Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms

References

• Abernathy W. J., Clark K. B. Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Res. Policy (1985) 14:3–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagozzi R. P., Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1988) 16(1):74–95Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barkema H. G., Shvyrkov O. Does top management team diversity promote or hamper foreign expansion? Strategic Management J. (2007) 28(7):663–680Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J. Firm resources and sustainable competitive advantage. J. Management (1991) 170(1):99–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1986) 51:1173–1182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner M. J., Tushman M. L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28:238–256Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom M. The performance effects of pay dispersion on individuals and organizations. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42:25–40Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bower J. L.Managing the Resource Allocation Process (1970) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Burgelman R. A. Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47(2):325–358Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlile P. R. Transferring, translating, and transforming: And integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15:555–568Link, Google Scholar
• Child J.Organization—A Guide to Problems and Practice (1984) (Harper and Row, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):128–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collins C. J., Clark K. D. Strategic human resource practices, top management team social networks, and firm performance: The role of human resources practices in creating organizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management J. (2003) 46:740–751Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daft R. L., Lengel R. H. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Sci. (1986) 32:554–571Link, Google Scholar
• Danneels E. The dynamics of product innovation and firm competencies. Strategic Management J. (2002) 23:1095–2022Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Cremer D., van Knippenberg D., van Dijk E., van Leeuwen E. Cooperating if one's goals are collective-based: Social identification effects in social dilemmas as a function of goal transformation. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. (2008) 38(6):1562–1579Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Luca L. M., Atuahene-Gima K. Market knowledge dimensions and cross-functional collaboration: Examining the different routes to product innovation performance. J. Marketing (2007) 71:95–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D. Reimaging the differentiation and integration of work for sustained product innovation. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:612–632Link, Google Scholar
• Duncan R. B., Kilmann R. H., Pondy L. R., Slevin D. The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. The Management of Organization (1976) (North Holland, New York) 167–188Google Scholar
• Edmondson A. C., Roberto M. A., Watkins M. D. A dynamic model of top management team effectiveness: Managing unstructured task streams. Leadership Quart. (2003) 14:297–325Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards J. R. The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: Critique and a proposed alternative. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1994) 58:51–100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Egelhoff W. G. Information-prosessing theory and the multinational enterprise. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1991) 22(3):341–368Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Martin J. A. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:1105–1121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Kahwajy J. L., Bourgeois L. J. Conflict and strategic choice: How top management teams disagree. California Management Rev. (1997) 75:77–85Google Scholar
• Floyd S. W., Lane P. J. Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25:154–177Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galbraith J. R.Designing Complex Organizations (1973) (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Galunic D. C., Eisenhardt K. M. Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44:1229–1249Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R., Nayyar P. R. Transformative capacity: Continual structuring by intertemporal technology transfers. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:365–386Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghoshal S., Korine H., Szulanski G. Interunit communication in multinational corporations. Management Sci. (1994) 40:96–110Link, Google Scholar
• Gibson C. B., Birkinshaw J. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47:209–226Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert C. G. Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48:741–763Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert C. G. Change in the presence of residual fit: Can competing frames coexist? Organ. Sci. (2006) 17:150–167Link, Google Scholar
• Golden B. R., Ma H. Mutual forbearance: The role of intrafirm integration and rewards. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28:479–493Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta R., Govindarajan V. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:473–496Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta A. K., Smith K. G., Shalley C. E. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49:693–706Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hage J., Aiken M. Program change and organizational properties: Comparative analysis. Amer. J. Sociol. (1967) 72:503–519Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall R. H.Organizations: Structure and Process (1977) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Hambrick D. C., von Werder A., Zajac E. J. New directions in corporate governance research. Organ. Sci. (2008) 19:381–385Link, Google Scholar
• Hansen M. T. Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13:232–248Link, Google Scholar
• Harris J., Bromiley P. Incentives to cheat: The influence of executive compensation and firm performance on financial misrepresentation. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18:350–367Link, Google Scholar
• Harrison D. A., Price K. H., Gavind J. H., Florey A. T. Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45:1029–1045Crossref, Google Scholar
• He Z., Wong P. Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15:481–494Link, Google Scholar
• Helfat C., Peteraf M. A. The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24:997–1010Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R., Cockburn I. Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:63–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill C. W. L., Rothaermel F. T. The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28:257–274Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iansiti M., Clark K. B. Integration and dynamic capability: Evidence from product development in automobiles and mainframe computers. Indust. Corporate Change (1994) 3:557–605Crossref, Google Scholar
• James L. R., Demaree R. G., Wolf G. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. J. Appl. Psych. (1984) 69:85–98Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jansen J. J. P., van den Bosch F. A. J., Volberda H. W. Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter? Acad. Management J. (2005) 48:999–1015Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jansen J. J. P., van den Bosch F. A. J., Volberda H. W. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Sci. (2006) 52:1661–1674Link, Google Scholar
• Jansen J. J. P., George G., van den Bosch F. A. J., Volberda H. W. Senior team attributes and organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of transformational leadership. J. Management Stud. (2008) 45:982–1007Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jansen J. J. P., Vera D., Crossan M. Strategic leadership for exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. Leadership Quart. (2009) 20(1):5–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaworski B. J., Kohli A. K. Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. J. Marketing (1993) 57:53–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn K. A., Chadwick C., Thatcher S. To agree or not to agree: Diversity, conflict, and group outcomes. Internat. J. Conflict Management (1997) 8:287–306Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kenny D. A.Correlation and Causality (1979) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:383–397Link, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D., Stern R. Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Soc. Psych. Quart. (1988) 51:123–140Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence P. R., Lorsch J. W. Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1967) 12:1–47Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D. A., March J. G. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:95–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li H., Atuahene-Gima K. Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in china. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44:1123–1134Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin Z., Yang H., Demirkan I. The performance consequences of ambidexterity in strategic alliance formations: Empirical investigation and computational theorizing. Management Sci. (2007) 53:1645–1658Link, Google Scholar
• Lubatkin M. H., Simsek Z., Ling Y., Veiga J. F. Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of TMT behavioral integration. J. Management (2006) 32(5):1–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:71–87Link, Google Scholar
• March J., Simon H.Organizations (1958) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Martinez J. I., Jarillo J. C. The evolution of research on coordination mechanisms in multinational corporations. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1989) 20(3):489–514Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martinez J. I., Jarillo J. C. Coordination demands of international strategies. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1991) 22(3):429–444Crossref, Google Scholar
• Michel J. G., Hambrick D. C. Diversification posture and top management team characteristics. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35:9–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23:242–266Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R. E. The strength of strong ties: Social networks and intergroup conflict in organizations. Acad. Management J. (1989) 32:377–401Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neter J., Wasserman W., Kutner M. H.Applied Linear Statistical Models (1990) (Homewood, Irwin, IL) Google Scholar
• O'Reilly C. A., Tushman M. L. The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2004) 82:74–82Google Scholar
• O'Reilly C. A., Tushman M. L. Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. Res. Organ. Behav. (2007) 28:1–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Reilly C. A., Caldwell D. F., Barnett W. P. Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1989) 34(1):21–38Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orton J. D., Weick K. E. Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Acad. Management Rev. (1990) 15:203–223Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J.Competitive Advantage Through People: Unleashing the Power of Work Force (1995) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Postrel S. Islands of shared knowledge: Specialization and mutual understanding in problem-solving teams. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13:303–320Link, Google Scholar
• Prabhu J. C., Chandy R. K., Ellis M. E. The impact of acquisitions on innovation: Poison pill, placebo, or tonic? J. Marketing (2005) 69(1):114–130Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raisch S., Birkinshaw J. Organizational ambidexterity: antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. J. Management (2008) 34:375–409Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindfleisch A., Moorman C. The acquisition and utilization of information in new product alliances: A strength-of-ties perspective. J. Marketing (2001) 65(2):1–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaw J. D., Gupta N., Delery J. E. Pay dispersion and workforce performance: Moderating effects of incentives and interdependence. Strategic Management J. (2002) 23:491–512Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sheremata W. A. Centrifugal and centripetal forces in radical new product development under time pressure. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25:389–408Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sidhu J. S., Commandeur H. R., Volberda H. W. The multifaceted nature of exploration and exploitations' value of supply, demand, and spatial search for innovation. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18:20–38Link, Google Scholar
• Siegel P. A., Hambrick D. C. Pay disparities within top management groups: Evidence of harmful effects on performance of high-technology firms. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16:259–274Link, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N., Levinthal D. A. Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14:650–669Link, Google Scholar
• Simsek Z. Organizational ambidexterity: Towards a multilevel understanding. J. Management Stud. (2009) 46(4):597–624Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sirmon D. G., Hitt M. A., Ireland R. D. Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Acad. Management Rev. (2007) 32:273–292Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slavin R. E.Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practise (1996) (Allyn and Bacon, London) Google Scholar
• Smith K. G., Smith K. A., Sims H. P., O'Bannon D. P., Scully J. A. Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39(3):412–438Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith W. K., Tushman M. L. Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16:522–536Link, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28:1319–1350Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:509–533Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsai W. Social structure of “coopetition” within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13:179–190Link, Google Scholar
• Tsai W., Ghoshal S. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41:464–476Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., O'Reilly C. A. Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Rev. (1996) 38(4):8–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., Smith W., Wood R. C., Westerman G., O'Reilly C. A. Organizational designs and innovation streams. (2006) . Working paper, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
• Van De Ven A. H., Delbecq A. L., Koenig R. Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1976) 41(2):322–338Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatraman N., Lee C.-H., Iyer B. Strategic ambidexterity and sales growth: A longitudinal test in the software sector. (2006) Presentation, Academy of Management Annual MeetingHonoluluGoogle Scholar
• Vera D., Crossan M. Strategic leadership and organizational learning. Acad. Management Rev. (2004) 29:222–240Crossref, Google Scholar
• Volberda H. W. Toward the flexible form: How to remain vital in hypercompetitive environments. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:359–374Link, Google Scholar
• Wageman R. Interdependence and group effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40:145–180Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wageman R., Baker G. Incentives and cooperation: The joint effects of task and reward interdependence on group performance. J. Organ. Behavior (1997) 18:139–158Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westerman G., McFarlan W. F., Iansiti M. Organizational design and effectiveness over the innovation life cycle. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17:230–238Link, Google Scholar
• Winter S. G. Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24:991–995Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahra S. A. Governance, ownership, and corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating impact of industry technological opportunities. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39:1713–1735Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahra S. A., Sapienza H. J., Davidsson P. Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, model, and research agenda. J. Management Stud. (2006) 43:917–955Crossref, Google Scholar