A Behavioral Resource-Based View of the Firm: The Synergy of Cyert and March (1963) and Penrose (1959)

References

• Alchian A., Demsetz H. Production, information costs, and economic organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1972) 62:777–795Google Scholar
• Augier M., Teece D. J. Strategic management and entrepreneurship: The evolving influence of Edith Penrose. Management Internat. Rev. (2007) 47(2Google Scholar
• Barney J. B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management (1991) 17(1):99–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartlett C. A., Grant R. EMI and the CT scanner [A] and [B]. Contemporary Strategy Analysis (2005) 2nd ed.(Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK) 185–210Google Scholar
• Beamish P. W., Goerzen A. The Penrose effect: “Excess” expatriates in multinational enterprises. Management Internat. Rev. (2007) 47(2Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw J., Lingblad M. Intrafirm competition and charter revolution in the multibusiness firm. Organ. Sci (2006) 16(6):674–686Link, Google Scholar
• Boddewyn J. J. Understanding and advancing the concept of “nonmarket”. Bus. Soc. (2003) 42(3):297–327Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buchanan L., O’Connell A. A brief history of decision making. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2006) 84(1):32–41Google Scholar
• Chandler A. D.Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise (1962) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Clarkson M. B. E., Clarkson M. B. E. Introduction. The Corporation and Its Stakeholders: Classic and Contemporary Readings (1998) (University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Ontario, Canada) 1–9Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coase R. H. The nature of the firm. Econmica (1937) 16(4):386–405Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coase R. H. The problem of social cost. J. Law Econom. (1960) 3(1):1–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coase R. H., Williamson O. E., Winter S. G. 1991 Nobel lecture: The institutional structure of production. The Nature of the Firm (1993a) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Coase R. H. Coase on Posner on Coase. J. Institutional Theoret. Econom. (1993b) 149(1):90–98Google Scholar
• Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963/1992) 2nd ed.(Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Dunbar R. L., Starbuck W. H. Learning to design organizations and learning from designing them. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(2):171–178Link, Google Scholar
• Dunning J. H., Lundan S., Collinson S., Morgan G. The MNE as a creator, fashioner and respondent to institutional change. Images of the Multinational Firm (2007) (Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Dunning J. H., Pitelis C. Stephen Hymer’s contribution to “International Business” scholarship—A critical assessment and extension. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (2007) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Economist, The Riding a wave. (2006a) April 6Google Scholar
• Economist, The Last tango in Detroit? General Motors. (2006b) April 6(Delphi and the unions)Google Scholar
• Financial Times Risky strategy in Detroit shows signs of payoff. (2006) October 30):2Google Scholar
• Foss N. Knowledge-based approaches to the theory of the firm: Some critical comments. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(5):470–476Link, Google Scholar
• Fransman M. Information, knowledge, vision and theories of the firm. Indust. Corporate Change (1994) 3(3):713–757Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G., Levinthal D. A. The strategy field from the perspective of management science: Divergent strands and possible integration. Management Sci. (2004) 50(10):1309–1318Link, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. (1985) 91(11):481–510Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gross R. D.Key Studies in Psychology (1990) (Hodder & Stoughton, London, UK) 126–129Google Scholar
• Heilbroner R.The Worldly Philosophers (1991) 6th ed.(Penguin Books, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B. The firm as a subeconomy. J. Law, Econom. Organ. (1999) 15:74–102Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hymer S. H. The efficiency (contradictions) of multinational corporations. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1970) 60(2):441–448Google Scholar
• Hymer S. H., Cohen R. B., Felton N., Nkosi M., Van Liere J. The multinational corporation and the law of uneven development. The Multinational Corporation (1979) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 54–74Google Scholar
• Jacobides M. G., Billinger S. Designing the boundaries of the firm: From “make, buy or ally” to the dynamic benefits of vertical architecture. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(2):249–261Link, Google Scholar
• Jensen M. C., Meckling W. Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. (1976) 3:304–360Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kay N. Searching for the firm: The role of decision in the economics of organizations. Indust. Corporate Change (2000) 9(4):683–707Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knight F. H.Risk, Uncertainty and Profit (1921) (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1993) 24(4):625–645Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kor Y. Y., Mahoney J. T. Edith Penrose’s (1959) contributions to the resource-based view of strategic management. J. Management Stud. (2000) 37(1):183–191Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kor Y. Y., Mahoney J. T. Penrose’s resource-based approach: The process and product of research activity. J. Management Stud. (2004) 41(1):109–139Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loasby B. J. The significance of Penrose’s theory for the development economics. Contributions Political Econom. (1999) 18:31–46Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahoney J. T.Economic Foundations of Strategy (2005) (SAGE Publications, London, UK, and New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahoney J. T. Toward a stakeholder theory of strategic management. (2006) . Working paper, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, ILGoogle Scholar
• March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:71–87Link, Google Scholar
• Marglin S. What do bosses do? The origins and functions of hierarchy in capitalist production. Rev. Radical Political Econom. (1974) 6:60–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marris R., Warner M. Managerial theories of the firm. International Encyclopedia of Business and Management (1996) (Routledge, London, UK) 317–325Google Scholar
• Mayer K. J., Argyres N. S. Learning to contract: Evidence from the personal computer industry. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(4):394–410Link, Google Scholar
• Meyer K. E. Globalfocusing: From domestic conglomerates to global specialists. J. Management Stud. (2006) 43(5):1109–1144Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgram S. Behavioural study of obedience. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. (1963) 67:371–378Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mueller D. C.Public Choice II. A Revised Edition of Public Choice (1989) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Nelson R., Winter S.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• North D. C.Structure and Change in Economic History (1981) (Norton, London, UK, and New York) Google Scholar
• North D. C.Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (1990) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• North D. C. Institutions. J. Econom. Perspect. (1991) 5(1):97–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olson M.The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (1965) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olson M.Power and Prosperity: Outgrowing Communist and Capitalist Dictatorships (2000) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Organization Science Special issue on trust in an organizational context. (2003) 14(1):1–4Google Scholar
• Penrose E. T.The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (1959/1995) 3rd ed.(Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Penrose E. T. The growth of the firm, a case study: The Hercules Powder Company. Bus. Hist. Rev. (1960) 34:1–23Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perrow C.Complex Organizations (1986) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Peteraf M. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14(3):179–191Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pitelis C. N.Market and Non-Market Hierarchies: Theory of Institutional Failure (1991) (Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Pitelis C. N.The Growth of the Firm—The Legacy of Edith Penrose (2002) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Pitelis C. N. Edith Penrose and the resource-based view of (international) business strategy. Internat. Bus. Rev. (2004) 13(4):523–532Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pitelis C. N. Edith Penrose, organizational economics and (business) strategy: An assessment and extension. Managerial Decision Econom. (2005) 26(2):67–82Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pitelis C. N. Edith Penrose and a learning-based perspective on the MNE and OLI. Management Internat. Rev. (2007) 47(2Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pitelis C. N., Wahl M. Edith Penrose: Pioneer of stakeholder theory. Long Range Planning (1998) 31(2):252–261Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter M. E.Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors (1980) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Powell W. W., DiMaggio P. J.The New Institutionalism in Organization Analysis (1991) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prendergast C. The provision of incentives in firms. J. Econom. Literature (1999) 37(1):7–63Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richardson G. The organisation of industry. Econom. J. (1972) 82:883–896Google Scholar
• Rugman A. M., Verbeke A. Edith Penrose’s contribution to the resource-based view of strategic management. Strategic Management J. (2002) 23:69–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Selznick P.Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation (1957) (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) Google Scholar
• Simon H. A. Organisations and markets. J. Public Admin. Res. Theory (Transaction) (1995) 5(3):273–295Google Scholar
• Slater M. The managerial limitation to a firm’s rate of growth. Econom. J. (1980) 90:520–528Google Scholar
• Teece D. J. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licencing and public policy. Res. Policy (1986) 15(6):285–305Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J., Augier M., Teece D. J. Explicating dynamic capabilities. Fundamentals of Business Strategy (2006) (Sage Publications, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(7):509–533Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tirole J.The Theory of Industrial Organization (1988) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1984) 5(2):171–180Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson O.Markets and Hierarchies: Antitrust Analysis and Implications (1975) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Williamson O. Strategy research: Governance and competence perspectives. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20(12):1087–1108Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zollo M., Winter S. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(3):339–351Link, Google Scholar