External Learning Activities and Team Performance: A Multimethod Field Study

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0413

References

  • Allen T. J.Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information Within the R&D Organization (1977) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Ancona D. G., Bresman H., Thompson L., Choi H.-S. Begging, borrowing and building on ideas from the outside to create pulsed innovation inside teams. Creativity and Innovation in Organizational Teams (2005) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ) 183–198Google Scholar
  • Ancona D. G., Caldwell D. F. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37:634–665CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ancona D. G., Bresman H., Kaeufer K. The comparative advantage of X-teams. Sloan Management Rev. (2002) 43:33–39Google Scholar
  • Argote L., Ingram P. Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2000) 82:150–169CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L., Gruenfeld D. H., Naquin C., Turner M. E. Group learning in organizations. Groups at Work: Theory and Research (2001) (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ) 369–411Google Scholar
  • Bandura A.Social Learning Theory (1977) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Bandura A., Vasta R. Social cognitive theory. Annals of Child Development (1989) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 1–60Google Scholar
  • Bandura A., Walters R. H.Social Learning and Personality Development (1963) (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York) Google Scholar
  • Bliese P. D., Klein K. J., Kozlowski S. W. J. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations (2000) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) 349–381Google Scholar
  • Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K. M. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:1–34CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bunderson J. S., Sutcliffe K. M. Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88:552–560CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen M. D., Bacdayan P. Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5:554–568LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:128–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cox R., McKendree J., Tobin R., Lee J., Mayes T. Vicarious learning from dialogue and discourse: A controlled comparison. Instructional Sci. (1999) 27:431–458CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cummings J. N. Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Sci. (2004) 50:352–364LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Darr E. D., Argote L., Epple D. The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: Productivity in franchises. Management Sci. (1995) 41:1750–1762LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Davis T. R. V., Luthans F. A social learning approach to organizational behavior. Acad. Management Rev. (1980) 5:281–290CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeVellis R. F.Scale Development (1991) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:350–383CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C. The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13:128–146LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C., McManus S. E. Methodological fit in management field research. Acad. Management Rev. (2007) 32:1155–1179CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C., Dillon J. R., Roloff K. S., Walsh J. P., Brief A. P. Three perspectives on team learning: Outcome improvement, task mastery, and group process. Acad. Management Annals (2007) (Routledge, New York) 269–314Google Scholar
  • Edmondson A. C., Winslow A. B., Bohmer R. M., Pisano G. P. Learning how and learning what: Effects of tacit and codified knowledge on performance improvement following technology adoption. Decision Sci. (2003) 34:197–223CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Acad. Management J. (1989) 32:543–576CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elder G. H. Racial learning and conflict. Sociometry (1971) 34:151–173CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Epple D., Argote L., Devadas R. Organizational learning curves: A method for investigating intra-plant transfer of knowledge acquired through learning by doing. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:558–570CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Faraj S., Sproull L. S. Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Sci. (2000) 46:1554–1568LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Garud R., Huff A. S., Walsh J. P. On the distinction between know-how, know-why and know-what in technological systems. Advances in Strategic Management (1997) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 81–101Google Scholar
  • George J., James L. Personality, affect, and behavior in groups revisited: Comment on aggregation, levels of analysis, and a recent application of within and between analysis. J. Appl. Psych. (1993) 78:789–804CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gersick C. J. G., Hackman J. R. Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1990) 47:65–97CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibson C., Vermeulen F. A healthy divide: Subgroups as a stimulus for team learning behavior. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48:202–239CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gladstein D. L. Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1984) 29:499–517CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guinan P. J., Cooprider J. G., Faraj S. Enabling software development team performance during requirements definition: A behavioral versus technical approach. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9:101–125LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta A. K., Tesluk P. E., Taylor M. S. Innovation at and across multiple levels of analysis. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18:885–897LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Haas M. R., Hansen M. T. When using knowledge can hurt performance: The value of organizational capabilities in a management consulting company. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26:1–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen M. T. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:82–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson J. C., Lee S. Managing I/S design teams: A control theories perspective. Management Sci. (1992) 38:757–777LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hinkin T. R. A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organ. Res. Methods (1998) 1:104–121CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kane A., Argote L., Levine J. M. Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2005) 96:56–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz R.Managing Creativity and Innovation (2003) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Katz R., Allen T. J. Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication of 50 R&D project groups. R & D Management (1982) 12:7–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kenny D. A., La Voie L. Separating individual and group effects. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1985) 48:339–348CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B., March J. G. Organizational learning. Ann. Rev. Sociol. (1988) 14:319–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis K., Lange D., Gillis L. Transactive memory systems, learning, and learning transfer. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16:581–598LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Libby R., Blashfield R. K. Performance of a composite as a function of the number of judges. Organ. Behav. Human Performance (1978) 21:121–129CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacCormack A., Verganti R., Iansiti M. Developing products on “Internet time”: The anatomy of a flexible development process. Management Sci. (2001) 47:133–150LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moorman C., Miner A. S. Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23:698–723CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nunnally J. C., Bernstein I. H.Psychometric Theory (1994) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Pitcher B. L., Hamblin R. L., Miller J. L. L. The diffusion of collective violence. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1978) 43:23–35CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Staw B. M. Attribution of the “causes” of performance: A general alternative interpretation of cross-sectional research on organizations. Organ. Behav. Human Performance (1975) 13:414–432CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Szulanski G. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:27–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tucker A. L., Nembhard I. M., Edmondson A. C. Implementing new practices: An empirical study of organizational learning in hospital intensive care units. Management Sci. (2007) 53:894–907LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman M. L. Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1977) 22:587–605CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wheelwright S. C., Clark K. B.Revolutionizing Product Development (1992) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Wong S.-S. Distal and local group learning: Performance trade-offs and tensions. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15:645–656LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zellmer-Bruhn M. Interruptive events and team knowledge acquisition. Management Sci. (2003) 49:514–528LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zellmer-Bruhn M., Gibson C. Multinational organization context: Implications for team learning and performance. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49:501–518CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.