Perspective—Cognitive Reactions to Rare Events: Perceptions, Uncertainty, and Learning

References

• Anheier H. K.When Things Go Wrong: Organizational Failures and Breakdowns (1999) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Argyris C., Schön D. A.Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness (1974) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) Google Scholar
• Bar-Hillel M. On the subjective probability of compound events. Organ. Behav. Human Performance (1973) 9:396–406Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum J. A. C., Dahlin K. B. Aspiration performance and railroads' patterns of learning from train wrecks and crashes. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18:368–385Link, Google Scholar
• Baumard P., Starbuck W. H. Learning from failures: Why it may not happen. Long Range Planning (2005) 38:281–298Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beach L. R. Accuracy and consistency in the revision of subjective probabilities. IEEE Trans. Human Factors Electronics (1966) 7:29–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell T. E., Esch K. The fatal flaw in flight 51-L. IEEE Spectrum (1987) 24(2):36–51Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein P. L.Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk (1996) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Blair T. PM's statement. The Bloody Sunday Inquiry (1998) . http://www.bloody-sunday-inquiry.org/index2.asp?p=1Google Scholar
• Boffey P. M. Space agency image: A sudden shattering. New York Times (1986a) 135(February 5):AlA25Google Scholar
• Boffey P. M. Analyst who gave shuttle warning faults “gung-ho, can-do” attitude. New York Times (1986b) 135(February 14):B4Google Scholar
• Boland R. J., Singh J., Salipante P., Aram J., Fay S. Y., Kanawattanachai P. Knowledge representations and knowledge transfer. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44:393–417Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brunsson N. The irrationality of action and action rationality: Decisions, ideologies and organizational actions. J. Management Stud. (1982) 19:29–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brunsson N.The Irrational Organization: Irrationality as a Basis for Organizational Action and Change (1985) (Wiley, Chichester, UK) Google Scholar
• Brunsson N.The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions, and Action in Organizations (1989) (Wiley, Chichester, UK) Google Scholar
• Camerer C. F., Kunreuther H. Decision processes for low probability events: Policy implications. J. Policy Anal. Management (1989) 8:565–592Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cannon M. D., Edmondson A. C. Failing to learn and learning to fail (intelligently): How great organizations put failure to work. Long Range Planning (2005) 38:299–319Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll G. R. Organizational ecology. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1984) 10:71–93Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cato Institute With all due respect Mr. President, that is not true. New York Times (2009) CLVIII(54630, March 30):A9Google Scholar
• Caudill A. Global climate science communications: Action plan, April 3. (1998) . Memorandum, Global Climate Science Team, Exxon CorporationGoogle Scholar
• Cauley L. NSA has massive database of Americans' phone calls. USA Today (2006) May 11)Google Scholar
• Chivers J., Flores N. E. Market failure in information: The national flood insurance program. Land Econom. (2002) 78:515–521Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Dreyfus H. L., Dreyfus S. E.Mind Over Machine (1986) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Dutton J. M., Starbuck W. H.Computer Simulation of Human Behavior (1971a) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Dutton J. M., Starbuck W. H., Dutton J. M., Starbuck W. H. Finding Charlie's run-time estimator. Computer Simulation of Human Behavior (1971b) (Wiley, New York) 218–242Google Scholar
• Erev I., Barron G. On adaptation, maximization, and reinforcement learning among cognitive strategies. Psych. Rev. (2005) 112(4):912–931Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farjoun M., Starbuck W. H., Farjoun M. History and policy at the space shuttle program. Organization at the Limit: Management Lessons from the Columbia Disaster (2005) (Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK) 21–40Google Scholar
• Feldman M. S., March J. G. Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26:171–186Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feynman R. P. Personal observations on reliability of shuttle. Report of the Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident (1986) Volume II, Appendix F(U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
• Fischhoff B., Shweder R. A., Fiste D. W. For those condemned to study the past: Reflections on historical judgment. New Directions for Methodology of Behavioral Science (1980) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) 79–93Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heimann C. F. L. Understanding the Challenger disaster: Organizational structure and the design of reliable systems. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. (1993) 87:421–435Crossref, Google Scholar
• Husted K., Michailova S. Diagnosing and fighting knowledge sharing hostility. Organ. Dynam. (2002) 31(1):60–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joint Science Academies Joint Science Academies' Statement: Global Response to Climate Change. (2005) . Joint statement by the academies of science of Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, Russia, United Kingdom, and United States. http://nationalacademies.org/onpi/06072005.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Kahneman D., Tversky A. On the psychology of prediction. Psych. Rev. (1973) 80:237–251Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kiesler C. A.The Psychology of Commitment (1971) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Kunreuther H. Disaster mitigation and insurance: Learning from Katrina. Ann. Amer. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. (2006) 604:208–227Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landau M. Redundancy, rationality, and the problem of duplication and overlap. Public Admin. Rev. (1969) 29:346–358Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein S., Fischhoff B., Phillips L., Kahneman D., Slovic P., Tversky A. Calibration probabilities: The state of the art to 1980. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1982) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 306–333Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loftus E. F. The malleability of human memory. Amer. Scientist (1979) 67:312–320Google Scholar
• Mezias J. M., Starbuck W. H., Hodgkinson G. P., Starbuck W. H. Decision making with inaccurate, unreliable data. Oxford Handbook of Organizational Decision Making (2008) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 76–96Chapter 4Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nisbett R. E., Wilson T. D. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psych. Rev. (1977) 84:231–259Crossref, Google Scholar
• Normann R. Organizational innovativeness: Product variation and reorientation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1971) 16:203–215Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nystrom P. C., Hedberg B. L. T., Starbuck W. H., Kilmann R. H., Pondy L. R., Slevin D. P. Interacting processes as organization designs. The Management of Organization Design (1976) 1(Elsevier North-Holland, New York) 209–230Google Scholar
• Oskamp S. Overconfidence in case-study judgments. J. Consulting Psych. (1965) 29:261–265Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips L. D., Hays W. L., Edwards W. Conservatism in complex probabilistic inference. IEEE Trans. Human Factors Electronics (1966) 7:7–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salgado S. R., Starbuck W. H., Mezias J. M., Augier M., March J. G. The accuracy of managers' perceptions: A dimension missing from theories about firms. The Economics of Choice, Change, and Organizations: Essays in Memory of Richard M. Cyert (2002) (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK) 168–185Google Scholar
• Sitkin S. B., Cummings L. L., Staw B. M. Learning through failure: The strategy of small losses. Research in Organizational Behavior (1992) 14(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 231–266Google Scholar
• Slovic P. Perceptions of risk: Paradox and challenge. Hazmat '91: Proceedings (1991) (Transportation Center, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL) 4–3422Google Scholar
• Slovic P., Corrigan B. Behavioral problems of adhering to a decision policy. (1973) . Institute for Quantitative Research in Finance, Napa, CAGoogle Scholar
• Starbuck W. H. Organizations as action generators. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1983) 48:91–102Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starbuck W. H., Lant T., Shapira Z. Is Janus the god of understanding? Managerial and Organizational Cognition (2000) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) 351–365Google Scholar
• Starbuck W. H. Keeping a butterfly and an elephant in a house of cards: The elements of exceptional success. Organizational Realities: Studies of Strategizing and Organizing (2006) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 302–339Google Scholar
• Starbuck W. H., Farjoun M.Organization at the Limit: Management Lessons from the Columbia Disaster (2005) (Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Starbuck W. H., Hedberg B. L. T., Dierkes M., Berthoin Antal A., Child J., Nonaka I. How organizations learn from success and failure. Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge (2001) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 327–350Google Scholar
• Starbuck W. H., Milliken F. J. Challenger: Changing the odds until something breaks. J. Management Stud. (1988) 25:319–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starbuck W. H., Stephenson J., Starbuck W. H., Farjoun M. Making NASA more effective. Organization at the Limit: Management Lessons from the Columbia Disaster (2005) (Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK) 309–335Google Scholar
• Starbuck W. H., Greve A., Hedberg B. L. T. Responding to crises. J. Bus. Admin. (1978) 9(2):111–137Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science New Series (1974) 85:1124–1131Google Scholar
• Viscusi W. K., Evans W. N. Estimation of revealed probabilities and utility functions for product safety decisions. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1998) 80:28–33Crossref, Google Scholar
• Viscusi W. K., Zeckhauser R. J. National survey evidence on disasters and relief: Risk beliefs, self-interest, and compassion. J. Risk Uncertainty (2006) 33:13–36Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wagner J. A., Gooding R. Z. Equivocal information and attribution: An investigation of patterns of managerial sensemaking. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:275–286Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whoriskey P. Shuttle failures raise a big question: With a 1-in-57 disaster rate, is space exploration worth the risk? Washington Post (2003) February 10Google Scholar