The Interactive Effects of Mood and Trait Negative Affect in Group Decision Making

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0461

References

  • Aiken L. S., West S. G.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (1991) (Sage Publications, London) Google Scholar
  • Argote L., Ingram P. Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2000) 82(1):150–169CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L., Ingram P., Levine J. M., Moreland R. L. Knowledge transfer in organizations: Learning from the experience of others. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2000) 82(1):1–8CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron K. M., Kenny D. A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychology research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1986) 51(6):1173–1182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barsade S. G., Ward A. J., Turner J. D. F., Sonnenfeld J. A. To your heart's content: A model of affective diversity in top management. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45(4):802–836CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beersma B., Hollenbeck J. R., Humphrey S. E., Moon H., Conlon D. E., Ilgen D. R. Cooperation, competition, and team performance: Towards a contingency approach. Acad. Management J. (2003) 46:572–590CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bell S. T. Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. (2007) 92:595–615CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bless H., Schwarz N., Chaiken S., Trope Y. Sufficient and necessary conditions in dual process models: The case of mood and processing styles. Dual Process Models in Social Psychology. (1999) (Guilford Press, New York) 423–440Google Scholar
  • Bless H., Clore G. L., Schwarz N., Golisano V., Rabe C., Wölk M. Mood and the use of scripts: Does a happy mood really lead to mindlessness? J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1996) 71(4):665–679CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bohner G., Crow K., Erbs H.-P., Schwarz N. Affect and persuasion: Mood effects on the processing of message content and contextual cues and on subsequent behaviour. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. (1992) 22(6):511–530CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brandon D. P., Hollingshead A. B. Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(6):633–644LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brief A. P., Weiss H. M. Organizational behavior: Affect in the workplace. Ann. Rev. Psych. (2002) 53(1):279–307CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown R. D., Hauenstein N. M. A. Interrater agreement reconsidered: An alternative to the rwg indices. Organ. Res. Methods (2005) 8(2):165–184CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown D. J., Lord R. G. The utility of experimental research in the study of transformational/charismatic leadership. Leadership Quart. (1999) 10(4):531–553CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ciarrochi J. V., Forgas J. P. On being tense yet tolerant: The paradoxical effects of trait and aversive mood on intergroup judgments. Group Dynam.: Theory, Res., Practice (1999) 3(3):227–238CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clore G. L., Schwarz N., Conway M., Wyer R. S., Srull T. K. Cognitive causes and consequences of emotion. Handbook of Social Cognition (1994) 2nd ed.(Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 323–419Google Scholar
  • Dahlin K., Weingart L., Hinds P. Team diversity and information use. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48(6):1107–1123CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Damen F., van Knippenberg B., van Knippenberg D. Affective match: Leader emotional displays, follower positive affect, and follower performance. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. (2008) 38:868–902CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Dreu C. K. W., Nijstad B. A., van Knippenberg D. Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Pers. Soc. Psych. Rev. (2008) 12:22–49CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Denison R. D., Hart S. L., Kahn J. A. From chimneys to cross-functional teams: Developing and validating a diagnostic model. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39(4):1005–1023CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dipboye R. L. Laboratory vs. field research in industrial and organizational psychology. Internat. Rev. Indust. Organ. Psych. (1990) 5:1–34Google Scholar
  • Elfenbein H. A. Emotions in organizations: A review and theoretical integration. Acad. Management Ann. (2007) 1:315–386CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ford R. C., Randolph W. A. Cross-functional structures: A review and integration of matrix organization and project management. J. Management (1992) 18(2):267–294CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forgas J. P. Affect in social judgments and decisions: A multi-process model. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1992a) 25:227–275CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forgas J. P. On mood and peculiar people: Affect and person typicality in impression formation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1992b) 62(5):863–875CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forgas J. P. Sad and guilty? Affective influences on the explanation of conflict in close relationships. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1994) 66(1):56–68CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forgas J. P. Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psych. Bull. (1995) 117(1):39–66CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forgas J. P. On feeling good and getting your way: Mood effects on negotiation strategies and outcomes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1998) 74(3):565–577CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forgas J. P., Bower G. H. Mood effects on person perception judgments. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1987) 53(1):53–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forgas J. P., George J. M. Affective influences on judgments and behavior in organizations: An information processing perspective. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2001) 86(1):3–34CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forgas J. P., Laham S. M., Vargas P. T. Mood effects on eyewitness memory: Affective influences on susceptibility to misinformation. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (2005) 41(6):474–588CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frijda N. The laws of emotion. Amer. Psych. (1988) 43(5):349–358CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • George J. M. Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. J. Appl. Psych. (1990) 75:107–116CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • George J. M. State or trait: Effects of positive mood on prosocial behaviors at work. J. Appl. Psych. (1991) 76:299–307CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • George J. M., Zhou J. Understanding when bad moods foster creativity and good ones don't: The role of context and clarity of feelings. J. Appl. Psych. (2002) 87(4):687–697CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • George J. M., Zhou J. Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Acad. Management J. (2007) 50(3):605–622CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gigone D., Hastie R. The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group judgment. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1993) 65(5):959–974CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gruenfeld D. H., Mannix E. A., Williams K. Y., Neale M. A. Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1996) 67(1):1–15CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hastie R., Pennington N., Resnick L. B., Levine J. M. Cognitive and social processes in decision making. Perspectives on Socially Shared Task Representations (1991) (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC) 308–327CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hinsz V. B., Tindale R. S., Vollrath D. A. The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processes. Psych. Bull. (1997) 121(1):43–64CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hollingshead A. B. The rank order effect in group decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1996) 68:181–193CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Homan A. C., van Knippenberg D., van Kleef G. A., De Dreu C. K. W. Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: Diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. J. Appl. Psych. (2007) 92(5):1189–1199CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Homan A. C., Hollenbeck J. R., Humphrey S. E., van Knippenberg D., van Kleef G. A., Ilgen D. R. Facing differences with an open mind: Openness to experience, salience of intra-group differences, and performance of diverse work groups. Acad. Management J. (2008) 51(6):1204–1222CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ilgen D. R., Hollenbeck J. R., Johnson M., Jundt D. Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Ann. Rev. Psych. (2005) 56:517–543CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kearney E., Gebert D. Managing diversity and enhancing team outcomes: The promise of transformational leadership. J. Appl. Psych. (2009) 94:77–89CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kearney E., Gebert D., Voelpel S. C. When and how diversity benefits teams: The importance of team members need for cognition. Acad. Management J. (2009) 52:581–598CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kelly J. R., Barsade S. Mood and emotions in small groups and work teams. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2001) 86:99–130CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerr N. L., Tindale R. S. Group performance and decision making. Ann. Rev. Psych. (2004) 55:623–655CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kooij-de Bode H. J. M., van Knippenberg D., van Ginkel W. P. Ethnic diversity and distributed information in group decision making: The importance of information elaboration. Group Dynam.: Theory, Res., Practice (2008) 12(4):307–320CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larsen R. J., Ketelaar T. Extraversion, neuroticism, and susceptibility to positive and negative mood induction procedures. Personality Individual Differences (1991) 10(12):1221–1228CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larsen R. J., Sinnett L. Meta-analysis of manipulation validity: Factors affecting the velten mood induction procedure. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1991) 17(3):323–334CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larson J. R., Foster-Fishman P. G., Keys C. B. Discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1994) 67(3):446–461CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Locke E. A.Generalizing from Laboratory to Field Settings: Research Findings from Industrial-Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1986) (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) Google Scholar
  • Mackie D. M., Worth L. T. Processing deficits and the mediation of positive affect in persuasion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1989) 57(1):27–40CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayer J. D., Salovey P., Fiedler K., Forgas J. P. Personality moderates the interaction of mood and cognition. Affect, Cognition and Social Behavior (1988) (Hogrefe, Göttingen, Germany) 87–99Google Scholar
  • Mook D. G. In defense of external invalidity. Amer. Psychologist (1983) 38(4):379–387CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Neuman G. A., Wright J. Team Effectiveness: Beyond skills and cognitive ability. J. Appl. Psych. (1999) 84(3):376–389CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Okhuysen G. A., Eisenhardt K. M. Integrating knowledge in groups: How formal interventions enable flexibility. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(4):370–386LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Olsen J. M., Zanna M. P. A new look at selective exposure. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1979) 15(1):1–15CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palmer L., Thompson L. Architectural design firm. Multiparty negotiation exercise. (1998) (Dispute Resolution Research Center, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL) . http://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/drrcGoogle Scholar
  • Russell J. A., Feldman Barrett L. Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: Dissecting the elephant. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1999) 76:805–819CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salovey P., Birnbaum D. Influence of mood on health-relevant cognitions. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1989) 57(3):539–551CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salovey P., Mayer J. D. Emotional intelligence. Imagination Cognition and Personality (1990) 9(3):185–211CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scholten L., van Knippenberg D., Nijstad B. A., De Dreu C. K. W. Motivated information processing and group decision making: Effects of process accountability on information sharing and decision quality. J. Exp. Soc. Psych. (2007) 43:539–552CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schulz-Hardt S., Brodbeck F., Mojzisch A., Kerschreiter R., Frey D. Group decision making in hidden-profile situations: Dissent as a facilitator for decision quality. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2006) 91:1080–1093CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schwarz N., Higgins E. T., Sorrentino R. Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior (1990) (Guildford Press, New York) 527–561Google Scholar
  • Schwarz N., Bless H. Happy and mindless, but sad and smart? The impact of affective states on analytic reasoning. Emotion and Social Judgment (1991) (Pergamon, London) 55–71Google Scholar
  • Spender J. C., Grant R. M. Knowledge and the firm: Overview. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Winter):5–9CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stasser G., Stewart D. Discovery of hidden profiles by decision making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1992) 63:426–434CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stasser G., Titus W. Pooling unshared information in group decision-making: Biased information sampling during discussion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1985) 48(6):1467–1478CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stasser G., Taylor L. A., Hanna C. Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three- and six-person groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1989) 57(1):67–78CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Staw B. M., Barsade S. Affect and managerial performance: A test of the sadder-but-wiser vs. happier-and-smarter hypotheses. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 31:56–77CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steiner I. D. Group Processes and Productivity. (1972) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Stewart D. D., Stasser G. The sampling of critical, unshared information in decision making groups: The role of an informed minority. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. (1998) 28:95–113CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sy T., Côté S., Saavedra R. The contagious leader: Impact of the leader's mood on the mood of group members, group affective tone, and group processes. J. Appl. Psych. (2005) 90:295–305CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tindale R. S., Kameda T. Social sharedness as a unifying theme for information processing in groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations (2000) 3:123–140CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tong E. M. W., Tan C. R. M., Latheef N. A., Selamat M. F. B., Tann D. K. B. Confformity: Mood matters. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. (2008) 38(4):601–611CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Ginkel W. P., van Knippenberg D. Group information elaboration and group decision making: The role of shared task representations. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2008) 105(1):82–97CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Ginkel W. P., van Knippenberg D. Knowledge about the distribution of information and group decision making: When and why does it work? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2009) 108:218–229CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Ginkel W. P., Tindale R. S., van Knippenberg D. Team reflexivity, development of shared task representations, and the use of distributed information in group decision making. Group Dynam.: Theory, Res., Practice (2009) 13(4):265–280CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Kleef G. A., De Dreu C. K. W., Manstead S. R. Supplication and appeasement in conflict and negotiation: The interpersonal effects of disappointment, worry, guilt, and regret. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2006) 91(1):124–142CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Kleef G. A., Homan A. C., Beersma B., van Knippenberg D., van Knippenberg B., Damen F. Searing sentiment or cold calculation? The effects of leader emotional displays on team performance depend on follower epistemic motivation. Acad. Management J. (2009) 52:562–580CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Knippenberg B., van Knippenberg D. Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of leader prototypicality. J. Appl. Psych. (2005) 90(1):25–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Knippenberg D., Schippers M. C. Work group diversity. Ann. Rev. Psych. (2007) 58:515–541CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Knippenberg D., De Dreu C. K. W., Homan A. C. Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. J. Appl. Psych. (2004) 89(6):1008–1022CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Knippenberg D., van Knippenberg B., van Kleef G. A., Damen F., Ashkanasy N., Cooper C. Leadership, affect, and emotions. Research Companion to Emotions in Organizations (2008) (Edgar Eldar, Cheltenham, UK) 465–475CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watson D., Clark L. A. Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psych. Bull. (1984) 96(3):465–490CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watson D., Clark L. A. Measurement and mismeasurement of mood: Recurrent and emergent issues. J. Pers. Assess. (1997) 68:267–296CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watson D., Tellegen A. Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psych. Bull. (1985) 98(2):219–235CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watson D., Clark L. A., Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1988) 54(6):1063–1070CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weingart L. R. How did they do that? The ways and means of studying group processes. Res. Organ. Behav. (1997) 19:189–240Google Scholar
  • Weiss H. M., Cropanzano R. Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. Res. Organ. Behav. (1996) 18:1–74Google Scholar
  • Winquist J. R., Larson J. R. Information pooling: When it impacts group decision-making. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1998) 74(2):371–377CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wittenbaum G. M., Stasser G., Nye J. L., Brower A. R. Management of information in small groups. What's Social About Social Task Representations? Research on Socially Shared Task Representations in Small Groups (1996) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 3–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wittenbaum G. M., Hollingshead A. B., Botero I. C. From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: Moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm. Comm. Monogr. (2004) 71(3):286–310CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wittenbaum G. M., Stasser G., Merry C. J. Tacit coordination in anticipation of small group task completion. J. Exp. Soc. Psych. (1996) 32:129–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wright J., Mischel W. Influence of affect on cognitive social learning person variables. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1982) 43(5):901–914CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.