Narrative Networks: Patterns of Technology and Organization

References

• Abbott A. From causes to events: Notes on narrative positivism. Sociol. Methods Res. (1992) 20(4):428–455Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abell P.The Syntax of Social Life: The Theory and Method of Comparative Narratives (1987) (Clarendon Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Abell P. Narrative explanation: An alternative to variable-centered explanation? Annual Rev. Sociol. (2004) 30:287–310Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andal-Ancion A., Cartwright P. A., Yip G. S. The digital transformation of traditional businesses. Sloan Management Rev. (2003) 44(4):34–41Google Scholar
• Bal M.Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative (1985) (University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Canada) Google Scholar
• Barley S. R. Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from the observation of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31:78–108Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley S. R., Arthur M., Hall T., Lawrence B. Careers, identities and institutions: The legacy of the Chicago School of Sociology. The Handbook of Career Theory (1989) (Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, New York) 41–65Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baskerville R., Smithson S. Information technology and new organizational forms: Choosing chaos over panaceas. Eur. J. Inform. Systems (1995) 4(2):66–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berg M. The politics of technology: On bringing social theory into technological design. Sci. Tech. Human Value (1998) 23(4):456–490Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birnholtz J., Cohen M. D., Hoch S. Organizational character: On the regeneration of Camp Poplar Grove. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(2):315–332Link, Google Scholar
• Boje D. M. The storytelling organization: A study of storytelling performance in an office supply firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36:106–126Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P.The Logic of Practice (1990) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burke K.A Grammar of Motives (1969) (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) Google Scholar
• Cairncross F.The Death of Distance: How the Communications Revolution Will Change Our Lives (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Chen M., Chen A. N. K., Shao B. B. M. The implications and impacts of web services to electronic commerce research and practices. J. Electronic Commerce Res. (2003) 4(4):128–139Google Scholar
• Cherbakov L., Galambos G., Harishankar R., Kalyana S., Rackham G. Impact of service orientation at the business level. IBM Systems J. (2005) 44(4):653–668Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chesbrough H., Spohrer J. A research manifesto for services science. Comm. ACM (2006) 49(7):35–40Crossref, Google Scholar
• Churchman C. W.Design of Inquiring Systems: Basic Concepts of Systems and Organization (1971) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Corsaro W. A., Heise D. R., Clogg C. Event structure models from ethnographic data. Sociological Methodology: 1990 (1990) (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK) 1–57Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coyle F. P.XML, Web Services, and the Data Revolution (2002) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Curtis B., Kellner M. I., Over J. Process modeling. Comm. ACM (1992) 35(9):75–90Crossref, Google Scholar
• Czarniawska B.Narrating the Organization: Dramas of Institutional Identity (1997) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Czarniawska B.A Narrative Approach to Organization Studies (1998) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Czarniawska B. On time, space and action nets. Organization (2004) 11(6):777–795Crossref, Google Scholar
• Czarniawska B., Joerges B., Czarniawska B., Sevón G. Travels of ideas. Translating Organizational Change (1996) (Walter de Gruyter, New York) 13–48Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G., Poole M. S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5:121–147Link, Google Scholar
• Doolin B., Lowe A. To reveal is to critique: Actor-network theory and critical information systems research. J. Inform. Tech. (2002) 17(2):269–278Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunbar R. L. M., Starbuck W. H. Learning to design organizations and learning from designing them. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17:171–178Link, Google Scholar
• Emery F.Characteristics of Socio-Technical Systems (1959) (Tavistock, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Faraj S., Kwon D., Watts S. Contested artifact: Technology sensemaking, actor networks, and the shaping of the Web browser. Inform. Tech. People (2004) 17(2):186–209Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fararo T. J., Butts C. Advances in generative structuralism: Structured agency and multilevel dynamics. J. Math. Sociol. (1999) 24(1):1–65Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman M. S. Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11:611–629Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman M. S. A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines. Indust. Corporate Change (2003) 12(4):727–752Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman M. S., Pentland B. T. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(1):94–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman M. S., Pentland B. T., Czarniawska B., Hernes T. Organizational routines and the macro-actor. Actor-Network Theory and Organizing (2005) (Liber and CBS Press, Stockholm, Sweden) 91–111Google Scholar
• Foray D., Steinmueller W. E. The economics of knowledge reproduction by inscription. Indust. Corporate Change (2003) 12(2):299–319Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fulk J., DeSanctis G. Electronic communication and changing organizational forms. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(4):337–349Link, Google Scholar
• Geertz C.The Interpretation of Culture: Selected Essays (1973) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Giddens A.The Constitution of Society (1984) (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) Google Scholar
• Giddens A., Held D., Thompson J. B. A reply to my critics. Social Theory of Modern Societies: Anthony Giddens and His Critics (1989) (Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, New York) 248–301Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grint K., Woolgar S.The Machine at Work: Technology, Work, and Organization (1997) (Polity Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Hanseth O., Aanestad M., Berg M. Guest editors' introduction: Actor-network theory and information systems. What's so special? Inform. Tech. People (2004) 17(2):116–123Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heise D. Modeling event structures. J. Math. Sociol. (1989) 14:139–169Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendricks W. O. The structural study of narration: Sample analyses. Poetics (1972) 3:100–123Reprinted in 1973, Essays on Semiolinguistics and Verbal Art. Mouton, The Hague, The Netherlands, 152–174Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendricks W. O. Methodology of narrative structural analysis. Semiotica (1973) 7:163–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hevner A. R., March S. T., Park J., Ram S. Design science in information systems research. MIS Quart. (2004) 28:75–105Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobides M. G., Billinger S. Designing the boundaries of the firm: From “Make, Buy, or Ally” to the dynamic benefits of vertical architecture. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17:249–261Link, Google Scholar
• Jones M. R., Karsten H. Review: Structuration theory and information systems research. (2003) . Working Paper 2003/11, Judge Institute of Management, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
• Kallinkos J. Reopening the black box of technology artifacts and human agency. 23rd Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (2002) Barcelona, Spain:287–294Google Scholar
• Latour B., Law J. The powers of association. Power, Action, and Belief (1986) (Routledge, London, UK) 268–280Google Scholar
• Latour B.Science in Action (1987) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Latour B., Law J. Technology is society made durable. A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination (1991) (Routledge, London, UK) 103–131Google Scholar
• Latour B.Aramis: The Love of Technology (1996) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Latour B.Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory (2005) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Latour B., Mauguin P., Teil G. A note on socio-technical graphs. Soc. Stud. Sci. (1992) 22:33–57Crossref, Google Scholar
• Law J. Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy and heterogeneity. Systems Practice (1992) 5:379–393Crossref, Google Scholar
• Law J., Hassard J.Actor Network Theory and After (1999) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Lee C., Dourish P., Mark G. The human infrastructure of cyberinfrastructure. Proc. 20th Anniversary Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work (2006) Banff, Alberta, Canada:483–492Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D., Rerup C. Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(4):502–513Link, Google Scholar
• Markoff J. The software out there. New York Times (2006) April 5):E1Google Scholar
• McAfee A. P. Enterprise 2.0: The dawn of emergent collaboration. Sloan Management Rev. (2006) 47(3):21–28Google Scholar
• Mohr L.Explaining Organizational Behavior (1982) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Mutch A. Actors and networks or agents and structures: Towards a realist view of information systems. Organization (2002) 9:513–532Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Reilly T. What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. (2005) . http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html.Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):398–427Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(4):404–428Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J., Barley S. R. Technology and institutions: What can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other? MIS Quart. (2001) 25(2):145–165Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J., Iacono C. S. Research commentary: Desperately seeking the IT in IT research—A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 12(2):121–134Link, Google Scholar
• Pasmore W. A., Francis C., Haldeman J., Shani A. Sociotechnical systems: A North American reflection on empirical studies of the seventies. Human Relations (1982) 35(12):1179–1204Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland B. T., Baum J., McKelvey B. Organizations as networks of action. Variations in Organization Science: In Honor of Donald T. Campbell (1999) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 237–253Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland B. T. Conceptualizing and measuring variety in organizational work processes. Management Sci. (2003) 49(7):857–870Link, Google Scholar
• Pentland B. T., Feldman M. S. Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Indust. Corporate Change (2005) 14(5):793–815Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perrow C. A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1967) 32:194–208Crossref, Google Scholar
• Propp V.Morphology of the Folktale (1927) (University of Texas Press, Austin, TX) . Translated by Laurence Scott, 2nd ed., 1968Google Scholar
• Reissman C. K.Narrative Analysis (1993) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
• Rimmon-Kenan S.Narrative Fiction: Contemporary Poetics (1983) (Routledge, London, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon H.The Sciences of the Artificial (1969) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Suchman L. Making work visible. Comm. ACM (1995) 38(9):56–64Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Trist E. L., Bamforth K. W. Some social and psychological consequences of the Longwall method of coal-getting: An examination of the psychological situation and defenses of a work group in relation to the social structure and technological content of the work system. Human Relations (1951) 4:3–38Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsoukas H., Chia R. On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(5):567–582Link, Google Scholar
• Walker J. Distributed narrative: Telling stories across networks. Assoc. Internet Researchers 5.0 (2004) Brighton, UKGoogle Scholar
• Walsham G., Lee A. S., Liebenau J., DeGross J. I. Actor-network theory and IS research: Current status and future prospects. Information Systems and Qualitative Research (1997) (Chapman and Hall, London, UK) 466–480Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman S., Faust K.Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (1994) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick K. E.The Social Psychology of Organizing (1979) 2nd ed.(Random House, New York) Google Scholar
• Weick K. E.Sensemaking in Organizations (1995) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Weick K. E., Sutcliffe K. M. Mindfulness and the quality of organizational attention. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(4):514–524Link, Google Scholar
• Westerman G., McFarlan F. W., Iansiti M. Organization design and effectiveness over the innovation life cycle. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17:230–238Link, Google Scholar
• White H., Mitchell W. J. T. The value of narrativity in the representation of reality. On Narrative (1981) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) 1–24Google Scholar
• Whitehead A. N.Process and Reality (1978) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Woodward J.Management and Technology (1958) (HSMO, London, UK) Google Scholar