A Dialogical Approach to the Creation of New Knowledge in Organizations

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0435

References

  • Andersen S. M., Chen S. The relational self: An interpersonal social-cognitive theory. Psych. Rev. (2002) 109:619–645CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson D. L. “What you'll say is…”: Represented voice in organizational change literature. J. Organ. Change Management (2005) 18(1):63–77CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson H.Conversation, Language, and Possibilities (1997) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Anderson R., Baxter L. A., Cissna K. N.Dialogue (2004) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Argyris C.Knowledge for Action (1993) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) Google Scholar
  • Argyris C. Teaching smart people how to learn. Reflections (2002) 4(2):4–14CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bakhtin M. M., Holquist M.The Dialogic Imagination (1981) (University of Texas Press, Austin) . [Translated by C. Emerson, M. Holquist.]Google Scholar
  • Bakhtin M., Emerson C.Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics (1984) (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis) . [Translated by C. Emerson.]CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barrett F. J., Montuori A., Purser R. E. Knowledge creating as dialogic accomplishment: A constructionist perspective. Social Creativity (1999) 1(Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ) 133–151Google Scholar
  • Barrett F. J., Thomas G. F., Hocevar S. P. The central role of discourse in large-scale change: A social constructionist perspective. J. Appl. Behavioral Sci. (1995) 31:352–372CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bartunek J. M., Qumn R. E., Cameron K. S. The dynamics of personal and organizational reframing. Paradox and Transformation (1988) (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) 137–162Google Scholar
  • Bateson G.Steps to an Ecology of Mind (1972) (Jason Aronson, Northvale, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Baxter L. A., Montgomery B. M.Relating (1996) (The Guilford Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Bechky B. A. Object lessons: Workplace artefacts as representations of occupational jurisdiction. Amer. J. Sociol. (2003a) 109:720–752CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky B. A. Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. (2003b) 14(3):312–330LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Beech N., MacIntosh R., MacLean D., Shepherd J., Stokes J. Exploring constraints on developing knowledge: On the need for conflict. Management Learn. (2002) 33:459–476CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bell D., Bell D. The axial age of technology foreword. The Coming of the Post-Industrial Society (1999) Special anniversary ed.(Basic Books, New York) ix–lxxxvGoogle Scholar
  • Benner P., Tully J. The role of articulation in understanding practice and experience as sources of knowledge in clinical nursing. Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism (1994) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 136–155CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benner P., Hooper-Kyriakidis P., Stannard D.Clinical Wisdom and Interventions in Critical Care (1999) (Saunders, Philadelphia) Google Scholar
  • Boden D.The Business of Talk (1994) (Polity, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
  • Bohm D.On Dialogue (1996) (Routledge, London) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boland R. J., Lyytinen K., Yoo Y. Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering and construction. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18:631–647LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Calhoun M. A., Starbuck W. H., Easterby-Smith M., Lyles M. A. Barriers to creating knowledge. The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management (2003) (Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK) 473–492Google Scholar
  • Carlile R. P. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13:442–455LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carlile R. P. Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15:555–568LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cissna K. N., Anderson R. Theorizing about dialogic moments: The Buber-Rogers position and postmodern themes. Comm. Theory (1998) 8(1):63–104CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cook S. D., Brown J. S. Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10:81–400LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cornelissen J. P. Beyond compare: Metaphor in organization theory. Acad. Management Rev. (2005) 30:751–764CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cross S. E., Morris M. A. M. L., Gore J. S. Thinking about oneself and others: The relational-interdependent self-construal and social cognition. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2002) 3:399–418CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeSanctis G., Monge P. Introduction to the special issue: Communication processes for virtual organizations. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10:693–703LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dewey J.Art as Experience (1934) (Perigee Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Dougherty D. Organizing practice in services: Capturing practice-based knowledge for innovation. Strategic Organ. (2004) 2:35–64CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dreyfus H.Being-in-the-World (1991) (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Dreyfus H., Dreyfus S. Expertise in real world contexts. Organ. Stud. (2005) 26:779–792CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dunbar K., Ward T. N., Smith S. M., Vaid J. How scientists think: On-line creativity and conceptual change in science. Creative Thought (1997) (Amer. Psych. Association, Washington, DC) 461–494CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dutton J. E., Heaphy E. D., Cameron K. S., Dutton J. E., Quinn R. E.Positive Organizational Scholarship (2003) (Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco) 263–278Google Scholar
  • Edmondson E. The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13:128–146LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M. S., Pentland B. T. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(1):94–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gentner D., Bechtel W., Graham G. Analogy. A Companion to Cognitive Science (1998) (Blackwell, Malden, MA) 107–113Google Scholar
  • Gentner D., Brem S., Ferguson R., Wolff P., Markaman A. B., Forbus K., Ward T. N., Smith S. M., Vaid J. Analogy and creativity in the works of Johannes Kepler. Creative Thought (1997) (Amer. Psych. Association, Washington, DC) 403–460CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gergen K. J., Thatchenkery T. J. Developing dialogue for discerning differences. J. Appl. Behavioral Sci. (1996) 32(4):428–433CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gergen M. M., Gergen K. J., Barrett F. Appreciative inquiry as dialogue: Generative and transformative. Adv. Appreciative Inquiry (2004) 1:3–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gittell J. H., Cameron K. S., Dutton J. E., Quinn R. E.Positive Organizational Scholarship (2003) (Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco) 279–295Google Scholar
  • Glucksberg S., Manfredi D. A., McGlone M. S., Ward T. N., Smith S. M., Vaid J. Metaphor comprehension: How metaphors create new categories. Creative Thought (1997) (Amer. Psych. Association, Washington, DC) 327–350CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goffman E., Lemert C., Branaman A. The interaction order. The Goffman Reader (1997) (Blackwell, Malden, MA) 233–261Google Scholar
  • Grant R., Choo C. W., Bontis N. The knowledge-based view of the firm. The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge (2002) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 133–148Google Scholar
  • Gratton L., Ghoshal S. Improving the quality of conversations. Organ. Dynam. (2002) 31(3):209–223CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grice P.Studies in the Way of Words (1989) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Habermas J.The Theory of Communicative Action (1991) 1(Polity Press, Cambridge, UK) . [Translated by T. McCarthy.]Google Scholar
  • Håkanson L. Creating knowledge: The power and logic of articulation. Indust. Corporate Change (2007) 16:51–88CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hampton J. A., Ward T. N., Smith S. M., Vaid J. Emergent attributes in combined concepts. Creative Thought (1997) (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC) 83–110CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hardy C., Lawrence T. B., Grant D. Discourse and collaboration: The role of conversations and collective identity. Acad. Management Rev. (2005) 30(1):58–77CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hargadon A.How Breakthroughs Happen (2003) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Hargadon A., Fanelli A. Action and possibility: Reconciling dual perspectives of knowledge in organizations. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13:290–302LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hargadon A., Sutton R. I. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:716–749CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hargadon A., Sutton R. I. Building an innovation factory. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2000) 78(5):157–166Google Scholar
  • Harré R., Gillett G.The Discursive Mind (1994) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Heracleous L. A take of three discourses: The dominant, the strategic and the marginalized. J. Management Stud. (2006) 43(5):1059–1088CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herbst D. P. What happens when we make a distinction: An elementary introduction to co-genetic logic. Cybernetics Human Knowing (1993) 2(1):29–38Google Scholar
  • Hirschhorn L.Reworking Authority (1997) (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Hoberg C., Göranzon B., Hammarén M., Ennals R. Maximum complexity. Dialogue, Skill and Tacit Knowledge (2006) (Wiley, Chichetser, UK) 110–134Google Scholar
  • Hodgkinson G. P., Wright G. Confronting strategic inertia in a top management team: Learning from failure. Organ. Stud. (2002) 23:949–977CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holquist M., Cole M., Engestrom Y., Vasquez O. The politics of representation. Mind, Culture and Activity (1997) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 389–408Google Scholar
  • Holquist M.Dialogism (2002) 2nd ed.(Routledge, London) Google Scholar
  • Isaacs W.Dialogue and the Art of Thinking Together (1999) (Currency, New York) Google Scholar
  • Kittay E. F., Ward T. N., Smith S. M., Vaid J. Of “men” and metaphors: Shakespeare, embodiment and filing cabinets. Creative Thought (1997) (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC) 375–402CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kögler H. H.The Power of Dialogue (1996) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:383–397LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:502–518LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lakoff G., Johnson M.Philosophy in the Flesh (1999) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Lee F., Caza A., Edmondson A., Thomke S., Cameron K. S., Dutton J. E., Quinn R. E. New knowledge creation in organizations. Positive Organizational Scholarship (2003) (Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco) 194–206Google Scholar
  • Leonard D., Sensiper S. The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation. California Management Rev. (1998) 40:112–132CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonard-Barton D.Wellsprings of Knowledge (1995) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Linell P., Markova I. Acts in discourse: From monological speech acts to dialogical inter-acts. J. Theory Soc. Behav. (1993) 23:173–195CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luckmann T., Markova I., Foppa K. Social communication, dialogue and conversation. The Dynamics of Dialogue (1990) (Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead, UK) 45–61Google Scholar
  • MacIntyre A.After Virtue (1985) 2nd ed.(Duckworth, London) Google Scholar
  • Markman A. B., Yamauchi T., Makin V. S., Ward T. N., Smith S. M., Vaid J. The creation of new concepts: A multifaceted approach to category learning. Creative Thought (1997) (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC) 179–208CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Markova I. On the interaction of opposites in psychological processes. J. Theory Soc. Behav. (1987) 17:279–299CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Markova I.Dialogicality and Social Representations (2003a) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
  • Markova I. Constitution of the self: Intersubjectivity and dialogicality. Culture Psych. (2003b) 8:249–259CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marshall N., Rollinson J. Maybe Bacon had a point: The politics of interpretation in collective sensemaking. British J. Management (2004) 15(Special Issue):S71–S86CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mead G. H., Morris C. W.Mind, Self, & Society (1934) (Chicago University Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Merleau-Ponty M.Phenomenology of Perception (1962) (Routledge, London) . [Translated by C. Smith.]Google Scholar
  • Middleton D., Engeström Y., Middleton D. Talking work: Argument, common knowledge, and improvisation in teamwork. Cognition and Communication at Work (1998) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 233–256Google Scholar
  • Möllering G.Trust: Reason, Routine, Reflexivity (2006) (Elsevier, Amsterdam) Google Scholar
  • Murphy G. L., Ward T. N., Smith S. M., Vaid J. Polysemy and the creation of novel meanings. Creative Thought (1997) (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC) 235–266CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23:242–266CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nonaka I., Takeuchi H.The Knowledge-Creating Company (1995) (Oxford University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nonaka I., Toyama R., Takeuchi H., Nonaka I. Knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Hitotsubashi on Knowledge Management (2004) (Wiley, Singapore) 91–124Google Scholar
  • Nonaka I., Toyama R. The theory of the knowledge-creating firm: Subjectivity, objectivity and synthesis. Indust. Corporate Change (2005) 14:419–436CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nonaka I., Toyama R., Byosiére P., Dierkes M. D., Antal A. B., Child J., Nonaka I. A theory of organizational knowledge creation: Understanding the dynamic process of creating knowledge. Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge (2001) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 491–517Google Scholar
  • Nonaka I., von Krogh G., Voelpel S. Organizational knowledge creation theory: Evolutionary paths and future advances. Organ. Stud. (2006) 27:1179–1208CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Obstfeld D. Knowledge creation, social networks and innovation: An integrative study. Proc. 2002 Acad. Management Meeting (2002) (Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor, NY) H1–H6CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Obstfeld D. Saying more and less of what we know: Knowledge articulation and the social process of knowledge creation and innovation. (2005) . Working paper, Graduate School of Management, University of California, IrvineGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J. Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13:249–273LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orr J.Talking about Machines (1996) (ILR Press, Ithaca, NY) Google Scholar
  • Oswick C., Anthony P., Keenoy T., Mangham I. L. A dialogic analysis of organizational learning. J. Management Stud. (2000) 37(6):887–901CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Philips N., Lawrence T. B., Hardy C. Discourse and institutions. Acad. Management Rev. (2004) 29(4):635–652CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Polanyi M.Personal Knowledge (1962) (University of the Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Polanyi M., Prosch H.Meaning (1975) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Quinn R. W., Dutton J. E. Coordination as energy-in-conversation. Acad. Management Rev. (2005) 30(1):36–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ren Y., Kraut R., Kiesler S. Applying common identity and bond theory to the design of online communities. Organ. Stud. (2007) 28:379–408Google Scholar
  • Reyes A., Zarama R. The process of embodying distinctions—A re-construction of the process of learning. Cybernetics Human Knowing (1998) 5:19–33Google Scholar
  • Ribeiro R., Collins H. The bread-making machine: Tacit knowledge and two types of action. Organ. Stud. (2007) 28(9):1417–1433CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robertson M., Scarbrough H., Swan J. Knowledge creation in professional service firms: Institutional effects. Organ. Stud. (2003) 24:831–858CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robichaud D., Giroux H., Taylor J. R. The metaconversation: The recursive property of language as a key to organizing. Acad. Management Rev. (2004) 29(4):617–634CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ryle G.The Concept of Mind (1963) (Penguin, London) Google Scholar
  • Sawyer R. K. The emergence of creativity. Philos. Psych. (1999) 12(4):447–469CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sawyer R. K. Improvisational cultures: Collaborative emergence and creativity in improvisation. Mind, Culture, Activity (2000) 7(3):180–185CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sawyer R. K.Improvised Dialogues (2003) (Ablex Publishing, Westport, CT) Google Scholar
  • Sawyer R. K.Group Genius (2007) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Schön D., Ortony A. Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy. Metaphor and Thought (1979) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 254–283Google Scholar
  • Schrage M.Serious Play (2000) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Shotter J. “Inside the moment of managing”: Wittgenstein and the everyday dynamics of our expressive-responsive activities. Organ. Stud. (2005) 26:113–135CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shotter J., Göranzon B., Hammarén M., Ennals R. Dialogue, depth, and life inside responsive orders: From external observation to participatory understanding. Dialogue, Skill and Tacit Knowledge (2006) (Wiley, Chichetser, UK) 243–265Google Scholar
  • Shotter J., Cunliffe A. L., Holman D., Thorpe R. Managers as practical authors: Everyday conversations for action. Management and Language (2003) (Sage, London) 15–37Google Scholar
  • Shotter J., Katz A. M. Articulating a practice from within the practice itself: Establishing formative dialogues by the use of a “social poetics”. Concepts Transformation (1996) 1:213–237CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sillince J. A. A. A contingency theory of rhetorical congruence. Acad. Management Rev. (2005) 30:608–621CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith S. M., Ward T. B., Finke R. A.The Creative Cognition Approach (1995) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Spinosa C., Flores F., Dreyfus H. L.Disclosing New Worlds (1997) (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Taylor C.Human Agency and Language (1985a) 1(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor C.Philosophy and the Human Sciences (1985b) 2(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor C., Hiley D. R., Bohman J. F., Shusterman R. The dialogical self. The Interpretive Turn (1991) (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY) 304–314Google Scholar
  • Taylor C., Guignon C. Engaged agency and background in Heidegger. The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger (1993) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 317–336CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor C.Philosophical Arguments (1995) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Taylor C., Malpas J., Arnswald U., Kertscher J. Understanding the other: A Gadamerian view on conceptual schemes. Gadamer's Century: Essays in Honor of Hans-Georg Gadamer (2002) (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 279–298Google Scholar
  • Taylor J. R., Van Every E. J.The Emergent Organization (2000) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Thagard P., Ward T. N., Smith S. M., Vaid J. Coherent and creative conceptual combinations. Creative Thought (1997) (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC) 129–141CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tschang F. T. Balancing the tensions between rationalization and creativity in the video games industry. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18:989–1005LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tsoukas H. The missing link: A transformational view of metaphors in organizational science. Acad. Management Rev. (1991) 16:566–585CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsoukas H. The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Winter Special Issue):11–25CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsoukas H., Easterby-Smith M., Lyles M. A. Do we really understand tacit knowledge? Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge (2003) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) 410–427Google Scholar
  • Tsoukas H., Chia R. On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(5):567–582LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tsoukas H., Vladimirou E. What is organizational knowledge? J. Management Stud. (2001) 38:973–993CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Eemeren F. H., Grootendorst R.A Systematic Theory of Argumentation (2004) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
  • Vera D., Crossan M., Easterby-Smith M., Lyles M. A. Organizational learning and knowledge management: Toward an integrative approach. Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge (2003) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) 122–141Google Scholar
  • von Foerster H., Steier F. Through the eyes of the other. Research and Reflexivity (1991) (Sage, London) 63–75Google Scholar
  • von Krogh G., Ichijo K., Nonaka I.Enabling Knowledge Creation (2000) (Oxford University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walton D.The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument (1998) (University of Toronto Press, Toronto) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walton D. The place of dialogue theory in logic, computer science and communication studies. Synthese (2000) 123:327–346CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walton D.Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation (2006) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Ward T. N., Smith S. M., Vaid J.Creative Thought (1997) (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • Watzlawick P., Weakland J., Fisch R.Change (1974) (W. W. Norton, New York) Google Scholar
  • Watzlawick P., Bavelas J. B. B., Jackson D. D.Pragmatics of Human Communication (1967) (W. W. Norton, New York) Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E.The Social Psychology of Organizing (1979) 2nd ed.(Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Wertsch J. V.Voices of the Mind (1991) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Wertsch J. V.Mind as Action (1998) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Wisniewski E. J., Ward T. N., Smith S. M., Vaid J. Conceptual combination: Possibilities and esthetics. Creative Thought (1997) (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC) 51–82CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wittgenstein L., Anscombe G. E. M., von Wright G. H.On Certainty (1979) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) . [Translated by D. Paul, G. E. M. Anscombe.]Google Scholar
  • Yanow D. Translating knowledge at organizational peripheries. British J. Management (2004) 15(Special Issue):S9–S25CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.