The Next Generation: Technology Adoption and Integration Through Internal Competition in New Product Development

References

• Abernathy W. J., Clark K. B. Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Res. Policy (1985) 14:3–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abernathy W. J., Utterback J. M. Patterns of industrial innovation. Tech. Rev. (1978) 80(7):40–47Google Scholar
• Abrahamson E. Managerial fads and fashions—The diffusion and rejection of innovations. Acad. Management Rev. (1991) 16(3):586–612Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abrahamson E., Rosenkopf L. Social network effects on the extent of innovation diffusion: A computer simulation. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8(3):289–309Link, Google Scholar
• Almeida P., Kogut B. The exploration of technological diversity and the geographic localisation of innovation. Small Bus. Econom. (1997) 9(1):21–31Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almeida P., Kogut B. Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Sci. (1999) 45(7):905–917Link, Google Scholar
• Baldwin C., Clark K.Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (2000) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J. B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management (1991) 17:99–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum J. A. C., Mezias S. J. Localized competition and organizational failure in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898–1990. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37:580–604Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bendor J., Kramer R. M., Stout S. When in doubt…Cooperation in a noisy prisoner's dilemma. J. Conflict Resolution (1991) 35:691–719Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benford R. D., Snow D. A. Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Rev. Sociol. (2000) 26:611–639Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bikhchandani S., Hirshleifer D., Welch I. A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural-change as informational cascades. J. Political Econom. (1992) 100(5):992–1026Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bower G. H., Hilgard E. R.Theories of Learning (1981) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K. M. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(1):1–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Browning L. D., Beyer J. M., Shetler J. C. Building cooperation in a competitive industry: SEMATECH and the semiconductor industry. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38(1):113–151Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgelman R. A. A process model of internal corporate ventures in the diversified major firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1983) 28:223–244Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chakravarthy B. S., Doz Y. A practice-centered model of organizational renewal through product innovation. Strategic Management J. Special Issue: Strategy Process: Managing Corporate Self-Renewal (1992) 13(Summer):5–14Google Scholar
• Christensen C. M. The rigid disk drive industry: A history of commercial and technological turbulence. Bus. Hist. Rev. (1993) 67(4):531–588Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen C. M.The Innovator's Dilemma (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Christensen C. M., Bower J. L. Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(3):197–218Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark K. B. The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution. Res. Policy (1985) 14:23–33Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen M. D., March J. G., Olsen J. P. A garbage can model of organizational choice. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1972) 17:1–25Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):128–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Deeds D. L. The role of R&D intensity, technical development and absorptive capacity in creating entrepreneurial wealth in high technology start-ups. J. Engrg. Tech. Management (2001) 18(1):29–47Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:179–202Link, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D., Heller T. The illegitimacy of new product development in established firms. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5:200–218Link, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K., Tabrizi B. N. Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40:84–110Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):117–132Link, Google Scholar
• Fleming L. Finding the organizational sources of technological breakthroughs: The story of Hewlett-Packard's thermal ink-jet. Indust. Corporate Change (2002) 11(5):1059–1084Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L., Sorenson O. Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data. Res. Policy (2001) 30:1019–1039Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L., Sorenson O. Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25:909–928Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fombrun C. J., Zajac E. J. Structural and perceptual influences on intraindustry stratification. Acad. Management J. (1987) 30(1):33–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve H. R., Taylor A. Innovations as catalysts for organizational change: Shifts in organizational cognition and search. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45:54–80Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R. Is job-enrichment just a fad? Harvard Bus. Rev. (1975) 53(5):129–138Google Scholar
• Hansen M. T. The stretch-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(1):82–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat C. E. Firm-specificity in corporate applied research-and-development. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(2):173–184Link, Google Scholar
• Henderson R. M., Clark K. B. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:9–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hlavacek J. D., Thompson V. A. Bureaucracy and new product innovation. Acad. Management J. (1973) 16(3):361–372Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoetker G., Agarwal R. Death hurts but it isn't fatal: The postexit diffusion of knowledge created by innovative companies. Acad. Management J. (2007) 50:446–467Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iansiti M.Technology Integration (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Iansiti M. How the incumbent can win: Managing technological transitions in the semiconductor industry. Management Sci. (2000) 46(2):169–185Link, Google Scholar
• Ingram P., Roberts P. W. Friendships among competitors in the Sydney hotel industry. Amer. J. Sociol. (2000) 106:387–423Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S., Murray F., Henderson R. Discontinuities and senior management: Assessing the role of recognition in pharmaceutical firm response to biotechnology. Indust. Corp. Change (2003) 12:203–233Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kidder T.The Soul of a New Machine (1982) (Allen Lane, London) Google Scholar
• Klepper S. Capabilities of new firms and the evolution of the US automobile industry. Indust. Corp. Change (2002) 11(4):645–666Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lane P. J., Salk J. E., Lyles M. A. Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22(12):1139–1161Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee M., Miller W. F., Hancock M. G., Rowen H.The Silicon Valley Edge (2000) (Stanford Business Books, Stanford, CA) Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D. Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13(Special Issue):111–125Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D. A. Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. (1997) 43(7):934–950Link, Google Scholar
• Locke K.Grounded Theory in Management Research (2001) (Sage, London) Google Scholar
• March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:71–87Link, Google Scholar
• March J. G., Olsen J. P.Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations (1976) (Universitetsforlaget, Bergen, Norway) Google Scholar
• March J., Simon H. (1958) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Martin X., Mitchell W. The influence of local search and performance heuristics on new design introduction in a new product market. Res. Policy (1998) 26(7–8):753–771Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKelvey W., Baum J., Singh J. Evolution and organizational science. Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations (1994) (Oxford University Press, New York) 314–326Google Scholar
• Miles M. B., Huberman A. M.Qualitative Data Analysis (1994) (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA) Google Scholar
• Miner A. S. Organizational evolution and the social ecology of jobs. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1991) 56:772–785Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miner A. S., Baum J., Singh J. Seeking adaptive advantage: Evolutionary theory and managerial action. Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations (1994) (Oxford University Press, New York) 76–89Google Scholar
• Moorman C., Miner A. S. Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23:698–723Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowery D., Oxley J., Silverman B. Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: Implications for the resource-based view of the firm. Res. Policy (1998) 507–523Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Nonaka I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5:14–37Link, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W. An attention based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1998) 18:187–206Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J., Gash D. C. Technological frames: Making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems (1994) 12:174–207Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers E. M.Diffusion of Innovations (1995) 4th ed.(Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Rogers E. M., Larsen J. K.Silicon Valley Fever: Growth of High-Technology Culture (1984) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L., Almeida P. Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. (2003) 49(6):751–766Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L., Nerkar A. Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22(4):287–306Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L., Metiu A., George V. From the bottom up? Technical committee activity and alliance formation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46:748–772Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saxenian A. L. Regional networks and the resurgence of Silicon Valley. Calif. Management Rev. (1990) 33:89–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schein E.Organizational Culture and Leadership (1985) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) Google Scholar
• Schilling M. A. Towards a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25:312–334Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J. A.Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process (1939) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Song J., Almeida P., Wu G. Learning by Hiring: When is mobility more likely to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer? Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):351–365Link, Google Scholar
• Staw B., Sandelands L., Dutton J. Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26:501–524Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart T. E., Podolny J. M. Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:21–38Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor A., Greve H. R. Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(4):723–740Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J. Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets. Calif. Management Rev. (1998) 40(3):55–79Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:509–533Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M. Discouraging opportunistic behavior in collaborative R&D: A new role for government. Res. Policy (1995) 24:367–370Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M. Surviving radical technological change through dynamic capability: Evidence from the typesetter industry. Indust. Corp. Change (1997) 6:341–377Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M., Gavetti G. Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(10/11):1147–1161Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., Anderson P. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31:439–469Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., Murmann J. P. Dominant designs, technology cycles, and organizational outcomes. Research in Organizational Behavior (1998) 20(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 231–266Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., O'Reilly C. A.Winning Through Innovation (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E. Co-operation between rivals: Informal know-how trading. Res. Policy (1987) 16:291–302Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick K. E.The Social Psychology of Organizing (1969) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Weick K. E. The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 3:626–652Google Scholar
• Yin R. K.Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1984) (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA) Google Scholar
• Zahra S. A., George G. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad. Management Rev. (2002) 27(2):185–203Crossref, Google Scholar