Structural Logic of Intraorganizational Networks

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0450

References

  • Akerlof G. A. Labor contracts as partial gift exchange. Quart. J. Econom. (1982) 97(4):543–569CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Akerlof G. A. Gift exchange and efficiency-wage theory: Four views. The Amer. Econom. Rev. (1984) 74(2):79–83Google Scholar
  • Anderson C. J., Wasserman S., Crouch B. A p* primer: Logit models for social networks. Soc. Networks (1999) 21(1):37–66CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baldwin T. T., Bedell M. D., Johnson J. L. The social fabric of a team-based M.B.A. program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance. Acad. Management J. (1997) 40(6):1369–1397CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barnes J. A.Social Networks (1972) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Baum J. R., Wally S. Strategic decision speed and firm performance. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(11):1107–1129CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bearman P. S. Generalized exchange. Amer. J. Sociol. (1997) 102(5):1383–1415CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Besag J. E. Markov chain Monte Carlo for statistical inference. (2000) . Working paper, Center for Statistics and the Social Sciences, University of Washington, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  • Blau P. M.Exchange and Power in Social Life (1964) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Bolton G., Ockenfels A. ECR: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2000) 90(1):166–193CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bourgeois L. J., Eisenhardt K. M. Strategic decision processes in high velocity environments: Four cases in the microcomputer industry. Management Sci. (1988) 34(7):816–835LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brass D. J. Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1984) 29(4):518–539CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brass D. J. Power in organizations: A social network perspective. Res. Politics Soc. (1992) 4:295–323Google Scholar
  • Brass D. J., Galaskiewicz J., Greve H. R., Tsai W. Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(6):795–817CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bunderson J. S. Team member functional background and involvement in management teams: Direct effects and the moderating role of power centralization. Acad. Management J. (2003) 46(4):458–474CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S.Toward a Structural Theory of Action (1982) (Academic Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S., Ronchi D. Measuring a large network quickly. Soc. Networks (1994) 16(2):91–135CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carley K. M. An approach for relating social structure to cognitive structure. J. Math. Sociol. (1986) 12(2):137–189CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carley K. M., Krackhardt D. Cognitive inconsistencies and non-symmetric friendship. Soc. Networks (1996) 18(1):1–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Contractor N. S., Wasserman S., Faust K. Testing multi-theoretical multilevel hypotheses about organizational networks: An analytic framework and empirical example. Acad. Management Rev. (2006) 31(3):681–703CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cook K. S., Emerson R. M., Gillmore M. R., Yamagishi T. The distribution of power in exchange networks: Theory and experimental results. Amer. J. Sociol. (1983) 89(2):275–305CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Corander J., Dahmström K., Dahmström P. Maximum likelihood estimation for Markov graphs. (1998) . Research report, Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  • Corander J., Dahmström K., Dahmström P., Hagberg J. Maximum likelihood estimation for exponential random graph models. Contributions to Social Network Analysis, Information Theory and Other Topics in Statistics: A Festschrift in Honour of Ove Frank on the Occasion of His 65th Birthday (2002) (Universitet Stockholms, Stockholm) 1–17Google Scholar
  • Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Dooley R. S., Fryxell G. E., Judge W. Q. Belaboring the not-so-obvious: Consensus, commitment, and strategy implementation speed and success. J. Management (2000) 26(6):1237–1257CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Du Plessis J. J. The German two-tier board and the German corporate governance code. Eur. Bus. Law Rev. (2004) 15(5):1139–1164Google Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Acad. Management J. (1989a) 32(3):543–576CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. (1989b) 14(4):532–550CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. Strategy as strategic decision making. Sloan Management Rev. (1999) 40(3):65–72Google Scholar
  • Ekeh P. P.Social Exchange Theory: The Two Traditions (1974) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Emerson R. M., Berger J., Zewditch M., Anderson B. Exchange theory I: A psychological basis for social exchange. Sociological Theories in Progress (1972a) 2(Houghton Mifflin, Boston) 38–57Google Scholar
  • Emerson R. M., Berger J., Zewditch M., Anderson B. Exchange theory II: Exchange relations and networks. Sociological Theories in Progress (1972b) 2(Houghton Mifflin, Boston) 58–87Google Scholar
  • Fehr E., Gächter S. Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2000) 90(4):980–994CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fienberg S. E., Wasserman S., Leinhardt S. Categorical data analysis of single sociometric relations. Sociological Methodology (1981) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) 156–192CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frank O., Nowicki K., Gimbel J., Kennedy J. W., Quintas L. V. Exploratory statistical analysis of networks. Quo Vadis, Graph Theory? Annals of Discrete Mathematics (1993) 55(North Holland, Amsterdam) 349–366Google Scholar
  • Frank O., Strauss D. Markov graphs. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1986) 81(395):832–842CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gouldner A. W. The norm of reciprocity. Amer. J. Sociol. (1960) 25(2):161–178CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. (1985) 91(3):481–510CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta A. K., Govindarajan V. Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations. Acad. Management Rev. (1991) 16(4):768–792CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haåkansson H., Johanson J., Grabher G. The network as a governance structure: Interfirm cooperation beyond markets and hierarchies. The Embedded Firm: On the Socioeconomics of Industrial Networks. (1993) (Routledge, London) 35–51Google Scholar
  • Handcock M. S., Hunter D. R., Butts C. T., Goodreau S. M., Morris M. Statnet: An R package for the statistical modeling of social networks. (2003) . http://www.csde.washington.edu/statnetGoogle Scholar
  • Hardin R.Collective Action (1982) (John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore) Google Scholar
  • Hax A. C., Majluf N. S.The Strategy Concept and Process: A Pragmatic Approach (1996) 2nd ed.(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Heider F.The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations (1958) (Wiley, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hickson D. J., Miller S. J., Wilson D. C. Planned or prioritized? Two options in management the implementation of strategic decisions. J. Management Stud. (2003) 40(7):1803–1836CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holland P. W., Leinhardt S. The structural implications of measurement error in sociometry. J. Math. Sociol. (1973) 3:85–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holland P. W., Leinhardt S., Heise D. R. The statistical analysis of local structure in social networks. Sociological Methodology, 1976 (1975) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) 1–45Google Scholar
  • Holland P. W., Leinhardt S. Notes on the statistical analysis of social network data. (1977) Paper presented at the Advanced Symposium on Stochastic Process Models of Social StructureCarnegie Mellon University, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  • Holland P. W., Leinhardt S. An exponential family of probability distributions for directed graphs. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1981) 76(373):33–65CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Homans G. C. Social behavior as exchange. Amer. J. Sociol. (1958) 63(6):597–606CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Human S. E., Provan K. G. Legitimacy building in the evolution of small-firm multilateral networks: A comparative study of success and demise. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45(2):327–365CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hunter D. R., Handcock M. S. Inference in curved exponential family models for networks. J. Computational Graphical Statist. (2006) 15(3):565–583CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ibarra H. Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(3):471–501CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ingram P., Roberts P. W. Friendship among competitors in the Sydney hotel industry. Amer. J. Sociol. (2000) 106(2):387–423CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jablin F. M., Jablin F. M., Putnam L. L., Roberts K. H., Porter L. W. Formal organizational structure. Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (1987) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) 389–419Google Scholar
  • Johnson J. D., Donohue W. A., Atkin C. K., Johnson S. Differences between formal and informal communication channels. J. Bus. Comm. (1994) 31(2):111–122CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones C., Hesterly W. S., Borgatti S. P. A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Acad. Management Rev. (1997) 22(4):911–945CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim W. C., Mauborgne R. A. Procedural justice, strategic decision making, and the knowledge economy. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19(4):323–338CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koehly L. M., Pattison P., Carrington P. J., Scott J., Wasserman S. Random graph models for social networks: Multiple relations or multiple raters. Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis (2005) (Cambridge University Press, New York) 162–191CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B. Research notes and communications: A note on global strategies. Strategic Management J. (1989) 10(4):383–389CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krackhardt D. Cognitive social structures. Soc. Networks (1987) 9(2):109–134CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krackhardt D. Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(2):342–369CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krackhardt D., Brass D. J., Wasserman S., Galaskiewicz J. Intraorganizational networks: The micro side. Advances in Social Network Analysis: Research in the Social and Behavioral Science (1994) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 207–229CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krackhardt D., Kilduff M. Friendship patterns and culture: The control of organizational diversity. Amer. Anthropologist (1990) 92(1):142–154CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krackhardt D., Stern R. N. Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Soc. Psych. Quart. (1988) 51(2):123–140CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larson A. Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of governance of exchange relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37(1):76–104CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laumann E. O., Pappi F. U.Networks of Collective Action: A Perspective on Community Influence Systems (1976) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Lazega E., Pattison P. E. Multiplexity, generalized exchange and cooperation in organizations: A case study. Soc. Networks (1999) 21(1):67–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazega E., van Duijn M. Position in formal structure, personal characteristics and choices of advisors in a law firm: A logistic regression model for dyadic network data. Soc. Networks (1997) 19(4):375–397CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leifer E. M. Interaction preludes to role setting: Exploratory local action. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1988) 53(6):865–878CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lévi-Strauss C.Les structures élémentaires de la paranté (1949) (Presses Universitaires de France, Paris) Google Scholar
  • Lincoln J. R., Miller J. Work and friendship ties in organizations: A comparative analysis of relational networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1979) 24(2):181–199CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lindenberg S., Markovsky B., Lovaglia M., Troyer L. Grounding groups in theory: Functional, cognitive, and structural interdependencies. Advances in Group Processes (1997) 14(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 281–331Google Scholar
  • Lomi A., Pattison P. E. Manufacturing relations: An empirical study of the organization of production across multiple networks. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(3):313–332LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lubbers M. J., Snijders T. A. B. A comparison of various approaches to the exponential random graph model: A reanalysis of 102 student networks in school classes. Soc. Networks (2007) 29(4):489–507CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Markovsky B., Willer D., Patton T. Power relations in exchange networks. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1988) 53(2):220–236CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marsden P. V. Network data and measurement. Annual Rev. Sociology (1990) 16(1):435–463CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martin J.Organizational Behaviour and Management (2005) (Thomson, London) Google Scholar
  • Mehra A., Kilduff M., Brass D. J. The social networks of high and low self-monitors: Implications for workplace performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46(1):121–146CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mintzberg H.The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning (1994) (Prentice Hall, Hemel Hempstead, UK) Google Scholar
  • Monge P. R., Contractor N. S., Jablin F. M., Putnam L. L. Emergence of communication networks. New Handbook of Organizational Communication (2001) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 440–502CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Monge P. R., Contractor N. S.Theories of Communication Networks (2003) (Oxford University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nohria N., Nohria N., Eccles R. G. Is a network perspective a useful way of studying organizations? Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action (1992) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) 1–22Google Scholar
  • Pattison P. E., Robins G. L. Neighborhood-based models for social networks. Sociol. Methodology (2002) 32:301–337CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pattison P., Wasserman S. Logit models and logistic regression for social networks: II. Multivariate relations. British J. Math. Statist. Psych. (1999) 52(2):169–193CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J.Organizational Design (1978) (Harlan Davidson, Arlington Heights, IL) Google Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R.The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (1978) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) Google Scholar
  • Provan K. G., Milward H. B. A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(1):1–33CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pugh D. S., Hickson D. J., Hinings C. R., Turner C. Dimensions of organization structure. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1968) 13(1):65–105CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reid D. M. Operationalizing strategic planning. Strategic Management J. (1989) 10(6):553–567CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Richards W. D., Seary A. J., Barnett G. A., Thayer L. Convergence analysis of communication networks. Organizational Communication: Emerging Perspectives V: The Renaissance in Systems Thinking (1997) (Ablex, Greenwich, CT) 141–189Google Scholar
  • Riordan C. M., Griffeth R. W. The opportunity for friendship in the workplace: An underexplored construct. J. Bus. Psych. (1995) 10(2):141–154CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robins G., Pattison P. Random graph models for temporal processes in social networks. J. Math. Sociol. (2001) 25(1):5–41CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robins G., Pattison P., Carrington P. J., Scott J., Wasserman S. Interdependencies and social processes: Generalized dependence structures. Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis (2005) (Cambridge University Press, New York) 192–214CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robins G., Pattison P., Woolcock J. Missing data in networks: Exponential random graph (p*) models for networks with non-respondents. Soc. Networks (2004) 26(3):57–283CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robins G., Snijders T. A. B., Wang P., Handcock M., Pattison P. Recent developments in exponential random graph (p*) models. Soc. Networks (2007) 29(2):192–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogers E. M., Kincaid D. L.Communication Networks (1981) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Salk J. E., Brannen M. Y. National culture, networks, and individual influence in a multinational management team. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43(2):191–202CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scharpf F. W.Games Real Actors Play: Actor Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research (1997) (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) Google Scholar
  • Schweinberger M., Snijders T. A. B. Network evolution models with actor-dependent random coefficients. (2004) Paper presented at the 24th Sunbelt International Social Network ConferenceMay 12–16Porporož, SloveniaGoogle Scholar
  • Settoon R. P., Bennett N., Liden R. C. Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader-member exchange, and employee reciprocity. J. Appl. Psych. (1996) 81(3):219–227CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sine W. D., Mitsahashi H., Kirsch D. A. Revisiting burns and stalker: Formal structure and new venture performance in emerging economic sectors. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(1):121–132CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Skvoretz J., Willer D. Exclusion and power: A test of four theories of power in exchange networks. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1993) 58(6):801–818CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Snijders T. A. B. Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation of exponential random graph models. J. Soc. Structure (2002) 3(2):1–40Google Scholar
  • Snijders T. A. B., Pattison P. E., Robins G. L., Handcock M. S. New specifications for exponential random graph models. Sociol. Methodology (2006) 36(1):99–153CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stevenson W. B., Golembiewski R. T. Organization design. Handbook of Organizational Behavior (2001) 2nd ed.(Dekker, New York) 145–174Google Scholar
  • Strauss D., Ikeda M. Pseudolikelihood estimation for social networks. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1990) 85(409):204–212CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thorelli H. B. Networks: Between markets and hierarchies. Strategic Management J. (1986) 7(1):37–52CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tichy N., Fombrun C. Network analysis in organizational settings. Human Relations (1979) 32(11):923–965CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsai W. Social structure of “coopetition” within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organ. Stud. (2002) 13(2):179–190Google Scholar
  • Uehara E. Dual exchange theory, social networks, and informal social support. Amer. J. Sociol. (1990) 96(3):521–557CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Umphress E. E., Labianca G., Brass D. J., Kass E., Scholten L. The role of instrumental and expressive social ties in employees' perceptions of organizational justice. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(6):738–753LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1996) 61(4):674–698CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Duijn M., Gile K., Handcock M. S. Comparison of maximum pseudo likelihood and maximum likelihood estimation of exponential family random graph models. Social Networks (2009) 31(1):52–62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wasserman S., Faust K.Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (1994) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wasserman S., Pattison P. Logit models and logistic regression for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs and p*. Psychometrika (1996) 61(3):401–425CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wasserman S., Robins G., Carrington P. J., Scott J., Wasserman S. An introduction to random graphs, dependence graphs, and p*. Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis (2005) (Cambridge University Press, New York) 148–161CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Willer D., Skvoretz J., Markovsky B., Lovaglia M., Troyer L. Network connection and exchange ratios: Theory, predictions, and empirical tests. Advances in Group Processes (1997) 14(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 199–234Google Scholar
  • Yamagishi T., Cook K. S. Generalized exchange and social dilemmas. Soc. Psych. Quart. (1993) 56(4):235–248CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yamagishi T., Gillmore M. R., Cook K. S. Network connections and the distribution of power in exchange networks. Amer. J. Sociol. (1988) 93(4):833–851CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yin R. K.Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1989) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.