CEO Ambivalence and Responses to Strategic Issues

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0471

References

  • Aaker J. L., Drolet A., Griffin D. Recalling mixed emotions. J. Consumer Res. (2008) 35(2):268–278CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aiken L. S., West S. G.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (1991) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Anderson J. C., Gerbing D. W. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two step approach. Psych. Bull. (1988) 103(3):411–423CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Audia P. G., Greve H. R. Less likely to fail: Low performance, firm size, and factory expansion in the shipbuilding industry. Management Sci. (2006) 52(1):83–94LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baier V. E., March J. G., Saetren H. Implementation and ambiguity. Scandinavian J. Management Stud. (1986) 2(3–4):197–212CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barr P. Adapting to unfamiliar environmental events: A look at the evolution of interpretation and its role in strategic change. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(6):644–669LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bartunek J. M., Gordon J. R., Weathersby R. P. Developing “complicated” understanding in administrators. Acad. Management Rev. (1983) 8(2):273–284Google Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Rowley T. J., Shipilov A. V., Chuang Y.-T. Dancing with strangers: Aspiration performance and the search for underwriting syndicate partners. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50(4):536–575CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boehm C. Ambivalence and compromise in human nature. Amer. Anthropologist (1989) 91(4):921–939CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bowman C., Ambrosini V. Perceptions of strategic priorities, consensus and firm performance. J. Management Stud. (1997) 34(2):241–258CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cacioppo J. T., Berntson G. G. Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psych. Bull. (1994) 115(3):401–423CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cacioppo J. T., Gardner W. L., Berntson G. G. Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. (1997) 1(1):3–25CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cacioppo J. T., Gardner W. L., Berntson G. G. The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1999) 76(5):839–855CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chaiken S., Thorpe Y.Dual Processing Theories in Social Psychology (1999) (Guildford Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Chattopadhyay P., Glick W. H., Huber G. P. Organizational response to threats and opportunities. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(5):937–955CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen M. D. Individual learning and organizational routine: Emerging connections. Organ. Sci. (1994) 2(1):135–139CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen M. D., March J. G., Olsen J. P. A garbage can model of organizational choice. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1972) 17(1):1–25CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conner M., Sparks P. Attitudes and ambivalence. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psych. (2002) 12:37–70CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Costarelli S., Colloca P. The effects of attitudinal ambivalence on pro-environmental behavioural intentions. J. Environ. Psych. (2004) 24(3):279–288CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Denison D. R., Dutton J. E., Kahn J. A., Hart S. L. Organizational context and the interpretation of strategic issues: A note on CEO's interpretations of foreign investment. J. Management Stud. (1996) 33(4):453–474CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dutton J. E., Cummings L. L., Staw B. M. The making of organizational opportunities: An interpretive pathway to organizational change. Research in Organizational Behavior (1993) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 195–226Google Scholar
  • Dutton J. E., Duncan G. J. The creation of momentum for change through the process of strategic issue diagnosis. Strategic Management J. (1987) 8(3):279–295CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dutton J. E., Jackson S. E. Categorizing strategic issues: Links to organizational action. Acad. Management Rev. (1987) 12(1):76–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eagly A. H., Chaiken S., Gilbert D. T., Fiske S. T., Lindzey G. Attitude structure and function. The Handbook of Social Psychology (1998) 4th ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) 269–322Google Scholar
  • Edwards J. R., Parry M. E. On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(6):1577–1613CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Acad. Management J. (1989) 32(3):543–576CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Festinger L.A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (1957) (Row & Peterson, Evanston, IL) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiol M. C., O'Connor E. J. Waking up! Mindfulness in the face of bandwagons. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28(1):54–70CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiske S. T., Taylor S. E.Social Cognition (1991) (McGraw-Hill, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fong C. T. The effects of emotional ambivalence on creativity. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(5):1016–1030CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G., Levinthal D. A. Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45(1):113–137CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G., Levinthal D. A., Ocasio W. Neo-Carnegie: The Carnegie School's past, present, and reconstructing for the future. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(3):523–536LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gilbert C. G. Change in the presence of residual fit: Can competing frames coexist? Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(1):150–167LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gioia D. A. Visionary ambiguity and strategic change: The virtue of vagueness in revising organizational knowledge. (2006) Paper Presented at the Academy of Management ConferenceAtlantaGoogle Scholar
  • Gioia D. A., Chittipeddi K. Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management J. (1991) 12(6):433–448CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gioia D. A., Thomas J. B. Identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sensemaking during strategic change in academia. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41(3):370–403CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve H. R. Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43(1):58–86CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve H. R. A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Acad. Management J. (2003) 46:685–702CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hambrick D. C., Mason P. A. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9(2):193–206CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hänze M. Ambivalence, conflict and decision making: Attitudes and feelings in Germany towards NATO's military intervention in the Kosovo war. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. (2001) 31:693–706CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Higgins E. T. Beyond pleasure and pain. Amer. Psychologist (1997) 52(12):1280–1300CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jackson S. E., Dutton J. E. Discerning threats and opportunities. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1988) 33(3):370–388CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jonas K., Diel M., Brömer P. Effects of attitudinal ambivalence on information processing and attitude-intention consistency. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1997) 33(2):190–210CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Julian S. D., Ofori-Dankwa J. C. Toward an integrative cartography of two strategic issue diagnosis frameworks. Strategic Management J. (2008) 29(1):93–114CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan K. J. On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique. Psych. Bull. (1972) 77(5):361–372CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz I., Hass R. G. Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1988) 55(6):893–905CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larsen J. T., McGraw A. P., Cacioppo J. T. Can people feel happy and sad at the same time? J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2001) 81(4):684–696CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lavine H. The electoral consequences of ambivalence towards presidential candidates. Amer. J. Political Sci. (2001) 45(4):915–929CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D. A., Rerup C. Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(4):502–523LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B., March J. G. Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1996) 14:319–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacCrimmon K. A., Wehrung D. A.Taking Risks: The Management of Uncertainty (1986) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • March J. G. The business firm as a political coalition. J. Politics (1962) 24(4):662–678CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):71–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G.A Primer on Decision Making (1994) (Simon & Schuster, New York) Google Scholar
  • March J. G., Olsen J. P.Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations (1976) (Universitetsforlaget, Bergen, Norway) Google Scholar
  • March J. G., Simon H. A.Organizations (1958) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Merton R. K.Sociological Ambivalence and Other Essays (1976) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Miles R. H.Coffin Nails and Corporate Strategies (1982) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Ocasio W. The enactment of economic adversity: A reconciliation of theories of failure-induced change and threat-rigidity. Res. Organ. Behav. (1995) 17:287–331Google Scholar
  • Ocasio W. Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:187–206CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Park O. S., Sims H. P., Motowidlo S. J., Sims H. P., Gioia D. A. Affect in organizations: How feelings and emotions influence managerial judgment. The Thinking Organization (1986) (Jossey-Bass, San Fransisco) 215–237Google Scholar
  • Pentland B. T. Grammatical models of organizational processes. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(5):541–556LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Petty R. E., Briñol P., DeMarree K. G. The meta-cognitive model (MCM) of attitudes: Implications for attitude measurement, change, and strength. Soc. Cognition (2007) 25(5):657–686CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Piderit S. K. Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25(4):783–794CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porac J. F., Rosa J. A. In praise of managerial narrow-mindedness. J. Management Inquiry (1996) 5(1):35–42CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Priester J. R., Petty R. E. The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: Relating positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1996) 71(3):431–449CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Priester J. R., Petty R. E. Extending the bases of subjective attitudinal ambivalence: Interpersonal and intrapersonal antecedents of evaluative tension. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2001) 80(1):19–34CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Russell J. A. Core affect and the psychlogical construction of emotion. Psych. Rev. (2003) 110(1):145–172CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Russell J. A., Carroll J. M. On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psych. Bull. (1999) 125(1):3–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sharma S. Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43(4):681–697CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shook N. J., Fazio R. H., Eiser J. R. Attitude generalization: Similarity, valence, and extremity. J Experiment. Soc. Psych. (2007) 43(4):641–647CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H. A. A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. (1955) 69(1):99–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H. A. Rationality as process and product and thought. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1978) 68(2):1–16Google Scholar
  • Singh J. V. Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making. Acad. Management J. (1986) 29(3):562–585CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sullivan D. Measuring the degree of internationalization of a firm. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1994) 25(2):325–341CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomas J. B., McDaniel R. R. Integrating strategic issues: Effects of strategy and the information-processing structure of top management teams. Acad. Management J. (1990) 33(2):286–306CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomas J. B., Clark S. M., Gioia D. A. Strategic sensemaking and organizational performance: Linkages among scanning, interpretation, action, and outcomes. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(2):239–270CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson M. M., Zanna M. P. The conflicted individual: Personality-based and domain specific antecedents of ambivalent social attitudes. J. Personality (1995) 63:259–288CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson M. M., Zanna M. P., Griffin D. W., Petty R. E., Krosnick J. A. Let's not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences (1995) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) 361–386Google Scholar
  • Venkatraman N., Ramanujam V. Measurement of business economic performance: An empirical examination of method convergence. J. Management (1987) 13(1):109–122CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick K. E.The Social Psychology of Organizing (1979) 2nd ed.(Random House, New York) Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E.Sensemaking in Organizations (1995) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E., Srivastava S., Cooperrider D. L. The attitude of wisdom: Ambivalence as the optimal compromise. Organizational Wisdom and Executive Courage (1998) (Lexington, San Fransisco) 40–64Google Scholar
  • Weick K. E., Sutcliffe K. M., Obstfeld D., Sutton R. I., Staw B. M. Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. Research in Organizational Behavior (1999) (JAI Press, Stamford, CT) 81–123Google Scholar
  • Weigert A. J., Franks D. D., Franks D. D., McCarthy E. D. Ambivalence: A touchstone of the modern temper. The Sociology of Emotions: Original Essays and Research Papers (1989) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 205–227Google Scholar
  • Williams P., Aaker J. L. Can mixed emotions peacefully coexist? J. Consumer Res. (2002) 28(4):636–649CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zou S., Cavusgil S. T. The GMS: A broad conceptualization of global marketing strategy and its effect on firm performance. J. Marketing (2002) 66(4):40–56CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.