Information Technology and Organizational Learning: An Investigation of Exploration and Exploitation Processes

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0286

References

  • Abernathy W. J.The Productivity Dilemma (1978) (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) Google Scholar
  • Ahuja M. K., Carley K. M. Network structure in virtual organizations. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(6):741–757LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Alavi M., Leidner D. E. Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems. Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(1):107–136CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alavi M., Kayworth T. R., Leidner D. E. An empirical examination of the influence of organizational culture on knowledge management practices. J. Management Inform. Systems (2005) 22(3):191–224CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L., McEvily B., Reagans R. Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):571–582LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Argyres N. S. The impact of information technology on coordination: Evidence from the B-2 “Stealth” bomber. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(2):162–180LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Attewell P. Technology diffusion and organizational learning: The case of business computing. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(1):1–19LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Benner M. J. Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47(4):676–706CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borgatti S., Foster P. C. The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. J. Management (2003) 29(6):991–1013Google Scholar
  • Burton R. M., Obel B. The validity of computational models in organization science: From model realism to purpose of the model. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory (1995) 1(1):57–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carley K. Organizational learning and personnel turnover. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(1):20–46LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carley K. Computational and mathematical organization theory: Perspective and directions. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory (1995) 1(1):39–56CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carlile P. R., Rebentisch E. S. Into the black box: The knowledge transformation cycle. Management Sci. (2003) 49(9):1180–1195LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carlson J. R., Zmud R. W. Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42(2):153–170CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chang M. H., Harrington J. J. E. Discovery and diffusion of knowledge in an endogenous social network. Amer. J. Soc. (2005) 110(4):937–976CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Constant D., Sproull L., Kiesler S. The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(2):119–135LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cross R., Baird L. Technology is not enough: Improving performance by building organizational memory. Sloan Management. Rev. (2000) 41(3):69–78Google Scholar
  • Dennis A. R., George J. F., Jessup L. M., Nunamaker J. F., Vogel D. R. Information technology to support electronic meetings. MIS Quart. (1988) 12(4):591–624CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • El Sawy O., Bowles G. Redesigning the customer support process for the electronic economy: Insights from storage dimensions. MIS Quart. (1997) 21(4):457–483CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Enriquez J., Pisano G. P., Bok G. L. In vivo to in vitro to in silico: Coping with tidal waves of data at Biogen. (2002) 1–30Harvard Business School Case 9-602-122, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Fang C., Lee J., Schilling M. Exploration and exploitation in complex networks: The influence of learning rates and interpersonal network structure. XII Organ. Sci. Winter Conf. (2006) Steamboat, COGoogle Scholar
  • Garfield M. J., Taylor N. J., Dennis A. R., Satzinger J. W. Research report: Modifying paradigms: Individual differences, creativity techniques, and exposure to ideas in group idea generation. Inform. Systems Res (2001) 12(3):322–333LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gill T. High tech hidebound: Case studies of information technologies that inhibited organizational learning. Accounting Management Inform. Tech (1995) 5(1):41–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gongla P., Rizzuto C. R. Evolving communities of practice: IBM Global Services experience. IBM Systems J. (2001) 40(4):842–862CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodman P. S., Darr E. D. Computer-aided systems and communities: Mechanisms for organizational learning in distributed environments. MIS Quart. (1998) 22(4):417–440CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant R. M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:109–122CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gray P. H. A problem-solving perspective on knowledge management practices. Decision Support Systems (2001) 31(1):87–102CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griffith T. L. Technology features as triggers for sensemaking. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24(3):472–488CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen M. T., Haas M. R. Competing for attention in knowledge markets: Electronic document dissemination in a management consulting company. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46(1):1–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen M. T., Nohria N., Tierney T. What's your strategy for managing knowledge? Harvard Bus. Rev. (1999) 77(2):106–115Google Scholar
  • Huang K. T. Capitalizing on intellectual assets. IBM Systems J. (1998) 37(4):570–584CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huber G. P. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):88–115LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Katila R., Ahuja G. Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(6):1183–1194CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larsson R., Bengtsson L., Henriksson K., Sparks J. The interorganizational learning dilemma: Collective knowledge development in strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(3):285–305LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee J., Lee H. Exploration and exploitation in the presence of network externalities. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):553–570LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mack R., Ravin Y., Byrd R. J. Knowledge portals and the emerging digital knowledge workplace. IBM Systems J. (2001) 40(4):925–955CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):71–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Miles M. B., Huberman A. M.Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J. Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7(1):63–92LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland B. T. Information systems and organizational learning: The social epistemology of organizational knowledge systems. Accounting Management Inform. Tech. (1995) 5(1):1–21CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perry-Smith J. E., Shalley C. E. The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28(1):89–106CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prietula M. J., Watson H. S. Extending the Cyert-March duopoly model: Organizational and economic insights. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(5):565–585LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Prietula M., Carley K., Gasser L.Simulating Organizations: Computational Models of Institutions and Groups (1998) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Robey D., Boudreau M.-C. Accounting for the contradictory organizational consequences of information technology: Theoretical directions and methodological implications. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10(2):167–185LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Robey D., Boudreau M.-C., Rose G. M. Information technology and organizational learning: A review and assessment of research. Accounting Management Inform. Tech. (2000) 10:125–155CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rudolph J. W., Repenning N. P. Disaster dynamics: Understanding the role of quantity in organizational collapse. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47(1):1–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sambamurthy V., Subramani M. Special issue on information technologies and knowledge management. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(1):1–7CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sastry M. A. Problems and paradoxes in a model of punctuated organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(2):237–275CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siggelkow N., Rivkin J. W. Speed and search: Designing organizations for turbulence and complexity. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(2):101–122LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Smith A. D., Zeithaml C. Garbage cans and advancing hypercompetition: The creation and exploitation of new capabilities and strategic flexibility in two regional Bell operating companies. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(4):388–399LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Taber C. S., Timpone R. J.Computational Modeling (1996) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(7):509–533CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vera D., Crossan M., Easterby-Smith M., Lyles M. Organizational learning and knowledge management: Toward an integrative framework. The Blackwell Handbook of Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning (2003) (Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK) 122–141Google Scholar
  • Vertegaal R. Attentive user interfaces. Comm. ACM (2003) 46(3):30–33CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wasko M. M., Faraj S. Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(1):35–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick K. E.The Social Psychology of Organizing (1992) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.