Minding the Gaps: Understanding Technology Interdependence and Coordination in Knowledge Work

References

• Bachrach D. G., Powell B. C., Bendoly E., Richev R. G. Organizational citizenship behavior and performance evaluations: Exploring the impact of task interdependence. J. Appl. Psych. (2006) 91(1):193–201Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley S. R., Ackroyd S., Batt R., Thompson P., Tolbert P. S. What we know (and mostly don't know) about technical work. The Oxford Handbook of Work and Organization (2005) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 376–403Google Scholar
• Bédard C., Smith I. F. C. On the adoption of computing and IT by industry: The case for integration in early building design. Intelligent Computing in Engineering and Architecture (2006) 4200(Springer, Heidelberg, Germany) 62–73Lecture Notes in Computer ScienceCrossref, Google Scholar
• Boland R. J., Lyytinen K., Yoo Y. Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(4):631–647Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau M.-C., Robey D. Enacting integrated information technology: A human agency perspective. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(1):3–18Link, Google Scholar
• Campbell-Kelly M.From Airline Reservations to Sonic the Hedgehog: A History of the Software Industry (2003) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Carlson P. A. Information technology and organizational change. J. Technical Writing Comm. (2001) 31(1):77–95Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carrillo J. E., Gaimon C. Improving manufacturing performance through process change and knowledge creation. Management Sci. (2000) 46(2):265–288Link, Google Scholar
• de Jong S. B., Van der Vegt G. S., Molleman E. The relationships among asymmetry in task dependence, perceived helping behavior, and trust. J. Appl. Psych. (2007) 92(6):1625–1637Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dodgson M., Gann D. M., Salter A. “In case of fire, please use the elevator”: Simulation technology and organization in fire engineering. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(5):849–864Link, Google Scholar
• Downey G. L., Donovan A., Elliott T. J. The invisible engineer: How engineering ceased to be a problem in science and technology studies. Knowledge Soc. (1989) 8:189–216Google Scholar
• Ecker K. H., Gupta J. N. D. Scheduling tasks on a flexible manufacturing machine to minimize tool change delays. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2005) 164(3):627–638Crossref, Google Scholar
• Espinosa J. A., Lerch J., Kraut R., Salas E., Fiore M. Explicit vs. implicit coordination mechanisms and task dependencies: One size does not fit all. Team Cognition: Understanding the Factors That Drive Process and Performance (2004) (APA Books, Washington, DC) 107–129Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S., Sproull L. Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Sci. (2000) 46(12):1554–1568Link, Google Scholar
• Glaser B.Theoretical Sensitivity (1978) (The Sociological Press, Mill Valley, CA) Google Scholar
• Gray A. E., Seidmann A., Stecke K. E. A synthesis of decision models for tool management in automated manufacturing. Management Sci. (1993) 39(5):549–567Link, Google Scholar
• Guzzo R. A., Shea G. P., Dunnette M. D., Hough L. M. Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (1992) 2nd ed.(Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA) 269–313Google Scholar
• Heath C., Staudenmayer N., Staw B. M., Sutton R. I. Coordinating neglect: How lay theories of organizing complicate coordination in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior (2000) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 153–191Google Scholar
• Henderson K. The role of material objects in the design process: A comparison of two design cultures and how they contend with automation. Sci., Technology Human Values (1998) 23(2):139–174Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ilgen D. R. Teams embedded in organizations: Some implications. Amer. Psychologist (1999) 54(2):129–139Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langfred C. W. The downside of self-management: A longitudinal study of the effects of conflict on trust, autonomy and task interdependence in self-managing teams. Acad. Management J. (2007) 50(4):885–900Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi P. M., Bailey D. E. Transformational technologies and the creation of new work practices: Making implicit knowledge explicit in task-based offshoring. MIS Quart. (2008) 32(2):411–436Crossref, Google Scholar
• Linden R. C., Wayne S. J., Bradway L. K. Task interdependence as a moderator of the relation between group control and performance. Human Relations (1997) 50(2):169–181Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacMillen D., Butts M., Composano R., Hill D., Williams T. W. An industrial view of electronic design automation. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Design Integrated Circuits Systems (2000) 19(12):1428–1448Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malone T. W., Crowston K. The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Comput. Surveys (1994) 26(1):87–119Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J. G., Simon H.Organizations (1958) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• March S., Hevner A., Ram S. Research commentary: An agenda for information technology research in heterogeneous and distributed environments. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(4):327–341Link, Google Scholar
• Markus M. L. Technochange management: Using IT to drive organizational change. J. Inform. Tech. (2004) 19(1):4–20Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markus M. L., Axline S., Petrie D., Tanis S. C. Learning from adopters' experiences with ERP: Problems encountered and success achieved. J. Inform. Tech. (2000) 15(4):245–265Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohr L. B. Organizational technology and organizational structure. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1971) 16(4):444–459Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morisi T. L. Commercial banking transformed by computer technology. Monthly Labor Rev. (1996) 119(8):30–36Google Scholar
• Naveh E., Erez M. Innovation and attention to detail in the quality improvement paradigm. Management Sci. (2004) 50(11):1576–1586Link, Google Scholar
• Rico R., Sanchez-Manzanares M., Gil F., Gibson C. Team implicit coordination processes: A team knowledge-based approach. Acad. Management Rev. (2008) 33(1):163–184Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robey D., Ross J. W., Boudreau M.-C. Learning to implement enterprise systems: An exploratory study of the dialectics of change. J. Management Inform. Systems (2002) 19(1):17–46Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenman M. A., Smith G., Maher M. L., Ding L., Marchant D. Multidisciplinary collaborative design in virtual environments. Automation Construction (2007) 16(1):37–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sangiovanni-Vincentelli A. The tides of EDA. IEEE Design Test Comput. (2003) 20(6):59–75Crossref, Google Scholar
• Senescu R., Mole R., Fresquez A. A case study in structural drafting, analysis and design using an integrated intelligent model. Joint Internat. Conf. Comput. Decision Making in Civil Building Engineering, Montreal (2006) 1797–1806Google Scholar
• Sharma R., Yetton P. The contingent effects of management support and task interdependence on successful information systems implementation. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(4):533–556Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shea G. P., Guzzo R. A., Ferris G. R., Rowlands K. M. Groups as human resources. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management (1987) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 323–367Google Scholar
• Sinreich D., Nelkenbaum B. D. Determining production sequences for single-stage multifunctional machining systems based on the tradeoff between fixture cost, re-fixturing and tool replenishment. IIE Trans. (2006) 38(10):813–828Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spriggs C. A., Jackson P. R., Parker S. K. Production teamworking: The importance of interdependence and autonomy for employee strain and satisfaction. Human Relations (2000) 53(11):1519–1542Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staum J., Peters B. A., Smith J. S., Medeiros D. J., Rohrer M. W. Simulation in financial engineering. Proc. 2001 Winter Simulation Conf. (2001) (IEEE Press, Los Alamitos, CA) 123–133Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stohr E. A., Zhao J. L. Workflow automation: Overview and research issues. Inform. Systems Frontiers (2001) 3(3):281–296Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strauss A., Corbin J.Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (1998) 2nd ed.(Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Streufert S., Satish U., Barach P. Improving medical care: The use of simulation technology. Simulation Gaming (2001) 32(2):164–174Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suchman L.Human–Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions (2007) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Van der Vegt G. S., Janssen O. Joint impact of interdependence and group diversity on innovation. J. Management (2003) 29(5):729–751Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van der Vegt G. S., Van de Vliert E. Effects of perceived skill dissimilarity and task interdependence on helping in work teams. J. Management (2005) 31(1):73–89Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van der Vegt G. S., Van de Vliert E., Oosterhof A. Informational dissimilarity and organizational citizenship behavior: The role of intrateam interdependence and team identification. Acad. Management J. (2003) 46(6):715–727Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wageman R. Interdependence and group effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(1):145–180Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wageman R., Baker G. Incentives and cooperation: The joint effects of task and reward interdependence on group performance. J. Organ. Behav. (1997) 18(2):139–158Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang Q. Z., Zhang Y. Semantic interoperability in building design: Methods and tools. Comput.-Aided Design (2006) 38(10):1099–1112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zantek P. F., Wright G. P., Plante R. D. Process and product improvement in manufacturing systems with correlated stages. Management Sci. (2002) 48(5):591–606Link, Google Scholar
• Zuboff S.In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power (1988) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar