Technology, Organization, and Structure—A Morphogenetic Approach

References

• Accountacy Age The real deal? (2007) October 25):26Google Scholar
• Ackroyd S.The Organization of Business: Applying Organizational Theory to Contemporary Change (2002) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Ackroyd S., Fleetwood S.Realist Perspectives on Management and Organisations (2000) (Routledge, London) Google Scholar
• Adler P. The future of critical management studies: A paleo-marxist critique of labour process theory. Organ. Stud. (2007) 28(9):1313–1345Crossref, Google Scholar
• Archer M.Social Origins of Educational System (1979) (Sage, London) Google Scholar
• Archer M. Morphogenesis versus structuration: On combining structure and action. British J. Sociol. (1982) 33(4):455–483Crossref, Google Scholar
• Archer M., Featherstone M. Theory, culture and post-industrial society. Global Culture (1990) (Sage, London) Google Scholar
• Archer M.Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach (1995) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Archer M.Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory (1996) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Archer M.Being Human: The Problem of Agency (2000) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Archer M.Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation (2003) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Archer M.Making Our Way Through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility (2007) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong P., Knights D., Willmott H. Management control strategies and inter-professional competition: The cases of accountancy and personnel management. Managing the Labour Process (1986) (Gower, Aldershot, UK) Google Scholar
• Baumard P.Tacit Knowledge in Organizations (1999) (Sage, London) Google Scholar
• Benders J.Optional Options: Work Design and Manufacturing Automation (1993) (Avebury, Aldershot, UK) Google Scholar
• Bhaskar R.The Possibility of Naturalism (1979) (Harvester, Hemel Hempstead, UK) Google Scholar
• Boal K. B., Hunt J. G., Jaros S. J., Westwood R., Clegg S. Order is free: On the ontological status of organizations. Debating Organization (2003) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Boland R., Boland R., Hirschheim R. The in-formation of information systems. Critical Issues in Information Systems Research (1987) (Wiley, Chichester, UK) Google Scholar
• Boudreau M.-C., Robey D. Enacting integrated information technology: A human agency perspective. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(1):3–18Link, Google Scholar
• Bowker G. Biodiversity, datadiversity. Soc. Stud. Sci. (2000) 30(5):643–683Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlile P. Transferring, translating and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(5):555–568Link, Google Scholar
• Carroll J., Mack R., Baecker R., Grudin J., Buxton W., Greenberg S. Learning to use a word processor: By doing, by thinking and by knowing. Readings in Human-Computer Interaction: Toward the Year 2000 (1995) (Morgan-Kaufman, San Francisco) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ciborra C. U.From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures (2000) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ciborra C. U., Patriotta G., Ciborra C. Groupware and teamwork in new product development: The case of a consumer goods multinational. Groupware and Teamwork: Invisible Aid or Technical Hindrance? (1996) (Wiley, Chichester, UK) Google Scholar
• Clark J., McLoughlin I., Rose H., King R.The Process of Technological Change: New Technology and Social Choice in the Workplace (1988) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Collier A.Critical Realism: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Roy Bhaskar (1994) (Verso, London) Google Scholar
• Contu A., Willmott H. You spin me round: The realist turn in organization and management studies. J. Management Stud. (2005) 42(8):1645–1662Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cruickshank J.Realism and Sociology: Anti-Foundationalism, Ontology, and Social Research (2003) (Routledge, London) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davenport T. Saving IT's soul: Human-centred information management. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1994) 72(2):119–131Google Scholar
• Davenport T. Competing on analytics. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2006) 84(1):99–107Google Scholar
• Davenport T., Harris J.Competing on Analytics: The New Science of Winning (2007) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• D'Adderio L.Inside the Virtual Product: How Organizations Create Knowledge Through Software (2004) (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK) Google Scholar
• Delbridge R., Edwards T. Reflections on developments in institutional theory. Scandinavian J. Management (2007) 23(2):191–205Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Vaujany F. Capturing reflexivity modes in IS: A critical realist approach. Inform. Organ. (2008) 18(1):51–72Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobson P. Critical realism and information systems research: Why bother with philosophy? Inform. Res. (2002) 7(2). http://informationr.net/ir/7-2/paper124.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Dobson P., Myles J., Jackson P. Making the case for critical realism: Examining the implementation of automated performance management systems. Inform. Res. Management J. (2007) 20(2):138–152Google Scholar
• Edwards D., Ashmore M., Potter J. Death and furniture: The rhetoric, politics and theology of bottom line arguments against relativism. Hist. Human Sci. (1995) 8(2):25–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emirbayer M., Mische A. What is agency? Amer. J. Sociol. (1998) 103(4):962–1023Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feenberg A.Questioning Technology (2001) (Routledge, London) Google Scholar
• Finnegan P., Sammon D., Barnes S. Fundamentals of implementing data warehousing in organizations. Knowledge Management Systems: Theory and Practice (2002) (Thomson Learning, London) Google Scholar
• Fleetwood S. Ontology in organization and management studies: A critical realist perspective. Organ. (2005) 12(2):197–222Google Scholar
• Fleetwood S., Ackroyd S.Critical Realist Applications in Organisation and Management Studies (2004) (Routledge, London) Google Scholar
• Fligstein N.The Transformation of Corporate Control (1990) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Giddens A.The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration (1984) (Polity, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Giddens A.The Consequences of Modernity (1990) (Polity, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Griffith T. Technology features as triggers for sensemaking. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24(3):472–488Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grint K., Woolgar S.The Machine at Work: Technology, Work and Organization (1997) (Polity, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Hayes N., Walsham G., Pritchard C., Hull R., Chumer M., Willmott H. Safe enclaves, political enclaves and knowledge working. Managing Knowledge (2000) (Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK) Google Scholar
• Hays S. Structure and agency and the sticky problem of culture. Soc. Theory (1994) 12(1):57–72Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoopes J., Lichtenstein N. Growth through knowledge: Wal-Mart, high technology and the ever less visible hand of the manager. Wal-Mart: The Face of Twenty-First-Century Capitalism (2006) (The New Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Humby C., Hunt T., Phillips T.Scoring Points: How Tesco Is Winning Customer Loyalty (2003) (Kogan Page, London) Google Scholar
• Hutchby I.Conversation and Technology: From the Telephone to the Internet (2001) (Polity, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Jasperson J. S., Carter P. E., Zmud R. W. A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors associated with information technology enabled work systems. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(3):525–557Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones M., Currie W., Galliers R. Structuration theory. Rethinking Management Information Systems (1999) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Jones M., Orlikowski W., Munir K., Mingers J., Willcocks L. Structuration theory and information systems: A critical reappraisal. Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems (2004) (Wiley, Chichester, UK) Google Scholar
• Kellog K., Orlikowski W., Yates J. Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(1):22–44Link, Google Scholar
• Klein H. Seeking the new and the critical in critical realism: Déjà vu? Inform. Organ. (2004) 14:123–144Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kreie J., Cronan T., Pendley J., Renwick J. Applications development by end-users: Can quality be improved? Decision Support Systems (2000) 29:143–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lapointe L., Rivard S. A triple take on information system implementation. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(1):89–107Link, Google Scholar
• Lave J., Wenger E.Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (1991) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence T., Suddaby R., Clegg S., Hardy C., Lawrence T., Nord W. Institutions and institutional work. The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies (2006) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawson C., Lawson C., Latsis J., Martins N. Technology, technological determinism and the transformational model of social activity. Contributions to Social Ontology (2007) (Routledge, London) Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein N.Wal-Mart: The Face of Twenty-First-Century Capitalism (2006) (The New Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M., Ventresca M. The new structuralism in organizational theory. Organ. (2003) 10(3):457–480Google Scholar
• Massa S., Testa S. Data warehouse-in-practice: Exploring the function of expectations in organizational outcomes. Inform. Management (2005) 42:709–718Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKelvey B., Westwood R., Clegg S. From fields to science: Can organization studies make the transition? Debating Organization (2003) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Mingers J. Real-izing information systems: Critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for information systems. Inform. Organ. (2004a) 14:87–103Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mingers J., Mingers J., Willcocks L. Re-establishing the real: Critical realism and information systems. Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems (2004b) (Wiley, Chichester, UK) Google Scholar
• Monteiro E., Hanseth O., Orlikowski W. J., Walsham G., Jones M. R., De Gross J. Social shaping of information infrastructure: On being specific about the technology. Information Technology and Changes in Organizational Work (1995) (Chapman & Hall, London) Google Scholar
• Monteiro E., Hepsø V., Ciborra C. Infrastructure strategy formation: Seize the day at Statoil. From Control to Drift (2000) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Morton P. Using critical realism to explain strategic information systems planning. J. Inform. Tech. Theory Appl. (2006) 8(1):1–20Google Scholar
• Mutch A. Actors and networks or agents and structures: Towards a realist view of information systems. Organ. (2002) 9(3):477–496Google Scholar
• Mutch A., Delbridge R., Ventresca M. Situating organizational action: The relational sociology of organizations. Organ. (2006) 13(5):607–625Google Scholar
• Negus K.Music Genres and Corporate Cultures: Strategy and Creativity in the Music Business (1999) (Routledge, London) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):398–427Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(4):404–428Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organ. Stud. (2007) 28(9):1435–1448Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W., Gash D. Technological frames: Making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems (1994) 12(2):174–207Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W., Iaconno S. Research commentary: Desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research—A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 12(2):121–134Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W., Yates J. Genre repertoire: The structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39:541–574Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland B., Feldman M. Narrative networks: Patterns of technology and organization. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(5):781–795Link, Google Scholar
• Popper K.Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach (1979) (Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Reed M. In praise of duality and dualism: Rethinking agency and structure in organizational analysis. Organ. Stud. (1997) 18(1):21–42Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reed M. Reflections on the “realist turn” in organization and management studies. J. Management Stud. (2005a) 42(8):1621–1644Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reed M. Doing the loco-motion: Response to Contu and Willmott's commentary on “The realist turn in organization and management studies. J. Management Stud. (2005b) 42(8):1663–1673Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rockart J. F. Chief executives define their own data needs. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1979) 57(2):81–92Google Scholar
• Rose S.The Making of Memory: From Molecules to Mind (1993) (Bantam, London) Google Scholar
• Sayer A.Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach (1992) (Routledge, London) Google Scholar
• Sayer A.Realism and Social Science (2000) (Sage, London) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shenhav Y.Manufacturing Rationality: The Engineering Foundations of the Managerial Revolution (1999) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Smith M. Overcoming theory-practice inconsistencies: Critical realsim and information systems research. Inform. Organ. (2006) 16:191–211Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stones R.Structuration Theory (2005) (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Troilo G.Marketing Knowledge Management: Managing Knowledge in Market Oriented Companies (2006) (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Volkoff O., Strong D., Elmes M. Technological embeddedness and organizational change. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(5):832–848Link, Google Scholar
• Walsham G.Interpreting Information Systems in Organisations (1993) (Wiley, Chichester, UK) Google Scholar
• Walsham G., Lee A., Liebenau J., DeGross J. Actor-network theory and IS research: Current status and future prospects. Information Systems and Qualitative Research (1997) (Chapman & Hall, London) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsham G.Making a World of Difference: IT in a Global Context (2001a) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Walsham G. Knowledge management: The benefits and limitations of computer systems. Eur. Management J. (2001b) 19(6):599–608Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wenger E.Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity (1999) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Westerman P.Data Warehousing: Using the Wal-Mart Model (2001) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wheeler F. P., Chang S. H., Thomas R. J. Moving from an executive information system to everyone's information system: Lessons from a case study. J. Inform. Tech. (1993) 8(3):177–183Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whittington R. Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organ. Stud. (2007) 27(5):613–634Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whyte J. Taking time to understand: Articulating relationships between technologies and organizations. 4th Critical Management Stud. Conf. (2005) . http://www.mngt.waikato.ac.nz/ejrot/cmsconference/2005/proceedings/criticalrealism/Whyte.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Yates J.Control Through Communication: The Rise of System in Americam Management (1989) (John Hopkins, Baltimore) Google Scholar
• Yates J., Orlikowski W. Genres of organizational communication: A structurational approach to studying communication and media. Acad. Management Rev. (1992) 17(2):299–326Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zammuto R., Griffith T., Majchrzak A., Dougherty D., Faraj S. Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(5):749–762Link, Google Scholar