Getting Everyone on Board: The Role of Inspirational Leadership in Geographically Dispersed Teams

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0383

References

  • Allen N. J., Meyer J. P. The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. J. Appl. Psych. (1990) 63:1–18Google Scholar
  • Armstrong D., Cole P., Jackson S. E., Ruderman M. Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups. Diversity in Work Teams (1996) (American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
  • Avolio B., Kahai S., Dodge G. E. E-leadership: Implications for theory, research and practice. Leadership Quart. (2000) 11:615–668CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bass B. M.Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations (1985) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Bell B. S., Kozlowski S. J. A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Groups Organ. Management (2002) 27:14–49CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brewer M. B. In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psych. Bull. (1979) 86:307–324CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brewer M. B., Kramer R. The psychology of intergroup attitudes and behavior. Annual Rev. Psych. (1985) 36:219–243CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brewer M. B., Kramer R. Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1986) 50:543–549CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Byrne B. M.Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming (2001) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Conger J., Kanungo R.Charismatic Leadership in Organizations (1998) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Cooper-Hakim A., Viswesvaran C. The construct of work commitment: Testing an integrative framework. Psych. Bull. (2005) 131:241–259CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cramton C. D., Hinds P. J. Sub group dynamics in internationally distributed teams: Ethnocentrism or cross-national learning? Res. Organ. Behavior (2005) 26:231–263CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Cremer D., Van Vugt M. Social identification effects in social dilemmas: A transformation of motives. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. (1999) 29:871–893CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Denison D. R., Hoojberg R., Quinn R. E. Paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organ. Sci. (1993) 6:524–539LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dirks K. T., Ferrin D. L. The role of trust in organizational settings. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:450–467LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ellemers N., De Gilder D., Haslam S. A. Motivating individuals and groups at work: A social identity perspective on leadership and group performance. Acad. Management Rev. (2004) 29:459–478Google Scholar
  • Ferrin D. L., Dirks K. T., Shah P. P. Direct and indirect effects of third-party relationships on interpersonal trust. J. Appl. Psych. (2006) 91:870–883CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiol M. C., O'Connor E. J. Identification in face-to-face, hybrid, and pure virtual teams: Untangling the contradictions. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16:19–32LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hackman R. J. Learning more about crossing levels: Evidence from airplanes, hospitals, and orchestras. J. Organ. Behavior (2003) 24:905–922CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hinds P. J., Mortensen M. Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16:290–307LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hofmann D. A., Gavin M. B. Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Theoretical and methodological implications for organizational science. J. Management (1998) 23:623–641Google Scholar
  • Hofmann D., Griffin M., Gavin M., Klein K., Kozlowski S. The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations (2000) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) 423–468Google Scholar
  • House R. J. A path goal theory of leader effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1971) 16:321–338CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • House R. J., Shamir B., Chemers M. M., Ayman R. Toward the integration of charismatic, visionary, and transformational leadership theories. Leadership Theory and Research: Perspectives and Directions (1993) (Academic Press, San Diego) 81–107Google Scholar
  • House R. J., Spangler W. D., Woycke J. Personality and charisma in the U.S. presidency: A psychological theory of leader effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36:364–396CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Howell J. M., Shamir B. The role of followers in the charismatic leadership process: Relationships and their consequences. Acad. Management Rev. (2005) 1:96–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Howell J. P., Dorfman P. W., Kerr S. Moderator variables in leadership research. Acad. Management Rev. (1986) 11:88–102Google Scholar
  • Janssen O., Van Yperren N. W. Employees' goal orientations, the quality of leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47:368–384CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jarvenpaa S. L., Leidner D. E. Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10:791–815LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jarvenpaa S., Knoll K., Leidner D. Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. J. Management Inform. Systems (1998) 14:29–63CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jehn K. A., Northcraft G. B., Neale M. A. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:741–763CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johns G. The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Acad. Management Rev. (2006) 31:386–408CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Joshi A., Lazarova M. B., Shapiro D. L., Von Glinow M. A., Cheng J. Do “global” teams need “global” leaders?: Identifying leadership competencies in multinational teams. Managing Multinational Teams: Cultural, Organizational, and National Influences (2006) (Elsevier Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Kark R., Shamir B., Avolio B. J., Yammarino F. J. The dual effect of transformational leadership: Priming relational and collective selves and further effects on follower. Transformational and Charismatic Leadership: The Road Ahead (2002) (Elsevier Science, Oxford) 67–91Google Scholar
  • Katz A., Te'eni D. The contingent impact of contextualizing on computer-mediated collaboration. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18:261–276LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kayworth T. R., Leidner D. E. Leadership effectiveness in global virtual teams. J. Management Inform. Systems (2002) 18:7–40CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerr S., Jermier J. M. Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1978) 22:375–403CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kiesler S., Cummings J., Hinds P., Kiesler S. What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? A legacy of research. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge) 55–81Google Scholar
  • Kirkman B. L., Rosen B., Tesluk P. E., Gibson C. B. The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance: The moderating role of face-to-face interaction. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47:175–192CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klein H. J., Wesson M. J., Hollenbeck J. R., Wright P. M., DeShon R. P. The assessment of goal commitment: A measurement model meta-analysis. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (2001) 85:32–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kramer R., Brewer M., Hanna B., Kramer R., Tyler T. Collective trust and collective action: The decision to trust as a social decision. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research (1996) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) 357–389CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lea M., Spears R. Computer-mediated communication, de-individuation and group decision-making. J. Organ. Computing Electronic Commerce (1992) 2:321–341CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacKenzie S. B., Podsakoff P. M., Fetter R. The impact of organizational citizenship behavior on evaluations of salesperson performance. J. Marketing (1993) 57:70–80CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malhotra A., Majchrzak A., Rosen B. Leading virtual teams. Acad. Management Perspectives (2007) 2:60–70CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martins L., Gilson L., Maynard M. T. Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? J. Management (2004) 30:805–836CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McAllister D. J. Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38:24–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mortensen M., Hinds P. J. Conflict and shared identity in geographically distributed teams. The Internat. J. Conflict Management (2001) 12:212–238CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mowday R. T., Sutton R. I. Organizational behavior: Linking individuals and groups to organizational contexts. Ann. Rev. Psych. (1993) 44:195–229CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O'Leary M. B., Cummings J. N. The spatial, temporal and configurational characteristics of geographic dispersion in teams. MIS Quart. (2007) 31:1–20Google Scholar
  • Podsakoff M., Ahearne M., Bommer W. H. Searching for a needle in a haystack: Trying to identify the illusive moderators of leadership behaviors. J. Management (1995) 21:422–470CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podaskoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Moorman R. H., Fetter R. Transformational leader behaviors and their effects of followers' trust in leader, satisfaction and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quart. (1990) 1:107–142CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raudenbush S. W., Bryk A. S., Cheong Y., Congdon R. T.HLM 5: Hierarchical Linear and Non-Linear Modeling (2000) (Scientific Software International, Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Shamir B., House R. J., Arthur M. B. The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organ. Sci. (1993) 4:577–594LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sosik J. J., Avolio B. J., Kahai S. S. Effects of leadership style and anonymity and group potency and effectiveness in group decision support system environment. J. Appl. Psych. (1997) 82:89–103CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spreitzer G., Janesz S., Quinn R. Empowered to lead: the role of psychological empowerment in leadership. J. Organ. Behavior (1999) 20:511–526CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tajfel H. Social psychology of inter-group relations. Annual Rev. Psych. (1982) 33:1–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tajfel H., Turner J., Worchel S., Austin W. The social identity of intergroup behavior. Psychology of Intergroup Relations (1985) (Nelson-Hall, Chicago) 7–24Google Scholar
  • Turner J. C., Haslam A., Turner M. Social identity, organizations and leadership. Groups at Work: Theory and Research (2001) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ) 25–65Google Scholar
  • Wiesenfeld B. M., Raghuram S., Garud R. Organizational identification among virtual workers: The role of need for affiliation and perceived work-based social support. J. Management (2001) 27:213–229Google Scholar
  • Wilson J., Straus S. G., McEvily B. All in due time: The development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (2006) 99:16–33CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.