Too Little or Too Much? Untangling the Relationship Between Corporate Philanthropy and Firm Financial Performance

References

• Adams M., Hardwick P. An analysis of corporate donations: United Kingdom evidence. J. Management Stud. (1998) 35:641–654Crossref, Google Scholar
• Backhaus K. B., Stone B. A., Heiner K. Exploring the relationship between corporate social performance and employer attractiveness. Bus. Soc. (2002) 41:292–318Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barber B. M., Lyon J. D. Detecting long-run abnormal stock returns: The empirical power and specification of test statistics. J. Financial Econom. (1996) 43:341–372Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett M. L. Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Acad. Management Rev. (2007) 32:794–816Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett M. L., Salomon R. M. Throwing a curve at socially responsible investing research. Organ. Environment (2003) 16:381–389Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnett M. L., Salomon R. M. Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance. Strategic Management J. (2006) 27:1101–1122Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beck N., Katz J. N. What to do (and not to do) with time-series-cross-section data in comparative politics. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. (1995) 89:634–647Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berle A. A., Means G. C.The Modern Corporation and Private Property (1932) (Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
• Berman S. L., Phillips R. A., Wicks A. C. Resource dependence, managerial discretion and stakeholder performance. Acad. Management Best Paper Proc. (2005) Honolulu:B1–B6Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berman S. L., Wicks A. C., Kotha S. K., Jones T. M. Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42:488–506Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya C. B., Sen S. Consumer-company identification: A framework for understanding consumers' relationships with companies. J. Marketing (2003) 67:76–88Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourgeois L. J. On the measurement of organizational slack. Acad. Management Rev. (1981) 6:29–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowman E. H., Haire M. A strategic posture toward corporate social responsibility. Calif. Management Rev. (1975) 18:49–58Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyd B. Corporate linkages and organizational environment: A test of the resource dependence model. Strategic Management J. (1990) 11:419–430Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brammer S., Millington A. The effect of stakeholder preferences, organizational structure and industry type on corporate community involvement. J. Bus. Ethics (2003) 45:213–226Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brammer S., Millington A. The development of corporate charitable contributions in the UK: A stakeholder analysis. J. Management Stud. (2004a) 41:1411–1434Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brammer S., Millington A. Stakeholder pressure, organizational size, and the allocation of departmental responsibility for the management of corporate charitable giving. Bus. Soc. (2004b) 43:268–295Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brammer S., Millington A. Corporate reputation and philanthropy: An empirical analysis. J. Bus. Ethics (2005) 61:29–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buchholtz A. K., Amason A. C., Rutherford M. A. Beyond resources: The mediating effect of top management discretion and values on corporate philanthropy. Bus. Soc. (1999) 38:167–187Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campa J. M., Kedia S. Explaining the diversification discount. J. Finance (2002) 57:1731–1762Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll A. B. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Acad. Management Rev. (1979) 4:497–506Crossref, Google Scholar
• Claessens S., Djankov S. Enterprise performance and management turnover in the Czech Republic. Eur. Econom. Rev. (1999) 43:1115–1124Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dess G. G., Beard D. W. Dimensions of organizational task environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1984) 29:52–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutton J. E., Dukerich J. M., Harquail C. V. Organizational images and member identifications. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39:239–263Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14:57–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama E., French K. R. The cross-section of expected stock returns. J. Finance (1992) 47:427–465Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell J., Rasmusen E. Monopoly slack and competitive rigor. Readings in Games and Information (2001) (Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• File K. M., Prince R. A. Cause related marketing and corporate philanthropy in the privately held enterprise. J. Bus. Ethics (1998) 17(14):1529–1539Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fombrun C. J., Gardberg N. A., Barnett M. L. Opportunity platforms and safety nets: Corporate reputation and reputational risk. Bus. Soc. Rev. (2000) 105(1):85–106Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman R. E.Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (1984) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Friedman M. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine (1970) September 13):122–126Google Scholar
• Frooman J. Stakeholder influence strategies. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24:191–206Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fry L. W., Keim G. D., Meiners R. E. Corporate contributions: Altruistic or for-profit? Acad. Management J. (1982) 25:94–106Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galaskiewicz J., Powell W. W., DiMaggio P. J. Making corporate actors accountable: Institution-building in Minneapolis–St. Paul. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (1991) (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) 293–310Google Scholar
• Galaskiewicz J., Burt R. S. Interorganization contagion in corporate philanthropy. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36:88–105Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galbraith J. A.Designing Complex Organizations (1973) (Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Godfrey P. C. The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Acad. Management Rev. (2005) 30:777–798Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goll I., Rasheed A. A. The moderating effect of environmental munificence and dynamism on the relationship between discretionary social responsibility and firm performance. J. Bus. Ethics (2004) 49:41–54Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graves S. B., Waddock S. A. Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37:1034–1046Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene W.Econometric Analysis (1997) (Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
• Greening D. W., Turban D. B. Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Bus. Soc. (2000) 39:254–280Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin J. J. Corporate restructurings: Ripple effects on corporate philanthropy. J. Public Affairs (2004) 4:27–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin J. J., Mahon J. F. The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Bus. Soc. (1997) 36:5–31Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z. Issues in assessing the contribution of R&D to productivity growth. Bell J. Econom. (1979) 10:92–116Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haley U. Corporate contributions as managerial masques: Reframing corporate contributions as strategies to influence society. J. Management Stud. (1991) 28:485–509Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall B. H. Innovation and market value. (1999) . Working Paper 6984, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick D. C., Finkelstein S., Cummings L. L., Staw B. M. Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior (1987) 9(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 369–406Google Scholar
• Harrison J. S., Freeman R. E. Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42:479–485Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart O. D.Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure (1995) (Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman J. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica (1979) 47:153–161Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hemingway C. A., Maclagan P. W. Managers' personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. J. Bus. Ethics (2004) 50:33–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill C. W. L., Jones T. M. Stakeholder-agency theory. J. Management Stud. (1992) 29:131–154Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman A. J., Keim G. D. Stakeholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What's the bottom line? Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:125–139Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirschey M., Weygandt J. J. Amortization policy for advertising and research and development expenditures. J. Account. Res. (1985) 23:326–335Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M. C. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76:323–339Google Scholar
• Jensen M. C., Andriof J., Waddock S., Husted B., Rahman S. S. Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking (2002) (Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, UK) 65–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M. C., Meckling W. H. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. (1976) 3:305–360Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M. C., Meckling W. H., Lars W., Wijkander H. Specific and general knowledge and organizational structure. Contract Economics (1992) (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK) 251–274Google Scholar
• Johnson R. A., Greening D. W. The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42:564–576Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones T. M. Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20:404–437Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kristensen I. P., Wawro G. Lagging the dog?: The robustness of panel-corrected standard errors in the presence of serial correlation and observation specific effects. (2006) . Unpublished manuscript, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Lafontaine F., Shaw J. K. The dynamics of franchise contracting: Evidence from panel data. J. Political Econom. (1999) 107:1041–1080Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence P., Lorsch J.Organization and Environment (1967) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Levy F., Shatto G. An evaluation of corporate contributions. Public Choice (1978) 33:19–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindenberg E. B., Ross S. A. Tobin's q ratio and industrial organization. J. Bus. (1981) 54:1–32Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malone T. W., Crowston K. The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Comput. Surveys (1994) 26:87–119Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C., Glynn M., Davis G. F. Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Acad. Management Rev. (2007) 32:925–945Crossref, Google Scholar
• McWilliams A., Siegel D. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:603–609Crossref, Google Scholar
• McWilliams A., Siegel D. Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Acad. Management Rev. (2001) 26:117–127Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milliken F. Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State, effect, and response uncertainty. Acad. Management Rev. (1987) 12(1):133–143Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morck R., Yeung B. Why investors value multinationality. J. Bus. (1991) 64:165–187Crossref, Google Scholar
• Navarro P. Why do corporations give to charity? J. Bus. (1988) 61:65–93Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver C. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Acad. Management Rev. (1991) 16:145–179Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlitzky M., Schmidt L., Rynes S. L. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organ. Stud. (2003) 24:403–441Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R.The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (1978) (Harper & Row, New York) Google Scholar
• Preston L. E., O'Bannon D. P. The corporate social-financial performance relationship: A typology and analysis. Bus. Soc. (1997) 36:419–429Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rowley T. J., Berman S. A brand new brand of corporate social performance. Bus. Soc. (2000) 39:397–418Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saiia D. H., Carroll A. B., Buchholtz A. K. Philanthropy as strategy: When corporate charity “begins at home”. Bus. Soc. (2003) 42:169–201Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seifert B., Morris S. A., Bartkus B. R. Having, giving, and getting: Slack resources, corporate philanthropy, and firm financial performance. Bus. Soc. (2004) 43:135–161Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh J. V. Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making. Acad. Management J. (1986) 29:562–585Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stanwick P., Stanwick S. The relationship between corporate social performance and organizational size, financial performance, and environmental performance: An empirical examination. J. Bus. Ethics (1998) 17:195–204Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strong J. W.McCormick on Evidence (1999) (West Group, St. Paul, MN) Google Scholar
• Sturdivant F. D., Ginter J. L. Corporate social responsiveness: Management attitudes and economic performance. Calif. Management Rev. (1977) 19:30–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turban D. B., Greening D. W. Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Acad. Management J. (1996) 40:658–672Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ullmann A. A. Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of U.S. firms. Acad. Management Rev. (1985) 10:540–557Google Scholar
• Villalonga B. Intangible resources, Tobin's q, and sustainability of performance differences. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2004) 54:205–230Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waddock S. A., Graves S. B. The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:303–319Crossref, Google Scholar
• Werbel J. D., Carter S. M. The CEO's influence on corporate foundation giving. J. Bus. Ethics (2002) 40:47–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wokutch R. E., Spencer B. A. Corporate saints and sinners: The effects of philanthropic and illegal activity on organizational performance. Calif. Management Rev. (1987) 28:62–77Crossref, Google Scholar