Incentives to Cheat: The Influence of Executive Compensation and Firm Performance on Financial Misrepresentation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0241

References

  • Agrawal A., Chadha S. Corporate governance and accounting scandals. J. Law Econom. (2005) 48(2):371–406CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • AICPA Statement on Auditing Standards (Sas) 53. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Professional Standards (1993) (AICPA, New York) Google Scholar
  • Aier J. K., Comprix J., Gunlock M. T., Lee D. The financial expertise of CFOS and accounting restatements. Accounting Horizons (2005) 19(3):123–135CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alexander C. R., Cohen M. A. New evidence on the origins of corporate crime. Managerial Decision Econom. (1996) 17:421–435CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arthaud-Day M., Certo S. T., Dalton C. M., Dalton D. R. A changing of the guard: Executive and director turnover following corporate financial restatements. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(6):1119–1136CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Badertscher B., Phillips J., Pincus M., Rego S. O. Tax implications of earnings management activities: Evidence from restatements. (2005) . Working paper. http://ssrn.com/abstract=888564Google Scholar
  • Baucus M. S., Baucus D. A. Paying the piper: An empirical examination of longer-term financial consequences of illegal corporate behavior. Acad. Management J. (1997) 40(1):129–151CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baucus M. S., Near J. P. Can illegal corporate behavior be predicted? An event history analysis. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34(1):9–36CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beasley M. S. An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. Accounting Rev. (1996) 71(4):443–465Google Scholar
  • Bebchuk L. A., Fried J. M. Executive compensation as an agency problem. J. Econom. Perspect. (2003) 17(3):71–92CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker C. L., Defond M. L., Jiambalvo J., Subramanyam K. R. The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Res. (1998) 15(1):1–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bowen H. P., Wiersema M. F. Modeling limited dependent variables: Methods and guidelines for researchers in strategic management. Research Methodology in Strategy Management (2004) 1(Elsevier Ltd., Oxford, UK) 87–134CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bromiley P.Corporate Capital Investment: A Behavioral Approach (1986) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Bromiley P. Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34(1):37–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bromiley P., Marcus A. The deterrent to dubious corporate behavior: Profitability, probability and safety recalls. Strategic Management J. (1989) 10(3):233–250CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bulow J., Shoven J. B. Accounting for stock options. J. Econom. Perspect. (2005) 19(4):115–134CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burns N., Kedia S. The impact of performance-based compensation on misreporting. J. Financial Econom. (2006) 79:35–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burns N., Kedia S., Lipson M. The effects of institutional ownership and monitoring: Evidence from financial restatements. (2006) . Working paper. http://ssrn.com/abstract=880788Google Scholar
  • Cannella A. A., Fraser D. R., Lee D. S. Firm failure and managerial labor markets: Evidence from Texas banking. J. Financial Econom. (1995) 38:185–210CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cassidy J. The greed cycle. The New Yorker (2002) September 23):64–77Google Scholar
  • Clinard M. B., Yeager P. C.Corporate Crime (1980) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Cochran P. L., Nigh D., Frederick W. C. Illegal corporate behavior and the question of moral agency: An empirical examination. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy (1987) 9(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 73–91Google Scholar
  • Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963/1992) 2nd ed.(Blackwell, Malden, MA) Google Scholar
  • Daboub A. J., Rasheed A. M. A., Priem R. L., Gray D. A. Top management team characteristics and corporate illegal activity. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(1):138–170CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daily C. M., Dalton D. R. Bankruptcy and corporate governance: The impact of board composition and structure. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37:1603–1617CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dechow P. M., Skinner D. J. Earnings management: Reconciling the views of accounting academics, practitioners, and regulators. Accounting Horizons (2000) 14(2):235–250CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dechow P. M., Sloan R. G., Sweeney A. P. Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Res. (1996) 13(1–36Google Scholar
  • Deephouse D. L., Wiseman R. M. Comparing alternative explanations for corporate risk-return relations. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2000) 42:463–482CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Degeorge F., Patel J., Zeckhauser R. Earnings management to exceed thresholds. J. Bus. (1999) 72:1–33CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Desai H., Hogan C. E., Wilkins M. S. The reputational penalty for aggressive accounting: Earnings restatements and management turnover. Accounting Rev. (2006) 81(1):83–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dlugosz J., Fahlenbrach R., Gompers P., Metrick A. Large blocks of stock: Prevalence, size, and measurement. J. Corporate Finance (2006) 12:594–618CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dunn P. The impact of insider power on fraudulent financial reporting. J. Management (2004) 30(3):397–412CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eliasson G.Business Economic Planning (1976) (Wiley, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Erickson M., Hanlon M., Maydew E. L. Is there a link between executive equity incentives and accounting fraud? J. Accounting Res. (2006) 44(1):113–143CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Farber D. B. Restoring trust after fraud: Does corporate governance matter? Accounting Rev. (2005) 80(2):539–561CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiegenbaum A. Prospect theory and the risk-return association: An empirical examination in 85 industries. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1990) 14:187–203CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiegenbaum A., Thomas H. Dynamic and risk measurement perspectives on Bowman’s risk-return paradox for strategic management: An empirical study. Strategic Management J. (1986) 7:395–407CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiegenbaum A., Thomas H. Attitudes toward risk and the risk-return paradox: Prospect theory explanations. Acad. Management J. (1988) 31:85–106CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L., Bromiley P. Working harder or working smarter? Aspirations, innovation, and breakthroughs. Strategic Management Soc. Internat. Conf. (2002) Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  • Gooding R. Z., Goel S., Wiseman R. M. Fixed versus variable reference points in the risk-return relationship. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1996) 29(2):331–350CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve H. Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43(1):58–77CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve H. Sticky aspirations: Organizational time perspective and competitiveness. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(1):1–17LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Greve H. A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Acad. Management J. (2003a) 46(6):685–702CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve H. Investment and the behavioral theory of the firm: Evidence from shipbuilding. Indust. Corporate Change (2003b) 12(5):1051–1076CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall B. J. Six challenges in designing equity-based pay. J. Appl. Corporate Finance (2003) 15(3):21–33CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall B. J., Liebman J. B. Are CEOs really paid like bureaucrats? Quart. J. Econom. (1998) 113(3):653–691CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall B. J., Murphy K. J. The trouble with stock options. J. Econom. Perspect. (2003) 17(3):49–70CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hambrick D. C., D’Aveni R. A. Large corporate failures as downward spirals. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1988) 33:1–23CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen J. V., McDonald J. B., Messier W. F., Bell T. B. A generalized qualitative-response model and the analysis of management fraud. Management Sci. (1996) 42(7):1022–1032LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hill C. W. L., Kelley P. C., Agle B. R., Hitt M. A., Hoskisson R. E. An empirical examination of the causes of corporate wrongdoing in the United States. Human Relations (1992) 45(10):1055–1077CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holford T.Multivariate Methods in Epidemiology (2002) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jenkins D. S., Kane G. D., Velury U. Earnings quality decline and the effect of industry specialist auditors: An analysis of the late 1990s. J. Accounting Public Policy (2006) 25:71–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen M. C., Murphy K. J. CEO incentives—It’s not how much you pay, but how. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1990) 68(3):138–149Google Scholar
  • Jensen M. C., Murphy K. J. Remuneration: Where we’ve been, how we got to here, what are the problems, and how to fix them. (2004) . Harvard Business School NOM Research Paper. http://ssrn.com/abstract=561305Google Scholar
  • Kane E. J. Continuing dangers of disinformation in corporate accounting reports. Rev. Financial Econom. (2004) 13:149–164CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan S., Henderson R. Inertia and incentives: Bridging organizational economics and organizational theory. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(5):509–521LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kedia S., Philippon T. The economics of fraudulent accounting. (2006) . Working paper. NBER Working Paper Series, Vol. 11573. www.nber.org/papers/w11573Google Scholar
  • King A. A., Lenox M. J. Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry’s responsible care program. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43(4):698–716CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kinney W. R., Palmrose Z.-V., Scholz S. Auditor independence, non-audit services, and restatements: Was the U.S. government right? J. Accounting Res. (2004) 42(3):561–588CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lange D. A. A study of controversial organizational action: Organizational action and audience reaction in the context of earnings restatement. (2005) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin, TXGoogle Scholar
  • Lant T. Aspiration level adaptation: An empirical exploration. Management Sci. (1992) 38(5):623–644LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D., March J. G. A model of adaptive organizational search. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1981) 2:307–333CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacLean T. Reframing organizational misconduct: A study of deceptive sales practices at a major life insurance company. Bus. Soc. (2002) 41(2):242–250CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G., Shapira Z. Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Sci. (1987) 33(11):1404–1418LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G., Simon H. A.Organizations (1958/1993) 2nd ed.(Blackwell, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Margolis J. D., Walsh J. P. Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48:268–305CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKendall M. A., Wagner J. A. Motive, opportunity, choice, and corporate illegality. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8(6):624–647LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Meyers M. Economists debate the role of technology in ’90s boom. Star Tribune (2003) January 4Google Scholar
  • Mezias S. J., Chen Y.-R., Murphy P. R. Aspiration-level adaptation in an American financial services organization: A field study. Management Sci. (2002) 48(10):1285–1300LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Miller K. D., Bromiley P. Strategic risk and corporate performance: An analysis of alternative risk measures. Acad. Management J. (1990) 33(4):756–779CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller K. D., Chen W. Variable organizational risk preferences: Tests of the March-Shapira model. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(1):105–115CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller K. D., Leiblein M. J. Corporate risk-return relations: Returns variablility versus downside risk. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39(1):91–122CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O’Connor J., Priem R., Coombs J., Gilley K. M. Do CEO stock options prevent or promote fraudulent financial reporting? Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(3):483–500CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palmer T., Wiseman R. M. Decoupling risk taking from income stream uncertainty: A holistic approach. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20:1037–1062CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rezaee Z. Causes, consequences, and deterence of financial statement fraud. Critical Perspect. Accounting (2005) 16(3):277–298CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ronen J., Tzur J., Yaari V. The effect of directors’ equity incentives on earnings management. J. Accounting Public Policy (2006) 25:359–389CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rynes S. L., Gerhart B.Compensation in Organizations: Current Research and Practice (2000) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
  • Sanders W. G. Behavioral responses of CEOs to stock ownership and stock option pay. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(3):477–492CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sanders W. G., Carpenter M. Strategic satisficing? A behavioral-agency theory perspective on stock repurchase program announcements. Acad. Management J. (2003) 46(2):160–178CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schnatterly K. Increasing firm value through detection and prevention of white-collar crime. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24:587–614CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • SEC (1992) . Standard instructions for filing forms under the Securities Act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975: Regulation S-K, Item 402(c)Google Scholar
  • Sheehe P. R. Dynamic risk analysis in retrospective matched pair studies of disease. Biometrics (1962) 18(3):323–341CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shleifer A., Vishny R. A survey of corporate governance. J. Finance (1997) 52:737–783CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H. A.Models of My Life (1991) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Singh J. Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making. Acad. Management J. (1986) 29(3):562–585CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Srinivasan S. Consequences of financial reporting failure for outside directors: Evidence from accounting restatements and audit committee members. J. Accounting Res. (2005) 43(2):291–334CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Staubus G. J. Ethics failures in corporate financial reporting. J. Bus. Ethics (2005) 57:5–15CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Staw B. M., Szwajkowski E. The scarcity-munificence component of organizational environments and the commission of illegal acts. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1975) 20(3):345–354CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Szwajkowski E. Organizational illegality: Theoretical integration and illustrative application. Acad. Management Rev. (1985) 10(3):558–567CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tucker J. W., Zarowin P. A. Does income smoothing improve earnings informativeness? Accounting Rev. (2006) 81(1):251–270CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. General Accounting Office Financial statement restatements: Trends, market impacts, regulatory responses, and remaining challenges. (2002) . Gao-03-138, General Accounting Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  • U.S. General Accounting Office Financial statement restatement database. (2003) . Gao-03-395r, General Accounting Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  • Varian H. R. Economic scene. The New York Times (2002) March 14Google Scholar
  • Wiesenfeld B. M., Wurthmann K., Hambrick D. C. Stigmatization and devaluation of elites associated with corporate failures: An enhanced model of “settling up”. Acad. Management Rev. (2006) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Wiseman R. M., Bromiley P. Toward a model of risk in declining organizations: An empirical examination of risk, performance and decline. Organ. Sci. (1996) 524–543LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wiseman R. M., Catanach A. A longitudinal disaggregation of operational risk under changing regulations: Evidence from the savings and loan industry. Acad. Management J. (1997) 40:799–830CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wiseman R. M., Gomez-Mejia L. R. A behavioral agency model of managerial risk taking. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(1):133–154CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wooldridge J.Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Young C. Trends in executive compensation. J. Bus. Strategy (1998) 19(2):21–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.