Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects

References

• Anderson J. C., Gerbing D. W. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review of recommended two-step approach. Psych. Bull. (1988) 103:411–423Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atuahene-Gima K., Ko A. An empirical investigation of the effect of market orientation and entrepreneurship orientation alignment on product innovation. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:54–74Link, Google Scholar
• Auh S., Menguc B. Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity. J. Bus. Res. (2005) 58:1652–1661Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagozzi R. P., Yi Y., Phillips L. W. Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36:421–438Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum J. A. C., Li S. X., Usher J. M. Making the next move: How experiential and vicarious learning shape the locations of chains' acquisition. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45:766–801Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum J. R., Locke E. A., Smith K. G. A multidimensional model of venture growth. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44:292–304Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beckman C. M. The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49:741–758Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner M. J., Tushman M. L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28:238–256Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bobko P.Correlation and Regression (2001) 2nd ed.(Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourgeois L. J. On the measurement of organizational slack. Acad. Management Rev. (1981) 6:29–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K. M. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:1–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgelman R. A. Fading memories: A process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39:24–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgelman R. A., Grove A. S. Let chaos reign, then reign in chaos—repeatedly: Managing strategic dynamics for corporate longevity. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28:965–979Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay P., Glick W. H., Huber G. P. Organizational actions in response to threats and opportunities. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44:937–955Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen M. J., Hambrick D. C. Speed, stealth, and selective attack: How small firms differ from large firms in competitive behavior. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38:453–482Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen C.The Innovator's Dilemma (1997) (HarperBusiness, New York) Google Scholar
• Christensen C., Overdorf M. Meeting the challenge of disruptive change. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2000) 78(2):66–76Google Scholar
• Cohen J., Cohen P., West S. G., Aiken L. S.Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2003) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
• Cohen W., Levinthal D. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:128–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Combs J. G., Ketchen D. J. Can capital scarcity help agency theory explain franchising? Revisiting the capital scarcity hypothesis. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42:196–207Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dess G. G., Beard D. W. Dimensions of organizational task environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1984) 29:52–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dess G. G., Robinson R. B. Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management J. (1984) 5:265–273Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards J. R. The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: Critique and a proposed alternative. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1994) 58:51–100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards J. R., Parry M. E. On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36:1577–1613Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. (2001) 47:117–132Link, Google Scholar
• Floyd S., Lane P. Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25:154–177Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fornell C., Larker D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. (1981) 18:39–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghemawat P., Costa J. The organizational tension between static and dynamic efficiency. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14(Winter):59–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson C., Birkinshaw J. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47:209–226Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta A. K., Govindarajan V. Resource sharing among SBUs: Strategic antecedents and administrative implications. Acad. Management J. (1986) 29:695–714Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta A. K., Smith K. G., Shalley C. E. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49:693–708Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan M. T., Freeman J. The population ecology of organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. (1977) 83:929–984Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hawes J. M., Crittenden W. F. A taxonomy of competitive retailing strategies. Strategic Management J. (1984) 5:275–287Crossref, Google Scholar
• He Z., Wong P. Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15:481–494Link, Google Scholar
• Hogan J., Barrett P., Hogan R. Personality measurement, faking, and employment selection. J. Appl. Psych. (2007) 92:1270–1285Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaccard J. J., Turrisi R.Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression (2003) 2nd ed.(Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jansen J., van den Bosch F., Volberda H. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Sci. (2006) 52:1661–1674Link, Google Scholar
• Kanuk L., Berenson C. Mail surveys and response rates: A literature review. J. Marketing Res. (1975) 22:440–453Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katila R., Ahuja G. Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45:1183–1194Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keats B. W., Hitt M. A. A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions. Acad. Management J. (1988) 31:570–598Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum D. G., Kupper L. L., Muller K. E.Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Methods (1988) 2nd ed.(PWS-Kent, Boston) Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm: Combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:383–397Link, Google Scholar
• Landis R. S., Dunlap W. P. Moderated multiple regression tests are criterion specific. Organ. Res. Methods (2000) 3:254–266Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D., Rosenkopf L. Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49:797–818Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D. A. Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13:111–125Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D. A., March J. G. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:95–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li H., Atuahene-Gima K. Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44:1123–1134Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lincoln J. R., Gerlach M. L., Ahmadjian C. L. Keiretsu networks and corporate performance in Japan. Amer. Soc. Rev. (1996) 61:67–88Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lubatkin M. H., Simsek Z., Ling Y., Veiga J. F. Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of TMT behavioral integration. J. Management (2006) 32:1–17Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:71–87Link, Google Scholar
• McGrath R. G. Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44:118–131Crossref, Google Scholar
• McEvily W., Zaheer A. Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20:1133–1156Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milton L. P., Westphal J. D. Identity confirmation networks and cooperation in work groups. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48:191–212Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nee V., Cao Y. Market transition and the firm: Institutional change and income inequality in urban China. Management Organ. Rev. (2005) 1:23–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R., Winter C.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• O'Reilly C. A., Tushman M. L. The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2004) 82(4):74–81Google Scholar
• Peng M. W., Heath P. S. The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: Institutions, organizations, and strategic choice. Acad. Management Rev. (1996) 21:492–528Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penrose E.The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (1959) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J., Salancik G.The External Control of Organizations (1978) (Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
• Powell W. W., Kogut K. W., Smith-Doerr L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:116–145Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raisch S., Birkinshaw J. Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. J. Management (2008) 34:375–409Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson R. B., Pearce J. A. Planned patterns of strategic behavior and their relationship to business-unit performance. Strategic Management J. (1988) 9:43–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott R.Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems (1992) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Sidhu J. S., Commandeur H. R., Volberda H. W. The multifaceted nature of exploration and exploitation: Value of supply, demand, and spatial search for innovation. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18:20–40Link, Google Scholar
• Smith W. K., Tushman M. L. Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16:522–536Link, Google Scholar
• Tabachnick B. G., Fidell L. S.Using Multivariate Statistics (1996) (Harper Collins College Publishers, New York) Google Scholar
• Teece D. J. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy (1986) 15:285–305Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson J.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Tisak J., Smith C. S. Defending and extending difference score methods. J. Management (1994) 20:675–682Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., Anderson P. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 35:9–30Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., O'Reilly C. Ambidextrous organization: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Rev. (1996) 38:8–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Utterback J. M.Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation (1994) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Wiklund J., Shepherd D. Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized business. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24:1307–1314Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahra S. A., George G. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad. Management Rev. (2002) 27:185–203Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahra S. A., Ireland R. D., Hitt M. A. International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Acad. Management J. (2001) 43:925–950Crossref, Google Scholar