Balancing Exploration and Exploitation Through Structural Design: The Isolation of Subgroups and Organizational Learning

References

• Ahuja G. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart (2000) 45(3):425–455Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L., Greve H. A behavioral theory of the firm—40 years and counting: Introduction and impact. Organ. Sci (2007) 18(3):337–349Link, Google Scholar
• Argote L., McEvily B., Reagans R. Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):571–582Link, Google Scholar
• Argote L., Insko C., Yovetich N., Romero A. Group learning curves: The effects of turnover and task complexity on group performance. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. (1995) 25:512–529Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyris C., Schon D.Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice (1996) (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Augier M. The evolution of behavioral economics. (2003) . Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Bell G., Zaheer A. Geography, networks, and knowledge flow. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(6):955–972Link, Google Scholar
• Benner M. J., Tushman M. Exploitation, exploitation, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28:238–256Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw J., Noble R., Ridderstrale J. Knowledge as contingency variable: Do the characteristics of knowledge predict organization structure? Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(3):274–299Link, Google Scholar
• Bower J. L., Christensen C. M. Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1995) 73(1):43–53Google Scholar
• Brown J., Duguid P. Organizational learning and communities of practice: Towards a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):40–57Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burns T., Stalker G. M.The Management of Innovation (1961) (Tavistock, London) Google Scholar
• Burt R.Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castore C. H., Peterson K., Goodrich T. A. Risky shift: Social value or social choice? An alternative model. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1971) 20:487–494Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandler A.Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of Industrial Enterprise (1962) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Child J. Organization structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology (1972) 6:1–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman J. Social capital in the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Soc. (1988) 94:95–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crossan M., Lane H., White R. An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24:522–537Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crosson M. M., Bedrow I. Organizational learning and strategic renewal. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24:1087–1105Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Daft R., Weick K. Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 66:70–74Google Scholar
• Davis J., Eisenhardt K., Bingham C. Complexity theory, market dynamism and the strategy of simple rules. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2009) . ForthcomingCrossref, Google Scholar
• Davis J. H., Kerr N. L., Atkin R. S., Holt R., Meek D. The decision processes of 6- and 12-person mock juries assigned unanimous and two thirds majority rules. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1975) 32:1–14Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davison B. Managment span of control: how wide it too wide? J. Bus. Strategy (2003) 24(4):22–29Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denrell J., March J. G. Adaptation as information restriction: The hot stove effect. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(5):523–538Link, Google Scholar
• Denrell J., Fang C., Levinthal D. From T-mazes to labyrinths: Learning from model based feedback. Management Sci. (2004) 50(10):1366–1378Link, Google Scholar
• Devine D. J., Clayton L. D., Philips J. L., Dunford B. B., Melner S. B. Teams in organizations: Prevalence, characteristics, and effectiveness. Small Group Res. (1999) 30:678–711Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dosi G. Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. J. Econom. Lit. (1988) 26(3):1120–1171Google Scholar
• Dyer J., Singh H. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management J. (1998) 23:660–679Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Brown S. L. Patching: Restitching business portfolios in dynamic markets. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1999) 77:72–82Google Scholar
• Ethiraj S., Levinthal D. Bounded rationality and the search for organizational architecture: An evolutionary perspective on the design of organizations and their evolvability. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2004) 49:404–437Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang C., Levinthal D. Near-term liability of exploitation: Exploration and exploitation in multistage problems. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(3):538–551Link, Google Scholar
• Fleming L. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):117–132Link, Google Scholar
• Fleming L., Sorenson O. Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data. Res. Policy (2001) 30:1019–1039Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L., King C., Juda A. Small worlds and regional innovation. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(6):938–954Link, Google Scholar
• Galbraith J. R.Designing Complex Organizations (1973) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Gibson C., Vermeulen F. A healthy divide: Subgroups as a stimulus for team learning behavior. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48:202–239Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldberg D. E.Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning (1989) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Soc. (1973) 78:1360–1380Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M., Nohria N., Eccles R. Problems of explanation in economic sociology. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action (1992) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) 25–56Google Scholar
• Gupta A. K., Smith K. G., Shalley C. E. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49:693–706Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen M. T. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:82–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen M. T. Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(3):232–250Link, Google Scholar
• Helfat C. Evolutionary trajectories in petroleum firm R&D. Management Sci. (1994) 40(12):1720–1747Link, Google Scholar
• Hickson D., Pugh D. S., Pheysey D. Operations technology and organization structure: An empirical reappraisal. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1969) 14:378–398Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinton G., Nowlan S. How learning can guide evolution. Complex Systems (1987) 1:495–502Google Scholar
• Holland J.Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems (1975) (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor) Google Scholar
• Holland J. Genetic algorithms. Scientific Amer. (1992) 267(1):66–72Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber G. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):88–115Link, Google Scholar
• Jacobides M. The inherent limits of organizational structure and the unfulfilled role of hierarchy: Lessons from a near-war. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(3):455–477Link, Google Scholar
• Jansen J. J. P., Van Den Bosch F. A. J., Volberda H. W. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Sci. (2006) 52(11):1661–1674Link, Google Scholar
• Kameda T., Davis J. The function of the reference point in individual and group risk decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1990) 46:55–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kane G. C., Alavi M. Information technology and organizational learning: An investigation of exploration and exploitation processes. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(5):796–812Link, Google Scholar
• Kauffman S.The Origins of Order (1993) (Oxford University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kauffman S.At Home in the Universe (1995) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Klimoski R., Mohammed S. Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? J. Management (1994) 20:403–437Google Scholar
• Larson J. R., Christensen C. Groups as problem-solving units: Toward a new meaning of social cognition. Brit. Psych. Soc. (1993) 32:5–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D., Rosenkopf L. Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49:797–818Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence P. R., Lorsch J. W.Organization and Environment (1967) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Lee E., Lee J., Lee J. Reconsideration of the winner-take-all hypothesis: Complex networks and local bias. Management Sci. (2006) 52(12):1838–1848Link, Google Scholar
• Lenox M. Organizational design, information transfer, and the acquisition of rent-producing resources. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory (2002) 8(2):113–131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D. A. Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. (1997) 43(7):934–950Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D., March J. G. A model of adaptive organizational search. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1981) 2:307–333Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D., March J. G. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:95–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt B., March J. G. Organizational learning. Ann. Rev. Soc. (1988) 14:319–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewin A. Y., Long C. P., Carroll T. N. The coevolution of new organizational forms. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(5):535–550Link, Google Scholar
• March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):71–87Link, Google Scholar
• March J. G. Parochialism in the evolution of a research community: The case of organization studies. Management Organ. Rev. (2004) 1:15–32Google Scholar
• Martin X., Mitchell W. The influence of local search and performance heuristics. Res. Policy (1998) 26(7/8):753–772Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller K. D., Zhao M., Calantone R. J. Adding interpersonal learning and tacit knowledge to March's exploration-exploitation model. Acad. Management. J. (2006) 49:709–722Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell M.An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms (1996) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Nickerson J. A., Zenger T. R. Being efficiently fickle: A dynamic theory of organizational choice. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(5):547–566Link, Google Scholar
• Onnela J. P., Saramäki J., Hyvönen J., Szabó G., Lazer D., Kaski K., Kertész J., Barabási A.-L. Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2007) 104:7332–7336Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Reilly C. A., Tushman M. L. The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2004) 82(4):74–81Google Scholar
• Patel H., Pavitt K. The technological competency of the world's largest firms: Complex path-dependent, but not much variety. Res. Policy (1997) 26:141–156Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perrow C. A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. Amer. Soc. Rev. (1967) 32:194–208Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R., McEvily B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48:240–267Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivkin J. Reproducing knowledge: Replication without imitation at moderate complexity. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(3):274–293Link, Google Scholar
• Rivkin J. W. Imitation of complex strategies. Management Sci. (2000) 46(6):824–844Link, Google Scholar
• Rogers M. It's the Apple of his eye. Newsweek (2003) March 1Google Scholar
• Sandelands L., Stablein R. The concept of organization mind. Res. Soc. Organ. (1987) 5:135–161Google Scholar
• Schilling M. A., Phelps C. Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Sci. (2007) 53(7):1113–1126Link, Google Scholar
• Schilling M. A., Steensma H. K. The use of modular organizational forms: An industry level analysis. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(6):1149–1168Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schoemaker P. Strategy, complexity, and economic rent. Management Sci. (1990) 36(10):1178–1192Link, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N., Levinthal D. Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(6):650–669Link, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N., Levinthal D. Escaping real (non-benign) competency traps: Linking the dynamics of organizational structure to the dynamics of search. Strategic Organ. (2005) 3:85–115Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N., Rivkin J. Speed and search: Designing organizations for turbulence and complexity. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(2):101–122Link, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N., Rivkin J. When exploration backfires: Unintended consequences of multi-level organizational search. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49:779–795Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon H. Rational decision making in business organizations. (1979) 69(4):493–513Google Scholar
• Strogatz S. Exploring complex networks. Nature (2001) 410:268–276Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart T., Podolny J. Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:21–38Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor A., Greve H. Superman or the fantastic four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49:723–740Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Ton Z., Huckman R. Managing the impact of employee turnover on performance: The role of process conformance. Organ. Sci. (2008) 19(1):56–68Link, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:35–67Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B., Spiro J. Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. Amer. J. Soc. (2005) 111:447–504Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waldrop M.Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos (1992) (Simon & Schuster, New York) Google Scholar
• Watts D. J.Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks Between Order and Randomness (1999) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson O. Examining economic organization through the lens of contract. Indust. Corp. Change (2003) 12:917–942Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woodward J.Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice (1965) (Oxford University Press, London) Google Scholar
• Wright S. The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution. Proc. VI Internat. Congress Genetics (1932) Cornell University, Ithaca, NY:356–366Google Scholar
• Wright S., Gurland J. Stochastic processes in evolution. Stochastic Models in Medicine and Biology (1964) (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison) 199-241Google Scholar
• Yayavaram S., Ahuja G. Decomposability in knowledge structures and its impact on the usefulness of inventions and knowledge-base malleability. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2008) 53(2):333–362Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zander U., Kogut B. Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(1):76–92Link, Google Scholar