Go (Con)figure: Subgroups, Imbalance, and Isolates in Geographically Dispersed Teams

References

• Allen T. J.Managing the Flow of Technology (1977) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Armstrong D. J., Cole P., Hinds P., Kiesler S. Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 167–212Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aron A., Aron E. N., Smollan D. Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1992) 63(4):596–612Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrow H., McGrath J. E., Berdahl J. L.Small Groups as Complex Systems: Formation, Coordination, Development, and Adaptation (2001) (Sage Press, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Ashforth B. E., Johnson S. A., Hogg M. A., Terry D. J. Which hat to wear? The relative salience of multiple identities in organizational contexts. Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts (2001) (Psychology Press, Philadelphia) 31–48Google Scholar
• Ashforth B. E., Mael F. Social identity theory and the organization. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(1):20–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• Axtell C. M., Fleck S. J., Turner N. Virtual teams: Collaborating across distance. Internat. Rev. Indust. Organ. Psych. (2004) 19:205–248Google Scholar
• Baba M. L., Gluesing J., Ratner H., Wagner K. H. The contexts of knowing: Natural history of a globally distributed team. J. Organ. Behav. (2004) 25(5):547–587Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhappu A. D., Zellmer-Bruhn M., Anand V., Beyerlein M., Johnson D., Beyerlein S. The effects of demographic diversity and virtual work environments on knowledge processing in teams. Advances in the Interdisciplinary Study of Work Teams (2001) 149–165Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boh W. F., Ren Y., Kiesler S., Bussjaeger R. Expertise and collaboration in the geographically dispersed organizations. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(4):595–612Link, Google Scholar
• Bos N., Shami N. S., Olson J. S., Cheshin A., Nan N. In-group/out-group effects in distributed teams: An experimental simulation. Proc. 2004 ACM Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work (2004) (ACM Press, Chicago) 429–436Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandon D. P., Hollingshead A. B. Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(6):633–644Link, Google Scholar
• Brewer M. B. The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1991) 17(5):475–482Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer M. B., Jackson S. E., Ruderman M. N. Managing diversity: The role of social identities. Diversity in Work Teams: Research Paradigms for a Changing Workplace (1995) (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC) 47–68Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer M. B., Smelser N. J., Baltes P. B. Social psychology of intergroup relations. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2001) (Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK) 7728–7733Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer M. B., Brown R., Gilbert D., Fiske S. T., Lindzey G. Intergroup relations. The Handbook of Social Psychology (1998) (McGraw Hill, Boston) 554–594Google Scholar
• Brewer M. B., Harasty A. S., Higgins E. T., Sorrentino R. M. Seeing groups as entities: The role of perceiver motivation. The Interpersonal Context (1996) (Guilford, New York) 347–370Google Scholar
• Brewer M. B., Kramer R. M. Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1986) 50:543–549Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown R., Wade G. Superordinate goals and intergroup behaviour: The effect of role ambiguity and status on intergroup attitudes and task performance. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. (1987) 17(2):131–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell D. T. Common fate, similarity and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Sci. (1958) 3(1):14–25Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark H. H., Brennan S. E., Resnick L. B., Levine J. M., Teasley S. D. Grounding in communication. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (1991) 1st ed.(American Psychological Association, Washington, DC) 127–149Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen L. L., Swim J. K. The differential impact of gender ratios on women and men: Tokenism, self-confidence, and expectations. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1995) 21(9):876–884Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper C. D., Kurland N. B. Telecommuting, professional isolation, and employee development in public and private organizations. J. Organ. Behav. (2002) 23(4):511–532Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coser L. A.The Functions of Social Conflict (1956) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Cota A. A., Dion K. L. Salience of gender and sex composition of ad hoc groups: An experimental test of distinctiveness theory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1986) 50:770–776Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cramton C. D. The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:346–371Link, Google Scholar
• Cramton C. D. Finding common ground in dispersed collaboration. Organ. Dynam. (2002) 30(4):356–368Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cramton C. D., Hinds P. J., Staw B. M., Kramer R. M. Subgroup dynamics in internationally distributed teams: Ethnocentrism or cross-national learning? Research in Organizational Behavior (2005) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 231–263Google Scholar
• Cummings J. N. Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Sci. (2004) 50(3):352–364Link, Google Scholar
• Cummings J. N. Team configuration data provided via personal communication with the authors. (2005) January 4Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G., Monge P. Introduction to the special issue: Communication processes for virtual organizations. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(6):693–703Link, Google Scholar
• Ellemers N., van den Heuvel H., de Gilder D., Maass A., Bonvini A. The underrepresentation of women in science: Differential commitment or the queen bee syndrome? British J. Soc. Psych. (2004) 43:315–338Crossref, Google Scholar
• Espinosa J. A., Carmel E. The impact of time separation on coordination in global software teams: A conceptual foundation. Software Process: Improvement and Practice (2003) 8(4):249–266Crossref, Google Scholar
• Espinosa J. A., Pickering C. The effect of time separation on coordination processes and outcomes: A case study. Proc. 39th Annual Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (HICSS'06) (2006) 25–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Espinosa J. A., Cummings J. N., Wilson J. M., Pearce B. M. Team boundary issues across multiple global firms. J. Management Inform. Systems (2003) 19(4):157–191Crossref, Google Scholar
• Espinosa J. A., Slaughter S. A., Kraut R. E., Herbsleb J. D. Familiarity, complexity, and team performance in geographically distributed software development. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(4):613–630Link, Google Scholar
• Fiol C., O'Connor E. Identification in face-to-face, hybrid, and pure virtual teams: Untangling the contradictions. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16:19–32Link, Google Scholar
• Fiske S. T., Taylor S. E.Social Cognition (1991) 2nd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fussell S. R., Krauss R. M. Coordination of knowledge in communication: Effects of speakers' assumptions about what others know. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1992) 62(3):378–391Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson C. B., Gibbs J. Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2006) 51(3):451–495Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffith T. L., Sawyer J. E., Neale M. A. Virtualness and knowledge in teams: Managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(2):265–288Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grinter R. E., Herbsleb J. D., Perry D. E. The geography of coordination: Dealing with distance in R&D work. Proc. Internat. ACM SIGGROUP Conf. Supporting Group Work (GROUP '99) (1999) (ACM, Phoenix, AZ) 306–315Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R.Groups That Work (and Those That Don't): Creating Conditions for Effective Teamwork (1990) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) Google Scholar
• Hamilton D. L., Sherman S. J., Lickel B., Sedikides C., Schopler J., Insko C. A. Perceiving social groups: The importance of the entitativity continuum. Intergroup Cognition and Intergroup Behavior (1998) (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) 47–74Google Scholar
• Hardin A. M., Fuller M. A., Davison R. M. I know I can, but can we? Culture and efficacy beliefs in global virtual teams. Small Group Res. (2007) 38(1):130–155Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison D. D., Klein K. J. What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. (2007) 32(4):1199–1228Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman M. E. The impact of situational factors on personnel decisions concerning women: Varying the sex composition of the applicant pool. Organ. Behav. Human Performance (1980) 26:386–395Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hertel G., Geister S., Konradt U. Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Rev. (2005) 15:69–95Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hewstone M. R. C. The “ultimate attribution error?” A review of the literature on intergroup causal attribution. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. (1990) 20:311–335Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinds P. J., Bailey D. E. Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(6):615–632Link, Google Scholar
• Hinds P., Kiesler S.Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinds P. J., Mortensen M. Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(3):290–307Link, Google Scholar
• Hoegl M., Proserpio L. Team member proximity and teamwork in innovative projects. Res. Policy (2004) 33:1153–1165Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogg M. A., Hogg M. A., Tindale R. S. Social categorization and group behavior. Group Processes (2001) (Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA) 56–85Google Scholar
• Hogg M. A., Terry D. J. Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25(1):121–140Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogg M. A., Turner J. C. Interpersonal attraction, social identification and psychological group formation. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. (1985) 15(1):51–66Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogg M. A., Turner J. C. Intergroup behaviour, self-stereotyping and the salience of social categories. British J. Soc. Psych. (1987) 26:325–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollingshead A. B. Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2001) 81:1080–1089Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hornsey M. J., Hogg M. A. Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. (2000) 4(2):143–156Crossref, Google Scholar
• House R., Rousseau D. M., Thomas-Hunt M. The meso paradigm: A framework for the integration of micro and macro organizational behavior. Res. Organ. Behav. (1995) 17:71–114Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa S. L., Leidner D. E. Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(6):791–815Link, Google Scholar
• Jehn K. A. Enhancing effectiveness: An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value-based intragroup conflict. Internat. J. Conflict Management (1994) 5:223–238Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn K. A. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(2):256–282Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn K. A. A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(3):530–557Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn K. A., Mannix E. A. The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(2):238–251Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanter R. M.Men and Women of the Corporation (1977a) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Kanter R. M. Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. Amer. J. Sociol. (1977b) 82(5):965–990Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kiesler S., Cummings J. N., Hinds P. J., Kielser S. What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? A legacy of research. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 57–82Crossref, Google Scholar
• King J. L., Frost R. L., Hinds P., Kiesler S. Managing distance over time: The evolution of technologies of dis/ambiguation. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 3–26Google Scholar
• Kirkman B. L., Mathieu J. E. The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. J. Management (2005) 31(5):700–718Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein K. J., Kozlowski S. W. J. From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organ. Res. Methods (2000) 3(3):211–236Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kramer R. M., Brewer M. B. Effects of group identity on resource utilization in a simulated common dilemma. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1984) 46:1044–1057Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraut R. E., Fussell S. R., Brennan S. E., Siegel J., Hinds P. J., Kiesler S. Understanding the effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 137–162Google Scholar
• Krebs S. A., Hobman E. V., Bordia P. Virtual teams and group member dissimilarity. Small Group Res. (2006) 37(6):721–741Crossref, Google Scholar
• Latane B., Williams K. D., Harkins S. G. Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1979) 37:822–832Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lau D. C., Murnighan J. K. Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(2):325–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawler E. E. Affective attachments to nested groups: A choice process theory. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1992) 57:327–339Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee C. S., Watson-Manheim M. B., Ramaprasad A. Exploring the relationship between communication risk perception and communication portfolio. IEEE Trans. Professional Comm. (2007) 50(2):130–146Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis K. Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(4):587–604Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang D. W., Moreland R. L., Argote L. Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating factor of transactive memory. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1995) 21:384–393Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loyd D. L., White J., Kern M., Phillips K. W., Mannix E., Neale M. A. Duo status: Disentangling the complex interactions within a minority of two. Research on Managing Groups and Teams (2008) (JAI Press, Amsterdam) 75–92Google Scholar
• Malone T. W., Crowston K. The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Comput. Surveys (1994) 26(1):87–119Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mannix E. A. Organizations as resource dilemmas: The effects of power balance on coalition formation in small groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1993) 55:1–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martins L. L., Gilson L. L., Maynard M. T. Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? J. Management (2004) 30(6):805–835Crossref, Google Scholar
• Massey A. P., Montoya-Weiss M. M., Hung Y. T. Because time matters: Temporal coordination in global virtual project teams. J. Management Inform. Systems (2003) 19:129–155Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menon T., Phillips K. W. Getting even vs. being the odd one out: Conflict and cohesion in even- and odd-sized groups. (2008) . Working paper, University of Chicago GSB, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
• Moore D. A., Kurtzberg T. R., Thompson L. L., Morris M. W. Long and short routes to success in electronically mediated negotiations: Group affiliations and good vibrations. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1999) 77(1):22–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreland R. L., Myaskovsky L. Exploring the performance benefits of group training: Transactive memory or improved communication? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2000) 82:117–133Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreland R. L., Argote L., Krishnan R., Brower A. M. Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. What's Social About Social Cognition? Research on Socially Shared Cognition in Small Groups (1996) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 57–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mortensen M., Hinds P. J. Conflict and shared identity in geographically distributed teams. Internat. J. Conflict Management (2001) 12(3):212–238Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mullen B., Hu L. Perceptions of ingroup and outgroup variability: A meta-analytic integration. Basic Appl. Soc. Psych. (1989) 10:233–252Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson L. J., Miller . The distinctiveness effect in social categorization: You are what makes you unusual. Psych. Sci. (1995) 6:246–249Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nonaka I., Takeuchi H.The Knowledge Creating Company (1995) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• O'Leary M. B., Cummings J. N. The spatial, temporal, and configurational characteristics of geographic dispersion in teams. MIS Quart. (2007) 32(3):433–452Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Leary M. B., Orlikowski W. J., Yates J., Hinds P., Kiesler S. Distributed work over the centuries: Trust and control in the Hudson's Bay company, 1670–1826. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 27–54Google Scholar
• Olson G. M., Olson J. S. Distance matters. Human-Comput. Interaction (2000) 15(1):139–179Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pena J., Walther J. B., Hancock J. T. Effects of geographic distribution on dominance perceptions in computer-mediated groups. Comm. Res. (2007) 34(3):313–331Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pettigrew T. F. Intergroup contact theory. Annual Rev. Psych. (1998) 49:65–85Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips K. W., Loyd D. L. When surface and deep-level diversity collide: The effects on dissenting group members. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2006) 99(2):143–160Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polzer J. T., Crisp B., Jarvenpaa S. L., Kim J. W. Extending the faultline concept to geographically dispersed teams: How colocated subgroups can impair group functioning. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(4):679–692Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell A., Piccoli G., Ives B. Virtual teams: A review of current literature and directions for future research. The DATA BASE Adv. Inform. Systems (2004) 35:6–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raab K. J., Ambos B. Isolation and separation in teams: An analysis of configurations and their impact on knowledge flows. Paper Presented at the 28th Annual SMS Conf. (2008) Cologne, GermanyGoogle Scholar
• Richman A., Noble K., Johnson A.When the Workplace Is Many Places: The Extent and Nature of Off-Site Work Today (2002) (WFD Consulting, Watertown, MA) Google Scholar
• Rutkowski A.-F. o., Saunders C., Vogel D., van Genuchten M. “Is it already 4 a.m. in your time zone?” Focus immersion and temporal dissociation in virtual teams. Small Group Res. (2007) 38(1):98–129Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saunders C. S., van Slyke C., Vogel D. R. My time or yours? Managing time visions in global virtual teams. Acad. Management Executive (2004) 19–31Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schopler J., Insko C. A., Stroebe W., Hewstone M. The discontinuity effect in interpersonal and intergroup relations: Generality and mediation. European Review of Social Psychology (1992) (Wiley, Chichester, UK) 121–151Google Scholar
• Sell J., Lovaglia M. J., Mannix E. A., Samuelson C. D., Wilson R. K. Investigating conflict, power, and status within and among groups. Small Group Res. (2004) 35(1):44–72Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sherif M., Harvey O. J., White B. J., Hood W. R., Sherif C. W.Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation. The Robbers Cave Experiment (1961) (Institute of Group Relations, Norman, OK) Google Scholar
• Sherman S. J., Hamilton D. L., Lewis A. C., Abrams D., Hogg M. A. Perceived entitativity and the social identity value of group memberships. Social Identity and Social Cognition (1999) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) 80–110Google Scholar
• Simon B. The perception of ingroup and outgroup homogeneity: Reintroducing the intergroup context. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psych. (1992) 3:1–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staples D. S., Webster J. Exploring the effects of trust, task interdependence and virtualness on knowledge sharing in teams. Inform. Systems J. (2008) 18:617–640Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stroh L. K., Brett J. M., Reilly A. H. A decade of change: Managers' attachment to their organizations and their jobs. Human Resource Management (1994) 33:531–548Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H.Social Identity and Intergroup Relations (1982) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Tajfel H., Turner J. C., Worchel S. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Psychology of Intergroup Relations (1986) 2nd ed.(Nelson-Hall Publishers, Chicago) 7–24Google Scholar
• Tajfel H., Wilkes A. Classification and quantitative judgement. British J. Psych. (1963) 54:104–114Google Scholar
• Taylor S. E., Hamilton D. L. A categorization approach to stereotyping. Cognitive Processes in Stereotyping and Intergroup Behavior (1981) (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) 83–114Google Scholar
• Taylor S. E., Fiske S. T., Etcoff N. L., Ruderman A. J. Categorical bases of person memory and stereotyping. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1978) 36:778–793Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner J. C., Tajfel H. Social identification and psychological group formation. The Social Dimension: European Developments in Social Psychology (1984) 2(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 518–538Crossref, Google Scholar
• Valacich J. S., Schwenk C. Devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiry effects on face-to-face and computer-mediated group decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1995) 63(2):158–173Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C., Moenaert R. K. The effects of R&D team co-location on communication patterns among R&D, marketing, and manufacturing. Management Sci. (1998) 44(11):S1–S18Link, Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg D., van Schie E. C. M. Foci and correlates of organizational identification. J. Occupational Organ. Psych. (2000) 73:137–147Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vega G., Brennan L. Isolation and technology: The human disconnect. J. Organ. Change Management (2000) 13(5):468–481Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wageman R., Gordon F. M. As the twig is bent: How group values shape emergent task interdependence in groups. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(6):687–700Link, Google Scholar
• Watson-Manheim M. B., Bélanger F. Communication media repertoires: Dealing with the multiplicity of media choices. MIS Quart. (2007) 31(2):267–293Crossref, Google Scholar
• Webster J., Staples D. S. Comparing virtual teams to traditional teams: An identification of new research opportunities. Res. Personnel and Human Resources Management (2006) 25:181–215Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wegner D. M., Goethals G. R. Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. Theories of Group Behavior (1987) (Springer-Verlag, New York) 185–203Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson J. M., O'Leary M. B., Metiu A., Jett Q. R. Perceived proximity in virtual work: Explaining the paradox of far-but-close. Organ. Stud. (2008) 29(7):979–1002Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zack M. H. Interactivity and communication mode choice in ongoing management groups. Inform. Systems Res. (1993) 4(3):207–239Link, Google Scholar