Securities Analysts and Incumbent Response to Radical Technological Change: Evidence from Digital Photography and Internet Telephony

References

• Abernathy W. J., Utterback J. M. Patterns of industrial innovation. Tech. Rev. (1978) 80(7):40–47Google Scholar
• Ahuja G., Lampert C. Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:521–543Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amihud Y., Lev B. Risk reduction as a managerial motive for conglomerate mergers. Bell J. Econom. (1981) 12:605–617Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amir E., Lev B., Sougiannis T. Do financial analysts get intangibles? Eur. Accounting Rev. (2003) 12:635–659Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson P., Tushman M. L. Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:604–633Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barber B., Lehavy R., McNichols M., Trueman B. Can investors profit from the prophets? Security analyst recommendations and stock returns. J. Finance (2001) 56:531–564Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner M. J. The incumbent discount: Stock market categories and response to radical technological change. Acad. Management Rev. (2007) 32(3):703–720Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner M. J., Tushman M. Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47:676–706Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner M. J., Tushman M. L. Exploitation, exploration and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28(2):238–256Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger P., Ofek E. Bust-up takeovers of value-destroying diversified firms. J. Finance (1996) 51(4):1175–1200Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beunza D., Garud R., Callon M., Millo Y., Muniesa F. Calculators, lemmings or frame-makers? The intermediary role of securities analysts. Market Devices (2007) (Blackwell, London) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradshaw M. How do analysts use their earnings forecasts in generating stock recommendations? Accounting Rev. (2004) 79(1):25–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brav A., Heaton J. B. Competing theories of financial anomalies. Rev. Financial Stud. (2002) 15:575–606Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brealey R., Myers S.Principles of Corporate Finance (1984) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Brown K., Latour A. Heavy toll: Phone industry faces upheaval as ways of calling change fast. Wall Street Journal (2004) August 25):A1Google Scholar
• Bushee B. J. The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. Accounting Rev. (1998) 73:305–333Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bushee B. J. Do institutional investors prefer near-term earnings over long-run value? Contemporary Accounting Res. (2001) 18(2):207–246Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen C. M.The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Christensen C. M., Bower J. L. Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:197–218Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper A., Smith C. How established firms respond to threatening technologies. Acad. Management Executive (1992) 6:55–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Credit Suisse First Boston Eastman Kodak. (1996) December 31):1Google Scholar
• Credit Suisse First Boston Polaroid Corporation: Digital is nothing but net for Polaroid. (1997) December 19):1–2Google Scholar
• Credit Suisse First Boston Polaroid Corporation. (1998a) February 10):2Google Scholar
• Credit Suisse First Boston Eastman Kodak. (1998b) May 4, 1998):1Google Scholar
• Credit Suisse First Boston Polaroid Corporation. (1998c) July 20):2Google Scholar
• Credit Suisse First Boston Eastman Kodak Company: Buy Kodak, get U.S. film business for free. (1999a) February 4):1Upgraded to strong buyGoogle Scholar
• Credit Suisse First Boston Eastman Kodak Company: Bullish meeting with management. (1999b) December 8):3Google Scholar
• Credit Suisse First Boston Polaroid Corporation: New products and accounting treatment drive top line. (1999c) December 22):2–4Google Scholar
• Dahlin K. B., Behrens D. M. When is an invention really radical? Defining and measuring technological radicalness. Res. Policy (2005) 34:717–737Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davidson P. Calling via Internet has suddenly arrived. USA Today (2003) July 7):1BGoogle Scholar
• Davis G., Robbins G., Powell W. W., Jones D. L. The fate of the conglomerate firm in the United States. How Institutions Change (In press) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Davis G., Useem M., Pettigrew A., Thomas H., Whittington R. Top management, company directors, and corporate control. Handbook of Strategy and Management (2002) (Sage, London) 233–259Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S., Pollet J. Attention, demographics and the stock market. (2005) . NBER Working Paper 11211, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossref, Google Scholar
• Deutsche Bank SBC Communications Inc. great value…News flow as bad as it gets. Initiating coverage with a BUY rating. (2002) November 21):1–2Google Scholar
• Deutsche Bank BellSouth Corporation: BellSouth 4Q02 results. (2003a) January 23):4Google Scholar
• Deutsche Bank BellSouth Corporation: Update following company visit. (2003b) March 23):3Google Scholar
• Deutsche Bank Verizon Communications: Verizon receives LD approvals in DC, MD, and WV. (2003c) March 19):1Google Scholar
• Deutsche Bank Verizon Communications: Buying by default, upgrade to buy. (2003d) October 22):1Google Scholar
• Deutsche Bank Verizon Communications: VZ 3Q03 Results: It's all about the wireless. (2003e) October 29):9Google Scholar
• Deutsche Bank Verizon Communications: Verizon receives LD approvals in DC, MD, and WV. (2004a) January 30):3Google Scholar
• Deutsche Bank Qwest 1Q04 results review: Recovery intact, but what shape? (2004b) May 4):4Google Scholar
• Deutsche Bank Verizon Communications: Short-term trade…upgrade to buy. (2005a) January 20):1Google Scholar
• Deutsche Bank Verizon launches “naked” DSL service. (2005b) April 19):1Google Scholar
• Deutsche Bank SBC Communications: Overdone, at least in the short term. (2005c) April 15):1Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P., Powell W. The iron cage revisited. Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1983) 48:147–160Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dingman J. Camera angles: Electronics takes a big step closer to replacing film. Associated Press Wire Service (1991) August 16Google Scholar
• Dosi G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Res. Policy (1982) 11:147–162Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D., Hardy C. Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39(5):1120–1153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K., Martin J. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:1105–1121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama E. Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. J. Finance (1970) 25:383–417Crossref, Google Scholar
• Francis J., Philbrick D. Analysts' decisions as products of multi-task environment. J. Accounting Res. (1993) 31:216–230Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frankel R., Kothari S. P., Weber J. Determinants of the informativeness of analyst research. J. Accounting Econom. (2006) 41:29–54Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frieswick K. What's wrong with this picture? CFO Magazine (2003) January 2003). http://www.cfo.com/article.cfm/3007726/c_3046585?f=magazine_featuredGoogle Scholar
• Froot K. A., Sharfstein D. S., Stein J. C. Herd on the street: Informational inefficiencies in a market with short-term speculation. J. Finance (1992) 47:1461–1484Crossref, Google Scholar
• Future Image Report (1993–2001) . Future Image Inc., San Mateo, CAGoogle Scholar
• Gatignon H., Tushman M., Smith W., Anderson P. A structural approach to assessing innovation. Management Sci. (2002) 48:1103–1122Link, Google Scholar
• Glasmeier A. Technological discontinuities and flexible production networks: The case of Switzerland the world watch industry. Res. Policy (1991) 20:469–485Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall M. Apple Quicktake 100: Digital camera shoots for ease of use and efficiency. MacWeek (1994) April 11Google Scholar
• Henderson R. Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation: Evidence from the photolithographic equipment industry. RAND J. Econom. (1993) 24:248–270Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R. M., Clark K. B. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:9–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henricks M. Cameras go digital. Kiplinger's Personal Finance Magazine (1996) 50(8):97Google Scholar
• Hobijn B., Jovanovic B. The information-technology revolution and the stock market: Evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2001) 91:1203–1220Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong H., Kubik J. Analyzing the analysts: Career concerns and biased forecasts. J. Finance (2003) 58:313–351Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong H., Kubik J. D., Solomon A. Security analysts career concerns and herding of earnings forecasts. RAND J. Econom. (2000) 31:121–144Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howe P. J. Free calls? So what's not to like? Internet phone service explodes in popularity, seen as threat to Bells. Boston Globe (2003) November 14):D1Google Scholar
• Kharif O. For whom the VoIP bell tolls; Failure to quickly respond to Internet telephony's rising popularity—At home and at work—Could cost incumbent telcos plenty. Business Week Online (2004) January 6). http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jan2004/tc2004016_6608_tc138.htmGoogle Scholar
• Laitner J., Stolyarov D. Technological change and the stock market. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2003) 93:1240–1267Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landes D.Revolution in Time: Clocks and the Making of the Modern World (1983) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge) Google Scholar
• Latour A. Internet phone service threatens industry's giants. Wall Street Journal (2003) November 28):B1Google Scholar
• Lavie D. Capability reconfiguration: An analysis of incumbent responses to technological change. Acad. Management Rev. (2006) 31:153–174Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D. Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13:111–125Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D. Surviving Schumpeterian environments: An evolutionary perspective. Indust. Corporate Change (1992) 1:427–443Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D., March J. G. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:95–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lys T., Sohn S. The association between revisions of financial analysts' earnings forecasts and security-price changes. J. Accounting Econom. (1990) 13:341–363Crossref, Google Scholar
• March . Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:71–87Link, Google Scholar
• Mazzucato M. Risk, variety and volatility: Growth, innovation and stock prices in early industry evolution. J. Evolutionary Econom. (2003) 13:491–512Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer J. W., Rowan B. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. (1977) 83:340–363Crossref, Google Scholar
• Michaely R., Womack K. Conflict of interest and the credibility of underwriter analyst recommendations. Rev. Financial Stud. (1999) 12:573–608Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell W. Whether and when? Probability and timing of incumbents' entry into emerging industrial subfields. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1989) 34:208–230Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreton P., Zenger T. Corporate strategy, analyst coverage, and the uniqueness discount. (2005) . Working paper, Washington University, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
• Morgan Stanley Eastman Kodak Company report. (1991a) May 28):3Google Scholar
• Morgan Stanley Eastman Kodak Company report. (1991b) December 19):1Google Scholar
• Morgan Stanley Eastman Kodak Company report. (1992) August 11):1–9Google Scholar
• Morgan Stanley Eastman Kodak (EK): Comments on BusinessWeek article. (1995a) January 26):1Google Scholar
• Morgan Stanley Eastman Kodak (EK): Keep betting on George Fisher. (1995b) March 1):3Google Scholar
• Morgan Stanley Eastman Kodak (EK): Great December quarter but not without issues. (1997a) February 5):1Google Scholar
• Morgan Stanley Polaroid (PRD): 1997 should be the real test; A review of corporate strategy. (1997b) March 13):2Google Scholar
• Morgan Stanley Polaroid (PRD): If only growth developed as quickly as pictures. (1998a) February 23):3–4Google Scholar
• Morgan Stanley Eastman Kodak (EK): Upgraded to outperform—Taking profitability to the max. (1998b) July 28):1Google Scholar
• Morgan Stanley Eastman Kodak (EK): Recent management meeting—Can digital imaging be profitable? (1999a) March 16):4Google Scholar
• Morgan Stanley Eastman Kodak (EK): Springtime trifecta; Upgrade to outperform. (1999b) April 30):1–2Google Scholar
• Morgan Stanley Polaroid: You are about to enter the IZone. (2000) January 27):1–3Google Scholar
• Morgan Stanley BellSouth Corp. Company Update: 2 down, 7 to go. (2002a) May 16):1Google Scholar
• Morgan Stanley BellSouth Corp.: Florida and Tenn. approved-100% LD entry achieved. (2002b) December 20):2Google Scholar
• Morgan Stanley 3Q02 review, BellSouth reports in-line results. (2002c) October 24):2Google Scholar
• Morgan Stanley Verizon Communications: 1Q 02 in line on cost controls; lower outlook. (2002d) April 24):1Google Scholar
• Morgan Stanley Verizon Communications: The empire strikes back. (2003a) January 27):1–2Google Scholar
• Morgan Stanley BellSouth Corp: Upgrading to overweight from equal-weight. (2003b) April 3):1Google Scholar
• Morgan Stanley BellSouth Corp.: Hanging tough as competition increases. (2004a) January 22):2Google Scholar
• Morgan Stanley Verizon Communications: Upgrading to overweight with a $40 price target. (2004b) February 24):1Google Scholar
• Morgan Stanley Verizon communications: Taking share in wireless; line loss up sharply. (2005) October 27):2Google Scholar
• Nocera J. Who really moves the market? Fortune (1997) 136(8):90–102Google Scholar
• Pastor L., Veronesi P. Technological revolutions and stock prices. (2005) . NBER Working Paper 11876, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R.The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (1978) (Harper & Row, New York) Google Scholar
• Pope J. Polaroid, left behind by advances in photography, files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. Associated Press (2001) October 12Google Scholar
• PR Newswire Polaroid honored with three top industry awards at Photo Marketing Association International. (1998) February 20Google Scholar
• Prudential Securities Eastman Kodak—Company report. (1992) January 2):1Google Scholar
• Prudential Securities Eastman Kodak—Company update. (1993) January 18):1Google Scholar
• Prudential Securities Eastman Kodak: Company update. (1994a) April 12):7Google Scholar
• Prudential Securities Eastman Kodak: Company update. (1994b) November 16):1Google Scholar
• Prudential Securities Eastman Kodak: Company update. (1995) February 22):3Google Scholar
• Prudential Securities Eastman Kodak: Company update. (1996a) January 18):1Google Scholar
• Prudential Securities Eastman Kodak: Company update. (1996b) July 12):3Google Scholar
• Prudential Securities Eastman Kodak: Company update. (1996c) December 2):1–3Google Scholar
• Prudential Securities Eastman Kodak: Company update. (1997) June 13):6Google Scholar
• Prudential Securities Eastman Kodak: Company update. (1998) July 29):1Google Scholar
• Prudential Securities Polaroid: Company update. (1999a) July 21):1Google Scholar
• Prudential Securities Polaroid: Company update. (1999b) October 27):1Google Scholar
• Prudential Securities Eastman Kodak: Company update. (1999c) February 9):1Google Scholar
• Ramnath S., Rock S., Shane P. The financial analyst forecasting literature: A taxonomy with suggestions for further research. Internat. J. Forecasting (2008) 24(1):34–75Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H., Sivakumar K. Institutional sources of boundary-spanning structures: The establishment of investor relations departments in the Fortune 500 industrials. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(1):27–42Link, Google Scholar
• Reinganum J. Uncertain innovation and the persistence of monopoly. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1983) 73:741–748Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig J. The Wall Street Transcript. (2001) . Analyst interview: Jonathan Rosenzweig, Salomon Smith. Wall Street Transcript Corp., New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Rothaermel F. Incumbent's advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:687–699Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salomon Smith Barney Eastman Kodak. (1998) May 28):1Google Scholar
• Salomon Smith Barney Eastman Kodak. (1999) May 10):1Google Scholar
• Salomon Smith Barney Polaroid Corp: Instant Upgrade. (2000a) February 23):1Google Scholar
• Salomon Smith Barney Eastman Kodak: E-photo space gains steam. (2000b) July 19):1Google Scholar
• Salomon Smith Barney Polaroid Corp.: PRD & Olympus introduce the C-211 Zoom Digital Printing Camera. (2000c) July 25):1Google Scholar
• Salomon Smith Barney Polaroid Corp: A fuzzy picture. (2000d) October 17):4Google Scholar
• Salomon Smith Barney Polaroid Corp: Q1 2001 preview. (2001) April 16Google Scholar
• Schipper K. Analysts' forecasts. Accounting Horizons (1991) 5:105–121Google Scholar
• Sevastopulo D., Taylor P. A disruptive technology: How the rise of internet telephony is shaking up America's communication giants. Financial Times (2004) April 13):15Google Scholar
• Shippey F. Kodak 3/r3 event: DC 40. Future Image Rep. (1995) 2(10):2Google Scholar
• Shippey F. Kodak DC 20. Future Image Rep. (1996) 4(1):6Google Scholar
• Shleifer A.Inefficient Markets: An Introduction to Behavioral Finance (2000) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith Barney Eastman Kodak—Company report. (1990) September 20):1Google Scholar
• Smith Barney Eastman Kodak—Company report. (1991a) July 11):1Google Scholar
• Smith Barney Eastman Kodak—Company report. (1991b) August 14):12Google Scholar
• Smith Barney Eastman Kodak—Company report. (1994) May 10):1Google Scholar
• Smith Barney Eastman Kodak. (1995) April 21):1Google Scholar
• Smith Barney Eastman Kodak. (1996a) January 30):3Google Scholar
• Smith Barney Eastman Kodak. (1996b) June 13):2Google Scholar
• Strickland D. Digital photography—A three year perspective. Future Image Rep. (1995) 2(8):6Google Scholar
• Sull D., Tedlow R., Rosenbloom R. Managerial commitments and technology change in the U.S. tire industry. Indust. Corporate Change (1997) 6:461–500Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor P. Get me a line online: Conventional phone services have remained unrivalled by net-based offerings—Until now. Financial Times (2002) December 24):7Google Scholar
• Teece D. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy (1986) 15:285–305Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:509–533Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thornton P., Ocasio W. Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. Amer. J. Sociol. (1999) 105(3):801–843Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tolbert P. S. Resource dependence and institutional environments: Sources of administrative structure in institutions of higher education. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1985) 30:1–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M. Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:119–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M., Gavetti G. Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:1147–1161Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., Anderson P. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31:439–465Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., OReilly C.Winning Through Innovation (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Useem M.Investor Capitalism (1996) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Utterback J.Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation (1994) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Womack K. Do brokerage analysts' recommendations have investment value? J. Finance (1996) 47:137–167Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman E. The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. (1999) 104(5):1398–1438Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman E. Focusing the corporate product: Securities analysts and de-diversification. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45(3):591–619Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman E., Rao H. Shrewd, crude or simply deluded? Comovement and the Internet stock phenomenon. Indust. Corporate Change (2004) 13:171–212Crossref, Google Scholar