Technological Embeddedness and Organizational Change

References

• Archer M. S.Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach (1995) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Archer M. S., Archer M. S., Bhaskar R., Collier A., Lawson T., Norrie A. Introduction: Realism in the social sciences. Critical Realism: Essential Readings (1998) (Routledge, London, UK) 189–205Google Scholar
• Avgerou C. IT and organizational change: An institutionalist perspective. Inform. Tech. People (2000) 13(4):234–262Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley S. R. Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31(1):78–108Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley S. R. The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):61–103Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker M. C. Organizational routines: A review of the literature. Indust. Corporate Change (2004) 13(4):643–677Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhaskar R.A Realist Theory of Science (1978) (The Harvester Press, Brighton, Sussex, UK) Google Scholar
• Bhaskar R.The Possibility of Naturalism (1979) (The Harvester Press, Brighton, Sussex, UK) Google Scholar
• Bhaskar R., Archer M. S., Bhaskar R., Collier A., Lawson T., Norrie A. General introduction. Critical Realism: Essential Readings (1998) (Routledge, London, UK) ix–xxivGoogle Scholar
• Boudreau M.-C., Robey D. Enacting integrated information technology: A human agency perspective. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(1):3–18Link, Google Scholar
• Collier A.Critical Realism: An Introduction to Roy Bhaskar's Philosophy (1994) (Verso, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Davenport T. H. Putting the enterprise into the enterprise systems. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1998) 76(4):121–131Google Scholar
• Dobson P. J. The philosophy of critical realism—An opportunity for information systems research. Inform. Systems Frontiers (2001) 3(2):199–210Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elmes M. B., Strong D. M., Volkoff O. Panoptic empowerment and reflective conformity in enterprise systems-enabled organizations. Inform. Organ. (2005) 15(1):1–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman M. S. Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(6):611–629Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman M. S. A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines. Indust. Corporate Change (2003) 12(4):727–752Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman M. S., Pentland B. T. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(1):94–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gattiker T. F., Goodhue D. L. What happens after ERP implementation: Understanding the impact of interdependence and differentiation on plant-level outcomes. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(3):559–585Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giddens A.The Constitution of Society (1984) (University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA) Google Scholar
• Glaser B. G.Theoretical Sensitivity (1978) (Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA) Google Scholar
• Glaser B. G., Strauss A.The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (1967) (Aldine, New York) Google Scholar
• Gosain S. Enterprise information systems as objects and carriers of institutional forces: The new iron cage? J. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2004) 5(4):151–182Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. (1985) 91(3):481–510Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M., Nohria N., Eccles R. G. Problems of explanation in economic sociology. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action (1992) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) 25–56Google Scholar
• Hanseth O., Aanestad M., Berg M. Actor-network theory and information systems. What's so special? Inform. Tech. People (2004) 17(2):116–123Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howcroft D., Mitev N., Wilson M., Mingers J., Willcocks L. What we may learn from the social shaping of technology approach. Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems (2004) (John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, UK) 329–371Google Scholar
• Jones M., Currie W., Galliers B. Structuration theory. Rethinking Management Information Systems: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (1999) (Oxford University Press, New York) 103–135Google Scholar
• Klaus K., Rosemann M., Gable G. What is ERP? Inform. Systems Frontiers (2000) 2(2):141–162Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langer E. J.Mindfulness (1989) (Da Capo Press, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Latour B., Law J. The powers of association. Power, Action and Belief (1986) (Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, UK) 264–280Google Scholar
• Latour B., Orlikowski W. J., Walsham G., Jones M. R., DeGross J. I. Social theory and the study of computerized work sites. Information Technology and Changes in Organizational Work (1996) (Chapman & Hall, London, UK) 295–307Crossref, Google Scholar
• Law J. Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice (1992) 5(4):379–393Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence P. R., Lorsch J. W.Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration (1967) (Harvard University Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Levinthal D., Rerup C. Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(4):502–513Link, Google Scholar
• Locke K.Grounded Theory in Management Research (2001) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Markus M. L., Tanis C., Zmud R. W. The enterprise system experience—From adoption to success. Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future Through the Past (2000) (Pinnaflex Educational Resources Inc., Cincinnati, OH) 173–207Google Scholar
• Miles M. B., Huberman M. A.Qualitative Data Analysis (1994) 2nd ed.(Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Mingers J. Real-izing information systems: Critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for information systems. Twenty-Third Internat. Conf. Information Systems (2002) Barcelona, Spain:295–303Google Scholar
• Mingers J., Mingers J., Willcocks L. Re-establishing the real: Critical realism and information systems. Social Theory and Philosophy for Inform. Systems (2004) (John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, UK) 372–406Google Scholar
• Monteiro E., Hanseth O., Orlikowski W. J., Walsham G., Jones M., DeGross R. J. I. Social shaping of information infrastructure: On being specific about the technology. Information Technology and Changes in Organizational Work (1996) (Chapman & Hall, London, UK) 325–343Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mutch A. Actors and networks or agents and structures: Towards a realist view of information systems. Organization (2002) 9(3):477–496Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):398–427Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(4):404–428Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J., Robey D. Information technology and the structuring of organizations. Inform. Systems Res. (1991) 2(2):143–169Link, Google Scholar
• Outhwaite W., Archer M. S., Bhaskar R., Collier A., Lawson T., Norrie A. Realism and social science. Critical Realism: Essential Readings (1998) (Routledge, London, UK) 282–296Google Scholar
• Pentland B. T., Feldman M. S. Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Indust. Corporate Change (2005) 14(5):793–815Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reed M. I. In praise of duality and dualism: Rethinking agency and structure in organizational analysis. Organ. Stud. (1997) 18(1):21–42Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robey D., Boudreau M. Accounting for the contradictory organizational consequences of information technology: Theoretical directions and methodological implications. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10(2):167–185Link, Google Scholar
• Strauss A., Corbin J.Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (1998) 2nd ed.(Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Suddaby R. From the editors: What grounded theory is not. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(4):633–642Crossref, Google Scholar
• Urquhart C., Lee A. S., Liebenau J., DeGross J. I. Exploring analyst-client communication: Using grounded theory techniques to investigate interaction in informal requirements gathering. Information Systems and Qualitative Research (1997) (Chapman & Hall, London, UK) 149–181Crossref, Google Scholar
• Volkoff O., Strong D. M., Elmes M. B. Understanding enterprise systems-enabled integration. Eur. J. Inform. Systems (2005) 14(2):110–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsham G., Lee A. S., Liebenau J., DeGross J. I. Actor-network theory and IS research: Current status and future prospects. Information Systems and Qualitative Research (1997) (Chapman & Hall, London, UK) 466–480Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick K. E., Sutcliffe K. M. Mindfulness and the quality of organizational attention. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(4):514–524Link, Google Scholar