Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance

References

• Adler P. S., Kwon S. W. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Acad. Management Rev. (2002) 27(1):17–40Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adler P. S., Goldoftas B., Levine D. I. Flexibility versus efficiency: A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(1):43–68Link, Google Scholar
• Amabile T. M.Creativity in Context (1996) (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) Google Scholar
• Ancona D. G., Caldwell D. F. Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):321–341Link, Google Scholar
• Ancona D. G., Goodman P. S., Lawrence B. S., Tushman M. L. Time: A new research lens. Acad. Management Rev. (2001) 26:645–663Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andriopoulos C., Lewis M. Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(4):696–717Link, Google Scholar
• Atuahene-Gima K. Resolving the capability-rigidity paradox in new product innovation. J. Marketing (2005) 69(4):61–83Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atuahene-Gima K., Murray J. Y. Exploratory and exploitative learning in new product development: A social capital perspective on new technology ventures in China. J. Internat. Marketing (2007) 15(2):1–29Crossref, Google Scholar
• Auh S., Menguc B. Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity. J. Bus. Res. (2005) 58:1652–1661Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baden-Fuller C., Volberda H., Heene A., Sanchez R. Strategic renewal in large complex organizations: A competence- based view. Competence-Based Strategic Management (1997) (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK) 89–110Google Scholar
• Beckman C. M. The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(4):741–758Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner M. J., Tushman M. L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28:238–256Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K.Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Bushe G. R., Shani A. B.Parallel Learning Structures: Increasing Innovation in Bureaucracies (1991) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Cao Q., Gedajlovic E. R., Zhang H. Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(4):781–796Link, Google Scholar
• Carlile P. R. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(4):442–455Link, Google Scholar
• Christensen C. M.The Innovator's Dilemma (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Cohen W., Levinthal D. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):128–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(2):179–202Link, Google Scholar
• Duncan R. B., Kilmann R. H., Pondy L. R., Slevin D. P. The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. The Management of Organization Design, Vol 1. Strategies and Implementation (1976) (North-Holland, New York) 167–188Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M. Paradox, spirals, ambivalence: The new language of change and pluralism. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25(4):703–705Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Martin J. A. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(October–November):1105–1121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Floyd S., Lane P. Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25:154–177Crossref, Google Scholar
• George S. S., Regani S. Xerox PARC: Innovation without profit? (2005) . ECCH Case Study 305-053-1, ICFAI Center for Management Research, Hyderabad, IndiaGoogle Scholar
• Ghoshal S., Bartlett C. A.The Individualized Corporation: A Fundamentally New Approach to Management (1997) (Harper Business, New York) Google Scholar
• Gibson C. B., Birkinshaw J. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47:209–226Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert C. G. Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource vs. routine rigidity. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48(5):741–763Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert C. G. Change in the presence of residual fit: Can competing frames coexist? Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(1):150–167Link, Google Scholar
• Ginsberg A., Venkatraman N. Contingency perspectives of organizational strategy: A critical review of the empirical research. Acad. Management Rev. (1985) 10(3):421–434Crossref, Google Scholar
• Groysberg B., Lee L. E. Hiring stars and their colleagues: Exploration and exploitation in professional service firms. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(4):740–758Link, Google Scholar
• Gulati R., Puranam P. Renewal through reorganization: The value of inconsistencies between formal and informal organization. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(2):422–440Link, Google Scholar
• Gupta A. K., Smith K. G., Shalley C. E. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Acad. Management J. (2006) 4:693–706Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen M. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organizational subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:83–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon A. Brokering knowledge: Linking learning and innovation. Res. Organ. Behav. (2002) 24:41–85Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon A., Sutton R. I. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(4):716–749Crossref, Google Scholar
• He Z.-L., Wong P.-K. Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(4):481–494Link, Google Scholar
• Henderson R., Cockburn I. Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:63–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill S. A., Birkinshaw J. Strategy-organization configurations in corporate venture units: Impact on performance and survival. J. Bus. Venturing (2008) 23:423–444Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmqvist M. Experiential learning processes of exploitation and exploration within and between organizations: An empirical study of product development. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(1):70–81Link, Google Scholar
• Im G., Rai A. Knowledge sharing ambidexterity in long-term interorganizational relationships. Management Sci. (2008) 54(7):1281–1296Link, Google Scholar
• Inkpen A. C., Tsang E. W. K. Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Acad. Management Rev. (2005) 30(1):146–165Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jansen J. J. P., van den Bosch F. A. J., Volberda H. W. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Sci. (2006) 52(11):1661–1674Link, Google Scholar
• Jansen J. J. P., George G., van den Bosch F. A. J., Volberda H. W. Senior team attributes and organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of transformational leadership. J. Management Stud. (2008) 45(5):982–1007Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jansen J. J. P., Tempelaar M., van den Bosch F. A. J., Volberda H. Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: The mediating role of integration mechanisms. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(4):797–811Link, Google Scholar
• Ketchen J. R., Thomas J. B., Snow C. C. Organizational configurations and performance: A comparison of theoretical approaches. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(6):1278–1313Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):383–397Link, Google Scholar
• Kostova T., Zaheer S. Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of multinational enterprise. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24:64–81Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kyriakopoulos K., Moorman C. Tradeoffs in marketing exploitation and exploration strategies: The overlooked role of market orientation. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2004) 21(3):219–240Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D., Rosenkopf L. Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(4):797–818Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence P. R., Lorsch J. W. Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1967) 12(1):1–47Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D. A., March J. G. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:95–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin Z., Yang H., Demirkan I. The performance consequences of ambidexterity in strategic alliance formations: Empirical investigation and computational theorizing. Management Sci. (2007) 53(10):1645–1658Link, Google Scholar
• Lubatkin M. H., Simsek Z., Ling Y., Veiga J. F. Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. J. Management (2006) 32(5):646–672Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):71–87Link, Google Scholar
• Miller D., Friesen P. H.Organizations: A Quantum View (1984) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Miller D., Fern M. J., Cardinal L. B. The use of knowledge for technological innovation within diversified firms. Acad. Management J. (2007) 50(2):308–326Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mom T. J. M., van den Bosch F. A. J., Volberda H. W. Investigating managers' exploration and exploitation activities: The influence of top-down, bottom-up, and horizontal knowledge inflows. J. Management Stud. (2007) 44(6):910–931Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mom T. J. M., van den Bosch F. A. J., Volberda H. W. Understanding variation in managers' ambidexterity: Investigating direct and interaction effects of formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(4):812–828Link, Google Scholar
• Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(2):242–266Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickerson J. A., Zenger T. R. Being efficiently fickle: A dynamic theory of organizational choice. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(5):547–566Link, Google Scholar
• Obstfeld D. Social networks, the tertius lungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50(1):100–130Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Reilly C. A., Tushman M. L. The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2004) 82:74–81Google Scholar
• O'Reilly C. A., Tushman M. L. Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. Res. Organ. Behav. (2008) 28:185–206Crossref, Google Scholar
• Probst G., Raisch S. Organizational crisis: The logic of failure. Acad. Management Executive (2005) 19(1):90–105Google Scholar
• Puranam P., Srikanth K. What they know vs. what they do: How acquirers leverage technology acquisitions. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28(8):805–826Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P., Singh H., Zollo M. Organizing for innovation: Managing the coordination-autonomy dilemma in technology acquisitions. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(2):263–280Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raisch S. Balanced structures: Designing organizations for profitable growth. Long Range Planning (2008) 41(5):483–508Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raisch S., Birkinshaw J. Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. J. Management (2008) 34(3):375–409Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L., Nerkar A. Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22(4):287–306Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel F. T., Alexandre M. T. Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(4):759–780Link, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel F. T., Deeds D. L. Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(3):201–221Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schreyögg G., Kliesch-Eberl M. How dynamic can organizational capabilities be? Towards a dual-process model of capability dynamization. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28(9):913–933Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N. Evolution toward fit. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47(1):125–159Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N., Levinthal D. A. Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(6):650–669Link, Google Scholar
• Smith W. K., Tushman M. L. Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(5):522–536Link, Google Scholar
• Taylor A., Helfat C. E. Organizational linkages for surviving technological change: Complementary assets, middle management, and ambidexterity. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(4):718–739Link, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28(13):1319–1350Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tempelaar M., Jansen J. J. P., van den Bosch F. A. S. J. Knowing your clients: The joint effect of client and internal social capital on organizational ambidexterity. (2008) Strategic Management Society Annual ConferenceCologne, GermanyGoogle Scholar
• Tiwana A. Do bridging ties complement strong ties? An empirical examination of alliance ambidexterity. Strategic Management J. (2008) 29(3):251–272Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., O'Reilly C. A. Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Rev. (1996) 38:8–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatraman N., Lee C. H., Iyer B. Strategic ambidexterity and sales growth: A longitudinal test in the software sector. (2007) . Unpublished manuscript, Boston University, Boston, http://www.softwareecosystems.com/SMJManuscript_revised.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Webb D., Pettigrew A. The temporal development of strategy: Patterns in the U.K. insurance industry. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(5):601–621Link, Google Scholar
• Wegner D. M., Bargh J. A., Gilbert D., Fiske S. T., Lindzey G. Control and automaticity in social life. Handbook of Social Psychology (1998) 14th ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) 446–496Google Scholar
• Westerman G., McFarlan F. W., Iansiti M. Organization design and effectiveness over the innovation life cycle. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(2):230–238Link, Google Scholar
• Zahra S., George G. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad. Management Rev. (2002) 27(2):185–203Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zajac E. J., Kraatz M. S., Bresser R. K. F. Modeling the dynamics of strategic fit: A normative approach to strategic change. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(4):429–455Crossref, Google Scholar