What Competition? Myopic Self-Focus in Market-Entry Decisions

References

• Alvarez S., Busenitz L. The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory. J. Management (2001) 27:755–775Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amit R., Schoemaker P. J. H. Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:33–46Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audretsch D. B. New-firm survival and the technological regime. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1991) 73:441–450Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psych. Rev. (1977) 84:191–215Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J. B.Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage (1995) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Baron R. A., Ward T. B. Expanding entrepreneurial cognition’s toolbox: Potential contributions from the field of cognitive science. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice (2004) 28:553–573Crossref, Google Scholar
• Busenitz L. W. Cognitive biases in strategic decision making: Heuristics as a differentiator between managers in large organizations and entrepreneurs. (1992) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, TXGoogle Scholar
• Busenitz L. W. Entrepreneurial risk and strategic decision making: It’s a matter of perspective. J. Appl. Behavioral Sci. (1999) 35:325–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Busenitz L., Barney J. Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations; biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. J. Bus. Venturing (1997) 12:9–31Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C. F., Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory in the wild: Evidence from the field. Choices, Values, and Frames (2000) (Russell Sage Foundation, New York) 288–300Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C. F., Lovallo D. Overconfidence and excess entry: An experimental approach. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1999) 89:306–318Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll G. R., Hannan M. T. Density delay in the evolution of organizational populations: A model and five empirical tests. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1989) 34:411Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper A. C., Woo C. Y., Dunkelberg W. C. Entrepreneurs’ perceived chances for success. J. Bus. Venturing (1988) 3:97–109Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert R., March J.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Daniel K., Hirshleifer D., Sabrahmanyam A. Investor psychology and security market under- and overreactions. J. Finance (1998) 53:1839–1885Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dun & Bradstreet Business failure record: A comparative statistical analysis of geographic and industry trends in business failures in the United States. (1997a) . Report, Dun & Bradstreet, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Dun & Bradstreet Business starts record: A comparative statistical analysis of geographic and industry trends in business failures in the United States. (1997b) . Report, Dun & Bradstreet, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Dunne T., Roberts M. J., Samuelson L. Patterns of firm entry and exit in U.S. manufacturing industries. RAND J. Econom. (1988) 19:495–515Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fujita M., Krugman P., Venables A. J.The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade (2001) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Gaglio C. M., Katz J. A. Opportunity identification: Review, critique and suggested research directions. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth (1997) 3(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 119–138Google Scholar
• Geroski P. A. What do we know about entry? Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (1996) 13:421–441Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gripsrud G., Gronhaug K. Structure and strategy in grocery retailing: A sociometric approach. J. Indust. Econom. (1985) 33:339–347Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta U.Done Deals: Venture Capitalists Tell Their Stories (2000) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Hannan M. T., Carroll G. R.Dynamics of Organizational Populations: Density, Legitimation, and Competition (1992) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan M., Freeman J.Organizational Ecology (1989) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen G., Wernerfelt B. Determinants of firm performance: The relative importance of economic and organizational factors. Strategic Management J. (1989) 10:399–411Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haveman H. A. Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38:593–628Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt M. A., Ireland R. D., Hosskinson R. E.Strategic Management and Competitive Globalization (2003) 5th ed.(South Western Publishing, Mason, OH) Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson G. P. The cognitive analysis of competitive structures: A review and critique. Human Relations (1997) 50:625Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hosmer D. W., Lemeshow S.Applied Logistic Regression (1989) (Wiley Interscience, New York) Google Scholar
• Kahneman D. A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. Amer. Psychologist (2003) 58:697–720Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Lovallo D. Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk and risk taking. Management Sci. (1993) 39:17–31Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Tversky A.Choices, Values, and Frames (2000) (Russell Sage Foundation, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirzner I. M.Perception, Opportunity and Profit (1979) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Klar Y., Giladi E. E. No one in my group can be below the group’s average: A robust positivity bias in favor of anonymous peers. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1997) 73:885–901Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klar Y., Giladi E. E. Are most people happier than their peers, or are they just happy? Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1999) 25:585–594Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kramer R. M., Newton E., Pommerenke P. L. Self-enhancement biases and negotiator judgment: Effects of self-esteem and mood. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1993) 56:110–133Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krueger F. N., Dickson P. How believing in ourselves increases risk taking: Self-efficacy and perceptions of opportunity and threat. Decision Sci. (1994) 25:385–400Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krueger J., Clement R. W. The truly false consensus effect: An ineradicable and egocentric bias in social perception. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1994) 67:596–610Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kruger J. Lake Wobegon be gone! The “below-average effect” and the egocentric nature of comparative ability judgments. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1999) 77:221–232Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langer E. J. The illusion of control. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1975) 32:311–328Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein S., Slovic P. Response-induced reversals of preference in gambling: An extended replication in Las Vegas. J. Experiment. Psych. (1973) 101:16–20Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mata J., Portugal P. Life duration of new firms. J. Indust. Econom. (1994) 42:227–246Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles M. B., Huberman A. M.Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Mitchell R. K., Busenitz L., Lant T., McDougall P. P., Morse E. A., Smith J. B. Toward a theory of entrepreneurial cognition: Rethinking the people side of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice (2002) 27:93–105Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore D. A. Myopic prediction, self-destructive secrecy, and the unexpected benefits of revealing final deadlines in negotiation. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2004a) 94:125–139Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore D. A. The unexpected benefits of final deadlines in negotiation. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (2004b) 40:121–127Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore D. A. Myopic biases in strategic social prediction: Why deadlines put everyone under more pressure than everyone else. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (2005) 31:668–679Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore D. A., Cain D. M. Overconfidence and underconfidence: When and why people underestimate (and overestimate) the competition. Organ. Behav. Human Decision ProcessesForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Moore D. A., Kim T. G. Myopic social prediction and the solo comparison effect. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2003) 85:1121–1135Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore D. A., Kurtzberg T. R., Fox C. R., Bazerman M. H. Positive illusions and forecasting errors in mutual fund investment decisions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1999) 79:95–114Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neale M. A., Bazerman M. H. The role of perspective-taking ability in negotiating under different forms of arbitration. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. (1983) 36:378–388Crossref, Google Scholar
• Northcraft G. B., Neale M. A. Expert, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1987) 39:228–241Crossref, Google Scholar
• Odean T. Volume, volatility, price, and profit when all traders are above average. J. Finance (1998) 53:1887–1934Crossref, Google Scholar
• Odean T. Do investors trade too much? Amer. Econom. Rev. (1999) 89:1279–1298Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palich L. E., Bagby D. R. Using cognitive theory to explain entrepreneurial risk-taking: Challenging conventional wisdom. J. Bus. Venturing (1995) 10:425–438Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porac J. F., Thomas H., Baden-Fuller C. Competitive groups as cognitive communities: The case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers. J. Management Stud. (1989) 26:397–416Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter M. E.Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors (1980) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Radzevick J. R., Moore D. A. For the love of the game? Betting, prediction, and myopic bias in athletic competition. (2005) . Unpublished manuscript, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
• Ross L., Greene D., House P. The false consensus effect: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1977) 13:279–301Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rumelt R. P. How much does industry matter? Strategic Management J. (1991) 12:167–185Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmalensee R. Do markets differ much? Amer. Econom. Rev. (1985) 75:341–351Google Scholar
• Simon M., Houghton S. The relationship between overconfidence and the introduction of risky products: Evidence from a field study. Acad. Management J. (2003) 46:139–150Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon M., Houghton S., Aquino K. Cognitive biases, risk perception, and venture formation: How individuals decide to start companies. J. Bus. Venturing (2000) 15:113–134Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh J. V. Review essay: Density dependence theory—Current issues, future promise. Amer. J. Sociol. (1993) 99:464–473Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O., Audia P. G. The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: Geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States, 1940–1989. Amer. J. Sociol. (2000) 106:424–465Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart T. E., Sorenson O. Liquidity events and the geographic distribution of entrepreneurial activity. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48:175–201Crossref, Google Scholar
• Svenson O. Are we less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers? Acta Psychologica (1981) 47:143–151Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. Belief in the law of small numbers. Psych. Bull. (1971) 76:105–110Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science (1974) 185:1124–1131Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Small Business Administration Longitudinal Establishment and Enterprise Microdata. (2003) . Office of Advocacy, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
• Venkataraman S., Katz J. The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth (1997) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 119–138Google Scholar
• Wagner J. The post-entry performance of new small firms in German manufacturing industries. J. Indust. Econom. (1994) 42:141–154Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B., Montgomery C. A. Tobin’s q and the importance of focus in firm performance. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1988) 78:246–251Google Scholar
• Wilson T. D.Strangers to Ourselves: Discovering the Adaptive Unconscious (2002) (Belknap, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Windschitl P. D., Kruger J., Simms E. The influence of egocentrism and focalism on people’s optimism in competitions: When what affects us equally affects me more. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2003) 85:389–408Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wood R. E., Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14:361–384Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zacharakis A. L., Shepherd D. A. The nature of information and overconfidence on venture capitalists’ decision making. J. Bus. Venturing (2001) 16:311–322Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahra S. A., Neubaum D. O., El-Hagrassey G. M. Competitive analysis and new venture performance: Understanding the impact of strategic uncertainty and venture origin. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice (2002) 26:1–28Crossref, Google Scholar