Understanding Variation in Managers' Ambidexterity: Investigating Direct and Interaction Effects of Formal Structural and Personal Coordination Mechanisms

References

• Adler P. S., Borys B. Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:61–89Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adler P. S., Kwon S. W. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Acad. Management Rev. (2002) 27:17–40Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adler P. S., Goldoftas B., Levine D. Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10:43–68Link, Google Scholar
• Aiken L. S., West S. G.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (1991) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
• Argote L., McEvily B., Reagans R. Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Sci. (2003) 49:571–582Link, Google Scholar
• Armstrong J. S., Overton T. S. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J. Marketing Res. (1977) 14:396–402Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atuahene-Gima K. The effects of centrifugal and centripetal forces on product development speed and quality: How does problem solving matter? Acad. Management J. (2003) 46:359–373Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagozzi R. P., Phillips L. W. Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construct. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1982) 27:459–489Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bahrami H., Evans S. Stratocracy in high-technology firms. California Management Rev. (1987) 30:51–66Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banker R. D., Chang H., Natarajan R. Productivity change, technical progress, and relative efficiency change in the public accounting industry. Management Sci. (2005) 51:291–304Link, Google Scholar
• Baum J. R., Wally S. Strategic decision speed and firm performance. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24:1107–1129Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner M. J., Tushman M. L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28:238–256Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettis R. A., Wong S. S., Easterby-Smith M., Lyles M. A. Dominant logic, knowledge creation, and managerial choice. Handbook of Organizational Learning & Knowledge Management (2003) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) 343–355Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw J., Gibson C. Building ambidexterity into an organization. MIT Sloan Management Rev. (2004) 45:47–55Google Scholar
• Burgelman R. A. A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1983) 28:223–244Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgelman R. A. Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47:325–357Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burns T., Stalker G. M.The Management of Innovation (1961) (Tavistock, London) Google Scholar
• Burt R. S.Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman J. S.Foundations of Social Theory (1990) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Cray D. Control and coordination in multinational corporations. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1984) 15:85–98Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crossan M. M., Berdrow I. Organizational learning and strategic renewal. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24:1087–1105Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Daft R. L., Lengel R. H. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Sci. (1986) 32:554–571Link, Google Scholar
• Desphande R., Zaltman G. Factors affecting the use of market research information: A path analysis. J. Marketing Res. (1982) 19:14–31Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dewar R. D., Whetten D. A., Boje D. An examination of the reliability and validity of the Aiken and Hage scales on centralization, formalization, and task routines. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1980) 25:120–128Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dill W. R. Environments as an influence on managerial autonomy. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1958) 2:345–367Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duncan R. B., Kilmann R. H., Pondy L. R., Slevin D. The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. The Management of Organization Design (1976) (North-Holland, New York) 167–188Google Scholar
• Egelhoff W. G. Information-processing theory and the multinational enterprise. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1991) 22:341–368Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S., Xiao Y. Coordination in fast-response organizations. Management Sci. (2006) 52:1155–1169Link, Google Scholar
• Flier B., van den Bosch F. A. J., Volberda H. W., Carnevale C. A., Tomkin N., Melin L., Quélin B. V., Kriger M. P. The changing landscape of the European financial services sector. Long Range Planning (2001) 34:179–207Crossref, Google Scholar
• Floyd S. W., Lane P. J. Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25:154–177Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galbraith J. R.Designing Complex Organizations (1973) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Ghemawat P., Ricart I Costa J. The organizational tension between static and dynamic efficiency. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:59–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghoshal S., Bartlett C. A. Creation, adoption, and diffusion of innovations by subsidiaries of multinational corporations. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1988) 19:365–388Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghoshal S., Korine H., Szulanski G. Interunit communication in multinational corporations. Management Sci. (1994) 40:96–110Link, Google Scholar
• Gibson C. B., Birkinshaw J. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47:209–226Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta A. K., Govindarajan V. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:473–496Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta A. K., Smith K. G., Shalley C. E. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49:693–706Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hage J. An axiomatic theory of organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1965) 10:289–320Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hage J., Aiken M. Program change and organizational properties a comparative analysis. Amer. J. Sociol. (1967) 72:503–519Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hage J., Aiken M. Routine technology, social structure, and organization goals. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1969) 14:366–376Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall R. H., Johnson N. J., Haas J. E. Organizational size, complexity, and formalization. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1967) 32:903–912Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen M. T., Podolny J. M., Pfeffer J. So many ties, so little time: A task contingency perspective on the value of social capital in organizations. Soc. Capital Organ. (2001) 18:21–57Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardy M. A. Regression with dummy variables. (1993) . Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-093, Sage, Newbury Park, CACrossref, Google Scholar
• He Z. L., Wong P. K. Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15:481–494Link, Google Scholar
• Henderson R., Cockburn I. Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:63–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henisz W. J., Macher J. T. Firm- and country-level trade-offs and contingencies in the evaluation of foreign investment: The semiconductor industry, 1994–2002. Organ. Stud. (2004) 15:537–54Google Scholar
• Holmqvist M. Experiential learning processes of exploitation and exploration within and between organizations: An empirical study of product development. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15:70–81Link, Google Scholar
• Ireland R. D., Hitt M. A., Bettis R. A., De Porras D. A. Strategy formulation processes: Differences in perceptions of strength and weakness indicators and environmental uncertainty by managerial level. Strategic Management J. (1987) 8:469–485Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaccard J., Turrisi R. Interaction effects in multiple regression, 2nd ed.. (2003) . Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-072, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CACrossref, Google Scholar
• Jansen J. J. P., van den Bosch F. A. J., Volberda H. W. Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter? Acad. Management J. (2005) 48:999–1015Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jansen J. J. P., van den Bosch F. A. J., Volberda H. W. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Sci. (2006) 52:1661–1674Link, Google Scholar
• Jaworski B. J., Kohli A. K. Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. J. Marketing (1993) 57:53–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katila R., Ahuja G. Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45:1183–1194Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence P. R., Lorsch J. W.Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration (1967) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Leana C. R., Barry B. Stability and change as simultaneous experiences in organizational life. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25:753–759Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewin A. Y., Long C. P., Carroll T. N. The coevolution of new organizational forms. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10:535–550Link, Google Scholar
• Lubatkin M. H., Simsek Z., Ling Y., Veiga J. F. Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of tom management team behavioral integration. J. Management (2006) 32:646–672Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:71–87Link, Google Scholar
• Martinez J. L., Jarillo J. C. The evolution of research on coordination mechanisms in multinational corporations. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1989) 20:489–514Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonough E. F., Leifer R. Using simultaneous structures to cope with uncertainty. Acad. Management J. (1983) 26:727–735Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath R. G. Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44:118–131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D. Strategy making and structure: Analysis and implications for performance. Acad. Management J. (1987) 30:7–32Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D. The architecture of simplicity. Acad. Management Rev. (1993) 18:644–659Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D., Dröge C. Psychological and traditional dimensions of structure. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31:539–560Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nadler D. A., Tushman M. L.Strategic Organization Design (1987) (Scott Foresman, New York) Google Scholar
• Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23:242–266Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neter J., Wasserman W., Kutner M. H.Applied Linear Statistical Models (1990) (Homewood, Irwin, IL) Google Scholar
• Nonaka I., Konno N. The concept of “ba”: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Rev. (1998) 40:40–54Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Reilly C. A., Tushman M. L. The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2004) 82:74–81Google Scholar
• Organ D. W., Greene C. N. The effects of formalization on professional involvement: A compensatory process approach. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26:237–252Crossref, Google Scholar
• Papadakis V. M., Lioukas S., Chambers D. Strategic decision-making processes: The role of management and context. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19:115–147Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pierce J. L., Delbecq A. L. Organization structure, individual attitudes and innovation. Acad. Management Rev. (1977) 2:27–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., Organ D. W. Self-reports in organization research: Problems and prospects. J. Management (1986) 40:308–338Google Scholar
• Pugh D. S., Hickson D. J., Hinings C. R., Macdonald K. M., Turner C., Lupton T. A conceptual scheme for organizational analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1963) 8:289–315Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raisch S., Birkinshaw J. Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. J. Management (2008) 34:375–409Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R., Zuckerman E. W. Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:502–517Link, Google Scholar
• Rindfleisch A., Moorman C. The acquisition and utilization of information in new product alliances: A strength-of-ties perspective. J. Marketing (2001) 65:1–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivkin J. W., Siggelkow N. Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Sci. (2003) 49:290–311Link, Google Scholar
• Rodan S., Galunic C. More than network structure: How knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25:541–562Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rowley T. J., Behrens D., Krackhardt D. Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:369–386Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanchez R., Heene A., Thomas H.Dynamics of Competence-Based Competition (1996) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Sheremata W. A. Centrifugal and centripetal forces in radical new product development under time pressure. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25:389–408Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith K. G., Collins C. J., Clark K. D. Existing knowledge, knowledge creation capability, and the rate of new product introduction in high-technology firms. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48:346–357Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith W. K., Tushman M. L. Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16:522–536Link, Google Scholar
• Subramaniam M., Youndt M. A. The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48:450–463Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsai W. Social structure of “coopetition” within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13:179–190Link, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., O'Reilly C. A. Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Rev. (1996) 38:8–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:35–67Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van De Ven A., Delbecq A. L., Koening R. Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1976) 41:322–338Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh J. P. Selectivity and selective perception: An investigation of managers' belief structures and information processing. Acad. Management J. (1988) 31:873–896Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whetten F. R. Coping with incompatible expectations: An integrated view of role conflict. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1978) 23:254–271Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zander U., Kogut B. Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6:76–92Link, Google Scholar
• Zmud R. W. Diffusion of modern software practices: Influence of centralization and formalization. Management Sci. (1982) 28:1421–1431Link, Google Scholar