Are Technology-Intensive Industries More Dynamically Competitive? No and Yes
Published Online:6 Nov 2008https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0392
References
- Patterns of innovation in industry. Tech. Rev. (1978) 80:40–47Google Scholar
- Competition policy in the new economy: Is European competition law up to the challenge? Eur. Competition Law Rev. (2001) 5:156–167Google Scholar
- Detecting abnormal operating performance: The empirical power and specification of test statistics. J. Financial Econom. (1996) 41:359–399Crossref, Google Scholar
- The red queen in organizational evolution. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:139–157Crossref, Google Scholar
- The red queen in organizational creativity and development. Indust. Corporate Change (2002) 11:289–325Crossref, Google Scholar
- Entrepreneurship, Management, and the Structure of Payoffs (1993) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
- The Free-Market Innovation Machine (2002) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
- The new competitive landscape. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16:7–19Crossref, Google Scholar
- Competing on the Edge (1998) (Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston) Google Scholar
- Organization task environments: Have they changed fundamentally over time? J. Management (2002) 28:129–150Crossref, Google Scholar
- A new strategy framework for coping with turbulence. Sloan Management Rev. (1997) 38:69–82Google Scholar
- The Innovator's Dilemma (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
- Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (1983) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London) Google Scholar
- Hypercompetition (1994) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
- Dimensions of organizational task environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1984) 29(1):52–73Crossref, Google Scholar
- Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Acad. Management J. (1989) 32:543–576Crossref, Google Scholar
- Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:1105–1121Crossref, Google Scholar
- , Jaffe A., Lerner J., Stern S. Some economic aspects of antitrust analysis in dynamically competitive industries. Innovation Policy and the Economy (2002) 2(MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 1–50Google Scholar
- The role of competitive action in market share erosion and industry dethronement: A study of industry leaders and challengers. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42:372–388Crossref, Google Scholar
- When does start-up innovation spur the gale of creative destruction? RAND J. Econom. (2002) 33:571–586Crossref, Google Scholar
- Technological and organizational designs for realizing economies of substitution. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16:93–109Crossref, Google Scholar
- Commitment: The Dynamic of Strategy (1991) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
- The patent paradox revisited: An empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979–1995. RAND J. Econom. (2001) 32:101–128Crossref, Google Scholar
- The population ecology of organizations. Amer. J. Soc. (1977) 82:929–964Crossref, Google Scholar
- Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Soc. Rev. (1984) 49:149–164Crossref, Google Scholar
- Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation: Evidence from the photolithographic alignment equipment industry. RAND J. Econom. (1993) 24:248–270Crossref, Google Scholar
- Architectural innovation—The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(4):9–30Crossref, Google Scholar
- Guest editor's introduction to the special issue strategic entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:479–491Crossref, Google Scholar
- The persistence of abnormal returns. Strategic Management J. (1988) 9:415–430Crossref, Google Scholar
- Innovation, cooperation, and antitrust. High Tech. Law Rev. (1989) 4:1–113Google Scholar
- The red queen paradox: A proper name for a popular game. J. Institutional Theoret. Econom. (1997) 153:411–415Google Scholar
- The robust inference of the Cox proportional hazards model. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1989) 84:1074–1078Crossref, Google Scholar
- Can first-mover and early-mover advantage be sustained in an industry with low barriers to entry/imitation? Strategic Management J. (1998) 19:683–696Crossref, Google Scholar
- How much does industry matter really? Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:15–30Crossref, Google Scholar
- The persistence of shocks to profitability: Comparing the market-structure and Chicago views. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1999) 81:43–53Crossref, Google Scholar
- What do we know about variance in accounting profitability? Management Sci. (2002) 48(7):834–851Link, Google Scholar
- The emergence and sustainability of abnormal profits. Strategic Organ. (2003) 1:79–108Crossref, Google Scholar
- Comment on “industry, corporate and business-segment effects and business performance: A non-parametric approach” by Ruefli and Wiggens. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26:873–880Crossref, Google Scholar
- , McKnight L., Vaaler P., Katz R. Introduction to creative destruction. Creative Destruction: Business Survival and Success in the Global Internet Economy (2001) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 3–20Google Scholar
- The same as it ever was: The search for increasing hypercompetition. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24:261–278Crossref, Google Scholar
- The persistence of profits above the norm. Economica (1977) 44:369–380Crossref, Google Scholar
- Profits in the Long Run (1986) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
- Eating your own lunch: Protection through preemption. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:342–358Link, Google Scholar
- Organization Science Special issue on hypercompetition. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:211–443Link, Google Scholar
- Antitrust Law (2001) 2nd ed.(University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Crossref, Google Scholar
- Continuous “morphing”: Competing through dynamic capabilities, form, and function. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44:1263–1280Crossref, Google Scholar
- Innovation and firm-level persistent profitability: A Schumpeterian framework. Managerial Decision Econom. (2001) 22:239–250Crossref, Google Scholar
- Markets vs. management: what “drives” profitability? Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:653–664Crossref, Google Scholar
- Antitrust issues in Schumpeterian industries. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2000) 99:192–196Crossref, Google Scholar
- The Theory of Economic Development (1934) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
- Business Cycles (1939) I–II(McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York) Google Scholar
- Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (1950) 3rd ed.(Harper and Brothers, New York) Google Scholar
- Strategic Management Journal Special issue on technological transformation and the new competitive landscape. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16:1–202Google Scholar
- Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:509–533Crossref, Google Scholar
- The two faces of competition: Dynamic resourcefulness and the hypercompetitive shift. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(3):221–242Link, Google Scholar
- Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31(3):439–465Crossref, Google Scholar
- Mastering the Dynamics Ofiinnovation (1994) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
- Economics of Regulation and Antitrust (1995) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
- Schumpeter's ghost: Is hypercompetition making the best of times shorter? Strategic Management J. (2005) 26:887–911Crossref, Google Scholar

