Organizational Linkages for Surviving Technological Change: Complementary Assets, Middle Management, and Ambidexterity

References

• Abernathy W. J., Utterback J. Patterns of industrial innovation. Tech. Rev. (1978) 80:40–47Google Scholar
• Adner R., Helfat C. E. Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(10):1011–1025Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aldrich H. E., Herker D. Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. Acad. Management Rev. (1977) 2:217–230Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen T. J.Managing the Flow of Technology (1977) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Allyn S. C.My Half Century with NCR (1967) (McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York) Google Scholar
• Amdahl G. Interview OH 107, by A. L. Norberg (April 16, 1986, and January 17, and April 5, 1989), Cupertino, CA. (1986) . Charles Babbage Institute, The Center for the History of Information Processing, University of Minnesota, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
• Anderson P. A., Tushman M. L. Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:604–633Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyris C. Empowerment: The emperor's new clothes. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1998) 76(3):98–107Google Scholar
• Baker W. Market networks and corporate behavior. Amer. J. Sociol. (1990) 6:589–625Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bechky B. A. Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(3):312–331Link, Google Scholar
• Benjamin B. A., Podolny J. M. Status, quality and social order in the California wine industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:563–589Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birkenstock J. Interview OH 4, by R. Stuewer and E. Tomash (August 12), Stamford, CT. (1980) . Charles Babbage Institute, The Center for the History of Information Processing, University of Minnesota, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
• Blau P. M.Inequality and Heterogeneity (1977) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Boland R. J., Singh J., Salipante P., Aram J., Fay S. Y., Kanawattanachai P. Knowledge representations and knowledge transfer. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44:393–417Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boumgarden P., Nickerson J., Zenger T. Sailing toward exploration and exploitation: Achieving abundant ambidexterity through organizational vacillation. (2008) . Working paper, Olin Business School, University of Washington at St. Louis, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
• Burgelman R. A. A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1983) 28:223–244Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgelman R. A., Grove A. Let chaos reign, then rein in chaos—Repeatedly: Managing strategic dynamics for corporate longevity. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28(10):965–979Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burkhardt M. E., Brass D. J. Changing patterns or patterns of change: The effects of a change in technology on social network structure and power. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:104–127Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell R. D. V. Interview OH 67 by W. Aspray (February 22), Concord, MA. (1984) . Charles Babbage Institute, The Center for the History of Information Processing, University of Minnesota, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
• Canning R. Interview OH 338 by J. Yost (August 23), Vista, CA. (2002) . Charles Babbage Institute, The Center for the History of Information Processing, University of Minnesota, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
• Carson S. J., Madhok A., Varman R., John G. Information processing moderators of the effectiveness of trust-based governance in interfirm R&D collaboration. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(1):45–56Link, Google Scholar
• Christensen C. M.The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Christensen C. M., Bower J. L. Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:197–218Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen C. M., Suarez F. F., Utterback J. M. Strategies for survival in fast-changing industries. Management Sci. (1998) 44(12):S207–S221Link, Google Scholar
• Clark H. H.Using Language (1996) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collis D. J., Noda T. Sharp corporation: Technology strategy. (1993) . Case 9-793-064, Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
• Corbato F. J. Interview OH 162 by A. L. Norberg (November 14), Cambridge, MA. (1990) . Charles Babbage Institute, The Center for the History of Information Processing, University of Minnesota, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
• Cortada J. W.Before the Computer: IBM, NCR, Burroughs, & Remington Rand & the Industry They Created (1993) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Daniel W. (1985) . Interview OH 235 by E. Ashmore (August 23), Charles Babbage Institute, The Center for the History of Information Processing, University of Minnesota, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
• DiMaggio P. J. Culture and cognition. Annual Rev. Soc. (1997) 23:263–287Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D., Hardy C. Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39(5):1120–1153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duncan R. B., Kilmann R. H., Pondy L. R., Slevin D. The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. The Management of Organization (1976) 1(North-Holland, New York) 167–188Google Scholar
• Dunwell S. Interview 153 by W. Aspray (February 13), Poughkeepsie, NY. (1989) . Charles Babbage Institute, The Center for the History of Information Processing, University of Minnesota, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
• Earley P. C., Gibson C. B.Multinational Teams: A New Perspective (2002) (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsbach K. D., Barr P. S., Hargadon A. B. Identifying situated cognition in organizations. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16:422–433Link, Google Scholar
• Flamm K.Creating the Computer. Government, Industry, and High Technology (1988) (Brookings Institute, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
• Gatignon H., Tushman M. L., Smith W., Anderson P. C. A structural approach to assessing innovation: Construct development of innovation locus, type, and characteristics. Management Sci. (2002) 48(9):1103–1122Link, Google Scholar
• Gibson C., Birkinshaw J. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47:209–226Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert C. Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48(5):741–763Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. S. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Soc. (1985) 91:481–510Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gresov C., Drazin R. Equifinality: Functional equivalence in organization design. Acad. Management Rev. (1997) 22(2):403–428Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick D., Mason P. A. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9:193–206Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hawkins R. L. Interview OH 64 by W. Aspray (February 20), Barnstable, MA. (1984) . Charles Babbage Institute, The Center for the History of Information Processing, University of Minnesota, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
• Hill C. W. L., Rothaermel F. T. The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28:257–274Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hurd C. C. Interview 76 by N. Stern (January 20), Portola Valley, CA. (1981) . Charles Babbage Institute, The Center for the History of Information Processing, University of Minnesota, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
• Hurd C. C. Interview OH 259 by R. W. Siedel (November 18), Portola Valley, CA. (1994) . Charles Babbage Institute, The Center for the History of Information Processing, University of Minnesota, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
• Hurd C. C. Interview OH 318 by C. R. Fillerup (August 28), Portola Valley, CA. (1995) . Charles Babbage Institute, The Center for the History of Information Processing, University of Minnesota, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
• Ibarra H. Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36:471–501Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S. Cognition, capabilities, and incentives: Assessing firm response to the fiber-optic revolution. Acad. Management J. (2008) 51(4):672–695Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S., Henderson R. Inertia and incentives: Bridging organizational economics and organizational theory. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(5):509–521Link, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S., Tripsas M. Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change. Res. Policy (2008) 37(5):790–805Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keane J. F. Interview OH 340 by M. Campbell-Kelly (May 3), Washington, D.C.. (2002) . Charles Babbage Institute, The Center for the History of Information Processing, University of Minnesota, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
• Lawrence P. R., Lorsch J. W.Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration (1967) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Lyles M., Schwenk C. Top management, strategy, and organizational knowledge structures'. J. Management Stud. (1992) 29:155–174Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J. G., Sproull L. S., Tamuz M. Learning from samples of one or fewer. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:1–13Link, Google Scholar
• Marcosson I. F.Colonel Deeds Industrial Builder (1948) (Vail-Ballou Press, Inc., Binghamton, New York) Google Scholar
• McDonald R. E. Interview OH 45 by J. B. Ross (December 16), Minneapolis. (1982) . Charles Babbage Institute, The Center for the History of Information Processing, University of Minnesota, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
• McDonald R. E. Interview OH 57 by J. B. Ross (May 4), Minneapolis. (1983) . Charles Babbage Institute, The Center for the History of Information Processing, University of Minnesota, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
• Meindl J. R., Stubbart C., Porac J. F. Cognition within and between organizations: Five key questions. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5):289–293Link, Google Scholar
• Miles R. E., Snow C. C.Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process (1978) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Miner A. S., Bassoff P., Moorman C. Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46:304–337Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell W. Whether and when? Probability and timing of incumbents' entry into emerging industrial subfields. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1989) 34:208–230Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell W. Are more good things better, or will technical and market capabilities conflict when a firm expands? Indust. Corporate Change (1992) 1(2):327–346Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreland R., Thompson L. L., Levine J. M., Messick D. Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. Shared Cognition in Organizations (1999) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 3–31Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mumma R. E. Interview OH 73 by W. Aspray (April 19), Dayton, OH. (1984) . Charles Babbage Institute, The Center for the History of Information Processing, University of Minnesota, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
• Murnighan J. K., Conlon D. E. The dynamics of intense work groups: A study of British string quartets. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36:165–186Crossref, Google Scholar
• NCR Annual Report. (1955) . NCR, Dayton, OHGoogle Scholar
• Nickerson J. A., Zenger T. R. Being efficiently fickle: A dynamic theory of organizational choice. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(5):547–566Link, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W. Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:187–206Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Reilly C. A., Tushman M. L., Staw B., Brief A. Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior (2008) 28(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 185–206Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ouchi W. G. Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1980) 25:120–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pendergrass J. T. Interview OH 93 by W. Aspray (March 28), Princeton, NJ. (1985) . Charles Babbage Institute, The Center for the History of Information Processing, University of Minnesota, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
• Podolny J. Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. Amer. J. Soc. (2001) 107:33–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell T. C. Organizational alignment as competitive advantage. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13:119–134Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pugh E. W.Memories that Shaped an Industry (1984) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Pugh E. W.Building IBM, Shaping an Industry and Its Technology (1995) (MIT Press, London, England) Google Scholar
• Puranam P., Singh H., Chaudhuri S. Integrating acquired capabilities: When structural integration is (un)necessary. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(2):313–328Link, Google Scholar
• Rench C. Interview OH 72 by W. Aspray (April 18), Dayton, OH. (1984) . Charles Babbage Institute, The Center for the History of Information Processing, University of Minnesota, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
• Rindova V. P., Kotha S. Continuous “morphing”: Competing through dynamic capabilities, form, and function. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(6):1263–1280Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ring P. S., Van de Ven A. H. Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. (1994) 19(1):90–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson H. W. Interview OH 147 by B. Bruemmer (July 13), Bethesda, MD. (1988) . Charles Babbage Institute, The Center for the History of Information Processing, University of Minnesota, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
• Rosenbloom R. S. Leadership, capabilities, and technological change: The transformation of NCR in the electronic era. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:1083–1103Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith R. B. (1980) . Interview OH 34 by R. Mapstone (May 29), Charles Babbage Institute, The Center for the History of Information Processing, University of Minnesota, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
• Smith W. K., Tushman M. L. Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(5):522–536Link, Google Scholar
• Sobel R.IBM: Colossus in Transition (1981) (Crown Publishing Group, New York) Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe A. L., Stinchcombe A. L. Contracts as hierarchical documents. Organizational Theory and Project Management (1985) (Norwegian University Press, Bergen, Norway) 121–171Google Scholar
• Stuart T. E., Hoang H., Hybels R. C. Interorganizational endorsement and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(2):315–349Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sull D. N., Tedlow R. S., Rosenbloom R. S. Managerial commitments and technological change in the US tire industry. Indust. Corporate Change (1997) 6(2):461–501Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor A. H. The next generation: A competitive learning model of technology adoption and integration. Organ. Sci. (2008) . ePub ahead of print November 25, http://orgsci.journal.informs.org/cgi/content/abstract/orsc.1080.0399v1Google Scholar
• Teece D. J. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy (1986) 15(6):285–305Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Tripsas M. Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:119–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M., Gavetti G. Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:1147–1161Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., Anderson P. C. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31(3):439–465Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., Katz R. External communication and project performance: An investigation into the role of gatekeepers. Management Sci. (1980) 26:1071–1085Link, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., Murmann J. P. Dominant designs, technology cycles, and organizational outcomes. Res. Organ. Behav. (1998) 20:231–266Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., Nadler D. A. Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Acad. Management Rev. (1978) 3:613–624Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., O'Reilly C. A. Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Rev. (1996) 38(4):8–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., Rosenkopf L., Staw B., Cummings L. Organizational determinants of technological change: Toward a sociology of technological evolution. Research in Organizational Behavior (1992) 14(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 311–347Google Scholar
• Usselman S. W. IBM and its imitators: Organizational capabilities and the emergence of the international computer industry. Bus. Econom. Hist. (1993) 22(2):1–35Google Scholar
• Vincent R. (1983) . Interview OH 54 by C. Solomonson (March 8), Charles Babbage Institute, The Center for the History of Information Processing, University of Minnesota, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
• Walsh J. P. Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(3):280–321Link, Google Scholar
• Watson T. J., Birkenstock J. W. Interview OH 109 by A. L. C. Humphreys (April 25), Armonk, NY. (1985) . Charles Babbage Institute, The Center for the History of Information Processing, University of Minnesota, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
• Watson T. J., Petre P.Father, Son & Co.: My Life at IBM and Beyond (1990) (Bantam Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Wyly S. Interview OH 374 by D. Allison (December 6), Washington, DC. (2002) . Charles Babbage Institute, The Center for the History of Information Processing, University of Minnesota, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
• Yates J.Structuring the Information Age: Life Insurance and Technology in the Twentieth Century (2005) (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore) Google Scholar
• Yost J.The Computer Industry (2005) (Greenwood Press, West Port, CT) Google Scholar