Faraway, Yet So Close: Organizations in Demographic Flux

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0447

References

  • Aldrich H.Organizations Evolving (1999) (Sage, London) Google Scholar
  • Allison P. D., Leinhardt S. Discrete-time methods for the analysis of event histories. Sociological Methodology (1982) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) 61–98CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allison P. D.Survival Analysis Using the SAS System (1995) (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) Google Scholar
  • Allison P. D., Christakis N. Fixed effects methods for the analysis of nonrepeated events. Sociol. Methodology (2006) 36:155–172CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Balkundi P., Harrison D. A. Ties, leaders, and time in teams: Strong inference about the effects of network structure on team viability and performance. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49:49–68CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bantel K., Jackson S. Top management and innovation in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management J. (1989) 10:107–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barkema H. G., Chvyrkov O. Top management team heterogeneity: Promoting or hampering foreign entry? Strategic Management J. (2007) 28:663–680CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barsade S. G., Ward A. J., Turner J. D. F., Sonnenfeld J. A. To your hearts content: A model of affective diversity in top management teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45:802–836CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Haveman H. A. Love thy neighbour: Differentiation and agglomeration in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898–1990. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(2):304–338CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Singh J. V. Dynamics of organizational responses to competition. Soc. Forces (1996) 74:1261–1297CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beckman C. M., Burton M. D. Founding the future: Path dependence in the evolution of top management teams from founding to IPO. Organ. Sci. (2008) 19:3–24LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Belzil C. Unemployment insurance and subsequent job duration: Job matching versus unobserved heterogeneity. J. Appl. Econometrics (2001) 16(5):619–636CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boone C., Bröcheler V., Carroll G. R. Custom service: Application and tests of resource-partitioning theory among Dutch auditing firms from 1896 to 1992. Organ. Stud. (2000) 21(2):355–381CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boone C., Wezel F. C., van Witteloostuijn A., Baum J. A. C., Dobrev S., van Witteloostuijn A. Top management team composition and organizational ecology. Ecology and Strategy, Advances in Strategic Management (2006) 23(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 103–135CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boone C., Wezel F. C., van Witteloostuijn A. An ecological theory of population diversity dependence. (2007) . Working Paper 2007/D1169/003, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  • Carpenter M. A., Sanders W. G., Geletkanycz M. A. The upper echelons revisited: The antecedents, elements, and consequences of TMT composition. J. Management (2004) 30:749–778CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll G. R., Harrison J. R. Organizational demography and culture: Insights from a formal model and simulation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43(3):637–667CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cattani G., Pennings J. M., Wezel F. C. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in founding patterns. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(6):670–685LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Davies R. B., Crouchley R. The limitations of cross-sectional analysis. Longitudinal Data Analysis (1987) (Averbury, Aldershot) Google Scholar
  • De Pree J. C. I. Grenzen aan Verandering: Reorganisatie en structuurprincipes van het binnenlands bestuur. (1997) . (“Borders [or limits] to change: The relationship between reorganization and structural attributes of interior governance”). Rapport, Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid, The Hague, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K., Schoonhoven K. Organizational growth: Linking founding team strategy environment and growth among U.S. semiconductor ventures 1978–1988. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:504–529CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Finkelstein S., Hambrick D. C. Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:484–503CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geroski P. A. Exploring niche overlaps between organizational ecology and industrial economics. Indust. Corporate Change (2001) 10:507–540CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodstein J., Boeker W. Turbulence at the top: A new perspective on governance structure changes and strategic change. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34:306–330CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Groysberg B. A., Lee L. E., Nanda A. Can they take it with them: The portability of star knowledge workers' performance. Management Sci. (2007) 54:1213–1230LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Guzzo R. A., Dickson M. W. Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual. Rev. Psych. (1996) 47:307–338CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hambrick D. C. Upper echelons theory—An update. Acad. Management Rev. (2007) 32(2):334–343CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hambrick D. C., Mason P. A. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top management. Acad. Management J. (1984) 9(2):193–206Google Scholar
  • Hambrick D. C., Cho T., Chen M. The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms competitive moves. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:659–684CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hambrick D. C., Werder v. A., Zajac E. J. New directions in corporate governance research. Organ. Sci. (2008) 19:381–385LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison R. J., Carroll G. R.Culture and Demography in Organizations (2006) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison D. A., Mohammed S., McGrath J. E., Florey A. T., Vanderstoep S. W. Time matters in team performance: Effects of member familiarity, entrainment, and task discontinuity on speed and quality. Personnel Psych. (2003) 56(3):633–669CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Homans G. C.The Human Group (1951) (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York) Google Scholar
  • Horwitz S. K., Horwitz I. B. The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. J. Management (2007) 33:987–1115CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jenkins S. Survival analysis. (2005) . Unpublished manuscript, Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Colchester, Essex, UKGoogle Scholar
  • Jovanovic B. Job matching and the theory of turnover. J. Political Econom. (1979) 87(5):972–990CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz R. The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1982) 27:81–104CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kiesler S., Sproull L. Managerial response to changing environments: Perspectives on problem sensing from social cognition. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1982) 27:548–570CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim P. H. When what you know can hurt you: A study of experiential effects on group discussion and performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1997) 69:165–177CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klepper S. Industry life cycles. Indust. Corporate Change (1997) 6:145–181CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knight D., Pearce C. L., Smith K. G., Olian J. D., Sims H. P., Smith K. A., Flood P. Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20:445–465CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kraatz M. S., Moore J. Governance form and organizational adaptation. (2007) Presentation, Annual Meeting of Academy of ManagementAnaheim, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Krackhardt D., Bacharach S. B., Andrews S. B., Knoke D. The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations. Res. Sociol. Organ. (1999) 16:183–210Google Scholar
  • Lant T. K., Milliken F. J., Batra B. The role of managerial learning and interpretation in strategic persistence and reorientation: An empirical exploration. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13:585–608CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawrence B. S. The black box of organizational demography. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8:1–22LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levine J. M., Moreland R. L. Progress in small groups research. Annual. Rev. Psych. (1990) 41:583–634CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levine J. M., Moreland R. L., Argote L., Carley K. M. Personnel turnover and organizational performance. (2005) (U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Arlington, VA) . Army project 61102B74FGoogle Scholar
  • Maister D. H.Managing the Professional Service Firm (1993) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:71–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McPherson J. M. An ecology of affiliation. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1983) 48:519–535CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McPherson M., Smith-Lovin L., Cook J. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual. Rev. Sociol. (2001) 27:415–444CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Merton R. K.Social Theory and Social Structure (1968) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Pegels C. C., Song Y. I., Yang B. Management heterogeneity competitive interaction groups and firm performance. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(9):911–923CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pelled L. H., Eisenhardt K. M., Xin K. R. Exploring the black box: An analysis of workgroup diversity, conflict and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:1–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pennings J. M., Wezel F. C.Human Capital, Inter-Firm Mobility and Organizational Evolution (2007) (Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pennings J. M., Lee K., van Witteloostuijn A. Human capital social capital and firm survival. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41(4):425–440CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Cummings L. L., Staw B. M. Organizational demography. Research in Organizational Behavior (1983) 5(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 299–357Google Scholar
  • Priem R. L., Lyon D. E., Dess G. G. Inherent limitations of demographic proxies in top management team heterogeneity research. J. Management (1999) 25(6):935–953CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reger R. K., Huff A. S. Strategic groups: A cognitive perspective. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14(2):103–123CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schmalensee R., Schmalensee R., Willig R. Inter-industry studies of structure and performance. Handbook of Industrial Organization (1989) 2(Elsevier, Amsterdam) 951–1009Google Scholar
  • Simons T., Pelled L. H., Smith K. A. Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42:662–673CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smigel E. O.The Wall Street Lawyer: Professional Organization Man? (1969) (Indiana University Press, Bloomington) Google Scholar
  • Smith K., Ferrier W., Ndofor H., Hitt M., Freeman R. E., Harrison J. Competitive dynamics research: Critique and future directions. Handbook of Strategic Management (2001) (Blackwell Publishers, London) 315–361Google Scholar
  • Smith K. G., Smith K. A., Olian J. D., Sims H. P., O'Bannon D. P., Scully J. A. Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Admin Sci. Quart. (1994) 39:412–438CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sørensen J. B. Executive migration and interorganizational competition. Soc. Sci. Res. (1999a) 28:289–315CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sørensen J. B. The ecology of organizational demography: Managerial tenure distributions and organizational competition. Indust. Corporate Change (1999b) 8:713–744CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sørensen J. B. The longitudinal effects of group tenure composition on turnover. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2000) 65:298–310CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sørensen J. B. The use and misuse of the coefficient of variation in organizational demography research. Sociol. Methods Res. (2002) 30:475–491CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stinchcombe A., March J. Social structure and organizations. Handbook of Organizations (1965) (Rand McNally, Chicago) 142–193Google Scholar
  • Taylor A., Greve H. R. Superman or the fantastic four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49:723–740CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tripsas M., Gavetti G. Capabilities cognition and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(10–11):1147–1161CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tuma N. B., Hannan M. T.Social Dynamics: Models and Methods (1984) (Academic Press, Orlando, FL) Google Scholar
  • Walsh J. P. Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(3):280–321LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Watson W. E., Kumar K., Michaelsen L. K. Cultural diversity's impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36:590–602CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wezel F. C., Cattani G., Pennings J. M. Competitive implications of inter-firm mobility. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17:691–709LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Williams K. Y., O'Reilly C. A., Cummings L. L., Staw B. M. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior (1998) 20(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 77–140Google Scholar
  • Yamaguchi Y.Event History Analysis (1991) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Zenger T. R., Lawrence B. S. Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions. Acad. Management J. (1989) 32(2):353–376CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.