Are Technology-Intensive Industries More Dynamically Competitive? No and Yes

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0392

References

  • Abernathy W., Utterback J. Patterns of innovation in industry. Tech. Rev. (1978) 80:40–47Google Scholar
  • Ahlborn C., Evans D., Podilla A. Competition policy in the new economy: Is European competition law up to the challenge? Eur. Competition Law Rev. (2001) 5:156–167Google Scholar
  • Barber B., Lyon J. Detecting abnormal operating performance: The empirical power and specification of test statistics. J. Financial Econom. (1996) 41:359–399CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barnett W., Hansen M. The red queen in organizational evolution. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:139–157CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barnett W., Sorenson O. The red queen in organizational creativity and development. Indust. Corporate Change (2002) 11:289–325CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baumol W.Entrepreneurship, Management, and the Structure of Payoffs (1993) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Baumol W.The Free-Market Innovation Machine (2002) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bettis R., Hitt M. The new competitive landscape. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16:7–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown S., Eisenhardt K.Competing on the Edge (1998) (Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Castrogiovanni G. Organization task environments: Have they changed fundamentally over time? J. Management (2002) 28:129–150CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chakravarthy B. A new strategy framework for coping with turbulence. Sloan Management Rev. (1997) 38:69–82Google Scholar
  • Christensen C.The Innovator's Dilemma (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Cohen J., Cohen P.Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (1983) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London) Google Scholar
  • D'Aveni R.Hypercompetition (1994) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Dess G., Beard D. Dimensions of organizational task environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1984) 29(1):52–73CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Acad. Management J. (1989) 32:543–576CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K., Martin J. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:1105–1121CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Evans D., Schmalensee R., Jaffe A., Lerner J., Stern S. Some economic aspects of antitrust analysis in dynamically competitive industries. Innovation Policy and the Economy (2002) 2(MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 1–50Google Scholar
  • Ferrier W., Smith K., Grimm C. The role of competitive action in market share erosion and industry dethronement: A study of industry leaders and challengers. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42:372–388CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gans J., Hsu D., Stern S. When does start-up innovation spur the gale of creative destruction? RAND J. Econom. (2002) 33:571–586CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garud R., Karaswamy A. Technological and organizational designs for realizing economies of substitution. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16:93–109CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghemawat P.Commitment: The Dynamic of Strategy (1991) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Hall B., Zeidonis R. The patent paradox revisited: An empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979–1995. RAND J. Econom. (2001) 32:101–128CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan M., Freeman J. The population ecology of organizations. Amer. J. Soc. (1977) 82:929–964CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan M., Freeman J. Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Soc. Rev. (1984) 49:149–164CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson R. Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation: Evidence from the photolithographic alignment equipment industry. RAND J. Econom. (1993) 24:248–270CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson R., Clark K. Architectural innovation—The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(4):9–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hitt M., Ireland D., Camp S., Sexton D. Guest editor's introduction to the special issue strategic entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:479–491CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jacobsen R. The persistence of abnormal returns. Strategic Management J. (1988) 9:415–430CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jorde T., Teece D. Innovation, cooperation, and antitrust. High Tech. Law Rev. (1989) 4:1–113Google Scholar
  • Khalil E. The red queen paradox: A proper name for a popular game. J. Institutional Theoret. Econom. (1997) 153:411–415Google Scholar
  • Lin D., Wei L. The robust inference of the Cox proportional hazards model. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1989) 84:1074–1078CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Makadok R. Can first-mover and early-mover advantage be sustained in an industry with low barriers to entry/imitation? Strategic Management J. (1998) 19:683–696CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGahan A., Porter M. How much does industry matter really? Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:15–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGahan A., Porter M. The persistence of shocks to profitability: Comparing the market-structure and Chicago views. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1999) 81:43–53CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGahan A., Porter M. What do we know about variance in accounting profitability? Management Sci. (2002) 48(7):834–851LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McGahan A., Porter M. The emergence and sustainability of abnormal profits. Strategic Organ. (2003) 1:79–108CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGahan A., Porter M. Comment on “industry, corporate and business-segment effects and business performance: A non-parametric approach” by Ruefli and Wiggens. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26:873–880CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKnight L., Vaaler P., Katz R., McKnight L., Vaaler P., Katz R. Introduction to creative destruction. Creative Destruction: Business Survival and Success in the Global Internet Economy (2001) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 3–20Google Scholar
  • McNamara G., Vaaler P., Devers C. The same as it ever was: The search for increasing hypercompetition. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24:261–278CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mueller D. The persistence of profits above the norm. Economica (1977) 44:369–380CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mueller D.Profits in the Long Run (1986) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nault B., Vandenbosch M. Eating your own lunch: Protection through preemption. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:342–358LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Organization Science Special issue on hypercompetition. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:211–443LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Posner R.Antitrust Law (2001) 2nd ed.(University of Chicago Press, Chicago) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rindova V. P., Kotha S. Continuous “morphing”: Competing through dynamic capabilities, form, and function. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44:1263–1280CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts P. Innovation and firm-level persistent profitability: A Schumpeterian framework. Managerial Decision Econom. (2001) 22:239–250CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roquebert J., Phillips R., Westfall P. Markets vs. management: what “drives” profitability? Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:653–664CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schmalensee R. Antitrust issues in Schumpeterian industries. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2000) 99:192–196CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schumpeter J.The Theory of Economic Development (1934) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Schumpeter J.Business Cycles (1939) I–II(McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York) Google Scholar
  • Schumpeter J.Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (1950) 3rd ed.(Harper and Brothers, New York) Google Scholar
  • Strategic Management Journal Special issue on technological transformation and the new competitive landscape. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16:1–202Google Scholar
  • Teece D., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:509–533CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomas L. The two faces of competition: Dynamic resourcefulness and the hypercompetitive shift. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(3):221–242LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman M., Anderson P. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31(3):439–465CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Utterback J.Mastering the Dynamics Ofiinnovation (1994) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Viscusi K., Vernon J., Harrington J.Economics of Regulation and Antitrust (1995) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Wiggins R., Ruefli T. Schumpeter's ghost: Is hypercompetition making the best of times shorter? Strategic Management J. (2005) 26:887–911CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.