Hiring Stars and Their Colleagues: Exploration and Exploitation in Professional Service Firms

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0430

References

  • Acemoglu D., Pischke J. S. Why do firms train? Theory and evidence. Quart. J. Econom. (1998) 113(1):79–119CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allison P. D., Long S. J. Departmental effects on scientific productivity. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1990) 55(4):469–478CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andersen B., Howells J., Hull R., Miles I., Roberts J.Knowledge and Innovation in the New Service Economy (2000) (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK) Google Scholar
  • Arthur M. B. The boundaryless career: A new perspective for organizational inquiry. J. Organ. Behav. (1994) 15:295–306CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arthur M. B., Rousseau D. M.The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era (1996) (Oxford University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Asquith P., Mullins D. Equity issues and offering dilution. J. Financial Econom. (1986) 15(1-2):61–89CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bagdadli S., Solari L., Usai A., Grandori A. The emergence of career boundaries in unbounded industries: Career odysseys in the Italian new economy. Internat. J. Human Resource Management (2003) 14:788–808CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker G. S. Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. J. Political Econom. (1962) 70(5):9–49CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benner M. Incumbent discount: Stock market categories and response to radical technological change. Acad. Management Rev. (2004) 32(3):703–720CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benner M. J., Tushman M. L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28:238–256CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brindisi L. J. Shareholder value and executive compensation. Planning Rev. (1985) 13(5):14–17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Broschak J. P. Managers' mobility and market interface: The effect of managers' career mobility on the dissolution of market ties. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2004) 49:608–640Google Scholar
  • Brown L., Chen D. How good is the All-America research team in forecast earnings? J. Bus. Forecasting (1991) 9:14–18Google Scholar
  • Brown S. J., Warner J. B. Measuring security price performance. J. Financial Econom. (1980) 8(3):205–258CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burgelman R. A. Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:239–262LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Capen E. C., Clapp R. V., Campbell W. M. Competitive bidding in high risk situations. J. Petroleum Technology (1971) 23(June):641–653CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chaudhuri S., Tabrizi B. Capturing the real value in high-tech acquisitions. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1999) 77(5):123–130Google Scholar
  • Christensen C. M.The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Cosh A., Hughes A., Kambhampati U. Take-over success or failure? The experience of large and small UK Companies. (1993) . Working paper, SBRC, Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  • Cowen A. P., Groysberg B., Healy P. Which types of analyst firms are more optimistic? J. Accounting Econom. (2006) 41:119–146CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cummings A., Oldham G. R. Enhancing creativity: Managing work contexts for the high potential employee. California Management Rev. (1997) 40(1):22–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeFillippi R., Arthur M. B. The boundaryless career: A competency-based perspective. J. Organ. Behav. (1994) 15:307–324CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dorfman J. Analysts devote more time to selling as firms keep scorecard on performance. Wall Street Journal (1991) October 29):1Google Scholar
  • Drucker P. F.On the Profession of Management (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Dyckman T., Philbrick D., Stephan J. A comparison of event study methodologies using daily stock returns: A simulation approach. J. Accounting Res. (1984) 22(Supplement):1–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eccles R. G., Crane D. B.Doing Deals: Investment Banks at Work (1988) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., Martin J. A. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:1105–1121CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ernst H., Vitt J. The influence of corporate acquisitions on the behaviour of key inventors. R&D Management (2000) 30:105–119CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Friedson E.Professional Powers: A Study of the Institutionalization of Formal Knowledge (1986) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Froot K. A. Consistent covariance matrix estimation with cross-sectional dependence and heteroskedasticity in financial data. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (1989) 24:333–355CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gabarro J. J. When a new manager takes charge. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1985) 63(3):110–123Google Scholar
  • Gilbert C. Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48:741–763CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood R., Hinings C. R., Brown J. “P2-Form” strategic management: Corporate practices in professional partnerships. Acad. Management J. (1990) 33(4):725–755CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood R., Hinings C. R., Brown J. Merging professional service firms. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(2):239–257LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood R., Suddaby R., McDougald M., Greenwood R., Suddaby R. Introduction. Research in the Sociology of Organizations (2006) (Elsevier, Boston) 1–16Google Scholar
  • Groysberg B., Abrahams R. Lift outs: How to acquire a high-functioning team. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2006) 84(December):133–140Google Scholar
  • Groysberg B., Lee L. The effects of colleague quality on top performance: The case of security analysts. J. Organ. Behav. (2008) 29:1123–1144CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Groysberg B., Lee L., Nanda A. Can they take it with them? The portability of star knowledge workers' performance. Management Sci. (2008) 54(7):1213–1230LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Groysberg B., Nanda A., Nohria N. The risky business of hiring stars. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2004) 82(5):92–100Google Scholar
  • Gupta A. K., Smith K. G., Shalley C. E. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49:693–706CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hackman J. R.Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances (2002) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haspeslagh P., Jemison D.Managing Acquisitions (1991) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Healy P., Palepu K., Ruback R. Does corporate performance improve after mergers? J. Financial Econom. (1992) 31(2):135–175CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Healy P., Palepu K., Ruback R. Which takeovers are profitable? Strategic or financial? Sloan Management Rev. (1997) 38(Summer):45–57Google Scholar
  • Heckman J. J. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica (1979) 47(1):153–161CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson R. M., Clark K. B. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):9–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Howard G. G. What makes a good analyst? Well…. Institutional Investor (1967) May):10–15Google Scholar
  • Huber P. J. The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under non-standard conditions. Proc. 5th Berkeley Sympos. Math. Statist. Probab. (1967) 1(University of California Press, Berkeley) 221–233Google Scholar
  • Huckman R. S., Pisano G. P. The firm specificity of individual performance: Evidence from cardiac surgery. Management Sci. (2006) 52(4):473–488LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ichniowski C., Shaw K., Prennushi G. The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing lines. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1997) 87(3):291–313Google Scholar
  • Institutional Investor The 1991 All-America fixed income research team. Institutional Investor (1991) October):81–87Google Scholar
  • Jacob J., Lys T. Z., Neale M. A. Expertise in forecasting performance of security analysts. J. Accounting Econom. (1999) 28(1):51–82CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jansen J. J. Senior teams and organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of transformational leadership. (2006) Presentation, Annual Academy of Management MeetingAugust(Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor, NY) Google Scholar
  • Jensen M. C., Ruback R. S. The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. J. Financial Econom. (1983) 11(1–4):5–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King Z., Burke S., Pemberton J. The “bounded” career: An empirical study of human capital, career mobility, and employment outcomes in a mediated labour market. Human Relations (2005) 58(8):981–1008CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kordana K. A. Law firms and associate careers: Tournament theory versus the production-imperative model. Yale Law J. (1995) 104:1907–1934CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laderman J. M. Who can you trust? Wall Street's spin game. Bus. Week (1998) October 5):148–156Google Scholar
  • Lave J.Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics, and Culture in Everyday Life (1988) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear E. P. Raids and offer matching. Research in Labor Econom. (1986) 8(A):141–165Google Scholar
  • Levinthal D., March J. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:95–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Littleton S. M., Arthur M. B., Rousseau D. M.The Future of Boundaryless Careers (2000) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lubatkin M. H., Simsek Z., Ling Y., Veiga J. F. Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of TMT behavioral integration. J. Management (2006) 32:1–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lurie S. B. What makes a good analyst? Institutional Investor (1967) July). 33, 42, 44Google Scholar
  • Maister D. H.Managing the Professional Service Firm (1993) (Free Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:71–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G. Understanding organizational adaptation. (2003) PresentationApril 2Budapest University of Economics and Public Administration, Budapest University, PragueGoogle Scholar
  • McGregor J. I can't believe they took the whole team. Bus. Week (2006) December 18):120–122Google Scholar
  • Mincer J.Schooling, Experience, and Earnings (1974) (Columbia University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Mitchell M. L., Netter J. M. The role of financial economics in securities fraud cases: Applications at the securities and exchange commission. Bus. Lawyer (1994) 49(2):545–590Google Scholar
  • Morck R., Shleifer A., Vishny R. Do managerial objectives drive bad acquisitions? J. Finance (1990) 45(1):31–48CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nayyar P. R. Stock market reactions to related diversification moves by service firms seeking benefits from information asymmetry and economies of scope. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14(8):569–591CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O'Reilly C., Tushman M. Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: resolving the innovator's dilemma. Res. Organ. Behav. (2008) 28:185–206CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J.Competitive Advantage Through People (1994) (Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phillips B. Free at last? Institutional Investor (1997) August):48–55Google Scholar
  • Porter M. From competitive advantage to corporate strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1987) 65(3):43–59Google Scholar
  • Ravid S. A. Information, blockbusters, and stars: A study of the film industry. J. Bus. (1999) 72(4):463–492CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rees A.The Economics of Work and Pay (1973) (Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Roll R. The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. J. Bus. (1986) 59(2):197–216CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosen S. The economics of superstars. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1981) 71(5):845–858Google Scholar
  • Scherer F., Ross D.Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance (1990) 3rd ed.(Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Seabright M. A., Levinthal D. A., Fichman M. Role of individual attachments in the dissolution of interorganizational relationship. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35:122–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sessa D. All-star analysts 1999 survey: Early mornings, late nights mark an analyst's days. Wall Street Journal (1999) June 29):R13Google Scholar
  • Shleifer A., Vishny R. W. Stock market driven acquisitions. J. Financial Econom. (1990) 70(3):295–311CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siconolfi M. Shearson research analysts finish first on “All-America Team” for third year. Wall Street Journal (1992) October 13):C18Google Scholar
  • Sinha P., Brown L., Das S. A re-examination of financial analysts' differential earnings forecast accuracy. Contemporary Accounting Res. (1997) 14:1–42CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sirower M.The Synergy Trap: How Companies Lose the Acquisition Game (1997) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Smith J. L. Non-aggressive bidding behavior and the “winner's curse”. Econom. Inquiry (1981) 19(3):380–388CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sobel R.When Giants Stumble: Classic Business Blunders and How to Avoid Them (1999) (Prentice Hall, Paramus, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Song J., Almeida P., Wu G. Learning-by-hiring: When is mobility more likely to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer? Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):351–365LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Starbuck W. H. Learning by knowledge-intensive firms. J. Management Stud. (1992) 29(6):713–740CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strober M. H.Human Capital Theory: Implications for HR Managers (1990) (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Sullivan S. E., Arthur M. B. The evolution of the boundaryless career concept: Examining physical and psychological mobility. J. Vocational Behav. (2006) 69:19–29CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sundbo J. Management of innovation in services. Service Indust. J. (1997) 17:432–456CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tampoe M.Motivating Knowledge Workers—The Challenge for the 1990s (1996) (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28(13):1319–1350CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. J., Pisano G. P., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:509–533CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomke S.Experimentation Matters: Unlocking the Potential of New Technologies for Innovation (2003) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Topel R. Specific capital, mobility, and wages: Wages rise with job seniority. J. Political Econom. (1991) 99(1):145–176CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tripsas M., Gavetti G. Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:1147–1161CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman M. L., O'Reilly C. A. Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Rev. (1996) 38:8–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman M. L., Smith W., Baum J. A. C. Organizational technology. Companion to Organizations (2002) (Blackwell, London) 286–414Google Scholar
  • Useem M., Karabel J. Pathways to top corporate management. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1986) 51:184–200CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Maanen J., Barley S. R., Frost P. J., Moore L. F., Louis M. R., Lundberg C. C., Martin J. Occupational communities: Culture and control in organizations. Organizational Culture (1984) (Sage Publishing Company, Beverly Hills, CA) 31–54Google Scholar
  • Varaiya N., Ferris K. Overpaying in corporate takeovers: The winners curse. Financial Anal. J. (1987) 43(3):64–72CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Veum J. R. Sources of training and their impact on wages. Industrial Labor Relations Rev. (1995) 48:812–826CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Warner J. B., Watts R. L., Wruck K. H. Stock prices and top management changes. J. Financial Econom. (1988) 20(1):461–492CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick E.Sensemaking in Organizations (1995) (Sage Publishing, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Weisman R. Once taboo, hiring away teams is getting popular. Boston Globe (2006) November 19):D1Google Scholar
  • White H. Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models. Econometrica (1982) 50(1):1–25CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams R. L. A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics (2000) 56:645–646CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Woodruffe C.Winning the Talent War (1999) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Zuckerman E. The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. (1999) 104(5):1398–1439CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zuckerman H. Nobel Laureates in science: Patterns of productivity, collaboration, and authorship. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1967) 32:391–403CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.