):397–416Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porac J. F., Thomas H., Wilson F., Paton D., Kanfer A. Rivalry and the industry model of Scottish knitwear producers. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(2):203–227Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter M. E. How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1979a) 80(2):137–145Google Scholar
• Porter M. E. The structure within industries and companies’ performance. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1979b) May):214–227Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter M. E. What is strategy? Harvard Bus. Rev. (1996) 74(6):61–78Google Scholar
• Reger R. K., Huff A. S. Strategic groups: A cognitive perspective. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:103–124Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rumelt R. P., Schendel D. E., Teece D. J., Rumelt R. P., Schendel D. E., Teece D. J. Fundamental issues in strategy. Fundamental Issues in Strategy. A Research Agenda (1994) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) 9–53Google Scholar
• Singh J. V. Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making. Acad. Management J. (1986) 29(3):562–585Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staw B. M., McKechnie P. I., Puffer S. M. The justification of organizational performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1983) 28(4):582–600Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart T. E. Network positions and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43(3):668–698Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal J. D., Seidel M.-D. L., Stewart K. J. Second-order imitation: Uncovering latent effects of board network ties. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46(4):717–747Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiseman R. M., Bromiley P. Toward a model of risk in declining organizations: An empirical examination of risk, performance and decline. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(5):524–543Link, Google Scholar
• Zott C. Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intraindustry differential firm performance: Insights from a simulation study. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(2):97–125Crossref, Google Scholar