Young and No Money? Never Mind: The Material Impact of Social Resources on New Venture Growth

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0438

References

  • Adler P., Kwon S. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Acad. Management Rev. (2002) 27(1):17–40CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aldrich H. E.Organizations Evolving (1999) (Sage Publications, New York) Google Scholar
  • Aldrich H. E., Auster E. R., Staw B. M., Cummings L. L. Even dwarfs started small. Research in Organizational Behavior (1986) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 165–198Google Scholar
  • Arndt M., Bigelow B. Presenting structural innovation in an institutional environment: Hospitals' use of impression management. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45(3):494–522CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker W. E. Market networks and corporate behavior. Amer. J. Sociol. (1990) 97:279–309CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker W. E., Faulkner R. R., Fisher G. A. Hazards of the market: The continuity and dissolution of interorganizational market relationships. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1998) 63:147–177CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron J. N., Bielby W. T. The proliferation of job titles in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31(4):561–586CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron J. N., Dobbin F. R., Jennings P. D. War and peace: The evolution of modern personnel administration in U.S. industry. Amer. J. Sociol. (1986) 92:350–383CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barton A. H. Determinants of economic attitudes in the American business elite. Amer. J. Sociol. (1985) 91(1):54–87CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Mezias S. J. Competition, institutional linkages, and organizational growth. Soc. Sci. Res. (1993) 22:131–164CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. R., Locke E. A., Smith K. G. A multidimensional model of venture growth. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(2):292–303CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beckman C. M., Burton M. D. Founding the future; path dependence in the evolution of top management teams from founding to IPO. Organ. Sci. (2008) 19(1):3–24LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Begley T. M. Using founder status, age of firm, and company growth rate as the basis for distinguishing entrepreneurs from managers of smaller businesses. J. Bus. Venturing (1995) 10(3):249CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benjamin B. A., Podolny J. Status, quality, and social order in the California wine industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:563–589CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger J., Cohen B., Zelditch M.Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1972) 37:241–255CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger P. L., Luckmann T.The Social Construction of Reality (1966) (Anchor Books, Garden City, NY) Google Scholar
  • Bourdieu P., Richardson J. G. The forms of capital. Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (1986) (Greenwood, New York) 241–258Google Scholar
  • Bourdieu P.The Field of Cultural Production (1993) (Columbia University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Broschak J. Managers' mobility and market interface: The effects of managers' career mobility on the dissolution of market ties. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2004) 49:608–640Google Scholar
  • Burt R. S.Corporate Profits and Cooptation (1983) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Caplow T. Organizational size. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1957) 1:484–505CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carman J. M., Langeard E. Growth strategies for service firms. Strategic Management J. (1980) 1(1):7–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caves R. E.Creative Industries: Contracts Between Art and Commerce (2000) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Chauvin K. W., Hirschey M. Market structure and the value of growth. Managerial Decision Econom. (1997) 18(3):247–254CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cialdini R. B., Giacalone R. A., Rosenfeld P. Indirect tactics of image management: Beyond basking. Impression Management in the Organization (1989) (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) 45–56Google Scholar
  • Clegg S. R., Hardy C., Clegg S. R., Cynthia H., Nord W. Organizations, organization and organizing. Handbook of Organization Studies (1996) (Sage, London) 1–28Google Scholar
  • Dávila A., Foster G., Gupta M. Venture capital financing and the growth of startup firms. J. Bus. Venturing (2003) 18(6):689–708CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis G. F., Diekmann K. A., Tinsley C. H. The decline and fall of the conglomerate firm in the 1980s: The deinstitutionalization of an organizational form. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1994) 59(4):547–570CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1983) 48:147–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dobbin F., Sutton J. R., Meyer J. W., Scott R. Equal opportunity law and the construction of internal labor markets. Amer. J. Sociol. (1993) 99(2):396–427CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Donald W., Bossong-Martines E. M. Standard & poor's industry surveys: Advertising. Standard & Poor's Industry Surveys (2002) (Standard and Poor's, New York) 40Google Scholar
  • Duncan J. W., Handler D. P. The misunderstood role of small business. Bus. Econom. (1994) 29(3):1–6Google Scholar
  • Eckhardt J. T., Shane S. A. Opportunities and entrepreneurship. J. Management (2003) 29(3):333–349CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., Schoonhoven C. B. Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among U.S. semiconductor ventures, 1978–1988. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:504–529CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elsbach K. D., Sutton R. I. Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35(4):699–738CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Erlanger H. S. The allocation of status within occupations: The case of the legal profession. Soc. Forces (1980) 58(3):882–903CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Evans D. S., Jovanovic B. An estimated model of entrepreneurial choice under liquidity constraints. J. Political Econom. (1989) 97(4):808–827CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fagiolo G., Luzzi A. Do liquidity constraints matter in explaining firm size and growth? Some evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry. Indust. Corporate Change (2006) 15(1):1–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fisek M. H., Ofshe R. The process of status evolution. Sociometry (1970) 33:327–346CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fligstein N. The spread of the multidivisional form among large firms, 1919–1979. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1985) 50:377–391CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fox S.The Mirror-Makers: A History of American Advertising and Its Creators (1997) (University of Illinois Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Galbraith C. S., Stiles C. H. Firm profitability and relative firm power. Strategic Management J. (1983) 4(3):237–249CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garnsey E. A theory of the early growth of the firm. Indust. Corporate Change (1998) 7(3):523–556CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. S. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. (1985) 91:481–510CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood R., Li S. X., Prakash R., Deephouse D. L. Reputation, diversification, and organizational explanations of performance in professional service firms. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(6):661–673LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood R., Suddaby R., Greenwood R., Suddaby R. Introduction to “professional service firms”. Professional Service Firms (2006) (Elsevier, Oxford, UK) 1–16CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greiner L. E. Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1998) May–June):55–67Google Scholar
  • Greve H. R. Managerial cognition and the mimetic adoption of market positions: What you see is what you do. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19(10):967–988CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison R. J. Models of growth in organizational ecology: A simulation assessment. Industrial and corporate change. Indust. Corporate Change (2004) 13(2):243–261CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haveman H. A. Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38(4):593–627CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hawley A.Human Ecology: A Theoretical Synthesis (1986) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Headd B. Business success: Factors leading to surviving and closing successfully. (2001) . Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Bureau of the Census, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  • Holtz-Eakin D., Joulfaian D., Rosen H. S. Sticking it out: Entrepreneurial survival and liquidity constraints. J. Political Econom. (1994) 102(1):53–75CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hsiao C.Analysis of Panel Data (1999) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
  • Human S. E., Provan K. G. Legitimacy building in the evolution of small-firm multilateral networks: A comparative study of success and demise. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45:327–365CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen M. The role of network resources in market entry: Commercial banks' entry into investment banking, 1991–1997. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48:466–497CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kamens D. H. Legitimating myths and educational organization: The relationship between organizational ideology and formal structure. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1977) 42(2):208–219CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kimberly J. R. Organizational size and the structuralist perspective: A review, critique and proposal. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1976) 21:571–597CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kimberly J. R., Kimberly J. R., Miles R. Initiation, innovation, and institutionalization in the creation process. Organizational Life Cycle (1980) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) 134–160Google Scholar
  • Larson A. Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37(1):76–104CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leana C. R., Pil F. K. Social capital and organizational performance: Evidence from urban public schools. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(3):353–366LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D. A. Random walks and organizational mortality. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36(3):397–420CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Logan J. R., Collver O. A. Residents' perceptions of suburban community differences. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1983) 48(3):428–433CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McEnough J., Egolf K.The Advertising Age Encyclopaedia of Advertising (2003) 1st ed.(Fitzroy Dearborn, New York) Google Scholar
  • Meyer J. W., Rowan B. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. (1977) 83:340–363CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Midgley D. F., Dowling G. R. A longitudinal study of product form innovation: The interactions between predispositions and social messages. J. Consumer Res. (1993) 19(4):611–625CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Minkoff D. C. The organization of survival: Women's and racial-ethnic voluntarist and activist organizations, 1955–1985. Soc. Forces (1993) 71(4):887–908CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(2):242–266CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oliver C. Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(9):697–713CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Park D. Y., Podolny J. The competitive dynamics of status and niche width: U.S. investment banking, 1920–1949. J. Indust. Corporate Change (2000) 9:377–414CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Penrose E.The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (1959) (Basil-Blackwell, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Perretti F., Negro G. Filling empty seats: How status and organizational hierarchies affect exploration versus exploitation in team design. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(4):759–777CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perrow C. Organizational prestige: Some functions and dysfunctions. Amer. J. Sociol. (1961) 66:335–341CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R.The External Control of Organizations (1978) (Harper & Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Podolny J. A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociol. (1993) 98:829–872CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny J. Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39(3):458–483CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny J., Phillips D. J. The dynamics of organizational status. J. Indust. Corporate Change (1996) 5:453–471CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny J., Stuart T. E. A role-based ecology of technological change. Amer. J. Sociol. (1995) 100:1224–1260CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny J. M., Stuart T. E., Hannan M. T. Networks, knowledge, and niches: Competition in the worldwide semiconductor industry, 1984–1991. Amer. J. Sociol. (1996) 102:659–689CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reynolds P. D., White S. B.The Entrepreneurial Process: Economic Growth, Men, Women, and Minorities (1997) (Quorum Books, Westport, CT) Google Scholar
  • Shane S., Cable D. Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures. Management Sci. (2002) 48(3):364–381LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sine W. D., David R. J., Mitsuhashi H. From plan to plant: Effects of certification on operational start-up in the emergent independent power sector. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(4):578–594LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sine W. D., Haveman H. A., Tolbert P. S. Risky business? Entrepreneurship in the new independent-power sector. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50:200–232CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sine W. D., Mitsuhashi H., Kirsch D. A. Revisiting burns and stalker: Formal structure and new venture performance in emerging economic sectors. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(1):121–132CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singh J. V., Tucker D. J., House R. J. Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31(2):171–193CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Starr J. A., MacMillan I. C. Resource cooptation via social contracting: Resource acquisition strategies for new ventures. Strategic Management J. (1990) 11:79–92CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Staw B. M., Epstein L. What bandwagons bring: Effects of popular management techniques on corporate performance, reputation, and CEO pay. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45(4):523–556CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stinchcombe A. L., March J. Social structure and organizations. Handbook of Organizations (1965) (Rand-McNally, Chicago) 142–193Google Scholar
  • Strang D., Baron J. N. Categorical imperatives: The structure of job titles in California state agencies. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1990) 55(4):479–495CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart T. E., Ha H., Hybels R. C. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:315–349CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suchman M. C. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(3):571–610CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tolbert P. S., Zucker L. G. Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880–1935. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1983) 28:22–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1996) 61(4):674–698CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(1):35–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B. Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: How social relations and networks benefit firms seeking financing. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1999) 64(4):481–505CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wallace J. E. Corporatist control and organizational commitment among professionals: The case of lawyers working in law firms. Soc. Forces (1995) 73(3):811–840CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Washington M., Zajac E. J. Status evolution and competition: Theory and evidence. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48(2):282–296CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Whetten D. A. Organizational growth and decline processes. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1987) 13:335–358CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilson R., Roth A. E. Reputations in games and markets. Game-Theoretic Models of Bargaining (1985) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 27–62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zott C., Huy Q. How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2007) 52(1):70–105CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zukin S., DiMaggio P. J., Zukin S., DiMaggio P. J. Introduction to structures of capital: The social organization of the economy. Structures of Capital: The Social Organization of the Economy (1990) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 1–36Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.