Managing Complexity and Unforeseeable Uncertainty in Startup Companies: An Empirical Study

References

• Adner R., Levinthal D. A. Real options and real tradeoffs. Acad. Management Rev. (2004) 29(1):120–126Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson P. Complexity theory and organization science. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(3):216–232Link, Google Scholar
• Bank D. The Java saga. Wired (1995) December):166–169238246Google Scholar
• Beinhocker E. D. Robust adaptive strategies. Sloan Management Rev. (1999) 40(3):95–106Google Scholar
• Boyd B. K. Strategic planning and financial performance. J. Management Stud. (1991) 28(4):353–374Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brokaw L. The truth about start-ups. Inc (1991) April):52–67Google Scholar
• Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K. M. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(1):1–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C., Weber M. Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity. J. Risk Uncertainty (1992) 5(4):325–370Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chapman C., Ward S.Project Risk Management (1997) (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK) Google Scholar
• Chew W. B., Leonard-Barton D., Bohn R. E. Beating Murphy's law. Sloan Management Rev. (1991) 32(3):5–16Google Scholar
• Day G. S., Schoemaker P. J. H.Peripheral Vision (2006) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Dekel E., Lipman B. L., Rustichini A. Standard state-space models preclude unawareness. Econometrica (1998) 66(1):159–173Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dekel E., Lipman B. L., Rustichini A. Representing preferences with a unique subjective state space. Econometrica (2001) 69(4):891–934Crossref, Google Scholar
• deYounge J., Pearce B. The case for capital efficiency: The hard data. Battery Ventures Newsletter (2004) OctoberGoogle Scholar
• Drucker P.Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles (1985) (Harper & Row, New York) Google Scholar
• Duchan A. I. A relationship between the F and t statistics and the simple correlation coefficients in classic least squares regression. Amer. Statistician (1969) 23(3):27–28Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Tabrizi B. N. Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(1):84–110Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferber R.Handbook of Marketing Research (1974) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Fleming L., Sorenson O. Technology as a complex adaptive system. Res. Policy (2001) 30(7):1019–1039Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox B. L. Random restarting versus simulated annealing. Comput. Math. Appl. (1993) 27(66):33–35Google Scholar
• Girotra K., Terwiesch C., Ulrich K. T. Valuing R&D projects in a portfolio: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. Management Sci. (2007) 53(9):1452–1466Link, Google Scholar
• Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (2002) 5th ed.(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Iansiti M., MacCormack A. Developing products on internet time. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1997) 75(5):108–117Google Scholar
• Kaplan S. N., Strömberg P. Financial contracting theory meets the real world: An empirical analysis of venture capital contracts. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2003) 70(2):281–315Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kauffman S. A., Lobo J., Macready W. G. Optimal search on a technology landscape. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2000) 43(2):141–166Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knight F. H.Risk, Uncertainty and Profit (1921) (Houghton Mifflin, Boston) Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D.Wellsprings of Knowledge (1995) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Levinthal D. A. Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. (1997) 43(7):934–950Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D. A., March J. G. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14(S2):95–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D., Warglien M. Landscape design: Designing for local action in complex worlds. Organization Sci. (1999) 10(3):342–357Link, Google Scholar
• Loch C. H., De Meyer A., Pich M. T.Managing the Unknown (2006) (John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loch C. H., Solt M. E., Bailey E. M. Diagnosing unforeseeable uncertainty in a new venture. J. Product Innovation Management (2008) 25(1):28–46Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loch C. H., Terwiesch C., Thomke S. Parallel and sequential testing of design alternatives. Management Sci. (2001) 47(5):663–678Link, Google Scholar
• Lynn G. S., Morone J. G., Paulson A. S. Marketing and discontinuous innovation: The probe and learn process. California Management Rev. (1996) 38(3):8–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Sci. (1991) 2(1):71–87Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath R. G. Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(1):118–131Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath R. G., MacMillan I. C. Discovery driven planning. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1995) 73(4):44–54Google Scholar
• Mendenhall W., Reinmuth J. E., Beaver R. J.Statistics for Management and Economics (1993) 7th ed.(Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA) Google Scholar
• Miller R., Lessard D. R.Strategic Management of Large Scale Engineering Projects (2000) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Modica S., Rustichini A. Unawareness and partial information structure. Games Econom. Behav. (1999) 27(2):265–298Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morris P. W. G., Hough G. H.The Anatomy of Major Projects (1987) (Wiley, Chichester, UK) Google Scholar
• Pich M. T., Loch C. H., De Meyer A. On uncertainty, ambiguity and complexity in project management. Management Sci. (2002) 48(8):1008–1023Link, Google Scholar
• PriceWaterhouseCooper MoneyTree™ Survey, Historical Trend Data for the U.S. (2005) . http://www.pwcmoneytree.comGoogle Scholar
• Rivkin J. W. Imitation of complex strategies. Management Sci. (2000) 46(6):824–844Link, Google Scholar
• Sahlman W. A. The structure and governance of venture-capital organizations. J. Financial Econom. (1990) 27(2):473–521Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanderson S., Uzumeri M. Managing product families: The case of the Sony walkman. Res. Policy (1995) 24(5):761–782Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schrader S., Riggs W. M., Smith R. P. Choice over uncertainty and ambiguity in technical problem solving. J. Engrg. Tech. Management (1993) 10(1,2):73–99Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shrader C. B., Taylor L., Dalton D. R. Strategic planning and organizational performance: A critical appraisal. J. Management (1984) 10(2):149–171Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon H. A.Science of the Artificial (1969) 2nd ed.(MIT Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Smith P. G., Merritt G. M.Proactive Risk Management (2002) (Productivity Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Sobek D. K., Ward A. C., Liker J. K. Toyota's principles of set-based concurrent engineering. Sloan Management Rev. (1999) 40(2):67–83Google Scholar
• Sommer S. C., Loch C. H. Selectionism and learning in complex and ambiguous projects. Management Sci. (2004) 50(10):1334–1347Link, Google Scholar
• Stalk G., Webber A. M. Japan's dark side of time. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1993) 71(4):93–102Google Scholar
• Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(7):509–533Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C., Lock C. H. Measuring the effectiveness of overlapping development activities. Management Sci. (1999) 45(4):455–465Link, Google Scholar
• Thomke S. H., Reinertsen D. Agile product development. California Management Rev. (1998) 41(1):8–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., O'Reilly C. A.Winning Through Innovation: A Practical Guide to Leading Organizational Change and Renewal (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wideman R. M.Project and Program Risk Management (1992) (Project Mgmt Inst., Newton Square, PA) Google Scholar
• Yin R. K.Case Study Research: Design and Methods (2003) 3rd ed.(Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar