Activating the Informational Capabilities of Information Technology for Organizational Change

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0284

References

  • Aydin C., Rice R. E. Bringing social worlds together: Computers as catalysts for new interactions in health care organizations. J. Health Soc. Behav. (1992) 33:168–185CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley S. R. Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31:78–108CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley S. R. The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990a) 35:61–103CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley S. R. Images of imaging: Notes on doing longitudinal field work. Organ. Sci. (1990b) 1:220–247LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Blau P. M.Dynamics of Bureaucracy (1955) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Boczkowski P. J. The processes of adopting multimedia and interactivity in three online newsrooms. J. Comm. (2004) 54:197–213CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borgatti S. P., Everett M. G., Freeman L. C. Ucinet for windows: Software for social network analysis. (2002) (Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA) Google Scholar
  • Brown J. S., Duguid P.The Social Life of Information (2000) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Burkhardt M. E., Brass D. J. Changing patterns or patterns of change: The effects of a change in technology on social network structure and power. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:104–127CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daft R. L., Weick K. E. Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9:284–295CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deetz S.Democracy in an Age of Corporate Colonization: Developments in Communication and the Politics of Everyday Life (1992) (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY) Google Scholar
  • Deetz S., Mumby D., Ruben B. Metaphors, information, and power. Information and Behavior (1985) 1(Transaction Press, New Brunswick, NJ) 369–386Google Scholar
  • DeSanctis G., Poole M. S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5:121–147LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M. S., March J. G. Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26:171–186CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman L. C. Centrality in networks 1: Conceptual clarifications. Soc. Networks (1979) 1:215–239CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fulk J. Social construction of communication technology. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36:921–951CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galbraith J.Designing Complex Organizations (1973) (Addison-Wesley Publishing, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Gibbons D. E. Friendship and advice networks in the context of changing professional values. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2004) 49:238–262Google Scholar
  • Giddens A.The Constitution of Society (1984) (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) Google Scholar
  • Goffman E. The interaction order. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1983) 48:1–17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gould R. V. The origins of status hierarchies: A formal theory and empirical test. Amer. J. Sociol. (2002) 107:1143–1178CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haythornthwaite C., Wellman B. Work, friendship, and media use for information exchange in a networked organization. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. (1998) 49:1101–1114CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hubert L. J., Schultz J. Quadratic assignment as a general data analysis strategy. British J. Math. Statist. Psych. (1976) 29:190–241CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaarst-Brown M. L., Robey D. More on myth, magic and metaphor: Cultural insights into the management of information technology in organizations. Inform. Tech. People (1999) 12:192–217CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krackhardt D., Nohria N., Eccles R. The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action (1992) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) 216–239Google Scholar
  • Leavitt H. J., Whistler T. L.Harvard Bus. Rev. (1958) 36:41–48Google Scholar
  • Leonard-Barton D. Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization. Res. Policy (1988) 17:251–267CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levine J. M., Moreland R. L., Gilbert D. T., Fiske S., Lindzey G. Small groups. The Handbook of Social Psychology (1998) (McGraw-Hill, New York) 415–469Google Scholar
  • Lucas H. C. Performance and the use of an information system. Management Sci. (1975) 29:908–919LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Majchrzak A., Rice R. E., Malhotra A., King N., Ba S. Technology adaptation: The case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(4):569–600CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Markus M. L. Power, politics, and mis implementation. Comm. ACM (1983) 26:430–444CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Markus M. L., Axline S., Petrie D., Tanis C. Learning from adopters' experiences with ERP: Problems encountered and success achieved. J. Inform. Tech. (2000) 15:245–265CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marsden P. V., Wasserman S. Recent developments in network measurement. Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis (2005) (Cambridge University Press, New York) 8–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nadel S. F.The Theory of Social Structure (1957) (Cohen and West, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J. Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7:63–92LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11:404–428LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J., Yates J., Okamura K., Fujimoto M. Shaping electronic communication: The metastructuring of technology in the context of use. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6:423–444LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orr J. E.Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job (1996) (ILR Press, Ithaca, NY) Google Scholar
  • Poole M. S., DeSanctis G., Fulk J., Steinfield C. Understanding the use of group decision support systems: The theory of adaptive structuration. Organizations and Communication Technology (1990) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) 173–193CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rice R. E. Computer-mediated communication and organizational innovation. J. Comm. (1987) 37:65–94CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rice R. E., Gattiker U., Jablin F. M., Putnam L. L. New media and organizational structuring. The New Handbook of Organizational Communication: Advances in Theory, Research, and Methods (2001) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 544–581CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rice R. E., Collins-Jarvis L., Zydney-Walker S. Individual and structural influences on information technology helping relationships. J. Appl. Comm. Res. (1999) 27:285–309CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robey D., Sahay S. Transforming work through information technology: A comparative case study of geographic information systems in county government. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7:93–110LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rothlisberger R. F., Dickson W. J.Management and the Worker (1939) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Stasser G., Titus W. Pooling of unshared information in group decision making. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1985) 48:1467–1478CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strauss A., Corbin J.Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (1998) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Sussman S. W., Siegal W. S. Informational influence in organizations: An integrated approach to knowledge adoption. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14:47–65LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thomas R. J.What Machines Can't Do: Politics and Technology in the Industrial Enterprise (1994) (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Tushman M. L., Nadler D. A. Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Acad. Management Rev. (1978) 3:613–624Google Scholar
  • Tyre M. J., Orlikowski W. J. Windows of opportunity: Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5:98–118LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Vaast E., Walsham G. Representations and actions: The transformation of work practices with IT use. Inform. Organ. (2005) 15:65–89CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Maanen J., Barley S. R., Staw B. M. Occupational communities: Culture and control in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior (1984) 6(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 287–365Google Scholar
  • Walsham G. Cross-cultural software production and use: A structuration analysis. MIS Quart. (2002) 26:359–380CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wasserman N., Faust K.Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (1994) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • White H. C., Boorman S., Breiger R. Social structure from multiple networks 1: Blockmodels of roles and positions. Amer. J. Sociol. (1976) 81:730–780CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zabusky S. E., Barley S. R., Orr J. E. Computers, clients, and expertise: Negotiating technical identities in a nontechnical world. Between Craft and Science: Technical Work in U.S. Settings (1996) (ILR Press, Ithaca, NY) 129–153Google Scholar
  • Zuboff S.In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power (1988) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.