Power Asymmetry and Learning in Teams: The Moderating Role of Performance Feedback

References

• Aiken L. S., West S. G.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (1991) (Sage, London) Google Scholar
• Ancona D. G., Caldwell D. F. Demography and design—Predictors of new product team performance. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:321–341Link, Google Scholar
• Annett J.Feedback and Human Behavior: The Effects of Knowledge of Results, Incentives and Reinforcement on Learning and Performance (1969) (Penguin, Baltimore) Google Scholar
• Argote L.Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge (1999) (Kluwer, Boston) Google Scholar
• Argote L., Gruenfeld D., Naquin C., Turner M. E. Group learning in organizations. Groups at Work: Theory and Research (2001) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ) 369–411Google Scholar
• Bantel K. A., Jackson S. E. Top management and innovations in banking: Does the demography of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management J. (1989) 10:107–124Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barr S. H., Conlon E. J. Effects of distribution of feedback in work groups. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37:641–655Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau P.Exchange and Power in Social Life (1964) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Blau P. B.Inequality and Heterogeneity (1977) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Bliese P. D., Klein K. J., Kozlowski S. W. J. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations (2000) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) Google Scholar
• Borgatti S. P., Everett M. G. Models of core/periphery structures. Soc. Networks (1999) 21:375–395Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer M. B., Miller R. S., Miller N., Brewer M. B. Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives on desegregation. Groups in Contact: The Psychology of Desegregation (1984) (Academic Press, Orlando, FL) 281–302Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brooks A. Power and the production of knowledge: Collective team learning in work organizations. Hum. Resources Dev. Quart. (1994) 5:213–235Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunderson J. S. Team member functional background and involvement in management teams: Direct effects and the moderating role of power centralization. Acad. Management J. (2003a) 46:458–474Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunderson J. S. Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003b) 48:557–591Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunderson J. S., Sutcliffe K. M., Sondak (vol. ed.) H., Mannix E. A., Neale (series eds.) M. A. Why some teams emphasize learning more than others: Evidence from business unit management teams. Research on Managing Groups and Teams. Vol. 4, Toward Phenomenology of Groups and Group Membership (2002) (Elsevier Science, Oxford, England) 49–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunderson J. S., Sutcliffe K. M. Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88:552–560Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen S., Lee-Chai A. Y., Bargh J. A. Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. J. Pers. Soc. Psych. (2001) 80:173–187Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christie R., Geis F.Studies in Machiavellianism (1970) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
• de Jong S. B., Van der Vegt G. S., Molleman E. The relationships among asymmetry in task dependence, perceived helping behavior, and trust. J. Appl. Psych. (2007) 92:1625–1637Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeShon R. P., Kozlowski S. W. J., Schmidt A. M., Milner K. R., Wiechmann D. A multiple-goal, multilevel model of feedback effects on the regulation of individual and team performance. J. Appl. Psych. (2004) 89:1035–1056Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drach-Zahavy A., Somech A. Understanding team innovation: The role of team processes and structures. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, Practice (2001) 5:111–123Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson A. C. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:350–383Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson A. C. The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13:128–146Link, Google Scholar
• Edmondson A. C., Dillon J. R., Roloff K., Walsh J. P., Brief A. P. Three perspectives on team learning: Outcome improvement, task mastery, and group process. The Academy of Management Annals (2007) (Psychology Press, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ) 269–314Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Bourgeois L. J. Politics of strategic decision-making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory. Acad. Management J. (1988) 31:737–770Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emerson R. M. Power-dependence relations. Amer. Soc. Rev. (1962) 27:31–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske S. T. Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. Amer. Psych. (1993) 48:621–628Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman L. C. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks (1979) 1:215–239Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaertner S. L., Dovidio J. F., Bachman B. A. Revisiting the contact hypothesis: The induction of a common ingroup identity. Int. J. Intercultural Rel. (1996) 20:271–290Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson C. B., Vermeulen F. A healthy divide: Subgroups as a stimulus for team learning. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48:202–239Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goncalo J. A., Duguid M. M. Hidden consequences of the group-serving bias: Causal attributions and the quality of group decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Proc. (2008) 107(2):219–233Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R., Morris C. C. Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1975) 8:45–99Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herold D. M., Greller M. M. Feedback: Definition of a construct. Acad. Management J. (1977) 20:142–147Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinsz V. B., Tindale R. S., Vollrath D. A. The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psych. Bull. (1997) 121:43–64Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ilgen D. R., Fisher C. D., Taylor M. S. Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. J. Appl. Psych. (1979) 64:349–371Crossref, Google Scholar
• James L. R., Demaree R. G., Wolf G. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. J. Appl. Psych. (1984) 69:85–98Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keltner D., Gruenfeld D. H., Anderson C. Power, approach, and inhibition. Psych. Rev. (2003) 110:265–284Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kenny D. A., Acitelli L. K. Accuracy and bias in the perception of the partner in a close relationship. J. Pers. Soc. Psych. (2001) 80:439–448Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kipnis D. Does power corrupt? J. Pers. Soc. Psych. (1972) 24:33–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kozlowski S. W. J., Klein K. J., Klein K. J., Kozlowski S. W. J. A multi-level approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions. (2000) (Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer, San Francisco) 3–90Google Scholar
• Langfred C. W. Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self-managing teams. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47:385–399Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larson J. R., Foster-Fishman P. G., Franz T. M. Leadership style and the discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups. Pers. Soc. Psych. Bull. (1998) 24:482–495Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee F. When the going gets tough, do the tough ask for help? Help seeking and power motivation in organizations. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Proc. (1997) 72:336–363Crossref, Google Scholar
• McClelland D.Power: The Inner Experience (1975) (Irvington, New York) Google Scholar
• Miles J., Shevlin M.Applying Regression and Correlation: A Guide for Students and Researchers (2001) (Sage, London) Google Scholar
• Milliken F., Martins L. Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Acad. Management Rev. (1996) 21:402–433Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell T. R., Silver W. S. Individual and group goals when workers are interdependent: Effects on task strategy and performance. J. App. Psych. (1990) 75:185–193Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nadler D. A. Effects of feedback on task group behavior: Review of the experimental research. Organ. Behav. Human Performance (1979) 23:309–338Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nembhard I. M., Edmondson A. C. Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. J. Organ. Behav. (2006) 27:941–966Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pitcher P., Smith A. D. Top management team heterogeneity: Personality, power, and proxies. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:1–18Link, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Lee J., Podsakoff N. P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88:879–903Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratto F., Sidanius J., Stallworth L. M., Malle B. F. Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. J. Pers. Soc. Psych. (1994) 67:741–763Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ragins B. R., Sundstrom E. Gender and power in organizations: A longitudinal perspective. Psych. Bull. (1989) 105:51–88Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C. L. Gender, status, and leadership. J. Soc. Issues (2001) 57:637–655Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rusbult C. E., Van Lange P. A. M. Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Ann. Rev. Psych. (2003) 54:351–375Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saavedra R., Earley P. C., Van Dyne L. Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. J. Appl. Psych. (1993) 78:61–72Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schippers M. C., Den Hartog D. N., Koopman P. L. Learning in teams: A measure and correlates. Appl. Psych.: An Internat. Rev. (2007) 56:189–211Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schippers M. C., Den Hartog D. N., Koopman P. L., Wienk J. A. Diversity and team outcomes: The moderating effects of outcome interdependence and group longevity and the mediating effect of learning. J. Organ. Behav. (2003) 24:779–802Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor M. S., Fisher C. D., Ilgen D. R., Rowland K. M., Ferris G. R. Individuals' reactions to performance feedback in organizations: A control theory perspective. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management (1984) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 81–124Google Scholar
• Thibaut J. W., Kelley H. H.The Social Psychology of Groups (1959) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Van der Vegt G. S., Bunderson J. S. Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48:532–547Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van der Vegt G. S., Bunderson J. S., Oosterhof A. Expertness diversity and interpersonal helping in teams: Why those who need the most help end up getting the least. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49:877–893Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van der Vegt G. S., Emans B. J. M., Van de Vliert E. Motivating effects of task and outcome interdependence in work teams. Group Organ. Management (1998) 23:124–143Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van der Vegt G. S., Van de Vliert E., Oosterhof A. Informational dissimilarity and organizational citizenship behavior: The role of intrateam interdependence and team identification. Acad. Management J. (2003) 46:715–727Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vroom V. H.Work and Motivation (1964) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Wageman R. Interdependence and group effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40:145–180Crossref, Google Scholar
• West M. A., West M. A. Learning and work group effectiveness: A conceptual integration. Handbook of Work Group Psychology (1996) (John Wiley and Sons, Chichester) 555–579Google Scholar
• Wiener N.Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine (1948) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Wieselquist J., Rusbult C. E., Foster C. A., Agnew C. R. Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships. J. Pers. Soc. Psych. (1999) 77:942–966Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zander A., Wolfe D. Administrative rewards and coordination among committee members. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1964) 9:50–69Crossref, Google Scholar