IT Assets, Organizational Capabilities, and Firm Performance: How Resource Allocations and Organizational Differences Explain Performance Variation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0306

References

  • Anderson E. W., Fornell C., Rust R. T. Customer satisfaction, productivity, and profitability: Differences between goods and services. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16(2):129–145LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Athey S., Stern S. An empirical framework for testing theories about complementarity in organizational design. (1998) . NBER Working Paper 6600, Cambridge, MACrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Autor D., Levy F., Murnane R. Computing inequality: Have computers changed the labor market? Quart. J. Econom. (1998) 113(4):1169–1214CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bakos Y. A strategic analysis of electronic marketplaces. MIS Quart. (1991) 15(3):295–310CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barney J. B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management (1991) 17(1):99–120CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bartel A., Ichniowski C., Shaw K. Using insider econometrics to study productivity. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2004) 2(1):217–223CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barua A., Kriebel C. H., Mukhopadhyay T. Information technology and business value: An analytical and empirical investigation. Inform. Systems Res. (1995) 6(1):2–23LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bharadwaj A. S. A resource-based perspective on IT capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(1):169–196CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bharadwaj A. S., Bharadwaj S. G., Konsynski B. Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin's q. Management Sci. (1999) 45(7):1008–1024LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Boudreau D., Gefen D., Straub D. W. Validation in MIS research: A state-of-the-art assessment. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(1):1–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bresnahan T. F., Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. M. Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Quart. J. Econom. (2002) 117(1):339–376CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Breusch T., Pagan A. A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica (1979) 47:1287–1294CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Broadbent M., Weill P., Neo B. S. Strategic context and patterns of IT infrastructure capability. J. Strat. Inform. Sys. (1999) 8(2):157–187CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E. The contribution of information technology to consumer welfare. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7(3):281–300LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. M. Information technology as a factor of production: The role of differences among firms. Econom. Innov. New Tech. (1995) 3(4):183–199CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. M. Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Sci. (1996) 42(4):541–558LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. M. Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. J. Econom. Perspectives (2000) 14(4):23–48CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E., Yang S., DeGross J. I., Kuldeep K. The intangible benefits and costs of investments: Evidence from financial markets. Proc. 18th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1997) (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta, GA) Google Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E., Malone T., Gurbaxani V., Kambil A. Does information technology lead to smaller firms? Management Sci. (1994) 40(12):1645–1662LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell D. T., Fiske D. W. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psych. Bull. (1959) 56(2):81–105CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Capon N., Farley J. U., Hoenig S. Determinants of financial performance: A meta analysis. Management Sci. (1990) 36(10):1143–1159LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clemons E. K., Row M. C. Sustaining IT advantage: The role of structural differences. MIS Quart. (1991) 15(3):275–292CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):128–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Devaraj S., Kohli R. Performance impacts of information technology: Is actual use the missing link? Management Sci. (2003) 49(3):273–289LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dewan S., Min C. The substitution of information technology for other factors of production: A firm level analysis. Management Sci. (1997) 43(12):1660–1675LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dierickx I., Cool K. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Sci. (1989) 35(12):1504–1511LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Doll W. J., Torkzadeh G. Developing a multidimensional measure of system use in an organizational context. Inform. Management (1998) 33(4):171–185CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dos Santos B. L., Peffers K. Rewards to investors in innovative information technology applications: First movers and early followers in ATMs. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(3):241–259LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dos Santos B. L., Peffers K., Mauer D. C. The impact of information technology investment announcements on the market value of the firm. Inform. Systems Res. (1993) 4(1):1–23LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dosi G., Nelson R., Winter S. G.The Nature and Dynamic of Organizational Capabilities (2000) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Duncan N. B. Capturing flexibility of information technology infrastructure: A study of resource characteristics and their measure. J. Management Inform. Sys. (1995) 12(2):37–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dunne T., Haltiwanger J., Troske K. Technology and jobs: Secular changes and cyclincal dynamics. Carnegie-Rochester Conf. Series Public Policy (1997) XLVI:107–178CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Floyd S. W., Wooldridge B. Path analysis of the relationship between competitive strategy, information technology and financial performance. J. Management Inform. Sys. (1990) 7(1):47–64CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gefen D., Straub D. W., Boudreau M. C. Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Comm. AIS (2000) 4(7):1–78Google Scholar
  • Goldin C., Katz L. The origins of technology-skill complementarity. Quart. J. Econom. (1998) 113(3):693–732CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodhue D. L., Thompson R. L. Task technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(2):213–236CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant R. M. Toward a knowledge based theory of the firm. Strat. Management J. (1996) 17:109–122CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hitt L. M. Information technology and firm boundaries: Evidence from panel data. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10(2):134–149LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hitt L. M., Brynjolfsson E. Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: Three different measures of information technology value. MIS Quart. (1996) 20(2):121–142CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen M. C., Meckling W. H. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. (1976) 3:295–316CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keen P. G. W.Shaping the Future: Business Design Through Information Technology (1991) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Kelley M. R. Productivity and information technology: The elusive connection. Management Sci. (1994) 40(11):1406–1425LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kohli R., Devaraj S. Measuring information technology pay-off: A meta-analysis of structural variables in firm-level empirical research. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(2):127–145LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kreuger A. How computers have changed the wage structure: Evidence from micro data. Quart. J. Econom. (1993) 108(1):33–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loveman G. W., Allen T. J., Scott Morton M. S. An assessment of the productivity impact of information technologies. Information Technology and the Corporation of the 1990s: Research Studies (1994) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Malone T. W., Yates J., Benjamin R. I. Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies. Comm. ACM (1987) 30(6):484–497CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mata F. J., Fuerst W. L., Barney J. Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(4):487–505CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom P., Roberts J. The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy and organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1990) 80(3):511–528Google Scholar
  • Mithas S., Krishnan M. S., Fornell C. Why do customer relationship management applications affect customer satisfaction? J. Marketing (2005) 69(4):201–209CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Montgomery C., Wernerfelt B. Diversification, Ricardian rents, and Tobin's q. RAND J. Econom. (1988) 19:623–632CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nagayama K., Weill P. 7-Eleven Japan Co., Ltd.: Reinventing the retail business model. (2004) (Sloan School of Management, MIT, Cambridge, MA) . Center for Information Systems Research Working Paper 338Google Scholar
  • Nelson R., Winter S.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Prahalad C. K., Hamel G. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1990) 63:79–91Google Scholar
  • Richardson G. B. The organization of industry. Econom. J. (1972) 82:883–896Google Scholar
  • Rockart J. F., Earl M. J., Ross J. Eight imperatives for the new IT organization. Sloan Management Rev. (1996) 38(1):43–55Google Scholar
  • Ross J. W., Beath C. M., Goodhue D. L. Develop long term competitiveness through IT assets. Sloan Management Rev. (1996) 38(1):31–45Google Scholar
  • Sambamurthy V., Bharadwaj A., Grover V. Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of IT in contemporary firms. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(2):237–263CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strassman P.The Business Value of Computers (1990) (Information Economics Press, New Haven, CT) Google Scholar
  • Straub D. W. Validating instruments in MIS research. MIS Quart (1989) 13(2):147–169CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strat. Management J. (1997) 18(7):509–533CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman M. L., Anderson P. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31(3):439–465CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wade M., Hulland J. Review: The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quart. (2004) 28(1):107–142CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weill P. The relationship between investment in information technology and firm performance: A study of the valve manufacturing sector. Inform. Systems Res. (1992) 3(4):307–333LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weill P., Aral S. IT savvy: Achieving industry leading returns from your IT portfolio. CISR Res. Briefing (2005) 5(2A):1–4Google Scholar
  • Weill P., Broadbent M.Levering the New Infrastructure: How Market Leaders Capitalize on Information Technology (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Weill P., Ross J.IT Governance: How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results (2004) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Wernerfelt B. A resource based view of the firm. Strat. Management J. (1984) 5:171–180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • White H. A heteroscedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroscedasticity. Econometrica (1980) 48(4):817–838CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O.Markets and Hierarchy: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (1975) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Zhu K., Kraemer K. L. e-Commerce metrics for net-enhanced organizations: Assessing the value of e-commerce to firm performance in the manufacturing sector. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(3):275–295LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.