Business Group Affiliation and Firm Search Behavior in India: Responsiveness and Focus of Attention

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0475

References

  • Allison P. D. Change scores as dependent variables in regression analysis. Sociol. Methodology (1990) 20:93–114CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Antonelli C. A failure-inducement model of research and development expenditure: Italian evidence from the early 1980s. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1989) 12(2):159–180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aoki M., Patrick H. T.The Japanese Main Bank System: Its Relevance for Developing and Transforming Economies (1994) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Arellano M., Bond S. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1991) 58(2):277–297CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L., Greve H. R. A behavioral theory of the firm—40 years and counting: Introduction and impact. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(3):337–349LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Audia P. G., Greve H. R. Less likely to fail: Low performance, firm size, and factory expansion in the shipbuilding industry. Management Sci. (2006) 52(1):83–94LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Banaszak-Holl J., Mitchell W., Baum J. A. C., Berta W. B. Transfer learning in ongoing and newly acquired components of multiunit chains: U.S. nursing homes, 1991–1997. Indust. Corporate Change (2006) 15(1):41–75CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barnard C. I.The Functions of the Executive (1938) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Barnett W. P., Freeman J. Too much of a good thing? Product proliferation and organizational failure. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(5):539–558LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Ingram P. Survival-enhancing learning in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898–1980. Management Sci. (1998) 44(7):996–1016LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Ingram P., Augier M., March J. G. Interorganizational learning and network organizations: Toward a behavioral theory of the “interfirm”. The Economics of Choice, Change, and Organization. Essays in the Memory of Richard M. Cyert (2002) (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK) 191–208Google Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Rowley T. C., Shipilov A. V., Chuang Y. T. Dancing with strangers: Aspiration performance and the search for underwriting syndicate partners. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50(4):536–575CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bebchuk L. A., Kraakman R., Triantis G. G., Morck R. K. Stock pyramids, cross-ownership, and dual class equity: The mechanisms and agency costs of separating control from cash-flow rights. Concentrated Corporate Ownership (2000) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) 295–315NBER Conference Report SeriesGoogle Scholar
  • Bolton M. K. Organizational innovation and substandard performance: When is necessity the mother of innovation. Organ. Sci. (1993) 4(1):57–75LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bouquet C., Birkinshaw J. M. Weight versus voice: How foreign subsidiaries gain attention from corporate headquarters. Acad. Management J. (2008) 51(3):577–601CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bradach J. L., Eccles R. G. Price, authority and trust: From ideal types to plural forms. Ann. Rev. Sociol. (1989) 15:97–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bromiley P. Corporate-planning and capital-investment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1986) 7(2):147–170CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bromiley P. Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34(1):37–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S.Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chacar A., Vissa B. Are emerging economies less efficient? Performance persistence and the impact of business group affiliation. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26(10):933–946CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chang S. J., Choi U. Strategy, structure and performance of Korean business groups: A transactions cost approach. J. Indust. Econom. (1988) 37(2):141–158CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chang S.-J., Chung C.-N., Mahmood I. P. When and how does business group affiliation promote firm innovation? A tale of two emerging economies. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(5):637–656LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen W.-R. Determinants of firms' backward- and forward-looking R&D search behavior. Organ Sci. (2008) 19(4):609–622LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen W.-R., Miller K. D. Situational and institutional determinants of firms' R&D search intensity. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28(4):369–381CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen M. D., March J. G., Olsen J. P. A garbage can model of organizational choice. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1972) 17(1):1–25CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Darr E. D., Argote L. The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: Productivity in franchises. Management Sci. (1995) 41(11):1750–1763LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Delacroix J., Swaminathan A. Cosmetic, speculative, and adaptive organizational change in the wine industry: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36(4):631–661CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dutt Report of the industrial licensing policy enquiry committee. (1969) . Government of IndiaGoogle Scholar
  • Encarnation D. J.Dislodging Multinationals: India's Comparative Perspective (1989) (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY) Google Scholar
  • Erickson B. H., Wellman B., Berkowitz S. D. The relational basis of attitudes. Social Structures: A Network Approach (1988) (Cambridge University Press, New York) 99–121Google Scholar
  • Ferrier W. J. Navigating the competitive landscape: The drivers and consequences of competitive aggressiveness. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(4):858–877CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fornell C., Bookstein F. L., Fornell C. A comparative analysis of two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to market data. A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis (1982) 1(Praeger, New York) 289–324Google Scholar
  • Fruin M. W.The Japanese Enterprise System: Competitive Strategies and Cooperative Strategies (1992) (Clarendon Press, Oxford) Google Scholar
  • Garud R., Rappa M. E. A socio-cognitive model of technology evolution: The case of cochlear implants. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(3):344–362LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G., Levinthal D., Ocasio W. Neo-Carnegie: The Carnegie school's past, present, and reconstructing for the future. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(3):523–536LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. Coase revisited: Business groups in the modern economy. Indust. Corporate Change (1995) 4:93–130CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (1993) 2nd ed.(Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
  • Greve H. R. Patterns of competition: The diffusion of a market position in radio broadcasting. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41(1):29–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve H. R. Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 44(1):58–86CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve H. R., Miner A., Anderson P. Branch systems and nonlocal learning in populations. Advances in Strategic Management (1999) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 57–80Google Scholar
  • Greve H. R. Investment and the behavioral theory of the firm: Evidence from shipbuilding. Indust. Corporate Change (2003a) 12(5):1051–1076CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve H. R. A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovation: Evidence from shipbuilding. Acad. Management J. (2003b) 46(6):685–702CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve H. R., Baum J. A. C., Baum J. A. C., Greve H. R. A multiunit, multimarket world. Multiunit Organization and Multimarket Strategy (2001) (Elsevier, Oxford, UK) 1–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grinyer P., McKiernan P. Generating major change in stagnating companies. Strategic Management J. (1990) 11(4):131–146Google Scholar
  • Guillen M. F. Business groups in emerging economies: A resource-based view. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43(3):362–380CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Freeman J. The population ecology of organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. (1977) 82(5):929–964CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Freeman J. Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1984) 49(2):149–164CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hazari R. K.The Structure of the Corporate Private Sector: A Study of Concentration, Ownership and Control (1966) (Asia Publishing House, Mumbai) Google Scholar
  • Hoffman A. J., Ocasio W. Not all events are attended equally: Toward a middle-range theory of industry attention to external events. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(4):414–434LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ingram P., Baum J. A. C. Opportunity and constraint: Organizations' learning from the operating and competitive experience of industries. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(Summer):75–98CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keister L. A. Engineering growth: Business group structure and firm performance in China's transition economy. Amer. J. Sociol. (1998) 104(2):404–440CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khanna T. Business groups and social welfare in emerging markets: Existing evidence and unanswered questions. Eur. Econom. Rev. (2000) 44(4–6):748–761CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khanna T., Palepu K. Policy shocks, market intermediaries, and corporate strategy: The evolution of business groups in Chile and India. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1999) 8(2):271–310CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khanna T., Palepu K. Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business. J. Finance (2000) 55(2):867–891CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khanna T., Palepu K. The evolution of concentrated ownership in India. Broad patterns and a history of the Indian software industry. (2004) . NBER Working Paper W10613CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khanna T., Rivkin J. W. Estimating the performance effect of business groups in emerging markets. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22(1):45–74CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khanna T., Rivkin J. W. Interorganizational ties and business group boundaries: Evidence from an emerging economy. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(3):333–352LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Khanna T., Yafeh Y. Business groups and risk sharing around the world. J. Bus. (2005) 78(1):301–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lant T. K., Milliken F. J., Batra B. The role of managerial learning and interpretation in strategic persistence and reorientation: An empirical exploration. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13(8):585–608CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee L.-F. Identification and estimation in binary choice models with limited (censored) dependent variables. Econometrica (1979) 47(2):415–433Google Scholar
  • Leff N. H. Industrial organization and entrepreneurship in the developing countries: The economic groups. Econom. Development Cultural Change (1978) 26(4):661–675CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B., March J. G., Scott W. R., Blake J. Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology (1988) 14(Palo Alto, CA)319–340Annual ReviewsCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lincoln J. R., Gerlach M. L.Japan's Network Economy: Structure, Persistence, and Change (2004) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lincoln J. R., Gerlach M. L., Ahmadjian C. L. Keiretsu networks and corporate performance in Japan. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1996) 61(1):67–88CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lounamaa P. H., March J. G. Adaptive coordination of a learning team. Management Sci. (1987) 33(1):107–123LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Luo X., Chung C.-N. Keeping it all in the family: The role of particularistic relationships in business group performance during institutional transition. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50(3):404–439CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mantrala M. K., Weitz B. A., Wensley R. Allocating marketing resources. Handbook of Marketing (2002) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) . Chapter 16CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G. Footnotes to organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26(4):563–577CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G., Simon H. A.Organizations (1958) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Miller K. D., Chen W.-R. Variable organizational risk preferences: Tests of the March-Shapira model. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(1):105–116CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miner A. S., Mezias S. J. Ugly duckling no more: Pasts and futures of organizational learning research. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(1):88–99LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ocasio W. Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J (1997) 18(S1):187–206CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orru M., Biggart N. W., Hamilton G. G., Powell W. W., DiMaggio P. J. Organizational isomorphism in East Asia. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (1991) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) 361–389Google Scholar
  • Ouchi W. Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1980) 25(1):129–141CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palich L. E., Cardinal L. B., Miller C. C. Curvilinearity in the diversification-performance linkage: An examination of over three decades of research. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(2):155–174CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peng M. W., Delios A. What determines the scope of the firm over time and around the world? An Asia Pacific perspective. Asia Pacific J. Management (2006) 23(4):385–405CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phillips D. J. A genealogical approach to organizational life chances: The parent-progeny transfer among Silicon Valley law firms, 1946–1996. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47(3):474–506CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phillips D. J. Organizational genealogies and the persistence of gender inequality: The case of Silicon Valley law firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 50(3):440–472CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rao H., Drazin R. Overcoming resource constraints on product innovation by recruiting talent from rivals: A study of the mutual fund industry, 1986–94. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(3):491–507CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reinartz W., Thomas J. S., Kumar V. Balancing acquisition and retention resources to maximize customer profitability. J. Marketing (2005) 69(1):63–79CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenkopf L., Nerkar A. Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disc industry. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22(4):287–306CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schulz M., Baum J. A. C. Organizational learning. Companion to Organizations (2002) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) 415–441Google Scholar
  • Singh J. V. Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making. Acad. Management J. (1986) 29(3):562–585CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Staw B. M., Ross J. Understanding escalation situations: Antecedents, prototypes, and solutions. Res. Organ. Behav. (1987) 9:39–78Google Scholar
  • Stinchcombe A., March J. Social structure and organizations. Handbook of Organizations (1965) (Rand McNally, Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Talukdar D., Sudhir K., Ainslie A. Investigating new product diffusion across products and countries. Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(1):97–114LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wiseman R. M., Bromiley P. Toward a model of risk in declining organizations: An empirical examination of risk, performance and decline. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(5):524–543LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.