Capabilities Unveiled: The Role of Ordinary Activities in the Evolution of Product Development Processes

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0408

References

  • Aassve A., Billari F. C., Piccarreta R. Strings of adulthood: A sequence analysis of young women's work-family trajectories. Eur. J. Population (2007) 23:369–388CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Abbott A. Event sequence and event duration: Colligation and measurement. Hist. Meth. (1984) 17(4):192–204CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Abbott A. A primer on sequence methods. Organ. Sci. (1990) 1(4):375–392LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Abbott A. Sequence analysis: New methods for old ideas. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1995) 21:93–113CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adner R., Helfat C. E. Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(10):1011–1025CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R., Helfat C. E. Strategic renewal of organizations. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(2):281–293LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Aldenderfer M. S., Blashfield R. K.Cluster Analysis (1984) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allen D. E. Towards a theory of consumer choice as sociohistorically shaped practical experience: The fits-like-a-globe (FLAG) framework. J. Consumer Res. (2002) 28(4):515–532CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L., Ingram P. Knowledge transfer as a basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2000) 82(1):150–169CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Augier M., Teece D. J. Dynamic capabilities and the role of managers in business strategy and economic performance. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(2):410–421LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bakeman R., Gottman J. M.Observing Interaction: An Introduction to Sequential Analysis (1997) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beckman C., Haunschild P. Network learning: The effects of partners' heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47:92–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhaskaran L.Designs of the Times (2005) (RotoVision, Hove, UK) Google Scholar
  • Blair-Loy M. Career patterns of executive women in finance: An optimal matching analysis. Amer. J. Soc. (1999) 104(5):1346–1397CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burgelman R. A. A process model of strategic business exit: Implications for an evolutionary perspective on strategy. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Summer):193–214Google Scholar
  • Chirico F., Salvato C. Knowledge integration and dynamic organizational adaptation in family firms. Family Bus. Rev. (2008) 21(2):169–181CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement of nominal scales. Ed. Psych. Measurement (1960) 20:37–46CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Collins M.Alessi (1999) (Carlton Books Limited, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Collis D. J. Research note: How valuable are organizational capabilities? Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:143–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Databank Competitors plus. (2002) . Report on the Italian home furnishings industry, Databank, Milan, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  • Dosi G., Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities (2000) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Dougherty D. A practice-centered model of organizational renewal through product innovation. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13:77–92CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C., Bohmer R. M., Pisano G. P. Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46:685–716CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eggers J. P., Kaplan S. Cognition and renewal: Comparing CEO and organizational effects on incumbent adaptation to technical change. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(2):461–477LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(4):532–550CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., Martin J. A. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(10–11):1105–1121CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M. S. Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(6):611–629LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Felin T., Foss N. Strategic organization: A field in search of micro-foundations. Strategic Organ. (2005) 3(4):441–455CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Felin T., Hesterly W. S. The knowledge-based view, nested heterogeneity, and new value creation: Philosophical considerations on the locus of knowledge. Acad. Management Rev. (2007) 32(1):195–218CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G. Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities' development. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(6):599–617LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Haunschild P. A., Sullivan B. N. Learning from complexity: Effects of prior accidents and incidents on airline learning. Admin. Sci. Quart (2002) 47:609–643CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helfat C. E., Helfat C. E. Stylized facts regarding the evolution of organizational resources and capabilities. The SMS Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Capabilities: Emergence, Development and Change (2003) (Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA) 1–11Google Scholar
  • Helfat C. E., Peteraf M. A. The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(10):997–1010CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helfat C. E., Finkelstein S., Mitchell W., Peteraf M. A., Singh H., Teece D. J., Winter S. G.Dynamic Capabilities. Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations (2007) (Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK.) Google Scholar
  • Howard-Grenville J. A. The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The role of agency and organizational context. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(6):618–636LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Isabella L. A. Evolving interpretations as a change unfolds: How managers construe key organizational events. Acad. Management J. (1990) 33(1):7–41CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kauffman L., Rousseeuw P. J.Finding Groups in Data (1990) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim H. E., Pennings J. M. Innovation and strategic renewal in mature markets: A study of the tennis racket industry. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(2):368–383LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Knott A. M., Posen H. E. Firm R & D behavior and evolving technology in established industries. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(2):352–367LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:383–397LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Langer E., Berkowitz L. Minding matters: The consequences of mindlessness-mindfulness. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1989) 22(Academic Press, New York) 137–173Google Scholar
  • Levinthal D. A., Rerup C. Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(4):502–513LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B., March J. G. Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1988) 14:319–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacIndoe H., Abbott A., Hardy M., Bryman A. Sequence analysis and optimal matching techniques for social science data. Handbook of Data Analysis (2004) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 387–406CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miles M. B., Huberman A. M.Qualitative Data Analysis (1994) 2nd ed.(Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Miner A. S., Bassoff P., Moorman C. Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46(2):304–337CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mintzberg H., Raisinghani D., Théorêt A. The structure of “unstructured” decision processes. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1976) 21(2):246–275CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murmann J. P., Aldrich H. E., Levinthal D. A., Winter S. G. Evolutionary thought in management and organization theory at the beginning of the new millennium. J. Management Inquiry (2003) 12(1):22–40CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(2):242–266CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (2000) 12(4):404–428LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland B. T. Sequential variety in work processes. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(5):528–540LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pisano G. P. Knowledge integration and the locus of learning: An empirical analysis of process development. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15(Winter):85–100CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ravasi D., Lojacono G. Managing design and designers for strategic renewal. Long Range Planning (2005) 38:51–77CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sabherwal R., Robey D. An empirical taxonomy of implementation processes based on sequences of events in information system development. Organ. Sci. (1993) 4(4):548–576LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Salvato C., Leif M. Creating value across generations in family-controlled businesses: The role of family social capital. Family Bus. Rev. (2008) 21(3):259–276CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sankoff D., Kruskal J. B.Time Warps, String Edits, and Macromolecules (1983) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Schreyögg G., Kliesch-Eberl M. How dynamic can organizational capabilities be? Towards a dual-process model of capability dynamization. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28(9):913–933CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:509–533CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tripsas M. Technology, identity, and inertia through the lens of “The Digital Photography Company”. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(2):441–460LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Van de Ven A. H., Huber G. P. Longitudinal field research models for studying processes of organizational change. Organ. Sci. (1990) 1:213–219LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Verganti R. Innovating through design. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2006) 84(12):114–122Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E., Sutcliffe K. M.Managing the Unexpected (2001) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E., Sutcliffe K. M. Mindfulness and the quality of organizational attention. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(4):514–524LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weick K. E., Sutcliffe K. M., Obstfeld D. Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. Res. Organ. Behav (1999) 21:81–123Google Scholar
  • Winter S. G. Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(10):991–995CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zollo M., Winter S. G. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(3):339–51LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.