A Behavioral Theory of the Firm—40 Years and Counting: Introduction and Impact

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0280

References

  • Adler P. S. The learning bureaucracy: New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc.. Res. Organ. Behav. (1993) 15:111–194Google Scholar
  • Adler P. S., Goldoftas B., Levine D. I. Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10:43–68LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Allison G. T.Essense of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis (1971) (Little, Brown, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Amburgey T. L., Kelly D., Barnett W. P. Resetting the clock: The dynamics of organizational change and failure. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38:51–73CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson P., Miner A., Anderson P. How does the mix of routines in a population change? Technology choice in the American cement industry. Advances in Strategic Management (1999) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 277–307Google Scholar
  • Argote L.Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge (1999) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Argote L., Ophir R., Baum J. A. C. Intraorganizational learning. The Blackwell Companion to Organizations (2002) (Blackwell Business, Oxford, UK) 181–207Google Scholar
  • Argote L., Todorova G., Hodgkinson G. P., Ford J. K. Organizational learning: Review and future directions. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (2007) (Wiley, New York) 193–234CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L., Beckman S. L., Epple D. The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Sci. (1990) 36:140–154LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Audia P. G., Greve H. R. Less likely to fail? Low performance, firm size, and factory expansion in the shipbuilding industry. Management Sci. (2006) 52:83–94LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Audia P. G., Locke E. A., Smith K. G. The paradox of success: An archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following a radical environmental change. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43:837–853CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Augier M., Prietula M. Historical roots of the A Behavioral Theory of the Firm model at GSIA. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(3):507–522LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Axelrod R.The Evolution of Cooperation (1984) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Barkema H. G., Shenkar O., Vermeulen F., Bell J. H. J. Working abroad, working with others: How firms learn to operate international joint ventures. Acad. Management J. (1997) 40:426–442CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley S. R. Technology as an occasion for restructuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31:24–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley S. R. The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:61–103CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barnett W. P. The dynamics of competitive intensity. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:128–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barnett W. P., Freeman J. Too much of a good thing? Product proliferation and organizational failure. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:539–558LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barnett W. P., Hansen M. T. The Red Queen in organizational evolution. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:139–157CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Dahlin K. B. Aspiration performance and railroads’ patterns of learning from train wrecks and crashes. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(3):368–385LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Ingram P. Survival-enhancing learning in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898–1980. Management Sci. (1998) 44:996–1016LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Singh J. V. Dynamics of organizational responses to competition. Soc. Forces (1996) 74:1261–1297CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Rowley T. J., Shipilov A. V., Chuang Y. T. Dancing with strangers: Aspiration performance and the search for underwriting syndicate partners. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50:536–575CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky B. Gaffers, gofers, and grips: Role-based coordination in temporary organizations. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17:3–21LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Benkard C. L. Learning and forgetting: The dynamics of aircraft production. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2000) 90:1034–1054CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bolton M. K. Organizational innovation and substandard performance: When is necessity the mother of innovation. Organ. Sci. (1993) 4:57–75LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brandon D. P., Hollingshead A. B. Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15:633–644LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bromiley P. Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34:37–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brunsson N.The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions, and Action in Organizations (1989) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Bunderson J. S., Sutcliffe K. M. Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(3):552–560CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carley K. Organizational learning and personnel turnover. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:20–46LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll G. R., Hannan M. T.The Demography of Corporations and Industries (2000) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll G. R., Harrison J. R. On the historical efficiency of competition between organizational populations. Amer. J. Soc. (1994) 100:720–749CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll G. R., Bigelow L. S., Seidel M. L., Tsai L. B. The fates of the de novo and de alio producers in American automobile industry: 1885–1981. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:117–137CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll T. N., Gormley T. J., Bilardo V. J., Burton R. M. Designing a new organization at NASA: An organization design process using simulation. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17:202–214LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Christensen T., Lægreid P. Administrative reform policy: The challenges of turning symbols into practice. Public Organ. Rev. (2003) 3:3–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chuang Y.-T., Baum J. A. C. It’s all in the name: Failure-induced learning by multiunit chains. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48:33–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coase R. H. The nature of the firm. Econometrica (1937) 4:386–405Google Scholar
  • Cohen M. Administrative Behavior: Laying the foundations for Cyert and March. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(3):503–506LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen M. D., Bacdayan P. Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5:554–568LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen M. D., March J. G., Olsen J. P. A garbage can model of organizational choice. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1972) 17:1–25CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:128–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Damanpour F. Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34:555–590CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Darr E. D., Argote L., Epple D. The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: Productivity in franchises. Management Sci. (1995) 41:1750–1762LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Davis J. H. Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. Psych. Rev. (1973) 80:97–125CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Soc. Rev. (1983) 48:147–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dobrev S. D., Kim T.-Y., Carroll G. R. Shifting gears, shifting niches: Organizational inertia and change in the evolution of the U.S. automobile industry, 1885–1981. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14:264–282LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dosi G., Kaniovski Y. On “badly behaved” dynamics: Some applications of generalized urn schemes to technological and economic change. J. Evolutionary Econom. (1994) 4:153–172CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dosi G., Marengo L. On the evolutionary and behavioral theories of organizations: A tentative roadmap. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(3):491–503LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dosi G., Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities (2000) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Dougherty D. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:179–202LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:350–383CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C., Bohmer R. M., Pisano G. P. Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46:685–716CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Epple D., Argote K., Murphy L. An empirical investigation of the micro structure of knowledge acquisition and transfer through learning by doing. Oper. Res. (1996) 44:77–86LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M. S. Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11:611–629LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M. S. Resources in emerging structures and processes of change. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15:295–309LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Florida R., Kenney M., Dosi G., Nelson R. R., Winter S. G. Transfer and replication of organizational capabilities: Japanese transplant organizations in the United States. The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities (2000) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 281–307Google Scholar
  • Gavetti G. D. Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities’ development. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16:599–617LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G., Levinthal D. A. Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45:113–137CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G., Levinthal D. A. The strategy field from the perspective of management science: Divergent strands and possible integration. Management Sci. (2004) 50:1309–1318LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G., Rivkin J. W. On the origin of strategy: Action and Cognition over time. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(3):420–439LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G., Levinthal D., Ocasio W. Neo-Carnegie School’s past, present, and reconstructing for the future. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(3):523–536LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Geiger S. W., Cashen L. H. A multidimensional examination of slack and is impact on innovation. J. Management Issues (2002) 14:68–84Google Scholar
  • Gouldner A. W.Patterns of Industrial Democracy (1954) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Greve H. R. Patterns of competition: The diffusion of a market position in radio broadcasting. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:29–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve H. R. Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 44:58–86CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve H. R.Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change (2003a) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve H. R. Investment and the behavioral theory of the firm: Evidence from shipbuilding. Indust. Corporate Change (2003b) 12:1051–1076CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grossman S., Hart O. An analysis of the principal-agent problem. Econometrica (1982) 51:7–45CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R. Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20:397–420CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R., Gargiulo M. Where do interorganizational networks come from? Amer. J. Soc. (1999) 104:1439–1493CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Freeman J. The population ecology of organizations. Amer. J. Soc. (1977) 82:929–964CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Freeman J.Organizational Ecology (1989) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen M. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organizational subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:82–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harris J., Bromiley P. Incentives to cheat: The influence of executive compensation and firm performance on financial misrepresentation. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(3):350–367LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Haunschild P. R. How much is that company worth? Interorganizational relationships, uncertainty, and acquisition premiums. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39:391–411CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haunschild P. R., Miner A. S. Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:472–500CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haunschild P. R., Sullivan B. N. Learning from complexity: Effects of prior accidents and incidents on airlines’ learning. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47:609–643CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helfat C. E. Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: The case of R&D. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:339–360CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson R. M., Clark K. B. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:9–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson R. M., Cockburn I. Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:63–84CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herriott S. R., Levinthal D., March J. G. Learning from experience in organizations. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1985) 75:298–302Google Scholar
  • Hinsz V. B., Tindale R. S., Vollrath D. A. The emerging conception of groups as information processors. Psych. Bull. (1997) 121:43–64CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B., Milgrom P., Schmalensee R., Willig R. D. The theory of the firm. Handbook of Industrial Organization (1989) (North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 63–133CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huber G. P. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:88–115LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ingram P., Baum J. A. C. Interorganizational learning. The Blackwell Companion to Organizations (2002) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) 642–663Google Scholar
  • Ingram P., Baum J. A. C. Opportunity and constraint: Organizations’ learning from the operating and competitive experience of industries. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:75–98CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jacobides M. G. The inherent limits of organizational structure and the unfulfilled role of hierarchy: Lessons from a near-war. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(3):455–477LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jansen J. J. P., Van den Bosch F. A. J., Volberda H. W. Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter? Acad. Management J. (2005) 48:999–1015CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47:263–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kane A. A., Argote L., Levine J. M. Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2005) 96:56–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karim S., Mitchell W. Path-dependent and path-breaking change: Reconfiguring business resources following acquisitions in the U.S. medical sector, 1978–1995. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:1061–1081CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kellogg K. C., Orlikowski W. C., Yates J. Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17:22–44LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kerr N. L., MacCoun R. J., Kramer G. P. Bias in judgment: Comparing individuals and groups. Psych. Rev. (1996) 103:687–719CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King A. A., Tucci C. L. Incumbent entry into new market niches: The role of experience and managerial choice in the creation of dynamic capabilities. Management Sci. (2002) 48:171–186LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kingdon J. W.Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies (1984) (Little, Brown, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Knott A. M. The dynamic value of hierarchy. Management Sci. (2001) 47:430–448LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Knott A. M. The organizational routines factor market paradox. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24:929–943CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:383–397LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. Did socialism fail to innovate? A natural experiment of the two Zeiss companies. Amer. Soc. Rev. (2000) 65:169–190CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kraatz M. S. Learning by association? Interorganizational networks and adaptation to environmental change. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41:621–643CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lane P. J., Salk J. E., Lyles M. A. Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:1139–1161CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lant T. K. Aspiration level adaptation: An empirical exploration. Management Sci. (1992) 38:623–644LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lant T. K., Milliken F. J., Batra B. The role of managerial learning and interpretation in strategic persistence and reorientation: An empirical exploration. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13:585–608CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larsson R., Bengtsson L., Henriksson K., Sparks J. The interorganizational learning dilemma: Collective knowledge development in strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9:285–305LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levin D. Z. Organizational learning and the transfer of knowledge: An investigation of quality improvement. Organ. Sci. (2001) 11:630–647LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levin S. G., Levin S. L., Meisel J. B. A dynamic analysis of the adoption of a new technology: The case of optical scanners. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1987) 69:12–17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levin S. G., Levin S. L., Meisel J. B. Market structure, uncertainty, and intrafirm diffusion: The case of optical scanners in grocery stores. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1992) 74:345–350CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D. A., March J. G. A model of adaptive organizational search. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1981) 2:307–333CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D. A., Myatt J. Coevolution of capabilities and industry: The evolution of mutual fund processing. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:45–62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B., March J. G., Scott W. R., Blake J. Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1988) 14(Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, CA) 319–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis K., Lange D., Gillis L. Transactive memory systems, learning, and learning transfer. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16:581–598LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Liang D., Moreland R., Argote L. Group versus individual training and group performance; The mediating effects of transactive memory. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1995) 21:384–393CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manns C. L., March J. G. Financial adversity, internal competition, and curriculum change in a university. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1978) 23:541–552CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G. The business firm as a political coalition. J. Politics (1962) 24:662–678CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G. Footnotes to organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26:563–577CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:71–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G. Scholarship, scholarly institutions, and scholarly communities. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(3):537–542LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G., Olsen J. P.Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics (1989) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • March J. G., Simon H.Organizations (1958) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • March J. G., Schulz M., Zhou X.The Dynamics of Rules: Change in Written Organizational Codes (2000) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G., Sproull L. S., Tamuz M. Learning from samples of one or fewer. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):1–14LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Marschak J., Radner R.Economic Theory of Teams (1972) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) Google Scholar
  • McKendrick D. G. Global strategy and population-level learning: The case of hard disk drives. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:307–334CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer J. W., Rowan B. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. (1977) 83:340–363CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom P., Roberts J. An economic approach to influence activities in organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. (1988) 94:S154–S179CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller D., Chen M.-J. Sources and consequences of competitive inertia: A study of the U.S. airline industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39:1–23CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miner A. S., Anderson P., Miner A. S., Anderson P. Industry and population-level learning: Organizational, interorganizational, and collective learning processes. Advances in Strategic Management (1999) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 1–30Google Scholar
  • Miner A. S., Mezias S. J. Ugly duckling no more: Pasts and futures of organizational learning research. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:88–99LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Miner A. S., Amburgey T. L., Stearns T. M. Interorganizational linkages and population dynamics: Buffering and transformational shields. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:689–713CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miner A. S., Kim J.-Y. J., Holzinger I. W., Haunschild P. R., Miner A., Anderson P. Fruits of failure: Organizational failure and population-level learning. Advances in Strategic Management (1999) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 187–220Google Scholar
  • Moore D. A., Oesch J. M., Zietsma C. What competition? Myopic self-focus in market-entry decisions. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(3):440–454LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Narduzzo A., Rocco E., Warglien M., Dosi G., Nelson R. R., Winter S. G. Talking about routines in the field: The emergence of organizational capabilities in a new cellular phone network company. The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities (2000) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 27–50Google Scholar
  • Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Belknap, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Nelson R. R., Winter S. G. Evolutionary theorizing in economics. J. Econom. Perspectives (2002) 16:23–46CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nickel M. N., Rodriguez M. C. A review of research on the negative accounting relationship between risk and return: Bowman’s paradox. Omega (2002) 30:1–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nohria N., Gulati R. Is slack good or bad for innovation? Acad. Management J. (1996) 39:1245–1264CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Olsen J. P. Towards a European administrative space? J. Eur. Public Policy (2003) 10:506–531CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Park K. M. Antecedents of convergence and divergence in strategic positioning: The effects of performance and aspiration on the direction of strategic change. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(3):386–402LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Penrose E. T.The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (1959) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Pentland B. T. Organizing moves in software support hot lines. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37:527–548CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Philips D. J. A genealogical approach to organizational life change: The parent-progeny transfer among Silicon Valley law firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47:474–506CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pisano G., Bohmer R. M., Edmondson A. C. Organizational differences in rates of learning: Evidence from the adoption of minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Management Sci. (2001) 47:752–768LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pitelis C. A behavioral resource-based view of the firm: The synergy of Cyert and March (1963) and Penrose (1959). Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(3):478–490LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Radner R. Bounded rationality, indeterminacy, and the theory of the firm. Econom. J. (1996) 106:1360–1373Google Scholar
  • Rao H., Greve H. R., Davis G. F. Fool’s gold: Social proof in the initiation and abandonment of coverage by Wall Street analysts. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46:502–526CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R., McEvily B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48:240–267CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R., Argote L., Brooks D. Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing what to do and knowing who knows what. Management Sci. (2005) 51:869–881LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schulz M. The uncertain relevance of newness: Organizational learning and knowledge flows. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44:661–681CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schulz M., Baum J. A. C. Organizational learning. Companion to Organizations (2002) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) 415–441Google Scholar
  • Scott W. R.Institutions and Organizations (2001) 2nd ed.(Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Selznick P.TVA and the Grass Roots (1949) (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) Google Scholar
  • Siggelkow N., Rivkin J. W. Speed and search: Designing organizations for turbulence and complexity. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16:101–122LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H. A. A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. (1952) 69:99–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sorenson O. Interdependence and adaptability: Organizational learning and the long-term effect of integration. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):446–463LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stasser G., Titus W. Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. J. Personality Sociol. Psych. (1985) 48:1467–1478CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strang D., Soule S. A. Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Ann. Rev. Sociol. (1998) 24:265–290CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:509–533CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsai W. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44:996–1004CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tuma N. B., Hannan M. T.Social Dynamics: Models and Methods (1984) (Academic Press, Orlando, FL) Google Scholar
  • Tushman M. L., Anderson P. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31:439–465CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wegner D. M., Mullen B., Goethals G. R. Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. Theories of Group Behavior (1986) (Springer-Verlag, New York) 185–208Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (1975) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting (1985) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Winter S. G., Szulanski G. Replication as strategy. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:730–743LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Winter S. G., Cattani G., Dorsch A. The value of moderate obsession: Insights from a new model of organizational search. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(3):403–419LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zollo M., Reuer J. J., Singh H. Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13:701–713LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.