Do Workgroup Faultlines Help or Hurt? A Moderated Model of Faultlines, Team Identification, and Group Performance

References

• Aiken L. S., West S. G.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (1991) (SAGE Publications, Inc., Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
• Allison P. D. Measures of inequality. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1978) 43:865–880Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashforth B. E., Mael F. Social identity theory and the organization. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14:20–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barlow M.Concordancing with MonoConc Pro. 2.0. (2000) (Athelstan, Houston) Google Scholar
• Bettencourt B. A., Dill K. E., Greathouse S., Charlton K., Mulholland A. Evaluations of ingroup and outgroup members: The category-based expectancy violation. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1997) 33:244–275Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bezrukova K., Thatcher S. M. B., Jehn K. A., Behfar K. J., Thompson L. L. Group heterogeneity and faultlines: Comparing alignment and dispersion theories of group composition. Conflict in Organizational Groups: New Directions in Theory and Practice (2007) (Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL) 57–92Google Scholar
• Blau P.Inequality and Composition: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure (1977) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Bliese P. D., Klein K. J., Kozlowski S. W. J. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations (2000) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) 349–381Google Scholar
• Bogardus E. S. Measuring social distances. J. Appl. Soc. (1925) 9:299–308Google Scholar
• Brewer M. B., Jackson S. E., Ruderman M. N. Managing diversity: The role of social identities. Diversity in Work Teams: Research Paradigms for a Changing Workplace (1995) (American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.) 47–68Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer M. B., Oskamp S. Reducing prejudice through cross-categorization: Effects of multiple social identities. Reducing Prejudice and Discrimination (2000) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 165–183Google Scholar
• Brickson S. L. Organizational identity orientation: Forging a link between organizational identity and organizations' relations with stakeholders. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50:576–609Google Scholar
• Chatman J. A., Flynn F. J. The influence of demographic heterogeneity on emergence and consequences of cooperative norms in work teams. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44:956–974Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatman J. A., Spataro S. E. Using self-categorization theory to understand relational demography-based variations in people's responsiveness to organizational culture. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48:321–331Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clement D., Schiereck J. Sex composition and group performance in a visual signal detection task. Memory Cognition (1973) 1:251–255Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cramton C. D., Hinds P. J., Staw B., Kramer R. Subgroup dynamics in internationally distributed teams: Ethnocentrism or cross-national learning? Research in Organizational Behavior (2005) 26(Oxford, UK, Elsevier Science Inc.) 231–263Google Scholar
• Crisp R. J., Hewstone M. Crossed categorization and intergroup bias: The moderating roles of intergroup and affective context. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (2000) 36:357–383Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cummings A., Zhou J., Oldham G. R. Demographic differences and employees work outcomes: Effects of multiple comparison groups. Acad. Management Meetings (1993) Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
• Dahlin K. B., Weingart L. R., Hinds P. J. Team diversity and information use. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48:1107–1123Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Dreu C. K. W., West M. A. Minority dissent and team innovation. J. Appl. Psych. (2001) 86:1191–1201Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doucet L., Jehn K. A. Analyzing harsh words in a sensitive setting: American expatriates in communist China. J. Organ. Behav. (1997) 18:559–582Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dovidio J. F., Gaetner S. L., Validzic A. Intergroup bias: Status, differentiation, and a common in-group identity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1997a) 75:109–120Google Scholar
• Dovidio J. F., Gaertner S. L., Validzic A., Matoka K., Johnson B., Frazier S. Extending the benefits of recategorization: Evaluations, self-disclosure, and helping. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1997b) 33:401–420Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyck B., Starke F. A. The formation of breakaway organizations: Observations and a process model. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:792–822Crossref, Google Scholar
• Earley P. C., Mosakowski E. Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43:26–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elvira M. M., Graham M. E. Not just a formality: Pay system formalization and the gender earnings effects. Organ. Sci. (2003) 13:601–617Link, Google Scholar
• Ely R. J., Thomas D. A. Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46:229–273Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eurich-Fulcer R., Schofield J. W. Correlated versus uncorrelated social categorizations: The effect on intergroup bias. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1995) 21:149–159Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans M. G. A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1985) 36:305–323Crossref, Google Scholar
• Florin P., Giamartino G. A., Kenny D. A., Wandersman A. Levels of analysis and effects: Clarifying group influence and climate by separating individual and group effects. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. (1990) 20:881–900Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freidman R. A., Podolny J. Differentiation of boundary spanning roles: Labor negotiations and implications for role conflict. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37:28–47Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaertner S. L., Dovidio J. F.Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model (2000) (Psychology Press/Taylor and Francis, Philadelphia) Google Scholar
• Gaertner S. L., Dovidio J. F., Anastasio P. A., Bachman B. A., Rust M. C., Strobe W., Hewstone M. The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of integroup bias. The European Review of Social Psychology (1993) 4(John Wiley & Sons, London) 1–26Google Scholar
• Gibson C., Vermeulen F. A healthy divide: Subgroups as a stimulus for team learning behavior. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48:202–239Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodman P. S., Ravlin E. C., Argote L., Goodman P. Current thinking about groups: Setting the stage for new ideas. Designing Effective Work Groups (1986) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) 1–33Google Scholar
• Gruenfeld D. H., Mannix E. A., Williams K. Y., Neale M. A. Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1996) 67:1–15Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R., Lorsch J. W. The design of work teams. Handbook of Organizational Behavior (1987) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) 315–342Google Scholar
• Hambrick D. C., Li J. T., Xin K., Tsui A. S. Compositional gaps and downward spirals in international joint venture management groups. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:1033–1053Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart C. M., Van Vugt M. From faultlines to group fission: Understanding membership changes in small groups. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (2006) 32:392–404Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haslam S. A., Ellemers N. Social identity in industrial and organizational psychology: Concepts, controversies and contributions. Internat. Rev. Indust. Organ. Psych. (2005) 20:39–118Google Scholar
• Hewstone M., Rubin M., Willis H. Intergroup bias. Annual Rev. Psych. (2002) 53:575–604Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogg M. A., Terry D. J. Social identity and social categorization processes in organizational contexts. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25:121–140Google Scholar
• Hornsey M. J., Hogg M. A. Subgroup relations: A comparison of mutual intergroup differentiation and common ingroup identity models of prejudice reduction. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (2000) 26:242–256Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hraba J., Hagendoorn L., Hagendoorn R. The ethnic hierarchy in the Netherlands: Social distance and social representation. British J. Soc. Psych. (1989) 28:57–69Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson S. E., Joshi A., Erhardt N. L. Recent research on teams and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. J. Management (2003) 29:801–830Google Scholar
• Jehn K. A. A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:520–557Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn K. A., Werner O. Hapax Legomenon II: Theory, a thesaurus, and word frequency. Cultural Anthropology Method (1993) 5:8–10Google Scholar
• Jehn K. A., Bezrukova K., Thatcher S. M. B., De Dreu C. K. W., Gelfand M. Conflict, diversity and faultlines in workgroups. The Psychology of Conflict and Conflict Management in Organizations (2007) (Lawrence Erlbaum, New York) 177–208The SIOP Frontiers SeriesGoogle Scholar
• Jehn K. A., Chadwick C., Thatcher S. M. B. To agree or not to agree: The effects of value congruence, individual demographic dissimilarity and conflict on workgroup outcomes. Internat. J. Conflict Management (1997) 8:287–306Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn K. A., Northcraft G., Neale M. A. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:741–763Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jetten J., Spears R., Manstead A. S. R. Defining dimensions of distinctiveness: Group variability makes a difference to differentiation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1998) 74:1481–1492Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jetten J., Spears R., Postmes T. Intergroup distinctiveness and differentiation: A meta-analytic integration. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2004) 86:862–879Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jobson J. D.Applied Multivariate Data Analysis. Volume II: Categorical and Multivariate Methods (1992) (Springer-Verlag, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kane A. A., Argote L., Levine J. M. Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2005) 96:56–71Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lau D., Murnighan J. K. Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23:325–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lau D., Murnighan J. K. Interactions within groups and subgroups: The dynamic effects of demographic faultlines. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48:645–659Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leong C., Ward C. Identity conflict in sojourners. Internat. J. Intercultural Relations (2000) 24:763–776Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li J. T., Hambrick D. C. Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48:794–813Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mackie D. M., Devos T., Smith E. R. Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2000) 79:602–616Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mael F., Ashforth B. E. Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. J. Organ. Behav. (1992) 13:103–123Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mannix E. A. Organizations as resource dilemmas: The effects of power balance on coalition formation in small groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1993) 55:1–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mannix E. A., Neale M. A. What differences make a difference? Psych. Sci. Public Interest (2005) 6:31–55Crossref, Google Scholar
• Messick D. M., Mackie D. M. Intergroup relations. Annual Rev. Psych. (1989) 40:45–81Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D. T., Prentice D. A., Prentice D. A., Miller D. T. Some consequences of a belief in group essence: The category divide hypothesis. Cultural Divides: Understanding and Overcoming Group Conflict (1999) (Sage Publications, New York) 213–238Google Scholar
• Molleman E. Diversity in demographic characteristics, abilities and personality traits: Do faultlines affect team functioning? Group Decision Negotiation (2005) 14:173–193Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrison D. G. Measurement problems in cluster analysis. Management Sci. (1967) 13:B-775–B-780Link, Google Scholar
• Mottola G. R., Bachman B. A., Gaertner S. L., Dovidio J. F. How groups merge: The effects of merger integration patterns on anticipated commitment to the merged organization. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. (1997) 27:1335–1358Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mullin B. A., Hogg M. A. Dimensions of subjective uncertainty in social identification and minimal intergroup discrimination. British J. Soc. Psych. (1998) 37:345–365Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nemeth C. J. Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psych. Rev. (1986) 93:23–32Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nesdale D., Mak A. S. Ethnic identification, self-esteem, and immigrant psychological health. Internat. J. Intercultural Relations (2003) 27:23–40Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pelled L. H. Demographic diversity, conflict, work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:615–631Link, Google Scholar
• Pelled L. H., Eisenhardt K. M., Xin K. R. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:1–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips K. W. The effects of categorically based expectations on minority influence: The importance of congruence. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (2003) 29:3–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Lee J., Podsakoff N. P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88:879–903Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polzer J. T., Milton L. P., Swann W. B. Capitalizing on diversity: Interpersonal congruence in small work groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47:296–324Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polzer J. T., Crisp C. B., Jarvenpaa S. L., Kim J. W. Extending the faultline model to geographically dispersed teams: How collocated subgroups can impair group functioning. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49:679–692Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratt M. G., Whetten D. A., Godfrey P. C. To be or not to be? Central questions in organizational identification. Identity in Organizations: Building Theory Through Conversations (1998) (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) 171–207Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratt M. G. The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: Managing identification among Amway distributors. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45:456–493Crossref, Google Scholar
• Randel A. E. Identity salience: A moderator of the relationship between group gender composition and work group conflict. J. Organ. Behav. (2002) 23:749–776Crossref, Google Scholar
• Randel A. E., Jaussi K. S. Functional background identity, diversity, and individual performance in cross-functional teams. Acad. Management J. (2003) 46:763–774Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rink F., Ellemers N. Diversity as a basis for shared organizational identity: The norm congruity principle. British J. Management (2007) 18:S17–S27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roccas S., Brewer M. B. Social identity complexity. Personality Soc. Rev. (2002) 6:88–106Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rokeach M. R.The Open and Closed Mind (1960) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Salk J. E., Shenkar O. Social identities in an international joint venture: An exploratory case study. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:161–178Link, Google Scholar
• Sawyer J. E., Houlette M. A., Yealey E. L. Decision performance and diversity structure: Comparing faultlines in convergent, crosscut, and racially homogeneous groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2006) 99:1–15Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schweiger D. M., Sandberg W. R. The utilization of individual capabilities in group approaches to strategic decision-making. Strategic Management J. (1989) 10:31–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwenk C. R. Effects of devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiry on decision making: A meta-analysis. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1990) 47:161–176Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharma S.Applied Multivariate Techniques (1996) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Sherif M.Group Conflict and Cooperation (1966) (Routledge, London) Google Scholar
• Stevenson W. B., Pearce J. L., Porter L. W. The concept of “coalition” in organizational theory and research. Acad. Management Rev. (1985) 10:256–268Google Scholar
• Tafarodi R. W., Kang S., Milne A. B. When different becomes similar: Compensatory conformity in bicultural visible minorities. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (2002) 28:1131–1142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H., Turner J. C., Worchel S., Austin W. G. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Psychology of Intergroup Relations (1986) (Nelson-Hall, Chicago) 7–24Google Scholar
• Thatcher S. M. B., Jehn K. A., Zanutto E. Cracks in diversity research: The effects of faultlines on conflict and performance. Group Decision Negotiation (2003) 12:217–241Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsui A. S., Egan T. D., O'Reilly C. A. Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37:549–577Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tziner A., Eden D. Effects of crew composition on crew performance: Does the whole equal the sum of its parts? J. Appl. Psych. (1985) 70:85–94Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A. H., Delbecq A. L., Koenig R. Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. Amer. Soc. Rev. (1976) 41:322–338Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van der Vegt G. S., Bunderson J. S. Learning and performance in multi-disciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48:532–547Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg D., Ellemers N., Haslam S. A., van Knippenberg D., Platow M. J., Ellemers N. Social identity and group performance: Identification as the key to group-oriented effort. Social Identity at Work: Developing Theory for Organizational Practice (2003) (Psychology Press, New York) 29–42Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg D., Schippers M. C. Work group diversity. Annual Rev. Psychol. (2007) 58:515–541Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Vugt M., Hart C. M. Social identity as social glue: The origins of group loyalty. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2004) 86:585–598Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wagner W. G., Pfeffer J., O'Reilly C. A. Organizational demography and turnover in top management groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1984) 29:74–92Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watson W. E., Kumar K., Michaelson L. K. Cultural diversity's impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Acad. Management J. (1993) 38:590–602Crossref, Google Scholar
• Webber S., Donahue L. Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. J. Management (2001) 27:141–162Google Scholar
• Weber R. A., Camerer C. F. Cultural conflict and merger failure: An experimental approach. Management Sci. (2003) 49:400–415Link, Google Scholar
• Williams K., O'Reilly C. A., Staw B. M., Cummings L. L. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior (1998) 20(Elsevier Science Inc., Oxford, UK) 77–140Google Scholar