Competition and Beyond: Problems and Attention Allocation in the Organizational Rulemaking Process

References

• Ancona D., Caldwell D. Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:321–341Link, Google Scholar
• Argote L.Organizational Learning (1999) (Kluwer Academic Press, London) Google Scholar
• Audia P. G., Greve H. R. Less likely to fail: Low performance, firm size, and factory expansion in the shipbuilding industy. Management Sci. (2006) 52(1):83–94Link, Google Scholar
• Baron R. Human error vs. airborne terrorism. (2002) . http://www.airlinesafety.com/editorials/HumanErrorVsTerrorismGoogle Scholar
• Barron D. N., Marsden P. The analysis of count data: Overdispersion and autocorrelation. Sociologial Methodology (1992) 22(Basil Blackwell, Oxford) 179–220Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bazerman M.Judgment in Managerial Decision Making (2001) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Beck N., Kieser A. The complexity of rule systems, experience and organizational learning. Organ. Stud. (2003) 24:793–814Crossref, Google Scholar
• Billings T. R. S., Milburn W., Schaalman M. L. Crisis perception: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1980) 25:300–315Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bouquet C., Birkinshaw J. Weight versus voice: How foreign subsidiaries gain attention from corporate headquarters. Acad. Management J. (2008) 51(3):577–601Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowman E. H. Risk seeking by troubled firms. Sloan Management Rev. (1982) 23(4):33–42Google Scholar
• Bromiley P. Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34:37–59Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen W. R. Determinants of firms' backward- and forward-looking R&D search behavior. Organ. Sci. (2008) 19(4):609–622Link, Google Scholar
• Cho T. S., Hambrick D. C. Attention as the mediator between top management team characteristics and strategic change: The case of airline deregulation. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(4):453–469Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen M. D., March J. G.Leadership and Ambiguity: The American College President (1974) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Cohen M. D., March J. G., Olsen J. P. A garbage can model of organizational choice. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1972) 17(1):1–25Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crozier M.The Bureaucratic Phenomenon (1964) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• D'Avolio G., Nierenberg E. Investor attention: Evidence from the message boards. (2003) . Working paper, Harvard, BostonGoogle Scholar
• Desai V. M. Constrained growth: How experience, legitimacy, and age influence risk taking in organizations. Organ. Sci. (2008) 19(4):594–608Link, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P., Powell W. W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1983) 48:147–160Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutton J. E., Duncan R. B. The influence of the strategic planning process on strategic change. Strategic Management J. (1987) 8:103–116Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ehrlich P.Human Natures: Genes, Cultures and the Human Prospect (2000) (Island Press, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
• Etzioni A. Mixed scanning: A third approach to decision making. Public Admin. Rev. (1967) 27:385–392Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G. Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities' development. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(6):599–617Link, Google Scholar
• General Accounting Office Report (GAO) Aviation rulemaking. (2001) . Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Aviation, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, House of Representatives (July 11)Google Scholar
• Greve H. Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43:58–86Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve H. R.Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback. A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change (2003) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Greve H. R., Pozner J., Rao H. Vox Populi: Resource partitioning, organizational proliferation and the cultural impact of the insurgent micro-radio movement. Amer. J. Sociol. (2006) 112(3):802–837Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen M. T., Haas M. R. Competing for attention is knowledge markets: Electronic document dissemination in a management consulting company. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46(1):1–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haunschild P., Sullivan B. N. Learning from complexity: Effects of airline accident/incident heterogeneity on subsequent accident/incident rates. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47:609–643Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman J. J., Borjas G. J. Does unemployment cause future unemployment: Definitions, questions, and answers from a continuous time model of heterogeneity and state dependence. Economica (1980) 47:247–283Google Scholar
• Hoffman A. J., Ocasio W. Not all events are attended equally: Toward a middle-range theory of industry attention to external events. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(4):414–434Link, Google Scholar
• Jehn K., Northcraft G., Neale M. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:741–763Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahnman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47:262–291Google Scholar
• Kieser A., Koch U., Augier M., March J. G. Organizational learning through rule adaptation: From the behavioral theory to transactive organizational learning. The Economics of Choice, Change, and Organization: Essays in Memory of Richard M. Cyert (2002) (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK) 237–249Google Scholar
• Kingdon J. W.Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies (1984) (Little Brown, Boston) Google Scholar
• Lamberts K. Categorization under time pressure. J. Experiment. Psych.: General (1995) 124:161–180Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lant T. K., Montgomery D. B. Learning from strategic success and failure. J. Bus. Res. (1987) 15:503–517Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leblebici H., Salancik G. Stability in interorganizational exchanges: Rulemaking processes of the Chicago Board of Trade. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1982) 27):227–242Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindblom C., Braybrooke D.A Strategy of Decision (1963) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Lounamaa P. H., March J. G. Adaptive coordination of a learning team. Management Sci. (1987) 33:107–123Link, Google Scholar
• Lynch A. Decision frequency and synchronization across agents: Implications for aggregate consumption and equity returns. J. Finance (1996) 51(4):1479–1497Crossref, Google Scholar
• Magat W. A., Krupnick A. J., Harrington W.Rules in the Making: A Statistical Analysis of Regulatory Agency Behavior (1986) (Resources for the Future, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
• Mankiw N. G., Reis R. Sticky information versus sticky prices: A proposal to replace the new Keynesian Phillips curve. Quart. J. Econom. (2002) 117(4):1295–1328Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J. G., Simon H. A.Organizations (1958) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• March J. G., Schulz M., Zhou X.The Dynamics of Rules: Change in Written Organizational Codes (2000) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton R. K.Social Theory and Social Structure (1957) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Meyer J. W., Rowan B. Institutional organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. (1977) 83:340–363Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miner A., Haunschild P., Cummings L., Staw B. M. Population level learning. Research in Organizational Behavior (1995) 17(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 115–166Google Scholar
• Miner A. S., Haunschild P., Schwab A. Experience and convergence: Curiosities and speculation. Indust. Corporate Change (2003) 12:789–813Crossref, Google Scholar
• Minzberg H., Raisinghani D., Theroret A. The structure of “unstructured” decision processes. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1976) 21:246–275Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morris M. W., Moore P. C., Sim D. L. H. Choosing remedies after accidents: Counterfactual thoughts and the focus on fixing “human error. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. (1999) 6:579–585Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nutt P. Types of organizational decision processes. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1984) 29:414–450Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W. Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:187–206Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W. Institutionalized action and corporate governance: The reliance on rules of CEO succession. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:384–416Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peng L., Xiong W. Capacity constrained learning and asset price comovement. (2003) . Working paper, Princeton University, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
• Perrow C.Normal Accidents (1984) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Pollet J. Predicting asset returns with expected oil price changes. (2003) . Working paper, Emory University, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
• Reason J.Human Error (1990) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reason J.Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents (1997) (Ashgate, Burlington, IN) Google Scholar
• Repenning N. Understanding fire fighting in new product development. J. Product Innovation Management (2001) 18(5):285–300Crossref, Google Scholar
• Repenning N. Structuring low capability in product development. (2002) . Working paper, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Rogers L. C. G. The relaxed investor and parameter uncertainty. Finance Stochastics (2001) 5(2):131–154Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rose N. L. Profitability and product quality: Economic determinants of airline safety performance. J. Political Econom. (1990) 98:944–964Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schulz M. Limits to bureaucratic growth: The density dependence of organizational rule births. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43:845–876Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott W. R.Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems (1998) (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Simon H.Models of Man: Social and Rational (1957) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Sims C. Implications of rational inattention. J. Monetary Econom. (2003) 50(3):665–690Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smart C., Vertinsky I. Designs for crisis unit. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1977) 22:640–657Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Vaughan D.The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA (1998) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Weber M., Gerth H. H., Mills C. W. Bureaucracy. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (1946) (Oxford University Press, New York) 196–244Google Scholar
• Weick K. E., Sutcliffe K. M. Mindfulness and the quality of organizational attention. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(4):514–524Link, Google Scholar
• Winter S. G., Cattani G., Dorsch A. The value of moderate obsession: Insights from a new model of organizational search. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(5):403–419Link, Google Scholar
• Yukl G. A., Malone M. P., Hayslip B., Pamin T. A. The effects of time pressure and issue settlement order on integrative bargaining. Sociometry (1976) 39:277–281Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou X. The dynamics of organizational rules. Amer. J. Sociol. (1993) 98:1134–1166Crossref, Google Scholar